| 词条 | Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1 |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1 |ArgueDate=January 11 |ArgueYear=2017 |DecideDate=March 22 |DecideYear=2017 |FullName=Endrew F., a minor, by and through his parents and next friends, Joseph F. et al. v. Douglas County School District RE-1 |USVol=580 |USPage=___ |ParallelCitations=137 S. Ct. 988; 197 L. Ed. 2d 335 |Docket=15–827 |OralArgument= | OralReargument = |OpinionAnnouncement= |Prior={{unbulleted list | ''Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1'', 798 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20150825070 1329] (10th Cir. 2015)| ''Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1'', No. 12-CV-02620-LTB (D. Colo. Sep. 15, 2014) }} |Procedural=On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |Subsequent= |Holding=To meet its substantive obligation under the IDEA, a school must offer an IEP reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacated and remanded. |SCOTUS=2016 |Majority=Roberts |JoinMajority=unanimous |LawsApplied=Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, {{USC|20|1400}} et seq. }}Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"),[1] schools must provide students an education that is "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances."[2] In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court vacated the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and held that the proper standard under the IDEA "is markedly more demanding than the 'merely more than de minimis test applied by the Tenth Circuit."[3] See also
References{{cbignore}}{{BBstyle}}1. ^{{USC|20|1400}} et seq. 2. ^{{ussc|name=Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1|volume=580|year=2017|docket=15-827}}, slip. op. at 11. 3. ^Endrew F., slip op. at 14, 16. External links
| case = Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, {{ussc|580|___|2017|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/580/15-827/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-827 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-827_0pm1.pdf{{DEFAULTSORT:Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE-1}} 5 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|United States disability case law|2017 in United States case law|Public education in the United States |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。