请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 British nuclear tests at Maralinga
释义

  1. Historical context

  2. Major tests

      Operation Buffalo    Operation Antler  

  3. Minor tests

  4. Legacy

  5. Media coverage

  6. In popular culture

  7. See also

  8. References

  9. Further reading

  10. External links

{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}}{{Use Australian English|date=August 2011}}{{Infobox Military Test Site
|name=Maralinga Atomic Test Site in South Australia
|map=AusNucTestSites.svg
|image_mapsize=300px
|map_caption=Map showing nuclear test sites in Australia
|type=Nuclear test range
|coordinates={{coord|30|10|S|131|37|E|region:AU-SA_type:event|name=Maralinga}}
|nearest_town=Maralinga
|country=Australia
|operator=United Kingdom
|status=Inactive
|dates=1955–1963
|remediation=Completed in 2000
|subcritical_tests=700
|nuclear_tests=7}}

British nuclear tests at Maralinga occurred between 1956 and 1963 at the Maralinga site, part of the Woomera Prohibited Area in South Australia and about 800 kilometres north-west of Adelaide. A total of seven nuclear tests were performed, with approximate yields ranging from {{convert|1|to|27|ktTNT|lk=on}}. Two major test series were conducted at the Maralinga site: Operation Buffalo and Operation Antler. The site was also used for hundreds of minor trials, many of which were intended to investigate the effects of fire or non-nuclear explosions on atomic weapons.

The site was contaminated with radioactive materials and an initial cleanup was attempted in 1967. The McClelland Royal Commission, an examination of the effects of the tests, delivered its report in 1985, and found that significant radiation hazards still existed at many of the Maralinga test areas. It recommended another cleanup, which was completed in 2000 at a cost of $108 million. Debate continued over the safety of the site and the long-term health effects on the traditional Aboriginal custodians of the land and former personnel. In 1994, the Australian Government paid compensation amounting to $13.5 million to the local Maralinga Tjarutja people.

The Maralinga tests were subject to extreme secrecy, but by the late 1970s there was a marked change in how the Australian media covered the British nuclear tests. Some journalists investigated the subject and political scrutiny became more intense. Journalist Brian Toohey ran a series of stories in the Australian Financial Review in October 1978, based in part on a leaked Cabinet submission.[1] In June 1993, New Scientist journalist Ian Anderson wrote an article titled "Britain's dirty deeds at Maralinga"[2] and several related articles.[3] In 2007, Australia's Nuclear Waste Cover-up by Alan Parkinson documented the unsuccessful clean-up at Maralinga.[4][5][6] Popular songs about the Maralinga story have been written by Paul Kelly, Midnight Oil, Anderson, Bruford, Wakeman, Howe and Alistair Hulett.

Historical context

On 3 October 1952, the United Kingdom tested its first nuclear weapon, named "Hurricane", at the Monte Bello Islands off the coast of Western Australia. A year later the first nuclear test on the Australian mainland was Totem 1 ({{convert|9.1|ktTNT}}) at Emu Field in the Great Victoria Desert, South Australia, on 15 October 1953. Totem 2 ({{convert|7.1|ktTNT}}) followed two weeks later on 27 October.[7] The Supply Minister, Howard Beale, stated in 1955 that "England has the know how; we have the open spaces, much technical skill and a great willingness to help the Motherland. Between us we should help to build the defences of the free world, and make historic advances in harnessing the forces of nature."[8]

The British government formally requested a permanent test facility on 30 October 1953. Due to concerns about nuclear fallout from the previous tests at Emu Field and the site's inadequate infrastructure and water supply, the recently surveyed Maralinga site was selected for this purpose.[9] The new site was announced in May 1955.[7][10] It was developed as a joint, co-funded facility between the British and Australian governments.[11]

Prior to selection, the Maralinga site was inhabited by the Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara Aboriginal people, for whom it had a great spiritual significance. Many were relocated to a new settlement at Yalata, and attempts were made to curtail access to the Maralinga site. These were often unsuccessful.[12]

Major tests

Two major test series were conducted at the Maralinga site: Operation Buffalo and Operation Antler.

Operation Buffalo

{{Infobox nuclear weapons test
|name = Buffalo
|picture =
|picture_description =
|country = United Kingdom
|test_site = Maralinga Range, SAU
|period = 1956
|number_of_tests = 4
|test_type = air drop, dry surface, tower
|max_yield = {{convert|15|ktTNT|lk=in}}
|previous_series = Operation Mosaic
|next_series = Operation Antler
}}{{GeoGroup|article=British nuclear tests at Maralinga#Operation Buffalo}}Operation Buffalo commenced on 27 September 1956. The operation consisted of the testing of four nuclear devices, codenamed One Tree, Marcoo, Kite and Breakaway respectively. One Tree ({{convert|12.9|ktTNT}}) and Breakaway ({{convert|10.8|ktTNT}}) were exploded from towers, Marcoo ({{convert|1.4|ktTNT}}) was exploded at ground level, and Kite ({{convert|2.9|ktTNT}}) was released by a Royal Air Force Vickers Valiant bomber from a height of {{convert|35,000|ft}}.[13][14][15]

This was the first drop of a British nuclear weapon from an aircraft.

