请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 War on Women
释义

  1. Development of the term

      Reproductive rights    Abortion restrictions    Mandatory ultrasounds    Gestational limits on abortion    Defining the beginning of human personhood    Targeted regulation of abortion providers    Other    Birth control    Defunding Planned Parenthood    Defunding international family planning    Violence against women    Rape    Military sexual assault    Domestic violence    Financial assistance    Workplace and pay discrimination  

  2. Public opinion

  3. Political campaigns

     Mark Udall  2016 Presidential candidates 

  4. Reaction

      Response from Republicans    Democratic sexual harassment scandals    Other reactions  

  5. See also

  6. References

  7. Further reading

{{pp-pc1}}War on Women is a slogan in United States politics used to describe certain Republican Party policies and legislation as a wide-scale effort to restrict women's rights, especially reproductive rights.[1][2][3][4] Prominent Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi[5] and Barbara Boxer,[6] as well as feminists, have used the phrase to criticize proponents of these laws as trying to force their social views on women through legislation.[7][8][9][10] The slogan has been used to describe Republican policies in areas such as access to reproductive health services, particularly birth control and abortion services; the prosecution of criminal violence against women; the definition of rape for the purpose of the public funding of abortion;[11][10] and workplace discrimination against women.[11][12][13][14]

While used in other contexts, and prior to 2010,[17][15] it became a common slogan in American political discourse after the 2010 congressional elections.[16][17] The term is often used to describe opposition to the contraceptive mandate in Obamacare and policies to defund women's health organizations that perform abortions, such as Planned Parenthood.

The concept again gained attention in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, when Republican nominee Donald Trump drew notice for a history of inflammatory statements and actions toward women.[18][19][20][21][22]

The phrase and the concept have been criticized by Republicans and some pro-life Democrats.[23] Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus described it as an over-simplified fiction advanced by Democrats and the media[24][25] while other Republicans contended that such rhetoric was used as a distraction from President Barack Obama and the Democrats' handling of the economy.[26][27][28] In August 2012, Todd Akin's controversial comments regarding pregnancy and rape sparked renewed media focus on the concept.[29][30][31] Republicans have tried to turn the phrase against Democrats by using it to argue hypocrisy for not critiquing sex scandals of members within their Party who have cheated, sexted, and harassed women; and for not supporting bills to combat sex-selective abortion.[32][33][34][35]

{{toc limit|4}}

Development of the term

{{Feminism sidebar}}

In 1989, radical feminist Andrea Dworkin[36] wrote in a book introduction about "war on women"[37] and, in 1997, she collected that and other writings in Life and Death, for which the subtitle was Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War Against Women.[38] Feminist Susan Faludi's 1991 book The Undeclared War Against American Women, argued that throughout the 1980s the media created a "backlash" against the feminist advances of the 1970s.[39] Former Republican political consultant Tanya Melich's 1996 memoir, The Republican War Against Women: An Insider's Report from Behind the Lines, describes the incorporation of the pro-life movement and opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment by Republicans as a divergence from feminist causes.[15]

George W. Bush's administration met with resistance from feminists and women's rights activists throughout his Presidency.[40][41] In 2004 The Feminist Press published Laura Flanders' collection of essays The W Effect: Bush's War On Women.[42] In 2006 economist Barbara Finlay's critique of the Bush administration's treatment of women was published by Zed Books under the title George W. Bush and the War on Women: Turning Back the Clock on Progress.[43][44]

In the 2010 midterm elections, the Republican Party (GOP) won the majority in the House of Representatives. On January 4, 2011, the day after Congress convened, Kaili Joy Gray of the liberal Daily Kos wrote an opinion piece titled "The Coming War on Women".[45] In the article, she outlined many of the measures that Republicans intended to push through the House of Representatives, including personhood laws, fetal pain laws, and the effort to defund Planned Parenthood.[45] In February 2011, an AlterNet article by Sarah Seltzer and Lauren Kelley entitled "9 New laws in the GOP's War on Women" [46] began to document state-level legislation restricting abortion access and rights. That same month, New York Representative Jerrold Nadler referred to the proposed No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, one of the Congress's first actions and one that would have changed policy to allow only victims of "forcible rape" or child sex abuse to qualify for Medicaid funding for abortion, as "an entirely new front in the war on women and their families".[47] Florida Representative and Chair of the Democratic National Committee Debbie Wasserman Schultz began using the term "War on Women" in March 2011.[47]

Reproductive rights

{{main|Reproductive rights}}

The "War on Women" slogan was used often when describing the unprecedented rise in the passage of provisions related to women's health and reproductive rights in 2011 and 2012.[55][48] In 2011, state legislatures across the United States introduced over 1100 provisions related to women's health and reproductive rights,[49][50] and in the first quarter of 2012 an additional 944 provisions were introduced in state legislatures, half of which would restrict access to abortion. Legislation has focused on mandatory ultrasounds, narrowing the time when abortions may be performed and limiting insurance coverage of abortion.[48][51]

Abortion restrictions

{{see also|Types of abortion restrictions in the United States}}

Democratic strategist Zerlina Maxwell wrote an editorial for U.S. News & World Report in which she cited a Guttmacher Institute analysis showing state legislatures enacted 135 pieces of legislation affecting women's reproductive rights as evidence that the "Republican 'War on Women' is no fiction."[52] The analysis found that between 2000 and 2011, the number of states hostile to abortion rights have increased markedly, and that in 2011 there was an unprecedented rise in the number of provisions passed by state legislatures restricting abortion.[53]

Many states have adopted model legislation written by Americans United for Life, a pro-life advocacy group.[54][55] In June 2011, Charmaine Yoest and Denise M. Burke of Americans United, acknowledged the expression in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, writing that "Indiana is being threatened with the loss of federal funding for health care and being held up to scorn as having 'declared war on women.'"[56]

Mandatory ultrasounds

In 2011 and 2012, "War on Women" was used to describe the legislation passed by many states requiring that women seeking abortions first undergo government-mandated ultrasounds.[57] Some states require that women view the image of the fetus and others require that women be offered the opportunity to listen to the fetal heartbeat. Since many women's pregnancies are not far enough along to get an image via a traditional ultrasound, transvaginal ultrasounds, which involve the physician inserting a probe into the woman's vagina, may be required, but these requirements vary state to state.[58][59] Critics have questioned the value of having a medically unnecessary procedure, and characterized it as similar to some states' legal definition of rape.[60] Writer Megan Carpentier underwent the procedure and indicated that although it was not comparable to being raped, the process was "uncomfortable to the point of being painful, emotionally triggering... and something that no government should force its citizens to undergo to make a political point."[61][62] However, in an article critical of the assumptions of those on both sides of the issue, sociologist Tracy Weitz, who opposes mandatory ultrasound, notes that "the use of trans-vaginal ultrasounds is routine among abortion providers."[63]

Virginia State legislators passed a bill in 2012 requiring women to have an ultrasound before having an abortion.[64] The legislation, signed by Governor Bob McDonnell, would require that the provider of an abortion make a copy of the fetal image and include it in the file of the patient.[65] In Louisiana, where pregnant women are already required to view ultrasounds of their fetuses before receiving an abortion, lawmakers proposed a bill that would require them to listen to the embryonic/fetal heartbeat as well.[66] Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett drew criticism when he said of his state's new mandatory transvaginal ultrasound law that "You can't make anybody watch, okay? Because you just have to close your eyes. As long as it's on the exterior and not the interior."[67]

Gestational limits on abortion
{{see also|Late termination of pregnancy#United States 2}}

In June 2013, Representative Trent Franks of Arizona, passed a national bill in the House Judiciary Committee that would ban abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. The bill did not include exceptions for rape, incest or health of the mother.[68][69][70] In responding to the bill's lack of exception for rape victims, Franks stated that "the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low," which was compared to the controversial statements made by Todd Akin; studies show that the incidence of pregnancy from rape is approximately equal to or higher than the rate from consensual sex.[69][71] Afterwards, the House Rules Committee added exceptions for rape and incest.[72] Georgia legislators passed HB 954, a "fetal pain bill" criminalizing abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy. The bill, which does not contain exemptions for rape or incest, has been referred to as the "women as livestock bill" by opponents[73] after Representative Terry England made a comparison between women seeking abortions for stillborn fetuses to delivering calves and pigs on a farm.[74]

In April 2012, Arizona passed legislation banning abortions occurring 20 weeks after a woman's last menstrual period. A judge from the District Court initially upheld this ban, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in August 2012 that the ban could not be enforced until an appeal on the law had been decided.[75] The Ninth Circuit then struck down the law as unconstitutional in May 2013.[76] Eight other states, including Nebraska,[77] Alabama,[78] Georgia,[79] Indiana,[80] Idaho[81] and Oklahoma,[82] have passed such bills; unlike Arizona, the gestational age in these states is calculated from fertilization (20 weeks post-fertilization-which means 22 weeks LMP).[83] In 2013, Idaho's ban was struck down as unconstitutional by a federal judge.[84] States such as Ohio have proposed so-called "heartbeat bills" that would prohibit abortions when the heartbeat of the fetus can be detected. Fetal heartbeats can be detected as early as six weeks into a pregnancy.[85]

