| 词条 | Evans v. Michigan |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Evans v. Michigan |ArgueDate=November 6 |ArgueYear=2012 |DecideDate=January 20 |DecideYear=2013 |FullName=Lamar Evans v. Michigan |Docket=11-1327 |OralArgument=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_11_1327 |USVol=568 |USPage=313 |ParallelCitations=133 S. Ct. 1069; 185 L. Ed. 2d 124; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 1614 |Prior= acquittal reversed and remanded, 288 Mich.App. 410, 794 N.W.2d 848 (2010); affirmed, |Subsequent= |Holding= The double jeopardy clause bars a retrial when a directed verdict was rendered, even if erroneous. Michigan Supreme Court reversed. |SCOTUS=2010-2016 |Majority=Sotomayor |JoinMajority=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan |Dissent=Alito | LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. V }}Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313 (2013),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that if a person accused of a crime receives a directed acquittal, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a second trial of that person for the same crime, even if the person was acquitted in error.[2] References1. ^{{ussc|name=Evans v. Michigan|volume=568|page=313|pin=|year=2013}}. 2. ^Evans v. Michigan www.scotusblog.com Retrieved February 27, 2013 External links
| case = Evans v. Michigan, {{Ussc|568|313|2013|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/820896/evans-v-michigan/ | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11830792929649689649 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/568/11-1327/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/11-1327 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1327_7648.pdf }}{{Fifth Amendment crimpro|jeopardy|state=expanded}} 5 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|2013 in United States case law|Legal history of Michigan|United States Double Jeopardy Clause case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。