1. Background

2. Views
     Political thinkers    Religious groups  

3. See also

4. References

Indian reunification refers to the potential unification of India (the Republic of India) with what is now Bangladesh and Pakistan, the latter of which was partitioned from British India in 1947.

Background

In 1947, British India was partitioned into the modern Dominion of India and the Dominion of Pakistan, the latter of which included northwest India and part of eastern India.^[1] The Indian National Congress, as well as the All India Azad Muslim Conference, opposed the partition of India; the president of the All India Azad Muslim Conference and Chief Minister of Sind, Shadeed Allah Bakhsh Soomro, stated that “No power on earth can rob anyone of his faith and convictions, and no power on earth shall be permitted to rob Indian Muslims of their just rights as Indian nationals.”^[2] Khaksar Movement leader Allama Mashriqi opposed the partition of India because he felt that if Muslims and Hindus had largely lived peacefully together in India for centuries, they could also do so in a free and united India.^[3] Mashriqi saw the two-nation theory as a plot of the British to maintain control of the region more easily, if India was divided into two countries that were pitted against one another.^[3] He reasoned that a division of India along religious lines would breed fundamentalism and extremism on both sides of the border.^[3] Mashriqi thought that "Muslim majority areas were already under Muslim rule, so if any Muslims wanted to move to these areas, they were free to do so without having to divide the country."^[3] To him, separatist leaders "were power hungry and misleading Muslims in order to bolster their own power by serving the British agenda."^[3]

The author of Composite Nationalism and Islam, Maulana Husain Ahmad Madani, a Deobandi Muslim scholar and proponent of a united India, argued that in order to maintain their divide and rule policy, the British were attempting to "scare Muslims into imagining that in a free India Muslims would lose their separate identity, and be absorbed into the Hindu fold", a threat that "aim[ed] at depoliticizing the Muslims, weaning them away from struggle for independence."^[4] In the eyes of Madani, support for a two-nation theory resulted in the entrenchment of British imperialism.^[4]

The pro-separatist All-India Muslim League, on the other hand, campaigned for a separate country, Pakistan, and their demand for the partition of India took place.^[5] Since that time, various individuals and political parties, as well as religious groups have called for Indian reunification.^[6]

Indian nationalists felt that following the departure of the British from the Indian subcontinent, Pakisan would destabilize and reunite with India; both the British, as well as the Indian National Congress thus thought it would be best for the British to leave sooner.^[12] On the other hand, Muhammad Ali Jinnah of the Muslim League wished to delay the departure of the British as he felt that it would allow the newly created state of Pakistan to receive its share of join assets.^[12]

In August 1953, several newspapers in India reported that meetings held on United India Day presented Indian reunification as the goal of patriots.^[12] One of them, Parbhat wrote that: "Pakistani leaders are well aware of the fact that the majority of the Indian population does not accept the partition of 1947 and will come out in the open to do away with it at the first opportunity."^[7]

Views

Political thinkers

In The Nation, Kashmiri Indian thinker Markandey Katju has advocated the reunification of India with Pakistan under a secular government.^[8] He stated that the cause of the partition was the divide and rule policy of Britain, which was implemented to spread communal hatred after Britain saw that Hindus and Muslims worked together to agitate against their colonial rule in India.^[8] Katju serves as the chairman of the Indian Reunification Association (IRA), which seeks to campaign for this cause.^[9][10]

Pakistani historian Nasim Yousaf, the grandson of Allama Mashriqi, has also championed Indian Reunification and presented the idea at the New York Conference on Asian Studies on 9 October 2009 at Cornell University; Yousaf stated that the partition of India itself was a result of the British interests and their divide and rule policy that sought to create another buffer state between the Soviet Union and India to prevent the spread of Communism, as well the fact that a "division of the people and territory would prevent a united India from emerging as a world power and keep the two nations dependent on pivotal powers."^[23] Yousaf cited former Indian National Congress president Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, who wrote in the same vein:^[23]

Yousaf holds that "Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the President of the All-India Muslim League and later founder of Pakistan, had been misleading the Muslim community in order to go down in history as the saviour of the Muslim cause and to become founder and first Governor General of Pakistan."^[23] Allama Mashriqi, a nationalist Muslim, thus saw Jinnah as "becoming a tool in British hands for his political career."^[23] Besides the pro-separatist Muslim League, Islamic leadership in British India rejected the notion of partitioning the country, exemplified by the fact that most Muslims in the heartland of the subcontinent remained where they were, rather than migrating to newly created state of Pakistan.^[23] India and Pakistan are currently allocating a significant amount of their budget into military spending—monies that could be spent in economic and social development.^[23] Poverty, homelessness, illiteracy, terrorism and a lack of medical facilities, in Yousaf's eyes, would not be plaguing an undivided India as it would be more advantaged "economically, politically, and socially."^[23] Yousaf has stated that Indians and Pakistanis speak a common lingua franca, Hindi-Urdu, "wear the same dress, eat the same food, enjoy the same music and movies, and communicate in the same style and on a similar wavelength".^[23] He argues that uniting would be a challenge, though not impossible, citing the fall of the Berlin Wall and the consequent German Reunification as an example.^[11]

French journalist François Gautier wrote that:^[13]

Educationalist P. A. Inamdar commented at the Rangoonwala College of Dental Science in July 2017 that the reunification of Pakistan and Bangladesh with India would "keep India prosperous and peaceful".^[14] Lal Khan, a Pakistani Communist activist suggested that undoing the partition is a necessity because it would resolve the Kashmir conflict, as well as reduce the power of the "security-bureaucratic machine", thus guaranteeing a true democratic society.^[15]

Religious groups

A group of 200 Islamic clerics gathered in Pune in July 2017 and issued a statement calling for Indian Reunification:^[14]

The Islamist group Lashkar-e-Taiba has framed the prophecy of Ghazwa-e-Hind, as one in which India is defeated and united with Pakistan, unifying the Indian subcontinent under Muslim rule.^[18]

See also

• German reunification
• Korean reunification
• Romanian reunification

References

• Betz Airport
• Bet-Zamani
• Betz (disambiguation)
• Betzdorf (disambiguation)
• Betzdorf Schlass
• Betzdorf Schloss
• Betzdorf–Haiger railway
• Betzel Cove
• Betz Elementary School
• Betzenberg (Schonbuch)
• Betzenberg (Schönbuch)
• Bet Zera
• Betzer, Michigan
• Betzet
• Bet zit in de penarie
• Betz-le-Chateau
• Betz-le-Château
• Betzner Falls
• Betzner Falls (Hamilton, Ontario)
• Betz, Oise
• Bet Zvi
• Betzweiler-Waelde
• Betzweiler-Walde
• Betzys Jewell, U.S. Virgin Islands
• Betânia do Piauí