| 词条 | Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois |
| 释义 |
|italic title=force |Litigants=Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois |ArgueDateA=April 14 |ArgueDateB=15 |ArgueYear=1886 |DecideDate=October 25 |DecideYear=1886 |FullName=Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. v. People of State of Illinois |USVol=118 |USPage=557 |ParallelCitations=7 S. Ct. 4; 30 L. Ed. 244 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=The Court held that Illinois had violated the Commerce Clause by placing a direct burden on interstate commerce. Under the Commerce Clause only Congress had the power to do so and states could only place indirect burdens on commerce. |SCOTUS=1882-1887 |Majority=Miller |JoinMajority=Field, Harlan, Woods, Matthews, Blatchford |Concurrence= |JoinConcurrence= |Dissent=Bradley |JoinDissent=Waite, Gray |LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. XIV |Overturned previous case=Munn v. Illinois (1877) }} Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois, 118 U.S. 557 (1886),{{Ref|citation}} also known as the Wabash Case, was a Supreme Court decision that severely limited the rights of states to control or impede interstate commerce. It led to the creation of the Interstate Commerce Commission. The courtThe majority's opinion was written by Justice Samuel Miller; joining him were Justices Stephen Field, John Harlan, William Woods, Thomas Matthews, and Samuel Blatchford. Dissenting were Chief Justice Morrison Waite and Justices Joseph Bradley and Horace Gray. The caseThe case was argued on April 14, 1886 - April 15, 1886 and was decided on October 25, 1886 by vote of 6 to 3. Associate Justice Miller wrote for the Court with Associate Justices Field, Harlan, Woods, Matthews, and Blatchford concurring; Associate Justices Bradley and Gray, along with Chief Justice Waite, dissented. In Wabash, "direct" burdens on interstate commerce were not permitted by the Export Tax Clause of the Constitution (Article I, Section 9); however, those "indirect" burdens were permitted under the Commerce Clause. This was a standard enacted in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852). Effects of decision
See also
External links
| case=Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois, {{ussc|118|557|1886|el=no}} | findlaw=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/118/557.html | justia=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/118/557/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep118/usrep118557/usrep118557.pdf }}
References
8 : Railway litigation in 1886|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Dormant Commerce Clause case law|1886 in United States case law|Wabash Railroad|Interstate Commerce Commission litigation|Legal history of Illinois|United States Supreme Court cases of the Waite Court |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。