请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 ETS v. New Oriental School
释义

  1. Background

  2. ETS v. New Oriental School

      Beijing High Court review  

  3. References

  4. External links

{{Orphan|date=November 2015}}{{Infobox court case
| name = ETS v. New Oriental School
| court = Beijing High Court
| full name = Educational Testing Service v. Beijing Haidian District Private New Oriental School
| date decided = 27 Dec 2004
| citations = Civil Judgment, People's Republic of China, Beijing High Court (2004)
| prior actions =
| italic title =
}}

ETS V. New Oriental School represents a landmark case in the People's Republic of China for the protection of foreign copyrights under the Berne Convention.

Background

The New Oriental School in Beijing had provided access to TOEFL test forms on its website and in the classroom for their students. They had previously struck an agreement with ETS for the use of the TOEFL test forms, but the extent of the use of the test forms went beyond the scope of the agreement. Furthermore, the agreement ended in 1998; at which time New Oriental School continued to provide access to the test forms.[1]

ETS v. New Oriental School

ETS brought action in the Beijing Intermediate Court for copyright infringement under the Berne Convention that required the Chinese government to protect the literary and artistic works of United States' Citizens. They also claimed trademark infringement for the "TOEFL" trademark that had been registered in China previously.

The Beijing Intermediate Court decided for ETS on both accounts. Ordering New Oriental to cease the distribution of all TOEFL materials, to cease the use of the "TOEFL" trademark, and awarded ETS RMB 5 million.[2]

Beijing High Court review

New Oriental School appealed the judgment to the Beijing of High Court shortly after the trial court's decision. The Beijing High Court affirmed the ruling of the trial court that ETS's copyright had been infringed under the Berne Convention. However, the Court did not believe that the "TOEFL" trademark had been infringed by simply labeling teaching aids as "TOEFL" prep-materials, due to the test's status as the predominant English equivalency test in China. The damages were lowered to RMB 3.7 million.[3]

References

1. ^http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200104/05/eng20010405_66873.html
2. ^http://cblawg.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=36:copyright-cases&id=498:ets-and-gmac-v-beijing-new-oriental-language-school
3. ^http://www.ciplawyer.com/article.asp?articleid=390

External links

{{wikisource}}
  • China Daily Overview

3 : Copyright case law|People's Republic of China intellectual property law|2004 in law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/21 20:39:41