请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 Grid-Enabled Measures
释义

  1. References

  2. External links

Grid-Enabled Measures (GEM) is an initiative of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute (NCI). GEM is a web-based collaborative platform and database enabling researchers to exchange harmonized data about behavioral constructs, measures, and datasets.[1][2]

GEM has two goals:

  1. "Promote use of standardized measures which are tied to theoretically based constructs" and
  2. "Facilitate sharing of harmonized data resulting from the use of standardized measures".&91;1&93;

GEM has been proposed as part of the solution to the problem of tracking constructs in electronic medical records[3] and for control of construct proliferation.[4]

GEM has been recognized in the academic literature as an instantiation of cyberinfrastructure for research standardization,[5] a tool for dialogue and consensus building,[6] a tool to facilitate use of linked data and interoperable data systems,[7] and in case reports of expert panel measure categorizations.[8] The GEM database, uses “web 2.0” functionality to solicit, comment, vet, and select measures from the behavioral and population science communities in open and transparent ways.[1] Scientists are taking advantage of information sharing and collaboration made possible by networking technologies. This new phenomenon is referred to by some as Science 2.0.[1] As Science 2.0[9] gains momentum in the science community, giving a glimpse of future scientific publishing and data sharing, the GEM database is distinct in that it uses these functionalities to help scientists facilitate discovery in a massively connected and participative environment.

References

1. ^1 2 3 {{cite journal|last=Moser|first=Richard P.|last2=Hesse, Bradford W.; Shaikh, Abdul R.; Courtney, Paul; Morgan, Glen; Augustson, Erik, Kobrin, Sarah; Levin, Kerry; Helba, Christina; Garner, David; Dunn, Marsha; Coa, Kisha|title=Grid-Enabled Measures: Using Science 2.0 to Standardize Measures and Share Data|journal=American Journal of Preventive Medicine|date=2011|volume=40|issue=5|pages=1532–1534}}
2. ^{{cite journal|last=Rabin|first=Borsika A.|author2=Purcell, Peyton |author3=Naveed, Sana |author4=Moser, Richard P. |author5=Henton, Michelle D. |author6=Proctor, Enola K. |author7=Brownson, Ross C. |author8= Glasgow, Rusell |title=Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures|journal=Implementation Science|volume=7|pages=1–11|doi=10.1186/1748-5908-7-119}}
3. ^{{cite journal|last=Glasgow|first=Russell E.|author2=Kaplan, Robert M. |author3=Ockene, Judith K. |author4=Fisher, Edwin B. |author5= Emmons, Karen M. |title=Patient-Reported Measures Of Psychosocial Issues And Health Behavior Should Be Added To Electronic Health Records|journal=Health Affairs|date=March 2012|volume=31|issue=3|pages=497–504|doi=10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1295|url=http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/3/497.short}}
4. ^{{cite journal|last=Larsen|first=Kai R.|author2=Voronovich, Zoya A. |author3=Cook, Paul F. |author4= Pedro, Leli W. |title=Addicted to constructs: science in reverse?|journal=Addiction|year=2013|volume=108|issue=9|pages=1532–1534|doi=10.1111/add.12227 |pmid=23718564}}
5. ^{{cite journal|last=Shaikh|first=Abdul R.|last2=Prabhu Das, Irene; Vinson, Cynthia A.; Spring, Bonnie|title=Cyberinfrastructure for consumer health|journal=American Journal of Preventive Medicine|volume=40|issue=5|pages=S91-S96|doi=10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.012}}
6. ^{{cite journal|last=Parry|first=Carla|author2=Kent, Erin E. |author3=Forsythe, Laura P. |author4=Alfano, Cathering M. |author5= Rowland, Julia H. |title=Can't see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning|journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology|volume=31|issue=21|pages=2651–2653 |doi=10.1200/jco.2012.48.4618 |pmid=23796989 |pmc=3709053}}
7. ^{{cite journal|last=Aberethy|first=Amy P.|author2=Wheeler, Jane L. |author3=Courtney, Paul K. |author4= Keefe, Francies J.|title=Supporting implementation of evidence-based behavioral interventions: the role of data liquidity in facilitating translational behavioral medicine|journal=Translational Behavioral Medicine|volume=1|issue=1|pages=45–52|doi=10.1007/s13142-011-0024-4|pmc=3717701}}
8. ^{{cite journal|last=Tai|first=Betty|author2=Boyle, Maureen |author3=Ghitza, Udi |author4=Kaplan, Robert M. |author5=Clark, H. Wesley |author6= Gersing, Kenneth |title=Meaningful Use of Electronic Behavioral Health data in Primary Health Care|journal=Science Translational Medicine|volume=4|issue=119|pages=1–3|doi=10.1126/scitranslmed.3003324}}
9. ^{{cite web|last1=Burke|first1=Adrienne|title=From open-access journals to research-review blogs, networked knowledge has made science more accessible to more people around the globe than we could have imagined 20 years ago|url=http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/science_2.0_pioneers/|website=Seedmagazine.com|accessdate=10 February 2015}}

External links

  • {{Official website|https://www.gem-measures.org}}

4 : National Institutes of Health|United States Department of Health and Human Services agencies|Cancer research|Institutional repository software
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/11 4:55:49