The fallout from these tests was measured using sticky paper, air sampling devices, and water sampled from rainfall and reservoirs.[16] The radioactive cloud from Buffalo 1 (One Tree) reached a height of {{convert|37500|ft|abbr=on}}, exceeding the predicted {{convert|27,900|ft|abbr=on}}, and radioactivity was detected in South Australia, Northern Territory, New South Wales, and Queensland. All four Buffalo tests were criticised by the 1985 McClelland Royal Commission, which concluded that they were fired under inappropriate conditions.[17]

In 2001, Dr Sue Rabbit Roff, a researcher from the University of Dundee, uncovered documentary evidence that troops had been ordered to run, walk and crawl across areas contaminated by the Buffalo tests in the days immediately following the detonations;[18] a fact that the British government later admitted.[19] Dr Roff stated that "it puts the lie to the British government's claim that they never used humans for guinea pig-type experiments in nuclear weapons trials in Australia."[20]

{{See also|List of nuclear weapons tests of the United Kingdom}}
 !style="background:#ffdead;" | Name [21] !style="background:#efefef;" | Date time (UT) !style="background:#ffdead;" | Local time zone [22][23] !style="background:#efefef;" | Location [24] !style="background:#ffdead;" | Elevation + height [25] !style="background:#efefef;" | Delivery, [26]
Purpose [27] !style="background:#efefef;" | Device [28] !style="background:#ffdead;" | Yield [29] !style="background:#efefef;" class="unsortable" | Fallout [30] !style="background:#ffdead;" class="unsortable" | Notes and
References
United Kingdom's Buffalo series tests and detonations
format=dmy|1956|9|27}} 07:30:??aCST (9.5 hrs)
-29.86876|131.65927|name=1/One Tree|display=inline}}000211|}}{{convert|180|m|abbr=on}} + {{convert|31|m|abbr=on}} tower,
Red Beard{{sort|000150000|15 kt}} [32][33][34]
format=dmy|1956|10|4}} 07:00:??aCST (9.5 hrs)
-29.8818|131.6247|name=2/Marcoo|display=inline}}000180|}}{{convert|180|m|abbr=on}} + {{convert|0.2|m|abbr=on}} dry surface,
weapon effect
Blue Danube{{sort|000015000|1.5 kt}} [32][33][34]
format=dmy|1956|10|11}} 05:57:??aCST (9.5 hrs)
-29.88915|131.65805|name=3/Kite|display=inline}}000330|}}{{convert|180|m|abbr=on}} + {{convert|150|m|abbr=on}} air drop,
weapons development
Blue Danube{{sort|000030000|3 kt}} [32][33][34]
format=dmy|1956|10|22}} 14:35:??aCST (9.5 hrs)
-29.89305|131.60474|name=4/Breakaway|display=inline}}000221|}}{{convert|190|m|abbr=on}} + {{convert|31|m|abbr=on}} tower,
Red Beard{{sort|000100000|10 kt}} [32][33][34]
1. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.foe.org.au/dig-secrets-lesson-maralingas-vixen-b |title=Dig for secrets: the lesson of Maralinga's Vixen B |author=Liz Tynan |date=November 2013 |work=Chain Reaction #119 }}
2. ^{{cite journal|last1=Ian Anderson|title=Britain's dirty deeds at Maralinga|journal=New Scientist|date=Jun 12, 1993|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13818772-700/}}
3. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2000/apr/05/guardianobituaries3 |title=Ian Anderson obituary |author=Philip Jones |date=5 April 2000 |work=The Guardian }}
4. ^Maralinga - Australia's nuclear waste cover-up
5. ^Nuclear waste and indigenous rights
6. ^Maralinga's nuclear nightmare continues {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080307102555/http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/730/37829 |date=7 March 2008 }}
7. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/470D247F-7615-460C-9829-DDAF99F88D39/0/Key_Events.pdf |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121026065214/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/470D247F-7615-460C-9829-DDAF99F88D39/0/Key_Events.pdf |dead-url=yes |archive-date=26 October 2012 |title=Key events in the UK atmospheric nuclear test programme |publisher=UK Ministry of Defence |accessdate=27 June 2009 |format=PDF }}
8. ^http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p72191/pdf/article106.pdf
9. ^Atomic Weapons Tests in: {{cite web | url=http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/fam/1042.html | title=Federation and Meteorology | accessdate=27 June 2009}}
10. ^Sources give slightly varying dates for the request and selection of the site.
11. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs129.aspx | title=Fact sheet 129: British nuclear tests at Maralinga | accessdate=27 June 2009}}
12. ^{{cite book|url=http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/lcj/wayward/ch16.html |first=P N |last=Grabosky |title=Wayward governance : illegality and its control in the public sector |publisher=Australian Institute of Criminology |location=Canberra |isbn=0-642-14605-5 |pages=235–253 |accessdate=27 June 2009 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080728180259/http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/lcj/wayward/ch16.html |archivedate=28 July 2008 }}
13. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/bsv/nuclear_explosions/great_britain.html | publisher=Swiss Seismological Service | title=Nuclear Explosions from Great Britain 1945–1998 | date=5 February 2003 | accessdate=27 June 2009 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080206002959/http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/bsv/nuclear_explosions/great_britain.html |archivedate = 6 February 2008}}
14. ^Some sources quote different yields. For example, Parkinson (MAPW 2000) states that their yields were 15 kt, 10 kt, 1.5 kt and 3 kt respectively.
15. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/valiant/history.html | title=Vickers Valiant: History | accessdate=27 June 2009}}
16. ^Atomic Weapons Tests–Buffalo 1, 2, 3 and 4 in: {{cite web | url=http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/fam/1047.html | title=Federation and Meteorology | accessdate=27 June 2009}}
17. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/guides/titt/22.htm | title=Summary of findings of the Royal Commission | accessdate=27 June 2009}}
18. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/stories/s295331.htm | title=Evidence uncovered about Maralinga experiment | publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation | date=11 May 2006 | accessdate=2 December 2008 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081227040445/http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/stories/s295331.htm# | archive-date=27 December 2008 | dead-url=yes | df=dmy-all }}
19. ^{{cite news | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1326580.stm | title=Australia confronts UK over N-tests | publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation | date=12 May 2006 | accessdate=2 December 2008}}
20. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.abc.net.au/am/stories/s294575.htm | title=Maralinga revelations | publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation | date=11 May 2006 | accessdate=2 December 2008}}
