“Road pricing”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

In most countries toll roads, toll bridges and toll tunnels are often used primarily for revenue generation to repay for long-term debt issued to finance the toll facility, or to finance capacity expansion, operations and maintenance of the facility itself, or simply as general tax funds.^[1] Road congestion pricing for entering an urban area, or pollution charges levied on vehicles with higher tailpipe emissions are typical schemes implemented to price externalities. The application of congestion charges is currently limited to a small number of cities and urban roads, and the notable schemes include the Electronic Road Pricing in Singapore, the London congestion charge, the Stockholm congestion tax, the Milan Area C, and High-occupancy toll lanes in the United States.^[2]^[3] Examples of pollution pricing schemes include the London low emission zone and the discontinued Ecopass in Milan. In some European countries there is a period-based charge for the use of motorways and expressways, based on a vignette or sticker attached to a vehicle, and in a few countries vignettes are required for the use of any road. Mileage based usage fees (MBUF) or distance based charging has been implemented for heavy vehicles based on truck weight and distance traveled in New Zealand (called RUC), Switzerland (LSVA), Germany (LKW-Maut), Austria (Go-Maut), Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, and in four US states: Oregon, New York, Kentucky and New Mexico.^[4]

Many recent road pricing schemes have proved controversial, with a number of high-profile schemes in the US and the UK being cancelled, delayed or scaled back in response to opposition and protest. Critics maintain that congestion pricing is not equitable, places an economic burden on neighboring communities, has a negative effect on retail businesses and on economic activity in general, and is just another tax. A 2006 survey of economic literature on the subject, however, finds that most economists agree that some form of road pricing to reduce congestion is economically viable, although there is disagreement on what form road pricing should take. Economists disagree over how to set tolls, how to cover common costs, what to do with any excess revenues, whether and how "losers" from tolling previously free roads should be compensated, and whether to privatize highways.^[5]

Terminology

Road pricing is a general term that may be used for any system where the driver pays directly for use of a particular roadway or road network in a particular city, region or nation. Road pricing also includes congestion charging, which are charges levied on qualifying road users to reduce peak demand, and thereby reduce traffic congestion^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11] and also to place a charge on road users for other negative externalities, including traffic accidents, noise, air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions.^[1]

History

The first published reference to 'road pricing' was possibly in 1949 when the RAND Corporation proposed "use of direct road pricing to make freight journeys more expensive on congested routes or to influence the time of day at which freight traffic operates".^[12] Nobel-laureate William Vickrey then built on the ideas of the economist Arthur Pigou, outlining a theoretical case for road pricing in a major work on the subject of 1955^[13] proposing in 1959 that drivers should be charged by electronic means for use of busy urban roads.^[14] Arthur Pigou had previously developed the concept of economic externalities in a publication of 1920^[15] in which he proposed that what is now referred to as a Pigouvian tax equal to the negative externality should be used to bring the outcome within a market economy back to economic efficiency.^[13]

In 1963 Vickery published a paper 'Pricing in urban and suburban transport’ in the American Economic Review^[21] and Gabriel Joseph Roth, John Michael Thomson of the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Cambridge published a short paper titled "Road pricing, a cure for congestion?"^[16] The Smeed Report, 'Road Pricing: The Economic and Technical Possibilities', which had been commissioned in 1962 by the United Kingdom Ministry of Transport, was published in 1964.^[17] Road pricing was then developed by Maurice Allais and Gabriel Roth in a paper titled "The Economics of Road User Charges" published by the World Bank in 1968.^[18]

The first successful implementation of a congestion charge was with the Singapore Area Licensing Scheme in 1976. The Electronic Road Pricing (Hong Kong) scheme operated as a trial between 1983 and 1985 but was not continued permanently due to public opposition. A number of road tolling schemes were then introduced in Norway between 1986 and 1991 in Bergen, Oslo, and the Trondheim Toll Scheme.^[25] It was noticed that the Oslo scheme had the unintended effect of reducing traffic by around 5%. The Singapore scheme was expanded in 1995 and converted to use a new electronic tolling system in 1998 and renamed Electronic Road Pricing. The first use of a road toll for access by low-occupancy vehicles to high-occupancy vehicle lane was introduced in the U.S. on California State Route 91 in 1995. Since 2000, other schemes have been introduced, although the New York congestion pricing proposal and a number of UK proposals were not progressed due to public opposition.

Example schemes

Asia-Pacific

Australia

In January 2009, variable tolls were implemented at Sydney Harbour Bridge, two weeks after upgrading to 100% free-flow electronic toll collection. The highest fees are charged during the morning and afternoon peak periods; a toll 25% lower applies for the shoulder periods; and a toll lower than the previously existing is charged at nights, weekends, and public holidays. This is Australia's first road congestion pricing scheme, and has had only a very minor effect on traffic levels, reducing them by 0.19% ^[19]^[20]^[21]^[22]

China

Main roadways and highways in Shanghai are tolled, and an assessment was completed to evaluate implementation of congestion pricing for vehicles entering the central business district.^[23]^[24] The city also restrains car use, ownership and there are restrictions on getting a driver's license; since 1998, the number of new car registrations is limited to 50,000 vehicles a year and car registrations are sold by public auction, with prices reaching up to US$5,000 in 2006. Parking is also limited.

Congestion based pricing for Beijing was recommended by the World Bank in 2010^[25]^[26] and local officials announced plans to introduce a scheme in September 2011 although no details about the cost or the charge zone have been provided.^[27] The city is dealt with traffic congestion and air pollution through a driving restriction scheme implemented since the 2008 Summer Olympics.^[28]^[29] {{As of|2016|06}}, another 11 Chinese cities have similar restriction schemes in place.^[30]

In early 2010 the city Guangzhou, Guangdong province, opened a public discussion on whether to introduce congestion charges. An online survey conducted by two local news outlets found that 84.4% of respondents opposed the charges.^[26] The city of Nanjing is also considering the implementation of congestion pricing.^[24]

In December 2015, the Beijing Municipal Commission of Transport announced plans to introduce congestion charges in 2016. According to city’s motor vehicle emission control plan 2013-2017, the congestion charge will be a real-time variable pricing scheme based on actual traffic flows and emissions data, and allow the fee to be charged for different vehicles and varying by time of the day and for different districts. The Dongcheng and Xicheng are among the districts that are most likely to firstly implement congestion charge. Vehicle emissions account for 31% of the city's smog sources, according to Beijing Environmental Protection Bureau. The local government has implemented already several policies to address air quality and congestion, such as a driving restriction scheme based upon the last digits on their license plates.^[31]^[32] Also a vehicle quota system was introduced in 2011, awarding new car licenses through a lottery, with a ceiling of 6 million units set by the city authority for 2017. In May 2016, the Beijing city legislature announced it will consider to start levying traffic congestion charges by 2020 as part of a package of measures to reform the vehicle quota system.^[33] {{As of|2016|06}}, the city's environmental and transport departments are working together on a congestion pricing proposal.^[30]

