| 词条 | United States v. McBratney |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=United States v. McBratney |ArgueDate= |ArgueYear=1882 |DecideDate= |DecideYear=1882 |FullName=United States v. McBratney |USVol=104 |USPage=621 |ParallelCitations=14 Otto 621; 26 L. Ed. 869 |Prior=Certificate of division from Circuit Court |Subsequent= |Holding=Upon the admission of Colorado as a state, there being no reservation to the United States of jurisdiction over the Indian territory within the state limits, that the United States circuit court for the district of Colorado had no jurisdiction over the murder of one white man by another in the Ute reservation in said state |SCOTUS=1882-1887 |Majority=Gray |JoinMajority=unanimous |Concurrence= |JoinConcurrence= |Concurrence2= |JoinConcurrence2= |Concurrence/Dissent= |JoinConcurrence/Dissent= |Dissent= |JoinDissent= |Dissent2= |JoinDissent2= |LawsApplied= }} United States v. McBratney, 104 U.S. 621 (1881), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that upon the admission of Colorado as a state, there being no reservation to the United States of jurisdiction over the Indian territory within the state limits, that the United States circuit court for the district of Colorado had no jurisdiction over the murder of one white man by another in the Ute reservation in said state. BackgroundMcBratney was convicted of the murder of Thomas Casey on the Ute Reservation in Colorado. Following conviction, McBratney appealed claiming that the federal courts did not have jurisdiction to try a white man for the murder of another white man on an Indian reservation. On appeal, the circuit court could not come to an agreement and issued a certificate of division.[1][2] Supreme CourtJustice Horace Gray delivered the opinion of the court. Gray stated that although the treaty with the Utes provided for federal jurisdiction, the act of Congress creating the state of Colorado did not reserve federal jurisdiction over Indian reservations. He noted that in the past, Congress had explicitly reserved such lands and jurisdiction, as in the case of Kansas. The federal court would still have jurisdiction for crimes committed against Indians by whites, or vice versa, but the state otherwise had jurisdiction.[1][2][3] Subsequent developmentsSince the decision, every state that has been admitted, with the exception of Hawaii, has been required to acknowledge federal jurisdiction over reservation lands.[3] References1. ^1 {{ussc|name=United States v. McBratney|104|621|1881}}. 2. ^1 {{smallcaps|Patrick A. Lee}}, {{smallcaps|Tribal Laws, Treaties, and Government: A Lakota Perspective}} 81 (2013). 3. ^1 {{smallcaps|David Eugene Wilkins & K. Tsianina Lomawaima}}, {{smallcaps|Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law}} 192 (2001). External links
| case = United States v. McBratney, {{Ussc|104|621|1881|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/104/621/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep104/usrep104621/usrep104621.pdf | openjurist =https://openjurist.org/104/us/621{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 7 : 1881 in United States case law|United States Constitution Article Four case law|United States Native American criminal jurisdiction case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Waite Court|Murder trials|Ute tribe |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。