21. ^The US, France and Great Britain have code-named their test events, while the USSR and China did not, and therefore have only test numbers (with some exceptions – Soviet peaceful explosions were named). Word translations into English in parentheses unless the name is a proper noun. A dash followed by a number indicates a member of a salvo event. The US also sometimes named the individual explosions in such a salvo test, which results in "name1 – 1(with name2)". If test is canceled or aborted, then the row data like date and location discloses the intended plans, where known.
22. ^To convert the UT time into standard local, add the number of hours in parentheses to the UT time; for local daylight saving time, add one additional hour. If the result is earlier than 00:00, add 24 hours and subtract 1 from the day; if it is 24:00 or later, subtract 24 hours and add 1 to the day. All historical timezone data are derived from here:
23. ^{{cite web| title=Timezone Historical Database| publisher=iana.com| url=http://www.ietf.org/timezones/| accessdate=8 March 2014}}
24. ^Rough place name and a latitude/longitude reference; for rocket-carried tests, the launch location is specified before the detonation location, if known. Some locations are extremely accurate; others (like airdrops and space blasts) may be quite inaccurate. "~" indicates a likely pro-forma rough location, shared with other tests in that same area.
25. ^Elevation is the ground level at the point directly below the explosion relative to sea level; height is the additional distance added or subtracted by tower, balloon, shaft, tunnel, air drop or other contrivance. For rocket bursts the ground level is "N/A". In some cases it is not clear if the height is absolute or relative to ground, for example, Plumbbob/John. No number or units indicates the value is unknown, while "0" means zero. Sorting on this column is by elevation and height added together.
26. ^Atmospheric, airdrop, balloon, gun, cruise missile, rocket, surface, tower, and barge are all disallowed by the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Sealed shaft and tunnel are underground, and remained useful under the PTBT. Intentional cratering tests are borderline; they occurred under the treaty, were sometimes protested, and generally overlooked if the test was declared to be a peaceful use.
27. ^Include weapons development, weapon effects, safety test, transport safety test, war, science, joint verification and industrial/peaceful, which may be further broken down.
28. ^Designations for test items where known, "?" indicates some uncertainty about the preceding value, nicknames for particular devices in quotes. This category of information is often not officially disclosed.
29. ^Estimated energy yield in tons, kilotons, and megatons. A ton of TNT equivalent is defined as 4.184 gigajoules (1 gigacalorie).
30. ^Radioactive emission to the atmosphere aside from prompt neutrons, where known. The measured species is only iodine-131 if mentioned, otherwise it is all species. No entry means unknown, probably none if underground and "all" if not; otherwise notation for whether measured on the site only or off the site, where known, and the measured amount of radioactivity released.
31. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ccsa.asn.au/nic/NucHazards/SAweapons.htm |title=Nuclear weapons proliferation in South Australia 1945–1965 |publisher=Conservation Council of South Australia |accessdate=2 December 2008 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080727134653/http://www.ccsa.asn.au/nic/NucHazards/SAweapons.htm |archivedate=27 July 2008 |df=dmy }}
32. ^{{cite web | url=http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Uk/UKTesting.html | title=Britain's Nuclear Weapons | publisher=Nuclear Weapon Archive | accessdate=2 December 2008}}
33. ^The US, France and Great Britain have code-named their test events, while the USSR and China did not, and therefore have only test numbers (with some exceptions – Soviet peaceful explosions were named). Word translations into English in parentheses unless the name is a proper noun. A dash followed by a number indicates a member of a salvo event. The US also sometimes named the individual explosions in such a salvo test, which results in "name1 – 1(with name2)". If test is canceled or aborted, then the row data like date and location discloses the intended plans, where known.
34. ^To convert the UT time into standard local, add the number of hours in parentheses to the UT time; for local daylight saving time, add one additional hour. If the result is earlier than 00:00, add 24 hours and subtract 1 from the day; if it is 24:00 or later, subtract 24 hours and add 1 to the day. All historical timezone data are derived from here:
35. ^Rough place name and a latitude/longitude reference; for rocket-carried tests, the launch location is specified before the detonation location, if known. Some locations are extremely accurate; others (like airdrops and space blasts) may be quite inaccurate. "~" indicates a likely pro-forma rough location, shared with other tests in that same area.
36. ^Elevation is the ground level at the point directly below the explosion relative to sea level; height is the additional distance added or subtracted by tower, balloon, shaft, tunnel, air drop or other contrivance. For rocket bursts the ground level is "N/A". In some cases it is not clear if the height is absolute or relative to ground, for example, Plumbbob/John. No number or units indicates the value is unknown, while "0" means zero. Sorting on this column is by elevation and height added together.
37. ^Atmospheric, airdrop, balloon, gun, cruise missile, rocket, surface, tower, and barge are all disallowed by the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Sealed shaft and tunnel are underground, and remained useful under the PTBT. Intentional cratering tests are borderline; they occurred under the treaty, were sometimes protested, and generally overlooked if the test was declared to be a peaceful use.
38. ^Include weapons development, weapon effects, safety test, transport safety test, war, science, joint verification and industrial/peaceful, which may be further broken down.
39. ^Designations for test items where known, "?" indicates some uncertainty about the preceding value, nicknames for particular devices in quotes. This category of information is often not officially disclosed.
40. ^Estimated energy yield in tons, kilotons, and megatons. A ton of TNT equivalent is defined as 4.184 gigajoules (1 gigacalorie).