Hong Kong

Hong Kong's Electronic Road Pricing system operated between 1983 and 1985 with positive results.^[34] Public opposition stalled its permanent implementation. Proposals were however raised again in 2012.^[35]

Singapore

The world's first congestion pricing scheme was introduced in Singapore's core central business district in 1975^[36] as the Singapore Area Licensing Scheme. It was extended in 1995 and converted to the 100% free-flowing Electronic Road Pricing (Singapore) in September 1998. Variable pricing based on congestion levels were introduced during 2007.^[37] It is one of a number of elements in their Transportation Demand Management, which also includes high annual road tax, custom duties and vehicle registration fees for new vehicles, a quota system for new vehicles and heavy investment in public transportation.^[38] Singapore has one of the highest per capita incomes in Asia, but fewer than 30% of Singaporean households own cars.^[39]

Europe

Austria

A distance based charging scheme called Go-Maut was implemented in Austria for all vehicles over 3.5 tonnes on motorways in 2004.^[4] In addition, all vehicles under 3.5 tonnes are required to buy a sticker or vignette to access the Austrian motorway network, which is owned and operated by a state owned company called ASFINAG. The vignette enables the vehicle to use almost the entire motorway network in Austria for a specific period of time, with the lower charge set at {{euro|8}} for 10 days. However, for selected routes, such as long tunnels and expensive routes through the Alps, there is an additional toll charge.^[40]

Belarus

Finland

The only Finnish town to suffer serious road congestion is Helsinki, which is built on a narrow peninsula. In the 1980s and 1990s the City Administration was already proposing tolls on vehicles entering the centre but these were successfully resisted by the Chamber of Commerce.^[41] Road pricing was taken up in the central government programme in 2011, when the coalition members committed themselves to examining "the introduction of GPS-based road user charges".^[42] Transport minister Merja Kyllönen set up a working group to study "road user charging systems" in October 2012.^[43] The Ministry was committed to the architecture of the European Electronic Toll Service.^[44]

In March 2013 an independent Finnish policy institute recommended a market-based road pricing architecture for Europe. The roads needed for a journey could be pre-booked, the price of "slots" rising as the roads to be used approached capacity. The price would become payable at the scheduled time of departure unless the slot holder resold the slot before then. Casual motorists without bookings would be charged the current price.^[45] The paper proposed that Finland, having no serious road congestion to address, could serve as a testbed for road charging mechanisms.

The Transport Ministry’s working group reported in December 2013 that a tax proportional to road use would implement transport and environment policies better than current fixed taxes on motoring, although collection costs would be many times higher. The focus of transport policy should be on solving capacity problems by managing demand rather than by building new infrastructure. However, it argued that buses and lorries should be exempted from road use charges on the grounds that the rise in costs could not be offset by cutting other heavy vehicle road taxes, which were already close to the minimum set in the EU’s vignette directive. For private cars the report looked at the implications of fixed and regional kilometre charges but did not consider market or other methods for responding to varying local congestion. Before the adoption of any system, it proposed broad trials to establish the technical viability of taxing road use, its enforceability and the protection of privacy.^[46]

Germany

The LKW-MAUT distance based charging scheme large goods vehicles in Germany began operation on 1 January 2005 after a two-year delay with prices varying depending on emission levels and the number of axles. The scheme, which combining satellite technology with other technologies and is operated by Toll Collect, suffered delays before implementation.^[4]

Italy

Rome converted a residents' pass system for the core of the city to a road pricing system in 2001 and Genoa started a trial system in 2003.^[47]

The Milan "Ecopass" system began operation in early 2008 with an objective to reduce air pollution from vehicles.^[48]^[49]^[50] It was extended several times^[51] before being replaced by Area C, a conventional congestion pricing scheme covering the same geographic area in January 2012 as an 18-month pilot. Electric vehicles, public utilities' vehicles, police and emergency vehicles, buses and taxis are exempted from the charge. Hybrid electric and bi-fuel natural gas vehicles (CNG and LPG) will be exempted until 1 January 2013.^[52]

The scheme was made permanent in March 2013. All net earnings from Area C are invested to promote sustainable mobility and policies to reduce air pollution, including the redevelopment, protection and development of public transport, "soft mobility" (pedestrians, cycling, Zone 30), and systems to rationalize the distribution of goods.^[53]

Malta

The automated 'Controlled Vehicular Access' (CVA) system was launched in Malta's capital city of Valletta on 1 May 2007.^[54] The number of vehicles entering the city reduced from 10,000 to 7,900; there has also been a 60% drop in car stays by non-residents of more than eight hours with a marked increase of 34% in non-residential cars visiting the city for an hour or less.^[55]^[56]

Norway

Norway implemented electronic urban tolling on the main road corridors into Bergen (1986), Oslo (1990) and then the Trondheim Toll Scheme the following year.^[57] The Bergen scheme operated as a cordon on all entry points to the central area of the city. The Oslo scheme was initially created as a conventional road toll for revenue generation reasons, but had the unintended effect of reducing traffic by around 5%. Charges vary by time of the day. The legal basis for introducing congestion charging fee was approved by Parliament in 2001^[58] In October 2011 the Norwegian government announced the introduction of rules allowing congestion charging in cities. The measure is intended to cut greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions, and relief traffic congestion.^[59] {{As of|2015|11}}, Norwegian authorities have implemented urban charging schemes that operates both on the motorways and for access into downtown areas in five additional cities or municipalities: Haugesund, Kristiansand, Namsos, Stavanger, and Tønsberg.^[60]

Sweden

The Stockholm congestion tax covering Stockholm City Centre was trialed for seven-month trial during 2006 and has been operational on a permanent basis since 1 August 2007;^[61]^[62] all the entrances and exits of this area have unmanned control points operating with automatic number plate recognition and most vehicles pay a fixed fee during peak hours.^[63]

A similar congestion tax was introduced in Gothenburg in 2013, the Gothenburg congestion tax. In opposite to Stockholm, this tax covers also usage of bypass road past the city.

The congestion tax is called tax, not toll or fee, since a principle has been established that road tolls can only exist to pay for the construction of the specific tolled road, during a limited period. The congestion tax charges every road that crosses certain lines, regardless of its age. Three bridges in Sweden have road tolls (as of 2015).

