| 词条 | Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Ltd v Lister |
| 释义 |
| name = Credit Suisse Ltd v Lister | court = Court of Appeal | image = Canary Wharf - Credit Suisse.jpg | caption = | date decided = 16 October 1998 | full name = | citations = [1998] EWCA Civ 1551, [1999] ICR 794 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = Business transfer, TUPE }} Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Ltd v Lister [1998] EWCA Civ 1551 is a UK labour law case, concerning the effects of a business transfer on an employee's rights at work. FactsThe transferee of the business that Mr Lister worked for, Credit Suisse, put a gardening clause into 209 employees’ new contracts. Mr Lister, who had been the head of European Equities, sought an injunction. The employees also had some advantageous new terms from the old ones under Barclays de Zoete Wedd. JudgmentClarke LJ held that the gardening clause was contrary to the purpose of now TUPER 2006 regulation 4[1] and contrary to the purpose of the Business Transfers Directive. See also{{Clist transfer}}
Notes1. ^TUPER 1981 r 5 ReferencesExternal links 6 : United Kingdom labour case law|Court of Appeal of England and Wales cases|1998 in case law|1998 in British law|Credit Suisse|Credit Suisse First Boston |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。