词条 | Concurrency (road) |
释义 |
A concurrency in a road network is an instance of one physical roadway bearing two or more different route numbers.[1] When two roadways share the same right-of-way, it is sometimes called a common section or commons.[2] Other terminology for a concurrency includes overlap,[3] coincidence,[4] duplex (two concurrent routes), triplex (three concurrent routes), multiplex (any number of concurrent routes),[5] dual routing or triple routing.[6][7] Concurrent numbering can become very common in jurisdictions that allow it. Where multiple routes must pass between a single mountain crossing or over a bridge, or through a major city, it is often economically and practically advantageous for them all to be accommodated on a single physical roadway. In some jurisdictions, however, concurrent numbering is avoided by posting only one route number on highway signs; these routes disappear at the start of the concurrency and reappear when it ends. OverviewMost concurrencies are simply a combination of two route numbers on the same physical roadway. This is often practically advantageous as well as economically advantageous; it may be better for two route numbers to be combined into one along rivers or through mountain valleys. Some countries allow for concurrencies to occur, however, others specifically do not allow it to happen. In those nations which do permit concurrencies, it can become very common. In these countries, there are a variety of concurrences which can occur. An example of this is the concurrency of Interstate 70 (I-70) and I-76 on the Pennsylvania Turnpike in western Pennsylvania. I-70 merges with the Pennsylvania Turnpike so the route number can ultimately continue east into Maryland; instead of having a second physical highway built to carry the route, it is combined with the Pennsylvania Turnpike and the I-76 designation.[8] A triple Interstate concurrency is found in Wisconsin along the {{convert|5|mi|km|adj=on|spell=in}} section of I-41, I-43, and I-894 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.[9] The concurrency of I-41 and I-43 on this roadway is an example of a wrong-way concurrency. The longest Interstate highway concurrency is I-80 and I-90 for {{convert|265|mi}} across Indiana and Ohio.[10] There are examples of eight-way concurrencies: I-465 around Indianapolis and Georgia State Route 10 Loop around downtown Athens, Georgia. Portions of the {{convert|53|mi|km|adj=on}} I-465 overlap with I-74, US Highway 31 (US 31), US 36, US 40, US 52, US 421, State Road 37 (SR 37) and SR 67—a total of eight other routes. Seven of the eight other designations overlap between exits 46 and 47 to create an eight-way concurrency.[11] Regional examplesNorth AmericaIn the United States, concurrencies are simply marked by placing signs for both routes on the same or adjacent posts. The federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices prescribes that when mounting these adjacent signs together that the numbers will be arranged vertically or horizontally in order of precedence. The order to be used is Interstate Highways, U.S. Highways, state highways, and finally county roads, and within each class by increasing numerical value.[12] Several states do not officially have any concurrencies, instead officially ending routes on each side of one.{{refn|Arkansas's highways exist in many officially designated "sections" rather than form concurrencies. Arkansas Highway 131 exists in five sections as an example.[13]|group=lower-alpha}} There are several circumstances where unusual concurrencies exist along state borders. One example occurs along the Oklahoma–Arkansas state line. At the northern end of this border Oklahoma State Highway 20 runs concurrently with Arkansas Highway 43 and the two highways run north–south along the boundary.[14] Concurrencies are also found in Canada. British Columbia Highway 5 continues east for {{convert|12|km|mi}} concurrently with Highway 1 and Highway 97, through Kamloops. This stretch of road, which carries Highway 97 south and Highway 5 north on the same lanes (and vice versa), is the only wrong-way concurrency in British Columbia. In Ontario, the Queen Elizabeth Way and Highway 403 run concurrently between Burlington and Oakville, forming the province's only concurrency between two 400-series highways.[15] The concurrency was not in the original plan which intended for both the QEW and Highway 403 to run parallel to each other, as the Hamilton–Brantford and Mississauga sections of Highway 403 were initially planned to be linked up along the corridor now occupied by Highway 407.Later it was planned for the Mississauga section of Highway 403 would be renumbered as Highway 410 but this never came to pass.[16] Consequently, Highway 403 was signed concurrently along the Queen Elizabeth Way in 2002, remedying the discontinuity to avoid confusing drivers that wanted to travel between the two segments without using the toll Highway 407. Nonetheless, many surface street signs referring to that section of freeway with the QEW/Highway 403 concurrency still only use the highway's original designation of QEW, although the MTO has updated route markers on the QEW to reflect the concurrency.