请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill 2012
释义

  1. Background

  2. Proposal

  3. Criticisms

  4. Filibuster

  5. References

  6. External links

{{Use Hong Kong English|date=January 2019}}{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2019}}{{Infobox legislation
|short_title = Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill 2012
|legislature = Legislative Council of Hong Kong
|image = Hong Kong SAR Regional Emblem.svg
|imagesize =
|imagealt =
|caption =
|long_title = An Ordinance to amend the Legislative Council Ordinance to impose a restriction on the nomination of candidates at a by-election of the Legislative Council.
|citation = {{Cite Hong Kong ordinance|542|39}}
|territorial_extent =
|enacted_by = Legislative Council of Hong Kong
|date_enacted =
|date_passed = 1 June 2012
|date_passed2 =
|date_assented =
|royal_assent =
|date_signed =
|date_commenced = 8 June 2012
|date_of_expiry =
|date_repealed =
|administered_by =
|bill =
|bill_citation =
|bill_date = 3 February 2012
|introduced_by = Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam
|1st_reading = 8 February 2012
|2nd_reading = 16 May 2012
|3rd_reading = 1 June 2012
|conf_committee_passed =
|date_conf_committee =
|white_paper =
|committee_report = [https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr11-12/english/bc/bc54/reports/bc540502cb2-1833-e.pdf Report of the Bills Committee on Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill 2012 ]
|amendments =
|repeals =
|related_legislation = Legislative Council Ordinance
|summary =
|keywords =
|status = amended
}}

The Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill 2012 is a Bill of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. It is an amendment to the Legislative Council Ordinance {{Cite Hong Kong ordinance|542|39}} to disqualify a resigned member of the Legislative Council from participating in a subsequent by-election. The original proposal was to avoid by-elections but it sparked vast controversies in the community. The revised Bill restricts a resigned member of the Legislative Council from standing in any by-elections within six months.

Background

{{main|Hong Kong by-election, 2010}}

In January 2010, five pro-democracy Legislative Council members from each of the five geographical constituencies resigned to trigger territory-wide by-elections for the purpose of instigating a so-called “referendum”. They stood in the by-elections and were all re-elected. The 2010 by-election launched by the pro-democracy legislators was strongly criticised by the Beijing government. As government claimed that "views received during the public consultation on the arrangements for filling vacancies in the LegCo indicate that more people consider that the phenomenon of Members resigning at will, triggering by-elections in which they seek to stand, is a mischief that needs to be addressed,"[1] the government therefore tried to change the electoral system to plug the "loophole".

Proposal

In mid-May 2011, the government revealed its plan to do away with by-elections entirely. Unveiling the proposal, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam cited the practice elsewhere: "In some countries where the proportional representation (PR) system is adopted, by-elections are not used to fill vacant seats arising mid-term." According to the plan published on 8 June 2011, a Legislative Council seat in any geographical constituency or one of the five newly created district council 'superconstituencies' vacated by the resignation or death of a legislator would be filled by a 'leapfrog' mechanism by the next best placed candidate at the previous election.[2]

The consultation document was opposed by the pro-democracy camp, professionals and legal experts. The government tabled a bill to amend current legislation for by-elections for 13 July 2011.[3] However, by late June, the bill's future looked in doubt when the Central Government Liaison Office suggested a re-think. On 28 June, the government revised its proposal stipulating replacement by an unsuccessful candidate on the same election ticket.[3] Whilst pro-government legislators declared support for the revised plan in principle, Regina Ip stated that consultation would still be desirable.[4] The government bowed to pressure and announced one week later that it would suspend reading of the bill for two months, pending consultations on the revised proposals.[5]

In July 2011, the Government published a consultation paper in which four options were proposed with regard to the arrangements for filling vacancies in the Legislative Council. Options to fill a casual vacancy arising mid-term in the Legislative Council:[6]

  1. restricting resigning Members from participating in any by-election in the same term,
  2. a replacement mechanism using the same candidate list followed by a precedence list system (the Administration’s revised proposal),
  3. a replacement mechanism which does not cover causal vacancies arising from death, serious illness or other involuntary circumstances; and
  4. a replacement mechanism using the same candidate list, followed by leaving the seat vacant when the list is exhausted.

