}}{{Starbox reference
| Simbad = AI+Phe
}}{{Starbox end}}AI Phoenicis is a variable star in the constellation of Phoenix. An Algol-type eclipsing binary, its apparent magnitude is constant at 8.58 for most of the time, sharply dropping to 9.35 during primary eclipse and to 8.89 during secondary eclipse.[3] The system's variability was discovered by W. Strohmeier in 1972.[35] From parallax measurements by the Gaia spacecraft, the system is located at a distance of {{Convert|171|pc|ly|abbr=off|lk=on|order=flip}} from Earth,[1] in agreement with earlier estimates based on its luminosity (173 ± 11 parsecs).[4]The primary star is a K-type subgiant with a spectral type of K0IV and an effective temperature of 5,000 K, while the secondary is an F-type main sequence star with a spectral type of F7V and a temperature of 6,300 K. The primary component, while visually fainter, is slightly more luminous than the secondary due to its higher infrared output.[4] The primary is at the end of its main sequence life and is likely in the short contraction phase known as a hook, where core hydrogen fusion has ceased but shell burning has not yet started, before ascending towards the red giant branch.[12] Photometric and spectroscopic observations have allowed the direct determination of the parameters of the stars with extreme precision, and this system is frequently used to test stellar evolution models.[20][4][12][43] The masses of the stars, 1.247 {{solar mass}} for the primary and 1.197 {{solar mass}} for the secondary, are known to a precision of just 0.3%, while the radii of 2.91 {{solar radius}} and 1.84 {{solar radius}} have uncertainties of 0.8% and 0.5% respectively.[12] Stellar evolution models show the stars have a common age of about 4.4 billion years.[12]
The orbit of AI Phoenicis has a period of 24.59248 days and a moderate eccentricity of 0.1821 ± 0.0051. The observation of eclipses is allowed by its 88.5° inclination to the plane of the sky. Times of minimum light show the orbital period of the system is not constant,[12] which can be caused by a third star in the system. An analysis of the alignment of the system by the Rossiter–McLaughlin effect suggests that the secondary star rotation axis is not aligned with the orbital axis, with an angle of 87 ± 17° between them, which also indicates interactions with a third star.[47]
References
1. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 {{cite DR2|4933562966514402176}}
2. ^1 2 3 {{cite journal | title=General catalogue of variable stars: Version GCVS 5.1 | last1=Samus' | first1=N. N | last2=Kazarovets | first2=E. V | last3=Durlevich | first3=O. V | last4=Kireeva | first4=N. N | last5=Pastukhova | first5=E. N | journal=Astronomy Reports | volume=61 | issue=1 | pages=80 | year=2017 | doi=10.1134/S1063772917010085 | bibcode=2017ARep...61...80S }}
3. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 {{cite journal|bibcode=2010A&ARv..18...67T|title=Accurate masses and radii of normal stars: Modern results and applications|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics Review|volume=18|issue=1–2|pages=67–126|last1=Torres|first1=G.|last2=Andersen|first2=J.|last3=Giménez|first3=A.|year=2010|arxiv=0908.2624|doi=10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1}}
4. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 {{cite journal|bibcode=2016A&A...591A.124K|title=Absolute parameters for AI Phoenicis using WASP photometry|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics|volume=591|pages=A124|last1=Kirkby-Kent|first1=J. A.|last2=Maxted|first2=P. F. L.|last3=Serenelli|first3=A. M.|last4=Turner|first4=O. D.|last5=Evans|first5=D. F.|last6=Anderson|first6=D. R.|last7=Hellier|first7=C.|last8=West|first8=R. G.|year=2016|arxiv=1605.07059|doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201628581}}
5. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite journal|bibcode=1988A&A...196..128A|title=Absolute dimensions of eclipsing binaries. XIII. AI Phoenicis : A casestudy in stellar evolution|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics|volume=196|pages=128|last1=Andersen|first1=J.|last2=Clausen|first2=J. V.|last3=Nordstrom|first3=B.|last4=Gustafsson|first4=B.|last5=Vandenberg|first5=D. A.|year=1988}}
6. ^1 {{cite journal|bibcode=1972IBVS..665....1S|title=Three New Bright Eclipsing Binaries|journal=Information Bulletin on Variable Stars|volume=665|pages=1|last1=Strohmeier|first1=W.|year=1972}}
7. ^1 {{cite journal|bibcode=2017A&A...608A..62H|title=Testing stellar evolution models with detached eclipsing binaries|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics|volume=608|pages=A62|last1=Higl|first1=J.|last2=Weiss|first2=A.|year=2017|doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201731008}}
8. ^1 {{cite journal|bibcode=2018MNRAS.478.1942S|title=Tracking spin-axis orbital alignment in selected binary systems: The Torun Rossiter-McLaughlin effect survey|journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society|volume=478|issue=2|pages=1942|last1=Sybilski|first1=P.|last2=Pawłaszek|first2=R. K.|last3=Sybilska|first3=A.|last4=Konacki|first4=M.|last5=Hełminiak|first5=K. G.|last6=Kozłowski|first6=S. K.|last7=Ratajczak|first7=M.|year=2018|doi=10.1093/mnras/sty1135}}
9. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite journal|bibcode=2009MNRAS.400..969H|title=Orbital and physical parameters of eclipsing binaries from the All-Sky Automated Survey catalogue - I. A sample of systems with components' masses between 1 and 2 Msolar|journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society|volume=400|issue=2|pages=969|last1=Hełminiak|first1=K. G.|last2=Konacki|first2=M.|last3=Ratajczak|first3=M.|last4=Muterspaugh|first4=M. W.|year=2009|doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15513.x}}