Defining the beginning of human personhood
{{main|Beginning of human personhood}}

In 2011, voters in Mississippi rejected Initiative 26, a measure that would have declared that human life begins at fertilization, which had drawn support from conservative Republicans and Democrats. Critics of the initiative indicated that the law would have made abortion illegal even in cases where the mother's life is in danger.[86]

Targeted regulation of abortion providers

Since the mid-1990s, the regulatory burden on abortion providers has increased.[87] TRAP laws (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) have been passed in numerous states.[88] In 2015, the United States Supreme Court agreed to an emergency appeal regarding a Texas law that would have shut down 10 of the remaining 19 abortion clinics within the state. Sometime in the fall of 2015, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to hear the clinics' full appeal of the ruling, which, if held, would be the largest abortion case before the Supreme Court in nearly 25 years.[89]

Other

In February 2011, South Dakota state legislators considered a bill that would expand that state's definition of justifiable homicide to include killings committed by a party other than a pregnant woman for the purpose of preventing harm to a fetus, a measure interpreted by critics as allowing the killing of abortion providers.[90] Similar legislation was considered in Iowa.[91]

Several state legislatures have passed or are considering legislation to prevent parents from suing doctors who fail to warn them of fetal problems, which are sometimes known as wrongful birth lawsuits. Some of the laws, such as one proposed in Arizona, make exceptions for "intentional or grossly negligent acts", while others do not.[92][93][94]

A Kansas bill passed March 2012 requires doctors to warn women seeking abortions that they are linked to breast cancer,[95] a claim that has been refuted by the medical community.[96]

In April 2012, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker signed into law a bill requiring doctors who prescribe the medical abortion pill to have three meetings with patients or be subject to felony charges. Planned Parenthood suspended non-surgical abortions in the state.[97]

Birth control

On January 20, 2012, Health and Human Services' Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced a mandate requiring that all health plans provide coverage for all contraceptives approved by the FDA as part of preventive health services for women.[98] Following complaints from Catholic bishops, an exception was created for religious institutions whereby an employee of a religious institution that does not wish to provide reproductive health care can seek it directly from the insurance company at no additional cost.[99] Missouri Senator Roy Blunt proposed an amendment (the Blunt Amendment) that would have "allowed employers to refuse to include contraception in health care coverage if it violated their religious or moral beliefs",[100] but it was voted down 51-48 by the U.S. Senate on March 1, 2012.[101] A bill passed by the Arizona House would allow employers to exclude medication used for contraceptive purposes from their health insurance plans.[13][14]

In February 2012, Republican Congressman Darrell Issa convened an all-male panel addressing religious freedom and contraceptive mandates for health insurers. He did not allow Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University Law Center student who was proposed as a witness by the Democrats, to participate in the hearing, arguing that Fluke was not a member of the clergy.[102] Democratic Representatives then staged a separate panel where Fluke was allowed to speak. Later that month, American conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh controversially called Sandra Fluke a "slut" and "prostitute" and continued in similar fashion for the next two days.[103] Foster Friess, the billionaire supporting the candidacy of Rick Santorum, suggested in February 2012 that women put aspirin between their knees as a form of contraception.[104] Limbaugh echoed the sentiment, saying he would "buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want."[105] Nancy Pelosi circulated a petition and asked that Republicans in the House of Representatives disavow the comments by Friess and Limbaugh, which she called "vicious and inappropriate".[106]

Defunding Planned Parenthood

Several Democrats used the phrase War on Women to criticize the Republican Party after House Republicans passed legislation to cut off funding for Planned Parenthood in February 2011.[107] Texas, Indiana and Kansas have passed legislation in an effort to defund the organization. Arizona, Ohio and New Hampshire are considering similar legislation. In Texas, lawmakers reduced funds for family planning from $111M to $37M.[108] The future of the Women's Health Program in Texas, which receives 90% of its funding from the federal government, is unclear.[109] The Indiana legislature passed a bill restricting Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood.[110] Indiana Representative Bob Morris later referred to the Girl Scouts of the USA as a tactical arm of Planned Parenthood.[111] A 2011 Kansas statute cut funding to Planned Parenthood.[112]

On January 31, 2012, breast cancer organization Susan G. Komen for the Cure stopped funding Planned Parenthood, citing a congressional investigation by Rep. Cliff Stearns and a newly created internal rule about not funding organizations under any federal, state or local investigation.[113] Four days later, Komen's Board of Directors reversed the decision and announced that it would amend the policy to "make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political".[114] Several top-level staff members resigned from Komen during the controversy.[115]

Defunding international family planning

The National Organization for Women (NOW), in the U.S., in 2011, stated its opinion that "the 'war on women' isn't restricted to U.S. women",[9] saying that the House of Representatives planned to "cut ... international family planning assistance.... [to] include the elimination of all U.S. funds designated for UNFPA"[9] (now known as the United Nations Population Fund).

Violence against women

Rape

{{Main|Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012}}{{See also|Pregnancy from rape}}

In January 2011, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act moved to change how rape is treated when used to determine whether abortions qualify for Medicaid funding. Under the language of the bill, only cases of "forcible rape" or child sexual abuse would have qualified.[116] Political activist groups Moveon.org and Emily's List charged that this constituted a Republican attempt to "redefine rape".[116][117][118]

In 2014, Michigan law prohibited all public and most private insurers from covering abortions including in cases of rape and incest.[119] It requires women to buy separate insurance and has been called "rape insurance" by opponents because of the possibility that women will need to have separate insurance for an abortion resulting from rape.[119][120]

Unsuccessful Missouri Republican candidate to the U.S. Senate Todd Akin made controversial comments in August 2012 asserting (falsely[121][122][123][124]) that women who are victims of "legitimate rape" rarely experience pregnancy from rape.[29] While he issued an apology for his comments, they were widely criticized, and they sparked a renewed focus on Republican attitudes towards women[8][30][31][125] and "shift[ed] the national discussion to divisive social issues that could repel swing voters rather than economic issues that could attract them".[126]

There were multiple calls from Republicans for Akin to step down as nominee. The Washington Post reported a "stampede" of Republicans dissociating from Akin. NRSC chairman John Cornyn said the Republican Party would no longer provide him Senate election funding.[127] A campaign spokesman for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan said both disagreed with Akin's position and would not oppose abortion in instances of rape. Ryan reportedly called Akin to advise him to step aside.[128] RNC Chairman Reince Priebus warned Akin not to attend the upcoming 2012 Republican convention and said he should resign the nomination. He described Akin's comments as "biologically stupid" and "bizarre" and said that "This is not mainstream talk that he's referring to and his descriptions of whatever an illegitimate rape is."[129][130]

Other Republican candidates in the 2012 election also created controversy with their comments on rape.[131] Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock, when discussing his opposition to exceptions on abortion bans in cases of rape, said, "I think even if life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen."[132][133] Tom Smith, the Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, compared pregnancy from rape to pregnancy out of wedlock.[134] Akin, Mourdock, and Smith all lost their races due to backlash from women voters.[135]

Military sexual assault

{{see also|Sexual assault in the United States military}}

Columnist Margery Eagan has said that opposition to reforming the military in order to better prosecute sexual assaults constitutes a war on women.[136] Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia was criticized for saying that part of the cause of the sexual assault was young officers' "hormone level created by nature".[137]

Domestic violence

The renewal of the Violence Against Women Act, which provides for community violence prevention programs and battered women's shelters, was fiercely opposed by conservative Republicans in 2012.[12] The Act was originally passed in 1994 and has been reauthorized by Congress twice.[138][139] Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell, who has previously voted against renewal of the Act, said the bill was a distraction from a small business bill.[140] However, in 2013 a strengthened version of the act was passed by Congress with bipartisan support.[141]

Financial assistance

In February 2011, Ms. magazine charged House Republicans with launching a new "War on Women" for their proposal to cut the WIC budget by 10%.[142][143] The WIC program, which President Barack Obama has called a spending priority, is a federal assistance program for low-income pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants and children under the age of five. The program had been running a surplus, primarily due to decreases in the cost of milk, which make up 20% of WIC expenditures, and lower participation than expected.[143] WIC's budget was later cut by 5.2% as part of the bipartisan budget sequestration in 2013.[143][144]