[17] EuropeIn the United Kingdom, routes do not run concurrently with others. Where this would normally occur, the roadway takes the number of only one of the routes (usually, but not always, the most important route), while the other routes are considered to have a gap and are signed in brackets (the equivalent of "to" signs in North America). An example is the meeting of the M60 and the M62 northwest of Manchester: the motorways coincide for the {{convert|7|mi|km|spell=in}} between junctions 12 and 18 but the motorway between those points is only designated as the M60. European route numbers as designated by UNECE may have concurrencies (for instance E15 and E30 around Greater London), but since the E-route numbers are unsigned and unused in the UK, the existence of these concurrencies is purely theoretical. In Sweden and Denmark, the most important highways use only the European route numbers that have cardinal directions. In Sweden the E6 and E20 run concurrently for {{convert|280|km|mi}}. In Denmark the E47 and E55 run concurrently for {{convert|157|km|mi}}. There are more shorter concurrencies. There are two stretches in Sweden and Denmark where three European routes run concurrently; these are E6, E20 and E22 in Sweden, and E20, E47, and E55 in Denmark. Along all these concurrencies, all route numbers are posted with signs.[18] In the Czech Republic, the European route numbers are only additional, and they are always concurrent with the state route numbering, usually highways or first-class roads. In the state numbering system, concurrences exist only in first-class and second-class roads; third class roads do not have them. The local term for such concurrences is {{lang|cs|peáž}} (somehow derived from the French word {{lang|fr|péage}}). In the road register, one of the roads is considered the main ("source") road and the others as the péaging (guest) roads. The official road map enables a maximum of five concurrent routes of the intrastate numbering system.[19] Cycling routes and hiking routes are often concurrent. The Middle EastIn Israel, two freeways, the Trans-Israel Highway (Highway 6), and Highway 1 run concurrently just east of Ben Shemen Interchange. The concurrency is officially designated "Daniel Interchange", providing half of the possible interchange directions. It is a {{convert|1|mi|adj=on|spell=in}} segment consisting of eight lanes providing high-speed access between the two highways. Access from Highway 1 west to Highway 6 south and Highway 6 north to Highway 1 east is provided via Route 431, while access between Highway 1 east to Highway 6 north and Highway 6 south to Highway 1 west are provided at Ben Shemen Interchange. The other movements are provided through the concurrency.[20] Wrong-way concurrenciesSince highways in the United States and Canada are usually signed with assigned cardinal directions based on their primary orientation, it is possible for a stretch of roadway shared between two highways to be signed with conflicting, even opposite, cardinal directions in a wrong-way concurrency. For example, near Wytheville, Virginia, there is a concurrency between I-77 (which runs primarily north–south, as it is signed) and Interstate 81 (which runs primarily northeast–southwest, but is also signed north–south). Because of the way they intersect, the section of Interstate where they overlap has the two roads signed for opposite directions, leading to the town's nickname of "Which-Way-Ville".[21] One might simultaneously be on I-77 northbound and I-81 southbound, while actually traveling due westbound.[22] An unusual example of a three-directional concurrency occurs southeast of Rhinelander, Wisconsin, where US 8 westbound (the actual compass direction) converges with southbound Wisconsin Highway 17 and northbound Wisconsin Highway 47. Effect on exit numbersOften when two routes with exit numbers overlap, one of the routes has its exit numbers dominate over the other and can sometimes result in having two exits of the same number, albeit far from each other along the same highway (although in one case the number 96 is only {{convert|6|mi|km|disp=sqbr}} apart). An example of this is from the concurrency of I-94 and US 127 near Jackson, Michigan. The concurrent section of freeway has an exit with M-106, which is numbered exit 139 using I-94's mileage-based numbers. US 127 also has another exit 139 with the southern end of the US 127 business loop in Mount Pleasant, Michigan. (US 127's mile markers in Michigan reflect the cumulative distance north of the Ohio state line; the numbers resume north of the I-94 overlap and reflect the distance accumulated on that concurrency.)[23] However, there are also instances where the dominant exit number range is far more than the secondary route's highest exit number, for example the concurrency of I-75 and I-85 in Atlanta, Georgia—where I-75 is dominant—the exit numbers range from 242 to 251 while I-85's highest independent mile marker in Georgia is 179.[24] Consolidation plansSome brief concurrencies in the past have been eliminated by reassigning the designations along the roadways. This can involve scaling back the terminus of one designation to the end of a concurrent section. At the same time, there could be an extension of another highway designation that is used to replace the newly shortened designation with another one. Between states, US 27 in Michigan previously ran concurrently with I-69 from the Michigan–Indiana state line to the Lansing, Michigan, area. From there it turned northwards to its terminus at Grayling. In 1999, the Michigan and Indiana departments of transportation petitioned the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials for permission to truncate US 27 at Fort Wayne, Indiana.[25] In 2002, Michigan removed the US 27 designation from I-69 and extended the US 127 designation from Lansing to Grayling.[26] MDOT's stated reason for the modification was to "reduce confusion along the US 27/US 127 corridor".[27] After US 27's signage was removed, the highway north of the Lansing area was renumbered US 127, and the US 27 designation was removed from I-69.[27] Some consolidation schemes involve the use of incorporating two single-digit numbers onto one marker, as along the US 1/9 concurrency in northern New Jersey.[28] In the mid-20th century, California had numerous concurrencies, but the California Legislature removed most of them in a comprehensive reform of highway numbering in 1964.[29] See also