United Kingdom

The Smeed Report recommended the implementation of congestion charging in 1964^[64] and road pricing for London was considered by the Greater London Council in 1973 but was not progressed. The Durham City congestion charge was introduced in 2002^[65] and the London congestion charge in 2003.^[66]

In June 2005, Transport Secretary Alistair Darling announced a proposal for a national scheme^[67]^[68] in which every vehicle would be fitted with a satellite receiver that would calculate charges, with prices (including fuel duty) ranging from 2p per mile on uncongested roads to £1.34 on the most congested roads at peak times.^[69] The scheme was dropped after an online petition against proposals gained over 1.8 million signatures.^[70] A number of local schemes were then proposed and rejected during 2007-2008, including the Manchester congestion charge^[71] Planned emissions based charges in London cancelled following the 2008 Mayoral election.^[72] A 'Western Extension' was added to the London scheme in 2007 but then removed in January 2011.^[73] The London low emission zone was introduced in stages between 2008 and 2012 with an aim of reducing the pollution emissions of diesel-powered commercial vehicles in London.^[74] UK wide road pricing for large goods vehicles, which was first proposed in 2000 before being dropped^[75] and then revived in 2012.^[76]

Approved by Mayor Boris Johnson in April 2013, the Ultra Low Emission Discount (ULED) went into effect on 1 July 2013, substituting the Greener Vehicle Discount. The ULED introduced more stringent emission standards that limited the free access to the congestion charge zone to electric cars, some plug-in hybrids, and any car or van that emits 75g/km or less of CO₂ and meets the Euro 5 emission standards for air quality. The measure was designed to curb the growing number of diesel vehicles on London's roads. The owners of vehicles registered for the Greener Vehicle Discount were granted a three-year sunset period before they have to pay the full congestion charge.^[77]^[78] The sunset period ended on 24 June 2016.^[79]

A new toxicity charge, known as T-charge will be introduced from 23 October 2017. Older and more polluting cars and vans that do not meet Euro 4 standards will have to pay an extra £10 charge on top of the congestion charge to drive in central London, within the Congestion Charge Zone (CCZ). The charge typically applies to diesel and petrol vehicles registered before 2006, and the levy is expected to affect up to 10,000 vehicles.^[80]^[81]

London Mayor Sadiq Khan announced the introduction of the scheme on 17 February 2017 after London achieved record air pollution levels in January 2017, and the city was put on very high pollution alert for the first time ever, as cold and stationary weather failed to clear toxic pollutants emitted mainly by diesel vehicles.^[82] The Mayor also announced plans to expand the London ultra low emission zone (ULEZ) beyond Central London a year earlier than planned in 2019. Motor vehicles that do not meet the emissions criteria would be charged from £12.50 upwards a day to enter central London. Drivers would not pay both the ULEZ and the new £10 T-charge, and the latter will not apply to taxis.^[80]^[81]^[82]

Middle east

Dubai

The Salik (road toll) system in Dubai, United Arab Emirates was introduced by the Roads and Transport Authority in 2007 and extended in 2008.

North America

New York

In March 2001, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey implemented a discount during off-peak hours for those vehicles paying tolls for several tunnels and bridges connecting New York City and New Jersey using the electronic EZ Pass.^[83]^[84] Since March 2008, qualified low-emission automobiles could get a 50% discount during off-peak hours.^[85]

In April 2007 the New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed a contentious congestion charge on cars using most streets in the central business district (southern half of Manhattan)^[86] as part of the broader PlaNYC 2030. The plan received broad support from a coalition of civic, business, environmental, labor, community and public health organizations and the City Council voted for the measure but also received significant opposition. The New York Legislature declined to vote on it in April 2008 saying that "... the opposition was so overwhelming,... that he would not hold an open vote of the full Assembly,".^[87]

Governor Andrew Cuomo reintroduced a congestion pricing proposal for New York City in 2017 in response to the New York City Subway's state of emergency, a proposal that Mayor Bill de Blasio opposed. A commission to investigate the feasibility of congestion pricing, organized in late 2017, found that a congestion pricing scheme could benefit New York City. If approved, New York City's congestion pricing zone will be the first in North America.^[88]^[89]^[90]^[91] Cuomo's administration was set to review these proposals in January 2018, although the details of the congestion zones had not been revealed yet.^[92]

San Francisco

In 2006, San Francisco authorities began a feasibility study to evaluate congestion pricing in the city. The initial charging scenarios considered were presented in public meetings held in December 2008^[93] and the final draft proposal were discussed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (SFBS) in December 2010, which recommended implementation of a six-month to one-year trial in 2015.^[94]^[95] Separately, in July 2010 congestion tolls were implemented at the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.^[96]

Other metropolitan areas

In August 2007, the United States Department of Transportation selected five metropolitan areas to initiate congestion pricing demonstration projects under the Urban Partnerships Congestion Initiative, for US$1 billion of federal funding.^[97] The five projects under this initiative are; Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco,^[98] State Route 520 serving downtown Seattle and communities to its east,^[99] Interstate 95 between Miami and Ft. Lauderdale,^[100] Interstate 35W serving downtown Minneapolis,^[101] and a variable rate parking meter system in Chicago, which replaced New York City after it left the program in 2008.^[102]

High-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes

High-occupancy toll lanes are lanes where a variable fee based on demand is charged to non-exempt vehicles. Exempt vehicles include high-occupancy vehicles, transit vehicles and often also low-emission vehicles. Users not wanting to pay the fee have the option of using general purpose lanes. HOT lanes were first implemented on California's private toll 91 Express Lanes, in Orange County in 1995, followed in 1996 by Interstate 15 in San Diego.

