| 词条 | Harding v Coburn |
| 释义 |
| name = Harding v Coburn | court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand | date_filed = | image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg | date decided = 22 July 1976 | full name = Harding v Coburn | citations = [1976] 2 NZLR 577 | judges = Sir Clifford RichmondJ, Woodhouse J, Cooke J | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | Keywords = illegal contracts }}Harding v Coburn [1976] 2 NZLR 577 was a New Zealand case that was one of the first that upheld that the Illegal Contracts Act 1970 had the power to validate (i.e. make legal) despite the fact that another legal enactment "deemed to be unlawful and shall have no effect".[1] BackgroundHarding sold their farm to Coburn. Unfortunately, the parties neglected to get the sale approved by the Court, as required under s25(4) of the Land Settlement Promotion and Land Acquisition Act [1952]. Under this Act, failure to obtain such a consent made the sale "unlawful and shall have no effect". As a consequence, Coburn sought the relief of validation under section 7 of the Illegal Contracts Act 1970. Harding's lawyers argued that as the sale was illegal under the Land Settlement Promotion and Land Acquisition Act, there was no legally enforceable sale agreement. DecisionThe Court of Appeal ruled that the courts had the power to validate contracts that are deemed illegal unless the other Act expressly prohibits validation under the Illegal Contracts Act. References1. ^{{cite book |title=Butterworths Student Companion Contract |edition=4th |last1=Walker |first1=Campbell |publisher=LexisNexis |ISBN=0-408-71770-X|year=2004 |pages=162–163}} Footnote: This position was later upheld by the Privy Council in Ross v Henderson [1977] 2 NZLR 458. {{NewZealand-case-law-stub}} 4 : New Zealand contract case law|Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases|1976 in case law|1976 in New Zealand law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。