41. ^Radioactive emission to the atmosphere aside from prompt neutrons, where known. The measured species is only iodine-131 if mentioned, otherwise it is all species. No entry means unknown, probably none if underground and "all" if not; otherwise notation for whether measured on the site only or off the site, where known, and the measured amount of radioactivity released.
42. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/05/11/1052280486255.html | first=John | last=Keane | title=Maralinga's afterlife | publisher=The Age | date=11 May 2003 | accessdate=2 December 2008}}
43. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.radioactivewaste.gov.au/Rehabilitation_former_test_sites.htm | title=Maralinga rehabilitation project | publisher=Australian Department of Education, Science and Training | accessdate=2 December 2008 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080719004540/http://www.radioactivewaste.gov.au/Rehabilitation_former_test_sites.htm |archivedate = 19 July 2008}}
44. ^Maralinga: nuclear testing in Australia {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071008223855/http://www.greenleft.org.au/1995/196/11520 |date=8 October 2007 }} Green Left, 2 August 1995. Retrieved 2 December 2008
45. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dva.gov.au/media/publicat/2006/nuclear_test/dosimetry/pdf/dosimetry_chapter_1_introduction.pdf |title=Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests in Australia 2006 – Dosimetry |publisher=Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs |page=7 |accessdate=2 December 2008 |format=PDF |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090225154407/http://www.dva.gov.au/media/publicat/2006/nuclear_test/dosimetry/pdf/dosimetry_chapter_1_introduction.pdf |archivedate=25 February 2009 |df=dmy }}
46. ^Atomic Weapons Tests—Minor Trials in: {{cite web | url=http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/fam/1051.html | title=Federation and Meteorology | accessdate=2 December 2008}}
47. ^{{cite web | url=http://arpansa.gov.au//pubs/basics/maralinga.pdf | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080831115407/http://arpansa.gov.au//pubs/basics/maralinga.pdf | archivedate=2008-08-31 | title=Maralinga | publisher=Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency | accessdate=2 December 2008|format=PDF}}
48. ^{{cite book|first1=Michio|last1=Kaku|first2=Jennifer|last2=Trainer|title=Nuclear Power, Both Sides: The Best Arguments for and Against the Most Controversial Technology|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|year=1983|url=https://books.google.com/?id=7A9A9BSk0eUC&lpg=PA78&pg=PA77#v=onepage|accessdate=8 December 2013|page=77|isbn=978-0-393-30128-1}}
49. ^Book Review: "Fallout: Hedley Marston and the British bomb tests in Australia" {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061019172546/http://www.discontents.com.au/words/review_fallout.php |date=19 October 2006 }}, by Tim Sherratt, Historical Records of Australian Science, vol. 14, no. 2, November 2002, pp. 209–10.
50. ^{{cite book|first=Richard|last=Broinowski|author-link=Richard Broinowski|date=2003|title=Fact or Fission: The Truth About Australia's Nuclear Ambitions|publisher=Scribe Publications|page=177}}
51. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.ippnw.org/pdf/mgs/7-2-parkinson.pdf | title=Maralinga: The Clean-Up of a Nuclear Test Site | publisher=International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War | accessdate=2 December 2008}}
52. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dva.gov.au/media/publicat/2006/nuclear_test/dosimetry/pdf/dosimetry_chapter_7_results.pdf |title=Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests in Australia 2006 – Dosimetry |publisher=Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs |page=145 |accessdate=2 December 2008 |format=PDF |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080802150714/http://www.dva.gov.au/media/publicat/2006/nuclear_test/dosimetry/pdf/dosimetry_chapter_7_results.pdf |archivedate=2 August 2008 |df=dmy }}
53. ^Do atomic test victims deserve compensation? {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110612114615/http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article5561441.ece |date=12 June 2011 }}
54. ^{{cite book|first=Richard|last=Broinowski|author-link=Richard Broinowski|date=2003|title=Fact or Fission: The Truth About Australia's Nuclear Ambitions|publisher=Scribe Publications|page=178}}
55. ^The Career Highlights of Mamu
56. ^{{cite book|first=Richard|last=Broinowski|author-link=Richard Broinowski|date=2003|title=Fact or Fission: The Truth About Australia's Nuclear Ambitions|publisher=Scribe Publications|pages=175–176}}
57. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.abc.net.au/tv/messagestick/stories/s2716335.htm |title=Maralinga: The Anangu Story |date=18 October 2009 |work=Message Stick |page= |access-date=28 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110601081300/http://www.abc.net.au/tv/messagestick/stories/s2716335.htm# |archive-date=1 June 2011 |dead-url=yes |df=dmy-all }}
58. ^Dresden Codak » Archive » Operation Buffalo
59. ^{{cite web|url = http://www.australiantelevision.net/acp/1982.html|title = Australian Television Information Archive|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = }}
60. ^{{cite book |last=Chatwin |first=Bruce |date=1987 |title=The Songlines |location=London |publisher=Vintage | pages=77–78 |isbn=0-09-976991-3}}
61. ^{{Cite web |url=http://www.smithshill-h.schools.nsw.edu.au/extra-curricular-activities/tadpole-productions-1/personal-space |title=Archived copy |access-date=10 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180325133545/http://www.smithshill-h.schools.nsw.edu.au/extra-curricular-activities/tadpole-productions-1/personal-space |archive-date=25 March 2018 |dead-url=yes |df=dmy-all }}
62. ^{{cite book| last1=Norris| first1=Robert S.| first2=Andrew S.| last2=Burrows| first3=Richard W.| last3=Fieldhouse| year=1994| title=Nuclear Weapons Databook, Vol. 5: British, French, and Chinese Nuclear Weapons| publisher=Westview Press| location=Boulder, CO}}
63. ^{{cite techreport| year=2002| title=Rehabilitation of Former Nuclear Test Sites at Emu and Maralinga (Australia) 2003| publisher=Maralinga Rehabilitation Technical Advisory Committee, Department of Education, Science and Training| location=Canberra City, CT| url=http://www.ret.gov.au/resources/radioactive_waste/maralinga/maralingaandemu/Pages/default.aspx| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120808120637/http://www.ret.gov.au/resources/radioactive_waste/maralinga/maralingaandemu/Pages/default.aspx| dead-url=yes| archive-date=8 August 2012| accessdate=18 December 2013| df=dmy-all}}
64. ^{{cite techreport| last1=Yang| first1=Xiaoping| first2=Robert| last2=North| first3=Carl| last3=Romney|date=August 2000| title=CMR Nuclear Explosion Database (Revision 3)| publisher=SMDC Monitoring Research}}