South America

Brazil

In January 2012, the federal government of Brazil enacted the Urban Mobility Law that authorizes municipalities to implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic flows. The law also seeks to encourage the use of public transportation and reduce air pollution. According to the law, revenues from congestion charges should be destined exclusively to urban infrastructure for public transportation and non-motorized modes of locomotion (such as walking and cycling), and to finance public subsidies for transit fares. The law went into effect in April 2013.^[104]^[105]^[106]

In April 2012, one of the committees of the São Paulo city council approved a bill to introduce a R$4 (~ {{USD|2}}) per day congestion charge within the same area as the existing road space rationing ({{lang-pt|Rodízio veicular}}) by the last digit of the license plate, which has been in force since 1996. The bill still needs approval by two other committees before going for a final vote at the city council.^[107]

Chile

Congestion pricing has also been implemented in urban freeways. Between 2004 and 2005, Santiago de Chile implemented the first 100% non-stop urban toll for concessioned freeways passing through a downtown area,^[112] charging by the distance traveled.^[113] Congestion pricing is used since 2007 during rush hours in order to maintain reasonable speeds within the city's core with the aim of keeping a minimum level of service for their customers.^[114]^[115]

See also

References

1. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/fuel_for_thought-johnson_et_al-150512.pdf|title=Fuel for Thought – The what, why and how of motoring taxation|author1=Paul Johnson, Andrew Leicester |author2=George Stoye |lastauthoramp=yes |publisher=Institute for Fiscal Studies and Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring|date=May 2012|accessdate=2012-05-22}} Executive Summary, pp. v.
2. ^{{Cite book|author1=Small, Kenneth A. |author2=Verhoef, Erik T. | title = The Economics of Urban Transportation |year = 2007| publisher = Routledge, New York| isbn = 978-0-415-28515-5| pages = 148–153}}
3. ^{{cite news|title=Area C è partita: calate del 40% le auto in centro dopo l'entrata in vigore del pedaggio|trans-title= Area C takes off: auto traffic decreased 40% in the center after the toll goes into force |language=Italian |url=http://milano.corriere.it/milano/notizie/cronaca/12_gennaio_16/congestion-primo-giorno-traffico-1902875137709.shtml |accessdate=2012-01-16|work=Corriere della Sera Milano|date=2012-05-23}}
4. ^¹²{{cite web |url=http://roadpricing.blogspot.com/2012/05/mileage-based-usage-fees-distance-based.html|title=Mileage based usage fees – distance based charging – vehicle mileage tax – a future? |author=Scott Wilson|publisher=Road Pricing Blog|date=2012-05-03|accessdate=2013-11-17}}
5. ^{{cite journal|journal=Econ Journal Watch|volume=3|issue=2|pages=292–379|author=Lindsey, Robin|title=Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Road Pricing? The Intellectual History of an Idea |date=May 2006 |url=http://econjwatch.org/issues/volume-3-number-2-may-2006|format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-09}}
6. ^¹²{{cite web|url=https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/tolling_and_pricing/defined/|title=Tolling and Pricing Defined|publisher=Federal Highway Administration}}
7. ^¹{{Cite book|url=http://www.uctc.net/papers/391.pdf|last = Small| first = Kenneth A. | last2 = José A. Gomez-Ibañez | year = 1998 |title = Road Pricing for Congestion Management: The Transition from Theory to Policy| publisher = The University of California Transportation Center, University of California at Berkeley| id =|page = 213 }}
8. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm35.htm|title=Road Pricing. Congestion Pricing, Value Pricing, Toll Roads and HOT Lanes|publisher=Victoria Transport Policy Institute}}
9. ^{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmtran/218/218i.pdf|title=Road Pricing: The Next Steps|publisher=Transport Select Committee}}
10. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/publications/committee-reports/819-final-report-on-the-inquiry-into-federal-state-road-funding-arrangements/download|title=Inquiry into Federal-State Road Funding Arrangements|page=143|publisher=Parliament of Victoria}}
11. ^{{cite web |url=http://managed-lanes.tamu.edu/glossary/2#letterr|title=Glossary terms|publisher=Texas Transportation Institute}}
12. ^{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MewnAQAAIAAJ|title=The Rand paper series |quote=Potentially more effective in the near term would be the use of direct road pricing to make freight journeys more expensive on congested routes or to influence the time of day at which freight traffic operates|page=16|publisher=RAND Corporation}}
13. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.economic-policy.org/pdfs/Santos_final.pdf.|title=Road Pricing: Lessons from London|quote=Models of increasing sophistication, which describe congestion have been developed over the years since the seminal work of Vickrey (1955).}}
14. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/business/yourmoney/11view.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin|title=What’s the Toll? It Depends on the Time of Day |work=The New York Times | first=Daniel|last=Gross|date=2007-02-11}}
15. ^{{cite book |last=Pigou |first=A. C. |title=The Economics of Welfare |location=London |publisher=Macmillan |year=1920 }}
16. ^{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1m1l5AAACAAJ |title=Road pricing, a cure for congestion?|author1=Gabriel Joseph Roth |author2=John Michael Thomson |publisher=University of Cambridge|year=1963}}
17. ^{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books/about/Road_pricing_the_economic_and_technical.html?id=XR00AQAAIAAJ |title=Road Pricing: The Economic and Technical Possibilities (Smeed Report)|author=R.J.Smeed|year=1964|publisher=Ministry of Transport}}
18. ^{{Cite book | last = Walters | first = A. A. | year = 1968 | title = The Economics of Road User Charges| publisher = World Bank Staff Occasional Papers Number Five, Chapter VII, Washington, D.C. pp. 191–217| isbn = 978-0-8018-0653-7}}
19. ^{{cite web |url=http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/12384129/harbour-bridge-variable-tolls-to-stay/ |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2012-04-21 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120115121350/http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/12384129/harbour-bridge-variable-tolls-to-stay |archivedate=15 January 2012 |df=dmy-all }}
20. ^{{cite web |date=2009-01-27 |url=http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/latest/5283437/peak-hour-toll-begins-harbour-bridge/ |title=Peak hour toll begins on Harbour Bridge |publisher=Yahoo!7 News (Australia) |accessdate=2009-03-10 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091005155307/http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/latest/5283437/peak-hour-toll-begins-harbour-bridge/ |archivedate=5 October 2009 |df=dmy-all }}
