| 词条 | Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire |
| 释义 |
The Turkish Capitulations were grants made by successive Sultans to Christian nations, conferring rights and privileges in favour of their subjects resident or trading in the Ottoman dominions, following the policy towards European states of the Byzantine Empire. According to these capitulations traders entering the Ottoman Empire were exempt from local prosecution, local taxation, local conscription, and the searching of their domicile. The capitulations were initially made during the Ottoman Empire's military dominance, to entice and encourage commercial exchange with Western merchants. However, after military dominance shifted to Europe, significant economic and political advantages were granted to the European powers by the Ottoman Empire.[2] HistoryIn the first instance capitulations were granted separately to each Christian state, beginning with the Genoese in 1453, which entered into peaceful relations with the Ottoman Empire. Afterwards new capitulations were obtained which summed up in one document earlier concessions, and added to them in general terms whatever had been conceded to one or more other states; a stipulation which became a most favored nation article. Around 1535 a capitulation was made by Suleiman the Magnificent regarding France. France signed its first treaty of Capitulations with the Mamluk Sultanate in Cairo in 1500, during the rule of Louis XII.[3][4] After the Turks conquered Egypt in the Ottoman–Mamluk War (1516–1517), the Ottomans upheld the capitulations to the French and applied them to the entire empire. StatusCapitulations signified that which was arranged under distinct headings; the Ottoman Turkish phrase was ahid nameh, whereas a "treaty" was mouahed. The latter did, and the former did not, signify a reciprocal engagement.{{Citation needed|date=August 2009}} According to Capitulations, and treaties confirmatory of them, made between the Porte and other states, foreigners resident in Turkey were subject to the laws of their respective countries. Thus, although the Turkish capitulations were not in themselves treaties, yet by subsequent confirmation they acquired the force of commercial durable instead of personal nature; the conversion of permissive into perfect rights; questions as to contraband and neutral trade stated in definite terms. AbolitionIn 1914, the Committee of Union and Progress abolished the capitulations in the Ottoman Empire and introduced economic policies that would benefit the Ottoman economy. As far as Turkey is concerned, the capitulations were abolished by the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), specifically by Article 28: {{quote|Each of the High Contracting Parties hereby accepts, in so far as it is concerned, the complete abolition of the Capitulations in Turkey in every respect.[5]}}Capitulations in Egypt ended in 1949 as stipulated in the Montreux Convention Regarding the Abolition of the Capitulations in Egypt in 1937.[6] List of capitulationsCapitulatory treaties were signed with the following countries:[7][8]
See also
References1. ^As regards technical distinctions, an agreement, an exchange of notes, or a convention properly applies to one specific subject; whereas a treaty usually comprises several matters, whether commercial or political. 2. ^{{cite book|last1=Cleveland|first1=William|last2=Bunton|first2=Martin|title=A History of the Modern Middle East|date=2009|publisher=Westview Press|isbn=978-0-8133-4374-7|page=50|edition=4}} 3. ^[https://books.google.com/books?id=cq90z2Ij6jsC&pg=PA139 Three years in Constantinople by Charles White p.139] 4. ^[https://books.google.com/books?id=cq90z2Ij6jsC&pg=PA147 Three years in Constantinople by Charles White p.147] 5. ^In addition to Turkey, the British Empire, France, Italy, Japan, Greece, Romania and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia were parties to the Treaty. 6. ^Convention regarding the Abolition of the Capitulations in Egypt, Protocol, and Declaration by the Royal Egyptian Government (Montreux, 8 May 1936) Art 1. 7. ^Lucius Ellsworth Thayer, "The Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire and the Question of their Abrogation as it Affects the United States", The American Journal of International Law, 17, 2 (1923): 207–33. 8. ^Philip Marshall Brown, [https://archive.org/details/foreignersintur00marsgoog Foreigners in Turkey: Their Juridical Status] (Princeton University Press, 1914), p. 41.
Bibliography
| last = Hoyle | first = Mark S. W. | authorlink = | coauthors = | editor = | others = | title = Mixed courts of Egypt | origyear = | month = | url = | format = | accessdate = | edition = | date = | year = 1991 | publisher = Graham & Trotman | location = London | nopp = true | page = xxvii, 206p. }}
| editor = Maurits H. van den Boogert and Kate Fleet (eds.) | title = The Ottoman capitulations: text and context | year = 2003 | publisher = Istituto per l'Oriente C.A. Nallino | location = Rome | pages = vii, [575]-727, 14p. of plates : ill., facsims. }}
| last = Boogert | first = Maurits H. van den | title = The capitulations and the Ottoman legal system: qadis, consuls, and beraths in the 18th century | year = 2005 | publisher = Brill | location = Leiden | nopp = true | page = xvi, 323p. }} 10 : Politics of the Ottoman Empire|Economic history of France|Catholicism and Islam|Foreign relations of the Ottoman Empire|France–Ottoman Empire relations|Germany–Ottoman Empire relations|Greece–Ottoman Empire relations|Ottoman Empire–United Kingdom relations|Nationality treaties|Christianity in the Ottoman Empire |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。