Operation Antler

{{Infobox nuclear weapons test
|name = Antler
|picture =
|picture_description =
|country = United Kingdom
|test_site = Maralinga Range, SAU
|period = 1957
|number_of_tests = 3
|test_type = balloon, tower
|max_yield = {{convert|26.6|ktTNT|lk=in}}
|previous_series = Operation Buffalo
|next_series = Operation Grapple
}}{{GeoGroup|article=British nuclear tests at Maralinga#Operation Antler}}Operation Antler followed in 1957. Antler was designed to test components for thermonuclear weapons, with particular emphasis on triggering mechanisms.[31] Three tests began in September, codenamed Tadje, Biak and Taranaki. The first two tests were conducted from towers, the last was suspended from balloons. Yields from the weapons were {{convert|0.93|ktTNT}}, {{convert|5.67|ktTNT}} and {{convert|26.6|ktTNT}} respectively.[13] The Tadje test used cobalt pellets as a 'tracer' for determining yield;[17][32] later rumours developed that Britain had been developing a cobalt bomb.[32] The Royal Commission found that personnel handling these pellets were later exposed to the active cobalt 60.[17] Although the Antler series were better planned and organised than earlier series, intermediate fallout from the Taranaki test exceeded predictions.[17]{{See also|List of nuclear weapons tests of the United Kingdom}}
 !style="background:#ffdead;" | Name [33] !style="background:#efefef;" | Date time (UT) !style="background:#ffdead;" | Local time zone [34][23] !style="background:#efefef;" | Location [35] !style="background:#ffdead;" | Elevation + height [36] !style="background:#efefef;" | Delivery,[37]
Purpose [38] !style="background:#efefef;" | Device [39] !style="background:#ffdead;" | Yield [40] !style="background:#efefef;" class="unsortable" | Fallout [41] !style="background:#ffdead;" class="unsortable" | Notes and
References
United Kingdom's Antler series tests and detonations
format=dmy|1957|9|14}} 05:05:??aCST (9.5 hrs)
-29.8898|131.6467|name=1/Tadje|display=inline}}000211|}}{{convert|180|m|abbr=on}} + {{convert|31|m|abbr=on}} tower,
weapons development
Pixie{{sort|000009300|930 t}} [32][33][34] Reportedly a cobalt-salted bomb, which was incorrect, as the cobalt left at the site was diagnostic. Test regarded as a failure.
format=dmy|1957|9|25}} 00:30:??aCST (9.5 hrs)
-29.89262|131.61718|name=2/Biak|display=inline}}000211|}}{{convert|180|m|abbr=on}} + {{convert|31|m|abbr=on}} tower,
weapons development
Indigo Hammer{{sort|000060000|6 kt}} [32][33][34]
format=dmy|1957|10|9}} 06:45:??aCST (9.5 hrs)
-29.8948|131.5916|name=3/Taranaki|display=inline}}000480|}}{{convert|180|m|abbr=on}} + {{convert|300|m|abbr=on}} balloon,
weapons development
{{sort|000266000|26.6 kt}} [32][33][34]
{{reflist|group=note}}