21. ^{{cite web|author=Michael Daley |date= 2009-02-05 |url=http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/newsevents/downloads/minister_releases/05022009_cashlesstolling.pdf |format=PDF|title=Motorists Embrace Cashless Tolling on Sydney Harbour Bridge |publisher=NSW Minister for Roads |accessdate=2009-03-10}}
22. ^{{cite web|date= 2009-01-22 |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/22/2471738.htm |title=Harbour congestion tax 'will anger some' |publisher=ABC News (Australia) |accessdate=2009-03-10}}
23. ^{{Cite journal |author1=Sperling, Daniel |author2=Deborah Gordon |lastauthoramp=yes | title = Two billion cars: driving toward sustainability | year = 2009 | pages=219–220 | publisher = Oxford University Press |location=New York| id = . See on Chapter 8 Stimulating Chinese Innovation. | isbn = 978-0-19-537664-7}}
24. ^¹{{cite journal |url=http://www.thinkinghighways.com/#/28|journal=ETC, etc |format=iPaper|author1=Bob McQueen |author2=Tom Biggstitle |author3=Chris Bausher |last-author-amp=yes |publisher=Thinking Highways|title=Congestion pricing|accessdate=2009-02-23|pages= 35–36|year=2006|volume=I|issue=1}} A PDF version of the article is available for download here
25. ^{{cite web|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/indepth/2010-12/21/c_13657902.htm|title=Time to fix traffic in Beijing|author=China Daily|publisher=Xinhuanet|date=2010-12-21|accessdate=2011-09-07|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101224153615/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/indepth/2010-12/21/c_13657902.htm|archivedate=24 December 2010|df=dmy-all}}
26. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.bjreview.com.cn/forum/txt/2010-05/31/content_275536.htm|title=Will Congestion Pricing Relieve Traffic Jams?|publisher=Beijing Review|date=2010-05-31|accessdate=2011-09-07}}
27. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14761711|title=Beijing 'plans congestion charge' to ease traffic woes|date=2011-09-02|accessdate=2011-09-07|publisher=BBC News}}
28. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-09/28/content_10126448.htm|title=Post-Olympics Beijing car restrictions to take effect next month|publisher=China View news|date=2008-09-28|accessdate=2009-10-17}}
29. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/17/world/asia/17beijing.html?_r=1&hpw|title=Beijing's Air Is Cleaner, but Far From Clean|newspaper=The New York Times|author=Michael Wines|date=2009-10-16|accessdate=2009-10-17}}
30. ^¹{{cite news | url=https://www.economist.com/news/china/21700676-chinese-love-their-cars-do-not-want-pay-more-driving-them-great-crawl?frsc=dg%7Ca | title=The great crawl | work=The Economist | date=2016-06-18 | accessdate=2016-06-22}} From the print edition.
31. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-12/03/content_22621398.htm |title=Beijing mulls congestion charge|work=China Daily |agency=Xinhua News Agency|date=2015-12-03|accessdate=2015-12-07}}
32. ^{{cite news|url=http://autonews.gasgoo.com/china-news/beijing-plans-to-implement-congestion-charge-nex-151204.shtml |title=Beijing Plans to Implement "Congestion Charge" Next Year|author=Natasha Li |work=Gasgoo.com |date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-07}}
33. ^{{cite news | url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-25/beijing-seeks-to-legislate-car-quotas-as-it-mulls-congestion-fee | title=Beijing Seeks to Legislate Car Quotas as It Mulls Congestion Fee | work=Bloomberg News | date=2016-05-25 | accessdate=2016-05-28}}
34. ^Electronic road pricing. Developments in Hong Kong 1983–1986
35. ^{{cite web|url=http://topics.scmp.com/news/hk-news-watch/article/SCMP-debate|title=HK news watch|newspaper=South China Morning Post|date=2012-02-27}}
36. ^{{Cite journal | last = Cervero | first = Robert | authorlink=Robert Cervero|year = 1998 | title = The Transit Metropolis| page = 169 | publisher = Island Press |location=Washington, D.C. | id = Chapter 6/The Master Planned Transit Metropolis: Singapore | isbn = 1-55963-591-6}}
37. ^{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/automobiles/16CONGEST.html?ex=1363320000&en=66db1c235736c7ea&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss | author=Ken Belson |title= Importing a Decongestant for Midtown Streets | newspaper=The New York Times |date=2008-03-16 | accessdate=2008-04-06 | language= }}
38. ^R. Cervero op. cit. pp. 155
39. ^Singapore Census of Population Office
40. ^{{cite web |url=http://roadpricing.blogspot.com.br/search/label/Austria|title=Salzburg seeks vignette exemption for local motorways|author=Scott Wilson|publisher=Road Pricing Blog|date=2012-02-25|accessdate=2013-11-17}}
41. ^{{cite news |title= Helsingin kauppakamari: Tietullit olisivat katastrofi (Helsinki Chamber of Commerce: Road tolls would be catastrophic) |work=Helsingin Sanomat |date=18 August 1993 }}
42. ^{{cite web |url = http://valtioneuvosto.fi/hallitus/hallitusohjelma/pdf/en334743.pdf |title = Programme of Prime Minister Jyrki Katainen’s Government |publisher = Prime Minister of Finland |date = 22 June 2011 |accessdate= 4 January 2014 }}
43. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.lvm.fi/web/en/topical/pressreleases/-/view/4129640 |title = Road user charging systems to be explored |publisher = Ministry of Transport and Communications of Finland |date = 23 October 2012 |accessdate= 6 March 2013 }}
44. ^{{cite web |url = http://ec.europa.eu/transport/media/publications/doc/2011-eets-european-electronic-toll-service_en.pdf |title = The European Electronic Toll Service |publisher = European Commission |date = 16 June 2011 |accessdate= 6 March 2013 }}
45. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.eubase.net/reports/RA.pdf |title = Road Authorities: price or tax? |last = Humphreys |first = Pat |publisher = Nordic Communications Corporation |date = 5 March 2013 |accessdate= 6 March 2013 }}
46. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.lvm.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=2497123&name=DLFE-22565.pdf&title=Julkaisuja%2037-2013 |title = Oikeudenmukaista ja älykästä liikennettä, Työryhmän loppuraportti (Fair and intelligent Transport Working Group, Final report) |publisher = Ministry of Transport and Communications of Finland |date = 16 December 2013 |accessdate= 4 January 2014 }}
47. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://oro.open.ac.uk/18361/|title=Comparisons of different implementation procedures of road pricing schemes in two European countries}}
48. ^{{cite web | url= http://www.nysun.com/foreign/milan-introduces-congestion-charge-to-cut/68854/ | title= Milan Introduces Congestion Charge To Cut Pollution | author = Marco Bertacche | date=2008-01-03 | newspaper = The New York Sun | accessdate=2008-01-17}}
49. ^{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/automobiles/27GREEN.html | title=Toll Discounts for Going Green | author = Ken Belson | date=2008-01-27 | newspaper =The New York Times | accessdate=2008-01-27}}