Workplace and pay discrimination

In April 2012, Governor Scott Walker's repeal of Wisconsin's Equal Pay Enforcement Act was described by opponents as furthering the "War on Women", which became a big issue in his recall election.[145] The Equal Pay Enforcement Act was passed in 2009 in response to the large gap between the wages of men and women in Wisconsin. Among other provisions, it allowed workplace discrimination victims redress in the less costly and more accessible state court system, rather than in federal court.[146][147] Defending the repeal, Walker stated that the Act had essentially been nothing but a boon for trial lawyers, incentivizing them to sue job creators, including female business owners, and that the law was being used to clog up the legal system in his state.[148] While it is still illegal in Wisconsin to pay women less on the basis of their sex,[148] the repeal was criticized for reinforcing the gender pay gap, a recurrent theme in the struggle for women's rights. Republican State Senator Glenn Grothman said of the repeal, "You could argue that money is more important for men. I think a guy in their first job, maybe because they expect to be a breadwinner someday, may be a little more money-conscious."[149] Law student Sandra Fluke, criticized Grothman's comment, highlighting legislation that supports equal pay for equal work, such as the federal Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009.[150]

Public opinion

A May 2012 Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that 31 percent of women and 28 percent of men believed there was an ongoing and wide-scale effort to "limit women's reproductive health choices and services".[2][151] 45 percent of women and 44 percent of men responded that some groups would like to limit these choices and services, but it's not wide‐scale.[151] Democrats were more likely than Republicans to say there is a movement, but the largest gap was between liberal and conservative ideologies.[151] Among those women believing these efforts to be wide-scale, 75 percent saw this as "a bad thing" against 16 percent who saw this as "a good thing".[151] In the same poll, 42 percent of women and men have said they have taken some action in response to what they heard regarding reproductive health issues.[2][151]

Political campaigns

Mark Udall

In the Colorado race of the 2014 midterm elections, the Republican candidate Cory Gardner unseated the incumbent Democratic Senator Mark Udall. NARAL Pro-Choice America gives Udall a 100% rating for abortion rights,[152] and Gardner earned a 0% rating.[153] Udall ran a number of TV ads highlighting his abortion stance,[154] which critics said was a negative campaign that overplayed the "war on women" issue.[155][156][157][158][159][160]

Sandra Fluke stood as a candidate in California, losing by 61 to 39.[160]

2016 Presidential candidates

Political analysts have interpreted the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign as appealing to a female constituency, and have used the phrase "war on women" to describe Republican opposition.[155][161][162][163] Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina said "If Hillary Clinton were to face a female nominee, there are a whole set of things that she won't be able to talk about. She won't be able to talk about being the first woman president. She won't be able to talk about a war on women without being challenged. She won't be able to play the gender card."[164]

Donald Trump, a Republican candidate for the 2016 Presidency attended a Fox News debate in August 2015, where Megyn Kelly asked him about how he would respond to a Hillary Clinton campaign saying that he was waging a "war on women".[165][166] In a later interview with Don Lemon on CNN Tonight, Trump said that Kelly is a "lightweight" and had "blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever".[167][168] Trump tweeted that his remark referred to Kelly's "nose" but was interpreted by critics as a reference to menstruation. RedState.com editor Erick Erickson cancelled Trump's invitation to a RedState meeting, saying "there are just real lines of decency a person running for President should not cross".[169][170]

Reaction

Response from Republicans

Critics of the term have denied that a War on Women exists and some have suggested that it is a ploy to influence women voters. Reince Priebus, the Chairman of the RNC, referred to the War as a "fiction", saying: "If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we'd have problems with caterpillars."[171][172][173] Republican Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers called the war a myth, saying "It's an effort to drive a political wedge in an election year." Referring to the 2010 elections and Nancy Pelosi, she said that "It could be argued that the women actually unelected the first woman Speaker of the House."[174][175] South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley said in 2012 "There is no war on women. Women are doing well."[176] Republican Representative Paul Ryan mocked the idea of a Republican War on Women, saying "Now it's a war on women; tomorrow it's going to be a war on left-handed Irishmen or something like that."[177]

Senator John McCain, when asked by journalist David Gregory if there was a Republican War on Women, said "I think that there is a perception out there because of how this whole contraception issue played out — ah, we need to get off of that issue, in my view."[178]

Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski countered the criticism from her fellow party members, challenging them to "go home and talk to your wife and your daughters" if they did not think there was a war on women, saying "It makes no sense to make this attack on women."[3]

After the 2012 rape and pregnancy controversies, Republican strategists met with aides of Republican figures to advise them on how to run against female candidates.[179][180]

Democratic sexual harassment scandals

Members of the Democratic Party, both prominent and local, have been accused of participating in the war on women. In a column for USA Today, Glenn Reynolds wrote in July 2013 that "most of the action in the war on women seems to be coming from the Democratic front," referring to the allegations of sexual harassment against San Diego mayor Bob Filner, the Anthony Weiner sexting scandal, and the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal.[181] The Republican National Senatorial Committee has also used these scandals in press releases, tying Democratic Senators in Iowa and New Hampshire to the allegations.[182][183]

The messaging from Republicans was described as unlikely to be effective by Garance Franke-Ruta in The Atlantic because "[the War on Women] was an argument about Republican policies on women ... rather than about reprehensible individual behavior." Noting that many of the targets are not on upcoming ballots, Franke-Ruta continued by saying the Republican Party "is going to need its own pro-active framework for thinking about what is happening in America and why women have been drawn to Democrats in numbers that matter in key elections."[16]

Other reactions

Jonathan Alter characterized the phrase as an "alliteratve but unfair notion".[184]David Weigel called for "a moment of silence" in his article entitled "The 'War on Women' Is Over: The life cycle of a political talking point, from birth to adolescence to death." In it he explained his understanding of the stages in the "life cycle" of the Democratic "talking point".[47]

Molly Redden wrote an article for Mother Jones entitled "The War on Women is Over -- and Women Lost". She described the difficulties faced by abortion providers: "Activists have been calling it the 'war on women.' But the onslaught of new abortion restrictions has been so successful, so strategically designed, and so well coordinated that the war in many places has essentially been lost."[185]

Feminist Camille Paglia has called the term "War on Women" a "tired cliché that is as substance-less as a druggy mirage but that the inept GOP has never been able to counter."[186]

See also

{{Portal|Feminism}}{{commons category|Women's rights}}
  • Birth control movement in the United States
  • War as metaphor
  • Forced pregnancy
{{Clear}}