Minor tests

In addition to the major tests, a large number of minor trials were also carried out, from June 1955 and extended through to April 1963.[7] Although the major tests had been carried out with some publicity, the minor tests were carried out in absolute secrecy.[42] These minor tests left a dangerous legacy of radioactive contamination at Maralinga.[43][44]

The four series of minor trials were codenamed 'Kittens', 'Tims', 'Rats' and 'Vixen'.[42] In all, these trials included up to 700 tests, with tests involving experiments with plutonium, uranium, and beryllium.{{cn|date=February 2019}}Operation Kittens involved 99 trials, performed at both Maralinga and Emu Field in 1953–1961.[45] The tests were used in the development of neutron initiators, involving use of polonium-210 and uranium, and generated "relatively large amounts of radioactive contamination."[45] Operation Tims took place in 1955–1963, and involved 321 trials of uranium and beryllium tampers, as well as studies of plutonium compression.[45] Operation Rats investigated explosive dispersal of uranium.[45] 125 trials took place between 1956 and 1960.

The Vixen minor trials (Vixen A and Vixen B) were formulated to investigate what would happen to a nuclear device which burnt or was subject to a non-nuclear explosion.[42] 31 Vixen A trials between 1959 and 1961 investigated the effects of an accidental fire on a nuclear weapon, and involved a total of about 1 kg of plutonium.[46] Twelve Vixen B trials, between 1960 and 1963, attempted to discover the effects of high explosives detonating a nuclear weapon in a fire (typical of conditions which would occur in aviation accidents) and involved 22 kg of plutonium.[46] They produced "jets of molten, burning plutonium extending hundreds of feet into the air."[47] It was the lack of subsequent disposal of the plutonium from these minor trials – Vixen B especially – which created the major radiation problems at the site.[47]

The Vixen experimental tests used TNT to blow up simulated nuclear warheads containing plutonium-239. In total, Vixen B scattered 22.2 kg of plutonium around the Maralinga test site known as Taranaki, in particles of widely divergent size. Plutonium is not particularly dangerous externally - it emits alpha particles which are stopped by {{convert|9|cm|abbr=on}} of air, or the dead layer of skin cells on the body, and is not a very intensive source of radiation, due to its long half-life of 24,000 years. It is most dangerous when it enters the body, in the worst case by breathing, and therefore tiny particles, often the result of such explosion testing, are the worst threat. The extreme biological persistence of plutonium's radioactive contamination and the cancer threat posed by alpha radiation occurring internally together establish plutonium's dangers.[48]

In terms of regular nuclear testing, Kittens represents bomb component testing, while Tims and Rats were early subcritical hydronuclear tests. Vixen is "safety testing" of a bomb; assuring that the core would not accidentally undergo criticality in the event of a fire or unintended crash. These are always messy (see the US equivalent at Plutonium Valley in Project 56), for a successful test subjects the core fuel to high explosives in the hope that it simply scatters rather than undergoes criticality. The differences in the sort of dangers presented by major vs the minor tests is that there was no critical explosion in the minor tests. In the major tests, the bomb cores reached critical mass; the plutonium or uranium fissile materials "burned" into highly radioactive fission products, and those, along with the unspent fuel and activated bomb case, tower and soil if the explosion was close to the ground, are lofted into the stratosphere to be dropped eventually as fallout globally. In Vixen, an equivalent amount of plutonium fuel was simply smashed by explosives and spread about much more locally. In Kittens, Tims and Rats, smaller amounts of various materials were similar exploded locally and spread about.

