| 词条 | Fox v. Vice |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Fox v. Vice |ArgueDate=March 22 |ArgueYear=2011 |DecideDate=June 6 |DecideYear=2011 |FullName=Ricky D. Fox, Petitioner v. Judy Ann Vice, as Executrix of the Estate of Billy Ray Vice, et al. |Docket=10-114 |USVol=563 |USPage=826 |ParallelCitations=131 S. Ct. 2205; 180 L. Ed. 2d 45 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=Reasonable fees may be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims. |OralArgument=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2010/2010_10_114/argument |OpinionAnnouncement=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2010/2010_10_114/opinion |SCOTUS=2010-2016 |Majority=Kagan |JoinMajority=unanimous |LawsApplied= }}Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that reasonable fees may be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims.[1] Notes1. ^". When a plaintiff’s suit involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, a court may grant reasonable fees to the defendant, but only for costs that the defendant would not have incurred but for the frivolous claims." p. 2 See also
References{{refbegin}}
External links
| case = Fox v. Vice, {{Ussc|563|826|2011|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/218177/fox-v-vice/ | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/563/826/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010/10-114 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-114.pdf{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 3 : 2011 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。