References

1. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/war-women| title=War On Women| publisher=American Civil Liberties Union|accessdate=2013-09-23}}
2. ^1 2 {{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/31/war-on-women_n_1559969.html | title='War On Women' Only Seen By Third Of Female Poll Respondents | publisher=The Huffington Post | date=2012-05-31 | accessdate=2013-08-28 | first=Greg | last=Rosalsky}}
3. ^1 {{cite news |last=Johnson|first=Luke|title=Lisa Murkowski: 'It Makes No Sense To Make This Attack On Women' |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/05/lisa-murkowski-war-on-women_n_1406923.html |publisher=The Huffington Post|accessdate=17 July 2012 |date=April 5, 2012}}
4. ^{{cite news | url=http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/03/19/120319taco_talk_talbot | title=Taking Control | publisher=The New Yorker | date=19 March 2012 | accessdate=28 August 2013 | author=Talbot, Margaret}}
5. ^{{cite news | url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/01/war-on-women-house-democrats-raise-million_n_1314661.html | title=House Democrats Raise $1.1 Million In 'War On Women' Campaign | publisher=The Huffington Post | date=March 1, 2012 | accessdate=December 14, 2013 | author=Bendery, Jennifer}}
6. ^{{cite news | url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75143.html | title=Foul play: War on women is real | publisher=Politico | date=April 15, 2012 | accessdate=December 14, 2013 | author=Boxer, Barbara}}
7. ^Houston
8. ^1 {{cite journal | url=http://docs.newsbank.com/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info:sid/iw.newsbank.com:AWNB:EBNB&rft_val_format=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rft_dat=1411F612552A26E0&svc_dat=InfoWeb:aggregated5&req_dat=0FB3382EE6AD1E46 | title=Democrats charge Republicans with "war on women" at convention | author=Zengerle, Patricia | journal=Employee Benefits News |date=September 2012}}
9. ^1 2 On International Women's Day NOW Calls for End to the "War on Women": Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill (National Organization for Women), March 8, 2011, as accessed December 12, 2013 (probably press release).
10. ^{{cite news | url=http://docs.newsbank.com/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info:sid/iw.newsbank.com:AWNB:APUP&rft_val_format=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rft_dat=14272ADBEE5338F0&svc_dat=InfoWeb:aggregated5&req_dat=0FB3382EE6AD1E46 | title=Election won't end abortion /contraception debate | date=November 8, 2012 | agency=Associated Press | accessdate=November 21, 2012 | author=Crary, David}}
11. ^{{cite news | url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0203/Did-bill-try-to-redefine-rape-GOP-backs-down-after-public-outcry. | title=Did bill try to redefine rape? GOP backs down after public outcry. | publisher=The Christian Science Monitor | date=February 3, 2011 | accessdate=August 1, 2012 | author=Feldmann, Linda}}
12. ^1 {{cite news|last=Weisman|first=Jonathan|title=Women Figure Anew in Senate's Latest Battle|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/us/politics/violence-against-women-act-divides-senate.html?pagewanted=all|newspaper=The New York Times|date=March 14, 2012}}
13. ^1 {{cite news|title=Arizona Might Curb Birth Control Coverage|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/us/arizona-might-curb-birth-control-coverage.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=March 17, 2012}}
14. ^1 {{cite news|last=Marlowe|first=Lara|title=Romney enters fray in Republican 'war on women'|url=http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2012/0316/1224313394396.html|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=March 16, 2012}}
15. ^1 {{cite web|title=The Republican War Against Women by Tanya Melich|url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/tanya-melich/the-republican-war-against-women/#review|publisher=Kirkus Book Reviews|accessdate=April 22, 2012}}
16. ^1 The Atlantic: [https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/08/the-gops-totally-reactive-reaction-to-the-war-on-women/278303/ The GOP's Totally Reactive Reaction to the War on Women.] Garance Franke-Ruta, August 2013.
17. ^{{cite news |last=Epstein |first=Jennifer |url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/52793.html |title=Nancy Pelosi calls GOP budget 'a war on women' |publisher=Politico |date=April 8, 2011 |accessdate=2012-08-29}}
18. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html|title=Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved With Women in Private|last=Barbaro|first=Michael|date=May 14, 2016|work=|last2=Twohey|first2=Megan|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=2016-11-01|via=}}
19. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trumps-war-on-women-is-officially-in-full-swing/2016/03/25/5704d33e-f2c7-11e5-85a6-2132cf446d0a_story.html|title=Donald Trump's war on women is officially in full swing|last=Parker|first=Kathleen|date=March 25, 2016|work=|newspaper=The Washington Post|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286|access-date=2016-11-01|via=}}
20. ^{{Cite news|url=http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/10/dozens-of-women-protested-outside-trump-tower-this-morning.html|title=Dozens of Women Are Protesting Donald Trump Outside Trump Tower|newspaper=The Cut|access-date=2016-11-01}}
21. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html|title=Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately|last=Twohey|first=Megan|date=2016-10-12|last2=Barbaro|first2=Michael|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=2016-11-01}}
22. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/the-trump-tapes/503417/|title=Trump Brags About Groping Women|last=Graham|first=David A.|newspaper=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2016-11-01}}
23. ^{{cite news |author=Sarah Boesveld |date=September 4, 2012 |title=Pro-life Democrats 'don't buy the line into the war on women' |url=http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/04/pro-life-democrats-dont-buy-the-line-into-the-war-on-women/ |newspaper=National Post |location=Canada |accessdate=February 13, 2014}}
24. ^K Jensen, Priebus Says Gender Battle Fictional as Caterpillar War [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-05/priebus-says-gender-battle-as-fictonal-as-caterpillar-war.html] in Bloomberg
25. ^{{cite news | url=http://docs.newsbank.com/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info:sid/iw.newsbank.com:AWNB:SPIB&rft_val_format=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rft_dat=13E99DE2D4D66D48&svc_dat=InfoWeb:aggregated5&req_dat=0FB3382EE6AD1E46 | title=Democrats double down in ' War on Women :' Goal here is to rescue Inslee | date=May 5, 2012 | agency=Seattle Post-Intelligencer | accessdate=January 2, 2013}}
26. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/next-war-on-woman-front-pennsylvania-governor-race-88710.html |title=Next 'war on women' front: Pennsylvania governor race? |first=Maggie |last=Haberman |publisher=Politico |date=2013-03-11 |accessdate=2013-08-20}}
27. ^{{cite web|url=http://politicmo.com/2012/09/06/op-ed-ann-wagner-war-on-women-rhetoric-a-distraction-from-economy/|title=Op-ed: Ann Wagner: 'War on women' rhetoric a distraction from economy|last=|first=|date=|website=|publisher=|accessdate=March 25, 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20120909175822/http%3A//politicmo%2Ecom/2012/09/06/op%2Ded%2Dann%2Dwagner%2Dwar%2Don%2Dwomen%2Drhetoric%2Da%2Ddistraction%2Dfrom%2Deconomy/|archivedate=September 9, 2012}}
28. ^{{cite web|last=Poor |first=Jeff |url=http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/28/george-will-obamas-war-on-women-rope-offensive-to-professional-educated-women/ |title=George Will: Obama's 'war on women trope' offensive to 'professional educated women' |publisher=Daily Caller |date=2013-08-14 |accessdate=2013-08-20 }}{{dead link|date=June 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}
29. ^1 {{cite news|last=Maxwell |first=Zerlina |title=Todd Akin, Paul Ryan and the very real war on women |url=http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/the_rumble/2012/08/todd-akin-paul-ryan-and-the-very-real-war-on-women |newspaper=Daily News |location=New York |date=August 20, 2012 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120822075947/http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/the_rumble/2012/08/todd-akin-paul-ryan-and-the-very-real-war-on-women |archivedate=August 22, 2012 }}
30. ^1 {{cite news|title=Akin's comments reignite war on women|url=http://video.msnbc.msn.com/jansing-and-co/48725939/#48725939|newspaper=NBC News|date=August 20, 2012}}
31. ^1 {{cite news|title=Despite Denials Akin's Comments Are Part GOP War On Women|url=http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/08/20/despite-denials-akins-comments-are-part-gop-war-on-women/|newspaper=CBS|date=August 20, 2012}}
32. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/08/02/gop-turns-war-on-women-back-on-democrats |title=GOP Turns 'War on Women' Back on Democrats | publisher=U.S. News | author=Metzler, Rebekah | date=August 2, 2013 | accessdate=September 1, 2013}}
33. ^{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/07/31/gop-finds-its-own-war-on-women/ | title=GOP finds its own 'War on Women' | publisher=The Washington Post | author=Rachel Weiner and Sean Sullivan | date=July 31, 2013 | accessdate=September 1, 2013}}
34. ^{{cite news| url=http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/315217-gop-committees-unite-to-push-democrats-war-on-women-attack | title=GOP committees unite to push 'Democrats' war on women' attack | publisher=The Hill | author=Joseph, Cameron | date=August 2, 2013 | accessdate=September 1, 2013}}
35. ^{{cite web|url=http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/abortion/230099-anti-abortion-groups-return-war-on-women-charge-ahead-of-controversial-vote|title=Anti-abortion groups turn 'war on women' charge against Democrats|website=TheHill}}