Legacy

In the 1950s, Hedley Marston's research into nuclear fallout from the Maralinga nuclear tests brought Marston into bitter conflict with the Australian government appointed Atomic Weapons Tests Safety Committee. He was vindicated posthumously by the McClelland Royal Commission, which found that significant radiation hazards existed at many of the Maralinga test sites long after the tests. His project tracked fallout across the continent by examining the thyroids of sheep and cattle as well as devices that filtered radioactive elements from air. Later the results, which showed dramatic increases of certain radioactive elements after British nuclear tests, prompted a further, controversial study where the bones of deceased people (especially children) were burnt to ash and then measured for strontium-90. These tests showed that the tests had increased the concentration of strontium-90 dramatically. As well as finding this after British tests a notable 50% increase was noticed one year when there were no tests and it was cited as evidence that the previous year's hydrogen bomb tests had contaminated the majority of the world.[49]

A Maralinga cleanup operation codenamed Operation Brumby was conducted in 1967.[7] Attempts were made to dilute the concentration of radioactive material by turning over and mixing the surface soil.[47] Additionally, the remains of the firings, including plutonium-contaminated fragments, were buried in 22 concrete-capped pits.[47]

In the 1970s, whistle-blower Avon Hudson disclosed details of the Maralinga testing program to the Australian media at risk of incarceration. His disclosures related to the inadequacy of clean-up measures, persistent contamination and associated health risks of ionizing radiation. Hudson gave testimony to the Royal Commission into British nuclear tests in Australia in 1984 and 1985 and has since continued to work as a spokesperson for nuclear veterans in South Australia.

The McClelland Royal Commission into the tests delivered its report in late 1985, and found that significant radiation hazards still existed at many of the Maralinga test sites, particularly at Taranaki,[43] where the Vixen B trials into the effects of burning plutonium had been carried out. A Technical Assessment Group was set up to advise on rehabilitation options, and a much more extensive cleanup program was initiated at the site.[47]

The TAG Report plan was approved in 1991 and work commenced on site in 1996 and was completed in 2000 at a cost of $108 million.[43][50] In the worst-contaminated areas, 350,000 cubic metres of soil and debris were removed from an area of more than 2 square kilometres, and buried in trenches. Eleven debris pits were also treated with in-situ vitrification. Most of the site (approximately 3,200 square kilometres) is now safe for unrestricted access and approximately 120 square kilometres is considered safe for access but not permanent occupancy.[43] Alan Parkinson has observed that "an Aboriginal living a semi-traditional lifestyle would receive an effective dose of 5 mSv/a (five times that allowed for a member of the public). Within the 120 km², the effective dose would be up to 13 times greater."[51]

A Department of Veterans' Affairs study concluded that "Overall, the doses received by Australian participants were small. ... Only 2% of participants received more than the current Australian annual dose limit for occupationally exposed persons (20 mSv)."[52] However, such findings are contested. Australian servicemen were ordered to: repeatedly fly through the mushroom clouds from atomic explosions, without protection; and to march into ground zero immediately after bomb detonation. Airborne drifts of radioactive material resulted in "radioactive rain" being dropped on Brisbane and Queensland country areas. A 1999 study for the British Nuclear Test Veterans Association found that 30 per cent of involved veterans had died, mostly in their fifties, from cancers.[53]

Successive Australian governments failed to compensate servicemen who contracted cancers following exposure to radiation at Maralinga. However, after a British decision in 1988 to compensate its own servicemen, the Australian Government negotiated compensation for several Australian servicemen suffering from two specific conditions, leukemia (except lymphatic leukemia) and the rare blood disorder multiple myeloma.[54]

One author suggests that the resettlement and denial of aboriginal access to their homelands "contributed significantly to the social disintegration which characterises the community to this day. Petrol sniffing, juvenile crime, alcoholism and chronic friction between residents and the South Australian police have become facts of life."[12] In 1994, the Australian Government reached a compensation settlement with Maralinga Tjarutja, which resulted in the payment of $13.5 million in settlement of all claims in relation to the nuclear testing.[43]

Media coverage

According to Liz Tynan from James Cook University, the Maralinga tests were a striking example of what can happen when the popular media are unable to report on activities that the government may be trying to hide. Maralinga was an example of extreme secrecy, but by the late 1970s there was a marked change in how the Australian media covered the British nuclear tests. Some resourceful investigative journalists emerged, whistle-blowers such as Avon Hudson spoke out and political scrutiny became more intense. The investigative journalist Brian Toohey ran a series of stories in the Australian Financial Review in October 1978, based in part on a leaked Cabinet submission.[1]

In June 1993, New Scientist journalist Ian Anderson wrote an article entitled "Britain's dirty deeds at Maralinga" and several related articles. They are a detailed analysis of the legacy of Vixen B and the Australian government's prolonged negotiations with the United Kingdom on cleaning up Maralinga and sharing the cost of "safe-sealing" waste plutonium. Previously, much of this highly toxic nuclear waste had simply been lightly bulldozed into the soil rather than buried in deep, secure, purpose-built, concrete bunkers. In 1993, Anderson won two Michael Daley Awards for his Maralinga articles.[3]

Australia’s Nuclear Waste Cover-up is a book by Alan Parkinson about the clean-up following the British nuclear tests at Maralinga, published in 2007.[4] Parkinson, a nuclear engineer, explains that the clean-up of Maralinga in the late 1990s was compromised by cost-cutting and simply involved dumping hazardous radioactive debris in shallow holes in the ground. Parkinson states that "What was done at Maralinga was a cheap and nasty solution that wouldn't be adopted on white-fellas land."[5][6]

In popular culture

Ground Zero is a fictional political conspiracy thriller about what happened during the Maralinga tests.

The 1991 folk song "Plains of Maralinga" by Alistair Hulett describes the tests and their deadly side-effects on the Pitjantjatjara people.

