| 词条 | Causewayed enclosure |
| 释义 |
A causewayed enclosure is a type of large prehistoric earthwork common to the early Neolithic in Europe. More than 100 examples are recorded in France and 70 in England, while further sites are known in Scandinavia, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Ireland and Slovakia.{{citation needed|date=October 2010}} The term "causewayed enclosure" is now preferred to the older term causewayed camp as it has been demonstrated that the sites did not necessarily serve as occupation sites. ConstructionCausewayed enclosures are often located on hilltop sites, encircled by one to four concentric ditches with an internal bank. Enclosures located in lowland areas are generally larger than hilltop ones. Crossing the ditches at intervals are causeways which give the monuments their names. It appears that the ditches were excavated in sections, leaving the wide causeways intact in between. They should not be confused with segmented, or causewayed ring ditches, which are smaller and are thought to relate only to funerary activity, or with hillforts, which appeared later and had a definite defensive function. With regard to defensive functionality, however, evidence of timber palisades has been found at some sites such as Hambledon Hill. FunctionArchaeological evidence implies that the enclosures were visited occasionally by Neolithic groups rather than being permanently occupied{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}}. The presence of human remains in the banks and ditches of the enclosures has been seen as an attempt by the builders to connect their ancestors with the land and thus begin to anchor themselves to specific areas{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}}. Longitudinal sections excavated along the ditches by archaeologists suggest that the builders repeatedly redug the ditches and each time deliberately deposited pottery and human and animal bones, apparently as a regular ritual{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}}. Environmental archaeology suggests that the European landscape was in general heavily forested when the enclosures were built and that they were rare clearings in the woodland that were used for various social and economic activities{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}}. In the 1970s the archaeologist Peter Drewett suggested seven possible functions for the sites:{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}}
Other interpretations{{Which?|date=October 2012}} have seen the causeways as symbolic of multi-directional access to the site by scattered communities, the enclosures as funerary centres for excarnation or the construction of the site being a communal act of creation by a fragmented society{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}}. Animal remains (especially cattle bone), domestic waste and pottery have been found at the sites. But there has been limited evidence of any structures. In some locations, such as Windmill Hill, Avebury, evidence of human occupation predates the enclosure. Generally, it appears that the ditches were permitted to silt up, even while the camps were in use, and then re-excavated episodically.[1] It is unlikely that they had a strong defensive purpose{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}}. The earthworks may have been designed to keep out wild animals rather than people{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}}. The sequential addition of second, third and fourth circuits of banks and ditches may have come about through growing populations{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}} adding to the significance of their peoples' monument over time. In some cases, they appear to have evolved into more permanent settlements{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}}. Most causewayed enclosures have been ploughed away in the intervening millennia and are recognized through aerial archaeology. The first were constructed in the fifth millennium BC and by the early third millennium BC{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}}; notable regional variations occur in their construction{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}}. French examples begin to demonstrate elaborate horn-shaped entrances which are interpreted{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}} as being designed to impress from afar rather than serve any practical purpose. Aubrey Burl believes that building of causewayed enclosures declined by 3000 BC and they were superseded by more localised types of earthworks and other structures{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}}. In Britain, such replacements include Stonehenge I, Flagstones, Duggleby Howe and Ring of Bookan, and the later henge monuments. ExamplesExamples of causewayed enclosures include: England
France
Ireland
Portugal
See also
References1. ^{{cite web|url=https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/|title=Search All Publications - Historic England|first=Historic|last=England|publisher=}} {{Neolithic Europe}}{{Prehistoric technology| state=expanded}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Causewayed Enclosure}} 3 : Monument types|Stone Age Europe|Causewayed enclosures |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。