36. ^[https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A02E0D6113EF934A25757C0A9639C8B63 The Nation: Seeing Eye to Eye; A Radical Feminist Who Could Dine With (Not On) Conservatives, in The New York Times, § Week In Review, Apr. 17, 2005], as accessed May 9, 2010.
37. ^Dworkin, Andrea (1989). Beaver Talks. In Dworkin, Andrea (1997 ({{ISBN|0-7432-3626-2}})). Life and Death: Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War Against Women (New York: Free Press), p. 89.
38. ^Dworkin, Andrea. Life and Death: Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War Against Women, op. cit., cover I.
39. ^1 {{cite news|title=Why Women Are Angry|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/1991/10/20/why-women-are-angry.html|newspaper=Newsweek|date=October 20, 1991}}
40. ^{{cite news|last=Williamson|first=Elizabeth|title=Abortion Rights Advocates Flood D.C.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A41023-2004Apr25?language=printer|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=April 25, 2004}}
41. ^{{cite news|title=Abortion activists on the march|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3657527.stm|newspaper=BBC News|date=April 26, 2004}}
42. ^{{cite book |last1= |first1= |authorlink1= |last2= |first2= |authorlink2= |editor1-first= Laura |editor1-last= Flanders |editor1-link= Laura Flanders |others= |title= The W Effect: Bush's War On Women |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=gg5NNztsUooC&pg=PR4 |edition= |year= 2004 |publisher= The Feminist Press |location= New York |isbn = 978-1-55861-471-0 }}
43. ^{{cite journal |last1= Esterchild |first1= Elizabeth |last2= |first2= |year= 2008 |title= Book Review: George W. Bush and the War on Women. By Barbara Finlay |journal= Gender & Society |volume= 22 |issue= 6 |pages= 824–826 |doi= 10.1177/0891243207312133 |url= |accessdate= }}
44. ^{{cite book |title= George W. Bush and the War on Women: Turning Back the Clock on Progress |first= Barbara |last= Finlay |authorlink= |publisher= Zed Books |location= London |year= 2006 |isbn= 978-1-84277-784-8 |pages= |page= |accessdate= |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=hyLCw9xlA-cC&printsec=frontcover }}
45. ^1 {{cite news|last=Gray|first=Kaili Joy|title=The Coming War on Women|url=http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2011/01/03/coming-women|newspaper=Daily Kos|date=January 4, 2011}}
46. ^{{cite news|last=Seltzer|first=Sarah|author2=Kelley, Lauren |title=9 New Laws in the GOP's War on Women|url=http://www.alternet.org/story/149761/9_new_laws_in_the_gop's_war_against_women|newspaper=AlterNet|date=February 1, 2011}}
47. ^1 2 3 {{cite news|last=Weigel|first=David|title=The "War on Women" Is Over|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/04/hilary_rosen_ann_romney_the_birth_adolescence_and_death_of_the_democrats_war_on_women_talking_point_.single.html|newspaper=Slate|date=April 12, 2012}}
48. ^1 2 {{cite web|title=State Policy Trends: Abortion and Contraception in the Crosshairs|url=http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2012/04/13/index.html|publisher=Guttmacher Institute|date=April 13, 2012}}
49. ^1 2 {{cite web|title=States Enact Record Number of Abortion Restrictions in 2011|url=http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2012/01/05/endofyear.html|publisher=Guttmacher Institute|date=January 5, 2012}}
50. ^{{cite news|last=Lithwick|first=Dahlia|title=The Faux Mommy Wars|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/04/presidential_election_season_conservatives_are_manufacturing_the_war_on_women_for_political_gain_.2.html|newspaper=Slate|date=April 20, 2012}}
51. ^{{cite news|last=Eckholm|first=Erik|title=Poll Finds Wide Support for Birth Control Coverage|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/us/politics/americans-divided-on-birth-control-coverage-poll-finds.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=March 1, 2012}}
52. ^1 2 {{cite news|last=Maxwell|first=Zerlina|title=Reproductive Health Laws Prove GOP 'War on Women' Is No Fiction|url=https://www.usnews.com/debate-club/is-there-a-republican-war-on-women/reproductive-health-laws-prove-gop-war-on-women-is-no-fiction|newspaper=U.S. News & World Report|date=April 10, 2012}}
53. ^1 {{cite journal|last=Gold|first=Rachel Benson|author2=Nash, Elizabeth |title=Troubling Trend: More States Hostile to Abortion Rights as Middle Ground Shrinks|journal=Guttmacher Policy Review|date=Winter 2012|volume=15|issue=1|url=http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/15/1/gpr150114.html}}
54. ^{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/magazine/the-reincarnation-of-pro-life.html | work=The New York Times | first=Emily | last=Bazelon | title=The Reincarnation of Pro-life | date=May 27, 2011}}
55. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/25/anti-abortion-group-womens-rights|title=Anti-abortion group drafting legislation to limit women's right to choose|author=Karen McVeigh|website=The Guardian}}
56. ^{{cite news|last=Yoest|first=Charmaine|last2=Burke|first2=Denise M.|title=Planned Parenthood Takes on the States|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304791204576402013054967644?mod=googlewsj|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=June 27, 2011}}
57. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terry-oneill/mandatory-ultrasound-laws_b_1300219.html|title=Mandatory Ultrasound Laws Violate Women's Rights and Bodies|publisher=The Huffington Post|first=Terry |last=O'Neill|date=Feb 2, 2012|accessdate=Dec 12, 2013}}
58. ^{{cite web | url=https://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RFU.pdf | title=State Policies in Brief: Requirement for Ultrasound | website=Guttmacher Institute | date=1 January 2014 | accessdate=27 January 2014}}
59. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/2012/statetrends12012.html | title=Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: Trends in the First Quarter of 2012 | website=Guttmacher Institute | accessdate=27 January 2014}}
60. ^{{cite news|last=Kristof|first=Nicholas D.|title=When States Abuse Women|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/opinion/sunday/kristof-when-states-abuse-women.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=March 3, 2012}}
61. ^{{cite news|last=Carpentier|first=Megan|title=I had a transvaginal ultrasound: My perspective on the mandate that touched off 2012′s War On Women|url=http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/17/i-had-a-transvaginal-ultrasound-my-perspective-on-the-mandate-that-touched-off-2012s-war-on-women/|newspaper=The Raw Story|date=April 17, 2012}}
62. ^{{cite news|last=Lowder|first=J. Bryan|title=What's It Like To Undergo a Transvaginal Ultrasound?|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/04/18/transvaginal_ultrasounds_and_the_war_on_women_megan_carpentier_reports.html|newspaper=Slate|date=April 18, 2012}}
63. ^{{cite web|url=http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/03/01/challenges-in-the-trans-vaginal-ultrasound-debate/|title=What We Are Missing in the Trans-vaginal Ultrasound Debate|website=RH Reality Check}}
64. ^{{cite news|last=Madison|first=Lucy|title=Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell signs Virginia ultrasound bill|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57392796-503544/virginia-gov-bob-mcdonnell-signs-virginia-ultrasound-bill/|newspaper=CBS News|date=March 7, 2012}}
65. ^{{cite news|last=Kumar|first=Anita|title=Virginia Senate passes bill requiring women to undergo ultrasound before abortion|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/virginia-senate-passes-bill-requiring-women-to-undergo-ultrasound-before-abortion/2012/01/30/gIQAW3MviQ_story.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=February 1, 2012}}
66. ^{{cite news|title=Bill would require woman hear heartbeat before abortion|url=http://www.wwl.com/pages/12872531.php?contentType=4&contentId=10426456|newspaper=WWL|date=April 18, 2012}}
67. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/15/tom-corbett-ultrasound-bill-pennsylvania_n_1348801.html |title=Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Governor, On Ultrasound Mandate: Just 'Close Your Eyes' |publisher=The Huffington Post |date=2012-03-15 |accessdate=2013-08-20 |first=Laura |last=Bassett}}
68. ^{{cite news|last=Milbank|first=Dana|title=Trent Franks's abortion claim and the manly Republican Party|url=https://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-06-12/opinions/39921015_1_men-todd-akin-20-weeks|newspaper=Washington Post|date=June 12, 2012}}
69. ^1 {{cite news|last=Terbush|first=Jon|title=The War on Women is back |url=http://theweek.com/article/index/245534/the-war-on-women-is-back|newspaper=The Week|date=June 12, 2012}}
70. ^{{cite news|last=Cottle|first=Michelle|title=Rep. Trent Franks: Just Another Idiot When It Comes to Abortion|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/14/rep-trent-franks-just-another-idiot-when-it-comes-to-abortion.html|newspaper=The Daily Beast|date=June 14, 2013}}
71. ^[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-claim-that-the-incidence-of-rape-resulting-in-pregnancy-is-very-low/2013/06/12/936bc45e-d3ad-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_blog.html The claim that the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy is 'very low' ]: Washington Post Fact Checker
72. ^{{cite news|last=Bassett|first=Laura|title=Rape, Incest Exceptions Quietly Added To Trent Franks' Abortion Bill |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/14/rape-exception-abortion-trent-franks_n_3443916.html|newspaper=The Huffington Post|date=June 14, 2013}}
73. ^{{cite news |url=http://inthesetimes.com/community/profile/4940 |title=Lindsay Beyerstein - Profile |publisher=In These Times |accessdate=2013-08-20}}
74. ^{{cite news|last=Peck|first=Adam|title=Georgia Republican Compares Women to Cows, Pigs, And Chickens|url=http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/03/12/442637/georgia-rep-compares-women-to-animals/?mobile=nc|newspaper=Think Progress|date=March 12, 2012}}
75. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.christianpost.com/news/ninth-circuit-blocks-arizonas-20-week-abortion-ban-79380/ |title=Ninth Circuit Blocks Arizona's 20-Week Abortion Ban |publisher=Christian Post |date=2012-08-03 |accessdate=2013-08-20}}
76. ^{{cite news|last=Santos|first=Fernanda|title=Arizona Law on Abortions Struck Down as Restrictive|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/us/arizonas-ban-on-abortions-struck-down-in-federal-court.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=May 21, 2013}}
77. ^{{cite web|title=LB1103 - Adopt the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act|url=http://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=10024|publisher=Nebraska Legislature|accessdate=April 20, 2012}}
78. ^{{cite web|title=Legislative Detail: AL House Bill 18 - Regular Session 2011|url=http://legiscan.com/gaits/view/292139|publisher=LegiScan|accessdate=April 20, 2012}}
79. ^{{cite web|title=House Bill 954|url=http://www1.legis.ga.gov/legis/2011_12/fulltext/hb954.htm|publisher=Georgia General Assembly|accessdate=April 20, 2012}}
80. ^{{cite web|title=HOUSE BILL No. 1127|url=http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2012/IN/IN1127.1.html|publisher=in.gov|accessdate=April 20, 2012}}
81. ^{{cite web|title=Senate Bill 1148|url=http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2011/S1148.htm|publisher=Idaho Legislature|accessdate=April 20, 2012}}
82. ^{{cite web|title=Bill Information for SB 1274|url=http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=SB%201274|publisher=Oklahome State Legislature|accessdate=April 20, 2012}}
83. ^{{cite news|last=Eckholm|first=Erik|title=Lawsuit Tries to Block New Arizona Abortion Law|url=http://travel.nytimes.com/2012/07/13/us/arizona-abortion-law-is-challenged.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=July 12, 2012}}
84. ^{{cite news |last=Zuckerman |first=Laura |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/03/07/us-usa-abortion-idaho-idINBRE92603L20130307 |title=Federal judge strikes down Idaho ban on late-term abortions |publisher=Reuters |date=2013-03-07 |accessdate=2013-08-20}}
85. ^{{cite news|last=McCartney|first=Hannah|title=Ohio's Heartbeat Bill Drawing National Attention|url=http://www.citybeat.com/cincinnati/blog-3325-ohios_heartbeat_bill_drawing_national_attention.html|newspaper=CityBeat|date=April 19, 2012}}
86. ^{{cite news|last=Seelye|first=Katharine Q.|title=Mississippi Voters Reject Anti-Abortion Measure|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/us/politics/votes-across-the-nation-could-serve-as-a-political-barometer.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=November 8, 2011}}
87. ^{{cite news|last=Yeoman|first=Barry|title=The Quiet War on Abortion|url=https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2001/09/quiet-war-abortion|newspaper=Mother Jones|date=September–October 2001}}
88. ^{{cite news|last=Carmon|first=Irin|title=Abortion options fade in South|url=http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/abortion_options_fade_in_south/singleton/|newspaper=Salon|date=April 12, 2012}}
89. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/06/29/supreme-court-blocks-texas-abortion-clinic-rules/|title=Supreme Court blocks Texas abortion-clinic rules|date=June 29, 2015|accessdate=June 29, 2015|publisher=FOX News via Associated Press}}
90. ^{{cite news|last=Sheppard|first=Kate|title=South Dakota Moves To Legalize Killing Abortion Providers|url=http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/south-dakota-hb-1171-legalize-killing-abortion-providers|newspaper=Mother Jones|date=February 15, 2011}}
91. ^{{cite news|last=Sheppard|first=Kate|title=Iowa Bills Could Also Allow for "Justifiable Homicide" Defense Against Abortion Docs|url=http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/02/iowa-bills-justifiable-homicide-abortion-docs|newspaper=Mother Jones|date=February 24, 2011}}
92. ^{{cite news |agency=The Associated Press |url=http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2012/03/06/senate-approves-bill-on-wrongful-births/ |title=Senate approves bill on 'wrongful births' |publisher=Arizona Capitol Times |date=2012-03-06 |accessdate=2013-08-20}}
93. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/05/15/152687638/should-parents-be-able-to-sue-for-wrongful-birth |title=Should Parents Be Able To Sue For 'Wrongful Birth'? |publisher=NPR |date=2012-05-15 |accessdate=2013-08-20}}
94. ^{{cite news|last=Durden|first=Chris|title=House panel approves changes to abortion regulations|url=http://www.kwch.com/news/kwch-news-ccd--panel-approves-69page-abortion-bill-20120315,0,3822841.story|newspaper=KWCH 12|date=March 16, 2012}}
95. ^{{cite news|last=Celock|first=John|title=Kansas Abortion Bill Would Impose Sweeping Restrictions|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/06/kansas-anti-abortion-bill_n_1258185.html|publisher=The Huffington Post|date=February 6, 2012}}
96. ^{{cite news|last=Celock|first=John|title=Kansas Abortion Bill To Ban Procedure By State Workers Passes House|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/17/kansas-abortion-bill-ku-medical-center_n_1355351.html|publisher=The Huffington Post|date=March 17, 2012}}
97. ^{{cite news|last=Bauer|first=Scott|title=Planned Parenthood suspends pill abortions in Wis.|url=http://www.kansascity.com/2012/04/20/3566969/planned-parenthood-suspends-pill.html|newspaper=The Kansas City Star|date=April 20, 2012}}
98. ^{{cite news|last=Hicks|first=Josh|title=A whopper ad for John Boehner's GOP opponent|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/a-whopper-ad-for-john-boehners-gop-opponent/2012/03/07/gIQAhS7JxR_blog.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=March 8, 2012}}
99. ^{{cite web | url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2012/02/10/fact-sheet-women-s-preventive-services-and-religious-institutions | title=FACT SHEET: Women's Preventive Services and Religious Institutions | website=White House Office of the Press Secretary | date=10 February 2012 | accessdate=27 January 2014}}
100. ^{{cite news|last=Parkinson|first=John|title=Women's Health vs. Religious Freedom: House Leaders Debate Birth Control Mandate|url=http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/womens-health-vs-religious-freedom-house-leaders-debate-birth-control-mandate/|newspaper=ABC News|date=March 1, 2012}}
101. ^{{cite news|last=Negrin|first=Matt|last2=Miller|first2=Sunlen|title=Senate Blocks Blunt's Repeal of Contraception Mandate|url=http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/contraception-mandate-goes-up-for-a-vote/|newspaper=ABC News|date=March 1, 2012}}
102. ^{{cite news|title=Rep. Darrell Issa Bars Minority Witness, a Woman, on Contraception|url=http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/rep-darrell-issa-bars-minority-witness-a-woman-on-contraception-2/|newspaper=ABC News|date=February 16, 2012}}
103. ^{{cite news|last=Portero|first=Ashley|title=MoveOn Ad Uses Conservatives' Own Words In 'War On Women'|url=http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/318306/20120322/moveon-ad-gop-war-against-women.htm|newspaper=International Business Times|date=March 22, 2012}}
104. ^{{cite news|last=James|first=Frank|title=Santorum Ally Friess Praises Old-School 'Contraceptive': Aspirin Between Knees|url=https://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/02/17/146999566/santorum-backer-friess-praises-old-school-contraceptive-aspirin|newspaper=NPR|date=February 16, 2012}}
105. ^{{cite news|last=Bassett|first=Laura|last2=Bendery|first2=Jennifer|title=Rush Limbaugh: I'll Buy Georgetown Women 'As Much Aspirin To Put Between Their Knees As They Want'|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/01/rush-limbaugh-sandra-fluke_n_1313891.html|publisher=The Huffington Post|date=March 1, 2012}}
106. ^{{cite news|last=Geiger|first=Kim|title=Rush Limbaugh's 'slut' comment draws rebukes from all sides|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/02/news/la-pn-rush-limbaugh-draws-rebukes-from-all-sides-20120302|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=March 2, 2012}}
107. ^{{cite news|last=Nather|first=David|last2=Nocera|first2=Kate|title=House votes to defund Planned Parenthood|url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49830.html|newspaper=Politico|date=February 18, 2011}}
108. ^{{cite news|last=Falkenberg|first=Lisa|title=Dumping Planned Parenthood may be expensive|url=http://www.chron.com/news/falkenberg/article/Falkenberg-Dumping-Planned-Parenthood-may-be-3313121.php|newspaper=Houston Chronicle|date=February 14, 2012}}
109. ^{{cite news|last=Tomlinson|first=Chris|title=Women's health fight over politics, not health|url=http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/04/15/3884949/womens-health-fight-over-politics.html|newspaper=Star-Telegram|date=April 15, 2012}}
110. ^{{cite news|last=Guarino|first=Mark|title=Indiana governor vows to block federal funds for Planned Parenthood|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0429/Indiana-governor-vows-to-block-federal-funds-for-Planned-Parenthood|newspaper=Christian Science Monitor|date=April 29, 2011}}
111. ^{{cite news|last=Guarino|first=Mark|title=Indiana lawmaker slams 'radicalized' pro-abortion group. Yes, Girl Scouts.|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/0222/Indiana-lawmaker-slams-radicalized-pro-abortion-group.-Yes-Girl-Scouts|newspaper=Christian Science Monitor|date=February 22, 2012}}
112. ^{{cite news|title=Judge blocks Kansas law aimed at Planned Parenthood|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/01/us-abortion-states-kansas-idUSTRE7704FQ20110801|newspaper=Reuters|date=August 1, 2011}}
113. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/top-susan-g-komen-official-resigned-over-planned-parenthood-cave-in/252405/ |title=Top Susan G. Komen Official Resigned Over Planned Parenthood Cave-In |first=Jeffrey |last=Goldberg |authorlink=Jeffrey Goldberg |date=February 2, 2012 |work=The Atlantic |accessdate=February 3, 2012}}