The Career Highlights of the Mamu is an Australian play by Trevor Jamieson and Scott Rankin, performed by the Adelaide Festival in February–March 2002. The play tells the story of the Tjuntjuntjara Aboriginal people, who lived in the desert country between South Australia and Western Australia, and their experience with British nuclear testing at Maralinga and Emu Field. Tribal elders describe being moved out of the area, and the death and illness of their people when they attempted to return to their contaminated homelands.[55][56]Maralinga: The Anangu Story, by the Yalata & Oak Communities with Christobel Mattingley (Allen & Unwin, 2009), is an information book about the history and culture of the region, the controversy and its original owners. Aimed at young people, the book was awarded a silver Honour medal in 2010 by the Children's Book Council of Australia.[57]

The Stranglers referenced the nuclear tests in Australia in their song "Nuclear Device (The Wizard of Aus)".

Australian rock band Midnight Oil recorded a song about the tests called "Maralinga" on their 1982 LP 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

Paul Kelly's "Maralinga (Rainy Land)" is about the effects of British nuclear tests on the Maralinga Tjarutja (indigenous people of Maralinga, South Australia).[18][31]

The tests were the subject of the song "Birthright" by progressive rock group Anderson Bruford Wakeman Howe.

The song "After Maralinga" by the British band Latin Quarter is about the aftermath of the nuclear tests.

In Marlo Morgan's 2001 novel Message from Forever, a group of nomadic Aborignies in the 1950s discover a previously unknown crater in a region whose occupants had been resettled five years prior. Curious to explore, they camp in it and later discover animals suffering from cancer and mutations in the vicinity.

The Australian writer Judy Nunn published a novel titled Maralinga in 2011.

The novel The Last Albatross by Ian Irvine referenced this location as the source of weapons grade plutonium used in a terror plot against Australia.

Web comic author Aaron Diaz wrote a one-page comic re-imagining the Maralinga tests.[58]

The fictional story of a man with leukemia who was present during the tests featured in the 1982 A Country Practice episode "Field of Thunder." [59]

A primary school in the Melbourne suburb of Keysborough was named Maralinga primary school between 1975-2009.

In the 1987 novel The Songlines by Bruce Chatwin, the nuclear tests are described from an Aboriginal point of view as a "cloud of flies [that] would burst upwards and cover the whole earth and kill every man and animal with poison" if a particular sacred site were to be disturbed.[60]

Bryan Cutler's 2013 play 'Personal Space' included scenes set in Marlinga as well as the character Atoll Fallout who had been infected with radiation from the tests.[61]

See also

  • Downwinders
  • Montebello Islands
  • Operation Grapple
  • Archie Barton

References

{{reflist|2|refs=[62][63][64]
}}

Further reading

  • {{cite book |author1=Arnold, Lorna |author2=Smith, Mark |lastauthoramp=yes | title=Britain, Australia and the Bomb: The Nuclear Tests and their Aftermath | publisher= Palgrave Macmillan | year=2006 | isbn=1-4039-2102-4}}
  • {{cite book | author=Beadell, Len | title= Blast The Bush | publisher=Lansdowne Publishing | year=1967 | isbn=1-86302-618-5 }}
  • {{cite book | author=Cross, R. T.| title= Beyond belief : the British bomb tests : Australia's veterans speak out | publisher=Wakefield Press| year=2005| isbn=1-86254-660-6 }}
  • {{cite book | author=Milliken, Robert| title=No Conceivable Injury | publisher= Penguin Books Australia| year=1986 | isbn=0-14-008438-X}}
  • {{cite book | author=Walker, Frank| title= Maralinga | publisher= Hachette Australia| year=2014 | isbn=978-0-7336-3190-0}}
  • {{cite book | author=Yalata & Oak Communities with Mattingley, Christobel | title= Maralinga: The Anangu Story | publisher=Allen & Unwin | year=2009 | isbn=978-1-74175-621-0 }}

External links

  • Video of British nuclear tests
  • Aerial photo of the Taranaki and Kite test sites (Maralinga village & airfield are situated approx 20 miles to the South)
  • [https://web.archive.org/web/20110312175054/http://www.ret.gov.au/resources/radioactive_waste/maralinga/Pages/MaralingaRehabilitationProject.aspx Maralinga Rehabilitation Project]
  • Backs to the Blast, an Australian Nuclear Story
  • Nuclear fallout hits families
  • Scandal of Operation Buffalo{{dead link|date=October 2016}}
  • [https://archive.is/20121230215114/http://news.theage.com.au/we-were-involved-in-nuke-test-veterans/20080421-27k5.html We were involved in nuke test: veterans]
  • [https://web.archive.org/web/20091115110704/http://www.australianatomicconfessions.com/ Australian Atomic Confessions film]
{{good article}}

11 : 1950s in military history|1960s in military history|1950s in South Australia|1960s in South Australia|1950s in the United Kingdom|1960s in the United Kingdom|British nuclear testing in Australia|20th-century military history of the United Kingdom|Environmental issues in Australia|Explosions in Australia|Australia–United Kingdom relations

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/10 17:17:36