After the consultation, the government modified the bill to bar the resigning legislator from running again for six months.

Criticisms

The original proposal attracted criticism from Pan-Democrats as it was seen as depriving citizens of their political rights; even pro-government figures in the legislature expressed reservations about the workability of the plan.[7] The pan democrats remained in opposition to any restriction of the electoral system.

A researcher in Britain's Electoral Reform Society said it was indeed common for vacancies to be filled by a candidate who was next-in-line, but one who was on the specific list of the outgoing. He said that the proposal meant that a seat held by a small party (without a list) would automatically go to another party if its representative resigned or died, thereby entirely losing representation.[8]

The Hong Kong Bar Association four strongly worded public warnings within two weeks of the first announcement of the plan, stating that the government's change violated the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Hong Kong Bill of Rights.[9] The Bar Association also opposed the revised proposal as its violation to the right to stand for election and right to elect guaranteed in the Article 26 of the Basic Law.[10]

Academics echoed the sentiments, and also brought to light the possibility, albeit slim, that the new mechanism may abet assassinations.[11]

Filibuster

Albert Chan and Wong Yuk-man of People Power start the filibuster by submitting 1306 amendments altogether to the revised Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill. Leung Kwok-hung of the League of Social Democrats and Andrew Cheng also participated in the filibustering. Miriam Lau of the Liberal Party carried out a 30-hour hunger strike to voice her opposition against such act of obstructionism and waste of public coffers. The Legislative Council carried on multiple overnight debates on the amendments with the support of the pro-Beijing camp.

On morning of 17 May 2012, Jasper Tsang Yok-sing, President of the Legco adopt Article 92 of the Standing Order, which allows the president follow foreign parliament rules for unregulated behaviors to terminate the debate. In the end, all amendments were defeated and the Bill was passed on 1 June 2012.

References

1. ^{{cite news|title=Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill 2012|url=http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201202/01/P201202010330.htm|date=1 February 2012|accessdate=2 May 2013|agency=Hong Kong SAR Government}}
2. ^Cheung, Gary (18 May 2011). "By-elections given a no-vote". South China Morning Post
3. ^Fung, Wai-yee Fanny (1 July 2011). "Majority oppose polls-axe bid". South China Morning Post
4. ^TV news broadcasts.
5. ^Lee, Colleen; Wong, Natalie (5 July 2011). "U-turn" {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121016014831/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=112760&sid=32936962&con_type=1 |date=2012-10-16 }}. The Standard (Hong Kong)
6. ^{{cite book|title=Consultation Paper on Arrangements for Filling Vacancies in the Legislative Council|url=http://www.cmab.gov.hk/doc/en/documents/filling_vacancies/Consultation_Paper_with_Annexes_en.pdf|work=Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau|date=July 2011|accessdate=2 May 2013}}
7. ^Fung, Wai-yee Fanny (19 May 2011). "Plan to scrap by-elections criticised". South China Morning Post
8. ^Cheung, Gary (20 May 2011). "Legco vacancy scheme questioned". South China Morning Post
9. ^{{cite web|title=HKBA's Submission on the Proposed Replacement Arrangement in the Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill 2011 - Press Release|date=17 June 2011|accessdate=2 May 2013|work=Hong Kong Bar Association}}
10. ^{{cite web|title=Consultation Paper on Arrangements for Filling Vacancies in the Legislative Council (July 2011) Response of the Hong Kong Bar Association|url=http://www.hkba.org/whatsnew/press-release/20110831e.pdf|work=Hong Kong Bar Association|date=31 August 2011|accessdate=2 May 2013}}
11. ^Cheung, Gary (7 June 2011). "Academic says proposal could abet assassinations". South China Morning Post

External links

  • Legislative Council Ordinance Cap 542 s 39
  • Bills Committee on Legislative Council (Amendment) Bill 2012
  • Public Consultation on Arrangements for Filling Vacancies in the Legislative Council
{{Hong Kong electoral reform}}

6 : Hong Kong legislation|2012 in Hong Kong|2012 in politics|Politics of Hong Kong|Election legislation|Electoral reform in Hong Kong

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/13 23:12:16