114. ^{{cite web|url=http://ww5.komen.org/KomenNewsArticle.aspx?id=19327354148 |title=Statement from Susan G. Komen Board of Directors and Founder and CEO Nancy G. Brinker |publisher=Susan G. Komen for the Cure |date=February 3, 2012 |accessdate=2012-08-29}}
115. ^{{cite news|title=Komen Foundation VP resigns, blasts Planned Parenthood|url=http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/07/us/komen-executive-resigns/index.html|newspaper=CNN|date=February 7, 2012}}
116. ^1 {{cite news|last=Baumann|first=Nick|title=The House GOP's Plan to Redefine Rape|url=http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/01/republican-plan-redefine-rape-abortion|newspaper=Mother Jones|date=January 28, 2011}}
117. ^{{cite web | url=http://pol.moveon.org/smithbill/splash.html?rc=homepage_splash | title=Sign the Petition: "Bruises and broken bones do not define rape - a lack of consent does. Stand up and oppose the dangerous GOP legislation to redefine rape." | publisher=Moveon.org | accessdate=August 1, 2012}}
118. ^{{cite web | url=http://emilyslist.org/news/releases/emilys_list_takes_action_against_boehners_radical_anti_woman_agenda | title=EMILY's List Takes Action Against Boehner's Radical Anti-Woman Agenda | publisher=Emily's List | date=February 2, 2011 | accessdate=August 1, 2012}}
119. ^1 {{cite news|last=Abcarian|first=Robin|title='Rape insurance,' a new front in the GOP's clueless 'war on women'|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2013/dec/12/local/la-me-ln-rape-insurance-abcarian-20131212|accessdate=21 August 2012|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=December 12, 2013}}
120. ^{{cite news|last=Woods|first=Ashley|title=Michigan's 'Rape Insurance' Abortion Rider Law Goes Into Effect Today|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/13/michigans-abortion-rider-_n_4958517.html|accessdate= 15 March 2014|newspaper=Huffington Post|date=13 March 2014}}
121. ^{{cite news|last=Carroll|first=Linda|title=Doctors appalled over Rep. Akin's comments that 'legitimate rape' prevents pregnancy|url=http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/20/13378579-doctors-appalled-over-rep-akins-comments-that-legitimate-rape-prevents-pregnancy?lite|accessdate=21 August 2012|newspaper=NBC News|date=21 August 2012}}
122. ^{{cite news | title = Health Experts Dismiss Assertions on Rape | date = 2012-08-21 | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/us/politics/rape-assertions-are-dismissed-by-health-experts.html | work = The New York Times | accessdate = 2012-08-21 | first=Pam | last=Belluck}}
123. ^Danielle Dellorto, Experts: Rape does not lower odds of pregnancy, CNN Health (22 August 2012)
124. ^Sharon Begley and Susan Heavey, [https://news.yahoo.com/rape-trauma-barrier-pregnancy-no-scientific-basis-235231028.html Rape trauma as barrier to pregnancy has no scientific basis], Reuters (20 August 2012).
125. ^{{cite news|last=Robinson|first=Eugene|title=Todd Akin's comment brings 'war on women' back to prominence|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/eugene-robinson-todd-akin-comment-brings-war-on-women-back-to-prominence/2012/08/20/c4570fae-eafd-11e1-9ddc-340d5efb1e9c_story.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=August 20, 2012}}
126. ^Akin imbroglio is bad news for Republicans Tom Cohen, CNN updated 3:23 PM EDT, Wed August 22, 2012
127. ^{{cite news |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/with-todd-akins-rape-comments-abortion-is-back-in-the-campaign-spotlight/2012/08/20/c497bae4-eac7-11e1-a80b-9f898562d010_story.html |title=National GOP pulls funding from Todd Akin's Missouri race|last= Nia-Malika Henderson & Paul Kane|work=The Washington Post |date=2012-08-20 |issn=0190-8286 |accessdate=20 August 2012}}
128. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79929.html?hp=t2_3 |title=Reports: Paul Ryan called Todd Akin — Tim Mak |publisher=Politico.Com |date=2012-08-08 |accessdate=2012-08-21}}
129. ^{{cite news |url=http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/20/gop-chair-akin-should-drop-out-skip-convention/|title=GOP chair: Akin should drop out, skip convention|last=Killough|first=Ashley|date=August 20, 2012|work=CNN|accessdate=21 August 2012}}
130. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/aug/20/picket-rnc-chair-wants-akin-step-aside-and-not-com/ |title=PICKET: RNC Chair wants Akin to 'step aside' and not come to convention |publisher=The Washington Times |accessdate=2012-08-21}}
131. ^{{Cite news |url=http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-06/obama-wins-big-time |title=Obama Wins, Big Time |first=Joshua |last=Green |date=November 6, 2012 |work=Business Week}}
132. ^{{cite news |last=Raju {{!}}|first=Manu |title=Richard Mourdock under fire for rape remarks|url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/10/richard-mourdock-under-fire-for-rape-remarks-139411.html?hp=l1|accessdate=24 October 2012}}
133. ^{{cite news |title=Richard Mourdock's response to abortion question provokes controversy in Indiana Senate debate|url=http://www.indystar.com/article/20121023/NEWS0502/210230326/Richard-Mourdock-s-response-abortion-question-provokes-controversy-Indiana-Senate-debate?nclick_check=1|newspaper=Indianapolis Star}}
134. ^{{cite news |last=Couloumbis |first=Angela |url=http://articles.philly.com/2012-08-29/news/33451676_1_abortion-missouri-candidate-casey |title=Pennsylvania Senate candidate Tom Smith tangled up over rape and abortion |newspaper=Philadelphia Inquirer |date=2012-08-29 |accessdate=2013-08-20}}
135. ^{{Cite news |url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83449.html |work=Politico |first=Jennifer |last=Haberkorn |title=Abortion, rape controversy shaped key races |date=November 6, 2012}}
136. ^{{Cite news |url=http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/margery_eagan/2013/06/eagan_lawmakers_in_real_war_on_women|work=Boston Herald|first=Margery |last=Eagan|title=Eagan: Lawmakers in real war on women |date=June 16, 2013}}
137. ^{{Cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/06/republicans-sexist-comments_n_3396907.html?1370534923|publisher=The Huffington Post|first=Laura|last=Bassett|title=DSCC Compares Saxby Chambliss, Erick Erickson To Todd Akin|date=June 6, 2013}}
138. ^{{cite news|last=Miller|first=Sunlen|title=Politics vs. Policy: Violence Against Women Act Dustup in Senate|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/politics-policy-violence-women-act-dustup-senate/story?id=15930290#.T5R9vuIS2JN|newspaper=ABC News|date=March 16, 2012}}
139. ^{{cite news|last=Hunter|first=Kathleen|title=Senate Democrats Aim to Extend Violence Against Women Act|url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-15/senate-democrats-aim-to-extend-violence-against-women-act|newspaper=Businessweek|date=March 16, 2012}}
140. ^{{cite news|last=Kellman|first=Laurie|title=Democrats raise violence against women act|url=http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Democrats-raise-violence-against-women-act-3409968.php|newspaper=Seattle Post-Intelligencer|date=March 16, 2012}}
141. ^{{cite news | url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-signs-a-strengthened-violence-against-women-act/2013/03/07/e50d585e-8740-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html | title=Obama signs a strengthened Violence Against Women Act | work=The Washington Post | date=7 March 2013 | accessdate=23 January 2014 | author=Henderson, Nia-Malika}}
142. ^{{cite news|title=Republican House Leaders Launch New War on Women|url=http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=12856|newspaper=Ms. Magazine|date=February 14, 2011}}
143. ^1 2 {{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/02/25/budget.women.children/|title=House Republicans want to cut WIC by 10%|publisher=CNN|date=February 25, 2011}}
144. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/20/the-sequester-absolutely-everything-you-could-possibly-need-to-know-in-one-faq/|title=The Sequester: Absolutely everything you could possibly need to know, in one FAQ|publisher=The Washington Post|date=March 1, 2013}}
145. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/17/scott-walker-recall-war-women_n_1431143.html|title=Scott Walker Recall: 'War On Women' Fight Becomes Big Issue In Election|publisher=The Huffington Post| date=April 17, 2012|first=Amanda|last=Terkel}}
146. ^{{cite news|last=Goldberg|first=Michelle|title=Wisconsin's Repeal of Equal Pay Rights Adds to Battles for Women|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/07/wisconsin-s-repeal-of-equal-pay-rights-adds-to-battles-for-women.html|newspaper=The Daily Beast|date=April 7, 2012}}
147. ^{{cite news|last=Wyler|first=Grace|title=Wisconsin Republican: Women Are Paid Less Because 'Money Is More Important For Men'|url=http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-04-09/politics/31311795_1_wage-gaps-wage-discrimination-daily-beast|newspaper=Business Insider|date=April 9, 2012}}
148. ^1 {{cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/23/scott-walker-wisconsin-equal-pay-repeal_n_1445674.html|title=Scott Walker Pressed For Answers On Wisconsin Equal Pay Law Repeal|publisher=The Huffington Post|date=April 23, 2012|first=Amanda|last=Terkel}}
149. ^{{cite news|last=Shahid |first=Aliyah |title=Wisconsin GOPer: Women make less because 'Money is more important for men' |url=http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-04-11/news/31326804_1_wage-gap-wage-bill-discrimination |newspaper=New York Daily News |date=April 11, 2012 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120504122611/http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-04-11/news/31326804_1_wage-gap-wage-bill-discrimination |archivedate=May 4, 2012 }}
150. ^{{cite news|last=Fluke|first=Sandra|title=Who says women don't care about wages?|url=http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/17/opinion/fluke-equal-pay-for-women/index.html|newspaper=CNN|date=April 17, 2012}}
151. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web | url=http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/8315-f.pdf | title=Kaiser Health Tracking Poll | publisher=Kaiser Family Foundation | date=May 2012 | accessdate=27 December 2013 }}
152. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/government-and-you/us-government/congressional-record-on-choice/state-page.html?state=CO|title=2014 Congressional Record on Choice|author=NARAL Pro-Choice America|website=prochoiceamerica.org}}
153. ^{{cite web|url=http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/the-senate-races-with-the-biggest-ideological-stakes/|title=The Senate Races With the Biggest Ideological Stakes|website=FiveThirtyEight}}
154. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2014-10-08/the-battle-for-colorado|title=The Battle for Colorado Is the Battle for America|date=8 Oct 2015|author-link=Joshua Green (journalist)|author=Joshua Green|quote=Torbit blurted out what anyone in Colorado with a TV can see: "His ads are all about abortion!"...But the main line of attack is Gardner's record on birth control and abortion, which he opposes even in cases of rape and incest.|website=Bloomberg}}
155. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/06/06/3664772/well-talk-war-women-2016/|title=Will We Be Talking About The 'War On Women' In 2016?|website=ThinkProgress|author=Kay Steiger|date=6 Jun 2015}}
156. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/05/us/udall-loses-senate-seat-to-gardner-a-republican.html?_r=0|title=Mark Udall of Colorado Loses Senate Seat to Cory Gardner, a Republican|quote=Mr. Udall's campaign echoed what Republicans called a "war on women" strategy, casting Mr. Gardner as a rigid opponent of abortion who supported legal rights for embryos and whose positions could outlaw some forms of birth control.|date=5 Nov 2014|author=Jack Healey}}
157. ^{{cite web|url=http://time.com/3541595/mark-udall-war-on-women-republican-colorado/|title=The Surprising Struggles of Mark Udall to Win Colorado Women|quote=The "War on Women" is a playbook Democrats ran successfully in 2012, with significant assists from GOP senatorial candidates Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock whose inopportune remarks on women and rape helped paint the party as out-of-touch on female issues. Unfortunately for Democrats, there have been no Akin and Murdoch repeats and candidates like Gardner have been much savvier in their messaging on women's issues. "A myopic focus on reproductive freedom and the 'War on the Women' does not seem to be an effective way to mobilize and motivate women in a year when the economy and jobs are at the forefront of voters' minds, and GOP candidates have not made the same kinds of mistakes that Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock did in 2012," says Jennifer Lawless, director of American University's Women & Politics Institute.}}
158. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/11/05/how-mark-uterus-lost-in-colorado/|title=How 'Mark Uterus' lost in Colorado|date=5 Nov 2014|author=Nia-Malika Henderson|website=Washington Post|quote=For the "war on women" message to actually be effective for Democratic candidates, one key thing has to happen: Women have to show up and vote for Democrats in larger numbers than men. In Colorado, that didn't happen for Sen. Mark Udall.}}
159. ^{{cite web|url=http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/218978-war-on-women-falling-flat-in-colorado-senate|title=Democrats' 'war on women' falling flat in Colorado Senate|author=Alexandra Jaffe|date=26 Sep 2014|website=The Hill}}
160. ^1 {{cite web|author-link=Nina Easton|author=Nina Easton|title=What Republicans learned from 2012's "War on Women" rhetoric|url=http://fortune.com/2014/11/07/war-on-women/|date=7 Nov 2014|website=Fortune Magazine}}
161. ^http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/29/politics/hillary-clinton-women-gender-planned-parenthood/
162. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/20/hillary-s-ready-for-the-war-on-women.html|title=Hillary's Ready for the 'War on Women'|website=The Daily Beast}}
163. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/gop-war-on-women-in-congress-213209|title=The House GOP's War on Women|author=Elijah Cummings|author-link=Elijah Cummings|date=30 Sep 2015}}
164. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/16/us-usa-election-fiorina-idUSKBN0N71Z820150416|title=Republican Fiorina says she would neutralize Clinton's 'gender card'|website=Reuters|date=16 Apr 2015}}
165. ^{{cite av media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOqtra7j6UM|title=Is Donald Trump part of the 'war on women'? - Fox News Republican Debate|date=August 6, 2015|work=YouTube}}
166. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2015/08/07/us-usa-election-trump-women-idUSKCN0QC04W20150807|title=Trump draws boos as he bristles at 'war on women' question|website=Reuters|date=6 August 2015}}
167. ^{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/08/politics/donald-trump-cnn-megyn-kelly-comment/index.html|title=Trump draws outrage after Megyn Kelly remarks - CNNPolitics.com|author=Holly Yan, CNN|date=August 8, 2015|website=CNN}}
168. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33833516|title=Donald Trump axed from event over Megyn Kelly blood comment|website=BBC News}}
169. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/erick-erickson-the-republican-party-created-donald-trump/400847/|title=Erick Erickson: 'The Republican Party Created Donald Trump'|website=The Atlantic}}
170. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/donald-trump-camp-in-crisis-121180.html?hp=t1_r|title=Trump camp in crisis}}
171. ^{{cite news|last=Edwards|first=David|title=RNC chair: GOP 'war on women' fictional like 'war on caterpillars'|url=http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/05/rnc-chair-gop-war-on-women-fictional-like-war-on-caterpillars/|newspaper=The Raw Story|date=April 5, 2012}}
172. ^{{cite news|last=Benen|first=Steve|title=RNC chairman reflects on women, caterpillars|url=http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/05/11035818-rnc-chairman-reflects-on-women-caterpillars|newspaper=The Maddow Blog|date=April 5, 2012}}
173. ^{{cite news|last=Jensen|first=Kristin|title=Priebus Says Gender Battle Fictional as Caterpillar War|url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-05/priebus-says-gender-battle-as-fictonal-as-caterpillar-war|newspaper=Businessweek|date=April 5, 2012}}
174. ^{{cite news|last=Dennis|first=Steven T.|title=Hill Women Play Starring Role in 'Mommy Wars'|url=http://www.rollcall.com/news/hill-women-play-starring-role-mommy-wars-213960-1.html?pos=htmbtxt|newspaper=Roll Call|date=April 20, 2012}}
175. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/18/us-usa-campaign-rodgers-idUSBRE84H0YD20120518|title=Top Republican woman in Congress becomes a force|website=Reuters}}
176. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/04/nikki-haley-there-is-no-war-on-women-120109#ixzz3qPCFXhVv|title=Nikki Haley: 'There is no war on women'|author=Emily Schultheis|date=4 Oct 2012|website=Politico}}
177. ^{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2012/10/18/at-fla-fundraiser-paul-ryan-mocks-war-on-women/ | work=The Washington Post|title=At Fla. fundraiser, Paul Ryan mocks 'war on women'}}
178. ^{{cite news|last=Gilbert|first=Kathleen|title=McCain decries GOP fight against Obama mandate: 'we need to get off that issue'|url=http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mccain-decries-gop-fight-against-obama-mandate-we-need-to-get-off-that-issu/|newspaper=LifeSiteNews.com|date=March 22, 2012}}
179. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/gop-men-tutored-in-running-against-women-100701|title=GOP men told how to talk to women|author=Anna Plamer|date=12 May 2013|website=Politico}}
180. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/gop-war-on-women-105453|author=Anna Palmer|date=4 Aug 2014|title=GOP solution to 'war on women'|website=Politico}}
181. ^USA Today: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/07/29/women-harassment-filner-weiner-sydney-leathers-column/2594213/ The latest in the war on women]. July 29, 2013.
182. ^NRSC Press Release: Republican Party of Iowa.
183. ^NH Journal: NRSC dings Shaheen over 'war on women'. July 23, 2013.
184. ^Alter, Jonathan, The Center Holds: Obama and His Enemies (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1st Simon & Schuster hardcover ed. 2013 ({{ISBN|978-1-4516-4607-8}})), p. 281 (author columnist, Bloomberg Voice, analyst & contributing ed., NBC News & MSNBC, & former sr. ed. & columnist, Newsweek).
185. ^{{Citation | last =Redden | first =Molly | author-link = | date=September 1, 2015 |title=The War on Women is Over -- and Women Lost. While you weren't watching, conservatives fundamentally rewrote abortion laws |publisher=Mother Jones |url=https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/07/planned-parenthood-abortion-the-war-is-over |accessdate=September 28, 2015 }}
186. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/2016/04/07/camille_paglia_feminists_have_abortion_wrong_trump_and_hillary_miscues_highlight_a_frozen_national_debate/ |title=Camille Paglia: Feminists have abortion wrong, Trump and Hillary miscues highlight a frozen national debate |last=Paglia |first=Camille |publisher=Salon |date=April 7, 2016 |accessdate=August 1, 2016}}

Further reading

  • {{cite news|last=Rich|first=Frank|title=Stag Party: The GOP's woman problem is that it has a serious problem with women|url=http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/gop-women-problem-2012-4/|newspaper=New York Magazine|date=March 25, 2012}}
{{Reproductive health}}{{Feminism}}{{DEFAULTSORT:War on Women}}

15 : 112th United States Congress|2011 in American politics|2012 controversies in the United States|2012 in American politics|Abortion debate|Articles containing video clips|Feminism|Metaphors referring to war and violence|Misogyny|Planned Parenthood|Political controversies in the United States|Reproductive rights|Republican Party (United States)|Women in the United States|Politics of the United States
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/17 20:58:06