50. ^{{cite news | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7167992.stm | title=Milan introduces traffic charge | author = BBC News | date=2008-03-02 | accessdate=2008-01-17}}
51. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.comune.milano.it/dseserver/webcity/comunicati.nsf/weball/077F561DB4A21D98C125752F004CDE33 | title=Ecopass. Prorogato fino al 31 dicembre 2009. Nei primi mesi dell'anno prevista la consultazione dei cittadini| author =Edoardo Croci | date=2008-12-31 | publisher = Comune di Milano | accessdate=2009-02-14|language=Italian}} The complete pricing scheme is presented in this article.
52. ^{{cite web|title=Congestion charge Milano: Area C, tariffe, divieti, esenti|url=http://sostenibile.blogosfere.it/2011/12/area-c-milano-divieti-regole-e-la-lista-degli-esenti.html|author= Rosario Mastrosimone|publisher=Sostenibile|date=2011-12-27|accessdate=2012-01-02|language=Italian}}
53. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.comune.milano.it/dseserver/webcity/comunicati.nsf/weball/02715EEE0A5B23ADC1257B3B0065658E|title=Area C. Istituita la congestion charge definitiva|language=Italian|trans-title= Area C. The congestion charge was made permanent|author=Comune di Milano|publisher=Comune di Milano|date=2013-03-17|accessdate=2013-10-19}}
54. ^Controlled Vehicular Access {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120306095431/http://www.cva.gov.mt/ |date=6 March 2012 }}, CVA Technology, 1 May 2007.
55. ^{{cite web| url=http://www.maltamedia.com/artman2/publish/govt_politics/article_1745.shtml|title= Valletta traffic congestion considerably reduced|date= 2007-05-06|publisher=MaltaMedia News|accessdate=2008-07-15}}
56. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.eltis.org/study_sheet.phtml?study_id=1610&comments=1|title=Controlled Vehicle Access, Valleta, Malta|author=European Local Transport Information Service (ELTIS)|accessdate=2008-04-05|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090907033346/http://www.eltis.org/study_sheet.phtml?study_id=1610&comments=1|archivedate=7 September 2009|df=dmy-all}}
57. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://design.open.ac.uk/potter/documents/NorwayTP.pdf |title=Norway's urban toll rings: evolving towards congestion charging? |author=Ieromanachou, Potter and Warren|format=PDF}}
58. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.piarc.org/library/aipcr/1/88FDcnh3295yCfA04Vm71nCN.pdf |title=Urban Tolling in Norway |page=5 |author=Wærsted, Kristian |format=PDF |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110807174435/http://www.piarc.org/library/aipcr/1/88FDcnh3295yCfA04Vm71nCN.pdf |archivedate=7 August 2011 |df=dmy-all }}
59. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.aecc.eu/en/content/pdf/AECC%20Newsletter%20September-October%202011.pdf|title=Norway to allow Congestion Charging|author=AECC|publisher=AECC Newsletter: International Regulatory Developments|date=September 2011|accessdate=2015-11-17|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117163944/http://www.aecc.eu/en/content/pdf/AECC%20Newsletter%20September-October%202011.pdf|archivedate=17 November 2015|df=dmy-all}} See pp. 7
60. ^{{cite web|url=http://urbanaccessregulations.eu/countries-mainmenu-147/norway-mainmenu-197/namsos-charging-scheme|title=Urban Access Regulations: Norway Road Charging|author=Sadler Consultants Ltd.|publisher= CLARS (Charging, Low Emission Zones, other Access Regulation Schemes) |year=2015|accessdate=2015-11-17}}
61. ^{{cite web|title=Trängselskatt i Stockholm |publisher=Swedish Road Administration |url=http://www.vv.se/templates/page3____10911.aspx |accessdate=2007-08-01 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070709043015/http://www.vv.se/templates/page3____10911.aspx |archivedate=9 July 2007 |df=dmy }}
62. ^{{cite web|title=Odramatisk start för biltullarna |newspaper=Dagens Nyheter |url=http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=1298&a=676098 |date=2007-08-01 |accessdate=2007-08-01 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930205105/http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=1298&a=676098 |archivedate=30 September 2007 |df=dmy }}
63. ^{{cite web|title=Tider och belopp |publisher=Swedish Road Administration |url=http://www.vv.se/templates/page3____21106.aspx |accessdate=2007-08-01 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070703093159/http://www.vv.se/templates/page3____21106.aspx |archivedate=3 July 2007 |df=dmy }}
64. ^{{cite news |last=Tempest |first=Matthews |url=https://www.theguardian.com/transport/Story/0,,1503017,00.html |title=Q&A: National road charging scheme |work=The Guardian |date=2006-08-07 |accessdate=2007-06-22 | location=London}}
65. ^{{cite news |title=Local welcome for congestion charge |date=2002-10-01 |publisher=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2289692.stm |accessdate=2007-04-27 | language = }}
66. ^{{cite news |first=Matthew |last=Beard |url=http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/transport/article119308.ece |title=Livingstone predicts 'difficult few days' as congestion charge begins |work=The Independent |date=2003-02-17 |accessdate=2006-04-09 | location=London}}
67. ^{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4610755.stm |title='Pay-as-you-go' road charge plan |publisher=BBC News |date=2005-06-06 |accessdate=2007-06-22}}
68. ^{{cite news |last=Tempest |first=Matthew |url=https://www.theguardian.com/transport/Story/0,2763,1502694,00.html |title=Darling unveils road charging plans |work=The Guardian |date=2005-06-09 |accessdate=2007-06-22 | location=London}}
69. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/roadpricing/feasibilitystudy/studyreport/annexbmodellingresultsandana3997 |title=Feasibility study of road pricing in the UK |pages=para B.52 |publisher=Department for Transport |date=2004-07-16 |accessdate=2007-08-25 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070717135452/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/roadpricing/feasibilitystudy/studyreport/annexbmodellingresultsandana3997|archivedate = 2007-07-17}}
70. ^{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6381279.stm |title=Blair's statement in full |publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation |work=BBC News |date=2007-02-21 |accessdate=2007-06-22}}
71. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1007/1007736_ccharge_details_revealed.html |title=C-charge details revealed |work=Manchester Evening News |publisher=M.E.N. media 2007 |first=Alan |last=Salter |date=2007-05-25 |accessdate=2007-11-25}}
72. ^{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7494495.stm| title=Mayor quashes £25 C-charge hike |publisher=BBC News |date=2008-07-08|accessdate=2008-08-16|language= }}
73. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/17094.aspx|title=Consultation results|publisher=Transport for London|accessdate=6 December 2010}}
74. ^{{Cite web |url=http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/LEZ/LEZ-information-leaflet.pdf |format=PDF |title=The Low Emission Zone. Cleaner air for Greater London. |pages=Pages 10–12 |publisher=Transport for London |accessdate=2007-11-25}}
75. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN00588.pdf|title=Roads: lorry road user charging|work=Parliament}}
76. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16712702|title=Foreign lorries face £10 daily charge on UK roads|work=BBC News|quote=Foreign lorry drivers could pay as much as £10 a day to use UK roads, the government has announced. UK haulage firms already have to pay to make journeys in other European Union countries, including France. Transport Minister Mike Penning said charging overseas companies would create a "fairer" situation.|date=2012-01-25}}
77. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.greencarcongress.com/2013/04/uled-20130424.html|title=London to introduce new Ulta Low Emission Discount for Congestion Charge scheme; countering dieselization|publisher=Green Car Congress|date=24 April 2013|accessdate=24 April 2013}}
78. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/apr/24/pollution|title=London tightens up congestion charge in attempt to drive out diesel |work=The Guardian|date=24 April 2013|accessdate=24 April 2013}}
79. ^{{cite web| url=http://www.nextgreencar.com/news/7701/congestion-charge-sunset-period-ends-today/ | title=Congestion charge sunset period ends today | first=Chris | last=Lilly |publisher=Next Green Car | date=2016-06-24| accessdate=2016-06-29}}
80. ^¹{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/feb/17/london-to-introduce-vehicle-pollution-charge-in-october-says-mayor-sadiq-khan |title=London to introduce £10 vehicle pollution charge, says Sadiq Khan | first=Rowena |last=Mason | work=The Guardian | date=17 February 2017 | accessdate=23 February 2017}}
81. ^¹{{cite news | url=http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/consumer-news/95559/london-introduces-new-10-t-charge-to-cut-vehicle-pollution |title=London introduces new £10 'T-charge' to cut vehicle pollution | first= Martin |last=Saarinen | work=Auto Express | date=17 February 2017 | accessdate=23 February 2017}}
82. ^¹{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/17/world/europe/london-smog-air-pollution.html?_r=0 |title=A Push for Diesel Leaves London Gasping Amid Record Pollution | author=Kimiko de Reytas-Tamura | work=The New York Times | date=17 February 2017 | accessdate=23 February 2017}}
83. ^{{cite web |author=Peter Samuel |date=2001-01-11 |url=http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/2848 |title=Peak/Off-Peak Tolls:Whitman whittles down PANYNJ tolls |publisher=TOLLROADSnews |accessdate=2009-03-10 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090302073502/http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/2848 |archivedate=2 March 2009 |df=dmy }}
84. ^{{cite news|author= Ronald Smothers |date=2001-03-27|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/27/nyregion/grumbling-but-still-moving-under-new-rush-hour-tolls.html |title=Grumbling, but Still Moving, Under New Rush-Hour Tolls |newspaper=The New York Times|accessdate=2009-03-10}}
85. ^{{cite web|date= |url=http://www.panynj.gov/COMMUTINGTRAVEL/tunnels/html/tolls.html#faq8 |title=New Toll Rates – Effective, 3 AM, March 2, 2008: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS) |publisher=Port Authority of New York and New Jersey |accessdate=2009-03-10 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090301021437/http://www.panynj.gov/CommutingTravel/tunnels/html/tolls.html |archivedate=1 March 2009 }}
86. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/downloads/pdf/report_transportation.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2012-03-08 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070703111917/http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/downloads/pdf/report_transportation.pdf |archivedate=3 July 2007 |df=dmy-all }}
87. ^{{cite web |author= |url=http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&aid=80238 |title=Congestion Pricing Dies in Albany |publisher=NY1 |date=2010-03-30 |accessdate=2010-12-12 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080511092713/http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&aid=80238 |archivedate=11 May 2008 |df=dmy-all }}
88. ^{{Cite news |last1=Santora |first1=Marc |title=Cuomo Calls Manhattan Traffic Plan an Idea ‘Whose Time Has Come’ |work=The New York Times |date=August 13, 2017 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/nyregion/cuomo-rethinks-opposition-to-tolls-to-ease-manhattan-traffic.html |issn=0362-4331 |df=mdy-all }}
89. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/21/nyregion/de-blasio-congestion-pricing.html|title=Mayor de Blasio Says He ‘Does Not Believe’ in Congestion Pricing|last=Goodman|first=J. David|date=August 21, 2017|work=The New York Times|access-date=August 23, 2017|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}
90. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/nyregion/congestion-pricing-new-york.html|title=New York’s Tilt Toward Congestion Pricing Was Years in the Making|last=Hu|first=Winnie|date=November 28, 2017|work=The New York Times|access-date=November 30, 2017|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}
91. ^{{cite web | last=Dwyer | first=Jim | last2=Hu | first2=Winnie | title=Driving a Car in Manhattan Could Cost $11.52 Under Congestion Plan | website=The New York Times | date=2018-01-19 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/18/nyregion/driving-manhattan-congestion-traffic.html }}
92. ^{{cite web | last=Hu | first=Winnie | last2=Wang | first2=Vivian | title=Cuomo’s Congestion Pricing for New York City Begins to Take Shape | website=The New York Times | date=2017-11-28 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/16/nyregion/cuomos-congestion-pricing-for-new-york-city-begins-to-take-shape.html | access-date=2018-01-19}}
93. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/us/04congestion.html|title=San Francisco Studies Fees to Ease Traffic|newspaper=The New York Times|author=Malia Wollan|date=2009-01-04|accessdate=2009-02-22}}
94. ^{{cite news|url=http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-11-11/news/24826058_1_new-toll-southern-border-zabe-bent|title=S.F. may hit drivers with variety of tolls|work=San Francisco Chronicle|author=Rachel Gordon|date=2010-11-11|accessdate=2010-12-05}}
95. ^{{cite news|url=http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=resources/traffic&id=7779319|title=SF considers downtown congestion pricing|work=ABC7 News San Francisco|author=Heather Ishimaru |date=2010-11-10|accessdate=2010-12-05}}
96. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/13/BA0I1DDKKU.DTL|title=Reminder: Bridge tolls go up July 1|work=San Francisco Chronicle|author=Michael Cabanatuan|date=2010-05-13|accessdate=2011-01-21}}
97. ^{{cite web| url=http://www.upa.dot.gov/index.htm| title=Urban Partnerships |publisher = U.S. Department of Transportation|date=|accessdate=2008-06-20|language=|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080628162520/http://www.upa.dot.gov/index.htm |archivedate = 28 June 2008|deadurl=yes}}
98. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.upa.dot.gov/agreements/sanfrancisco.htm| title=San Francisco Urban Partnership Agreement |publisher = U.S. Department of Transportation|date=|accessdate=2008-06-20|language=}}
99. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.upa.dot.gov/agreements/seattle.htm |title=Seattle (Lake Washington) Urban Partnership Agreement |publisher=U.S. Department of Transportation |date= |accessdate=2008-06-20 |language= |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080807161601/http://www.upa.dot.gov/agreements/seattle.htm |archivedate=7 August 2008 }}
100. ^{{cite web| url=http://www.upa.dot.gov/agreements/miami.htm| title=Miami Urban Partnership Agreement|publisher = U.S. Department of Transportation|date=|accessdate=2008-06-20|language=|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080503024205/http://www.upa.dot.gov/agreements/miami.htm |archivedate = 3 May 2008|deadurl=yes}}
101. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.upa.dot.gov/agreements/minneapolis.htm |title=Minneapolis Urban Partnership Agreement |publisher=U.S. Department of Transportation |date= |accessdate=2008-06-20 |language= |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080807161643/http://www.upa.dot.gov/agreements/minneapolis.htm |archivedate=7 August 2008 }}
102. ^{{cite news | url=http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/chicago-gets-new-yorks-congestion-money/?scp=1-b&sq=congestion+pricing+Chicago&st=nyt|title=Chicago Gets New York's Congestion Money|date=2008-04-29|accessdate=2008-06-20|author=Jennifer Lee|publisher=The New York Times blogs}}
103. ^{{Cite news|url= http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1733872,00.html |title=The World's Worst Traffic Jams|work=Time|date=2008-04-21|accessdate=2013-06-27|author= Andrew Downie}}
104. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.estadao.com.br/noticias/cidades,lei-federal-autoriza-criacao-de-pedagio-urbano-por-prefeituras,820711,0.htm|title=Lei federal autoriza criação de pedágio urbano por prefeituras|language=Portuguese|trans-title=Federal law authorizes the creation of congestion pricing by local governments|author1=Marta Salomon, Iuri Dantas |author2=Andréa Jubé Vianna |lastauthoramp=yes |work=O Estado de S. Paulo|date=2012-01-09|accessdate=2013-06-26}}
105. ^{{cite news|url=http://noticias.r7.com/brasil/noticias/dilma-aprova-lei-que-preve-pedagio-urbano-20120104.html|title=Dilma aprova lei que prevê pedágio urbano|language=Portuguese|trans-title=Dilma approves law that allows congestion pricing|author=Agência Estado|work=R7 Noticias|date=2012-01-04|accessdate=2013-06-26}}
106. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12587.htm|title=Lei Nº 12.587, de 3 de Janeiro de 2012|language=Portuguese|trans-title=Law N. 12.587 of 3 January 2012|author=Presidência da República|publisher=Presidência da República, Casa Civil|date=2012-01-03|accessdate=2013-06-26}} See article 23.
107. ^{{cite news|url=http://g1.globo.com/sao-paulo/noticia/2012/04/projeto-que-cria-pedagio-urbano-passa-em-comissao-na-camara-de-sp.html|title=Projeto que cria pedágio urbano passa em comissão na Câmara de SP|language=Portuguese|trans-title=Bill to create congestion pricing passed in commission of the São Paulo city council|author=Roney Domingos|work=O Globo|date=2012-04-25|accessdate=2013-06-27}}
108. ^{{cite news|url=http://noticias.terra.com.br/brasil/transito/pedagio-urbano-de-sao-paulo-pode-custar-ate-r-88-por-mes,b769e7948c1da310VgnCLD200000bbcceb0aRCRD.html|title=Pedágio urbano de São Paulo pode custar até R$ 88 por mês|language=Portuguese|trans-title=São Paulo's congestion pricing could cost up to R$88 per month|work=Terra|date=2012-04-26|accessdate=2013-06-27}}
109. ^{{cite news|url=http://veja.abril.com.br/blog/ricardo-setti/politica-cia/perdendo-30-bilhoes-de-reais-por-ano-por-congestionamentos-de-transito-sp-mira-o-exemplo-do-pedagio-urbano-de-londres/|title=Perdendo 30 bilhões de reais por ano por congestionamentos de trânsito, SP mira o exemplo do pedágio urbano de Londres|language=Portuguese|trans-title=Lossing 30 billion reais per year due to traffic congestion, São Paulo looks at the example of London congestion charges|author=Claudia Jordão e Maria Paola de Salvo|work=Veja São Paulo|date=2012-06-20|accessdate=2013-06-27|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219055853/http://veja.abril.com.br/blog/ricardo-setti/politica-cia/perdendo-30-bilhoes-de-reais-por-ano-por-congestionamentos-de-transito-sp-mira-o-exemplo-do-pedagio-urbano-de-londres/|archivedate=19 December 2013|df=dmy-all}}
110. ^{{cite news|url=http://exame.abril.com.br/brasil/noticias/paulistano-nao-quer-pedagio-urbano-segundo-datafolha|title=Paulistano não quer pedágio urbano, segundo Datafolha|language=Portuguese|trans-title=São Paulo residents do not want congestion pricing according to Datafolha |author=Amanda Previdelli|work=Exame|date=2012-06-11|accessdate=2013-06-27}}
111. ^{{cite news|url=http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/1184743-pedagio-urbano-e-incineracao-de-lixo-estao-entre-as-propostas-da-sp-2040.shtml|title=Pedágio urbano e incineração de lixo estão entre as propostas da SP 2040|language=Portuguese|trans-title=Congestion pricing and waste incineration are among the proposals of SP 2040|work=Folha de S. Paulo|date=2012-11-13|accessdate=2013-06-27}}
112. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.cfit.gov.uk/map/southamerica-chile-santiago.htm |title=Road Charging Scheme: South America – Chile, Santiago de Chile |author=UK Commission on Integrated Transport |accessdate=2008-07-04 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080421115116/http://www.cfit.gov.uk/map/southamerica-chile-santiago.htm |archivedate=21 April 2008 }}
113. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.cnorte.cl |title=Costanera Norte Freeway |author=Costanera Norte Freeway |language=Spanish}}
114. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.costaneranorte.cl/pdfs/tarifas10.pdf |title=Costanera Norte Tarifas 2010 |publisher=Sociedad Concesionaria Costanera Norte |accessdate=2010-02-27 |language=Spanish |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100215151551/http://www.costaneranorte.cl/pdfs/tarifas10.pdf |archivedate=15 February 2010 }} Three different tolls are charged based on pre-set average operating speeds: basic non-peak hour, basic rush hour, and fixed congestion toll.
115. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.odecu.cl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=612&Itemid=195|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707011840/http://www.odecu.cl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=612&Itemid=195|dead-url=yes|archive-date=2011-07-07|title=Autopistas urbanas proponen subir tarifas y el MOP elabora plan para auditar alzas|publisher=ODECU|date=2009-07-15|accessdate=2010-02-27|language=Spanish}}