| 词条 | Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Württemberg |
| 释义 |
| name = Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Württemberg | court = European Court of Justice | image = | caption = | date decided = 3 July 1986 | full name = | citations = {{URL|1=http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-66/85|2=Case 66/85}}, [1986] ECR 2121 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = Free movement of workers Contract of employment }} Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Württemberg (1986) {{URL|1=http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-66/85|2=Case 66/85}} was a European Union law case about the free movement of workers within the territory of the European Union. The decision of the European Court of Justice concerned the scope of protection for people with regard to employment rights. The Court took the view that an employment contract requires someone to work under the direction of another. FactsDeborah Lawrie-Blum was a British national who had passed the first stage of teacher training whilst studying at the University of Freiburg. She was refused entry to the second stage of training by the State of Baden-Württemberg because teachers in Germany are regarded as civil servants. Federal law stated that such posts could only be held by German citizens. Lawrie-Blum took the case to the Landgericht (State Court) of Stuttgart on the grounds that she was a worker and therefore entitled to obtain employment in any EEC state. The Landesgericht held that a trainee teacher was not a ‘worker’ within the terms of Article 48(1) of the Treaty of the European Economic Community, and even if it was, a public servant exemption in Article 48(4) applied. Lawrie-Blum then appealed to the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court) which requested a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ). JudgmentThe ECJ stated that the concept of ‘worker’ in Article 48 should be interpreted broadly as (I) a person (II) performing services (III) under the direction of another (IV) for remuneration, and that included a trainee teacher. Article 48(4) is to be construed narrowly, and only to safeguard a state’s interests, {{Cquote|17. The essential feature of an employment relationship, however, is that for a certain period of time a person performs services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he receives remuneration.}}See also{{Clist worker scope}}{{Clist person movement}}
Notes{{DEFAULTSORT:Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Wurttemberg}} 6 : Court of Justice of the European Union case law|German case law|1986 in case law|1986 in Germany|European Union labour case law|20th century in Baden-Württemberg |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。