| 词条 | Ross v. Blake |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Ross v. Blake |ArgueDate=March 29 |ArgueYear=2016 |DecideDate=June 6 |DecideYear=2016 |FullName=Michael Ross, Petitioner v. Shaidon Blake |Docket=15-339 |OpinionAnnouncement=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-339_1b7d.pdf |USVol=578 |USPage=___ |ParallelCitations=136 S. Ct. 1850; 195 L. Ed. 2d 117 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=The Prison Litigation Reform Act’s requirement to exhaust administrative remedies does not have a “special circumstances” exception. |SCOTUS=2016 |Majority=Kagan |JoinMajority=Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor |Concurrence=Thomas |Concurrence2=Breyer |LawsApplied=Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 }}Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995.[1][2] Opinion of the CourtAssociate Justice Elena Kagan authored the majority opinion.[2]References1. ^SCOTUSblog coverage 2. ^1 {{ussc|name=Ross v. Blake|volume=578|year=2016|docket=15–339}}. External links
| case = Ross v. Blake, {{Ussc|578|___|2016|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3209793/ross-v-blake/ | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/578/15-339/ | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/15-339 | other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) | other_url1 =https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-339_1b7d.pdf
3 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court|2016 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。