Notes1. ^{{cite web |author = Esri |date = March 4, 2014 |title = Realigning Concurrent Routes |url = http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#//022300000023000000 |work = ArcGIS Help 10.2 & 10.2.1 |publisher = Esri |access-date = April 8, 2014 }} 2. ^{{cite news |work = Star Tribune |location = Minneapolis |title = Freeway Flaws: Fixing Them May Take Decades |date = June 3, 2005 |quote = common sections ... 2 freeways share a single right-of-way }} 3. ^{{cite web |author = Esri |date = December 19, 2012 |title = Realigning Overlapping Routes |url = http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//022300000023000000 |work = ArcGIS Resource Center |publisher = Esri |access-date = April 8, 2014 }} 4. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/HSEB/products/state_highway_routes_selected_information_1995_revised.pdf |title = State Highway Routes Selected Information, 1994 with 1995 Revisions |format = PDF |date = August 1995 |author = Office of Highway System Engineering |publisher = California Department of Transportation |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070316231706/http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/HSEB/products/state_highway_routes_selected_information_1995_revised.pdf |archive-date = March 16, 2007 |access-date = March 7, 2012 |at = Route 3 |quote = Coincident with Rte 299 }} 5. ^{{cite web |first = Timothy |last = Reichard |url = http://www.m-plex.com/roads/mpguide.html |title = Guide to Highway Multiplexes |work = Central PA/MD Roads |access-date = April 8, 2014 }} 6. ^{{cite letter |first = John J. |last = Kanillopoolos |date = October 19, 1982 |subject = Dual and Triple Routing on State Trunklines |recipient = Trunkline Numbering Committee |location = Lansing |publisher = Michigan Department of Transportation }} 7. ^{{cite letter |first = John J. |last = Kanillopoolos |date = March 17, 1983 |subject = Dual and Triple Routing on State Trunklines |recipient = Trunkline Numbering Committee |location = Lansing |publisher = Michigan Department of Transportation }} 8. ^{{cite map |author = Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Geographic Information Section |title = Tourism & Transportation Map |year = 2010 |scale = Scale not given |location = Harrisburg |publisher = Pennsylvania Department of Transportation |sections = E10–L11 }} 9. ^{{cite news |url = http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/2015/04/09/us-named-officially-interstate-highway-system/25529965/ |title = It's Officially Interstate 41 Now in Wisconsin |first = Paul |last = Srubas |work = Green Bay Press-Gazette |date = April 9, 2015 |access-date = May 27, 2015 }} 10. ^{{cite web |author = Federal Highway Administration |date = December 31, 2013 |title = Table 1: Main Routes of the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways as of December 31, 2013 |url = https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/routefinder/table1.cfm |work = Route Log and Finder List |publisher = Federal Highway Administration |access-date = April 8, 2014 }} 11. ^{{cite map |author = Indiana Department of Transportation |title = Indiana Transportation Map |edition = 2007–08 |year = 2007 |scale = Scale not given |inset = Indianapolis |location = Indianapolis |publisher = Indiana Department of Transportation }} 12. ^{{cite book |author = Federal Highway Administration |year = 2009 |chapter = Chapter 2D. Guide Signs: Conventional Roads, §2D.29: Route Sign Assemblies |chapterurl = http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2009r1r2/mutcd2009r2chpt2d.pdf |chapter-format = PDF |title = Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices |edition = Revisions 1&2, 2009 |location = Washington, DC |publisher = Federal Highway Administration |page = 148 |isbn = 9781615835171 |access-date = December 20, 2014 }} 13. ^{{cite book |title = State Highways 2009 |type = Database |date = April 2010 |publisher = Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department |author = Planning and Research Division |url = http://www.arkansashighways.com/planning_research/technical_services/databases/Arkansas_Roadlog_2009.zip |format = ZIP |access-date = April 11, 2011 |dead-url = yes |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110707161957/http://www.arkansashighways.com/planning_research/technical_services/databases/Arkansas_Roadlog_2009.zip |archive-date = July 7, 2011 |df = }} 14. ^{{cite map |author = Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Planning and Research Division |year = 2010 |title = State Highway Map |location = Little Rock |publisher = Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department |section = A1 |scale = 1:950,400 }} 15. ^{{cite map |author = Ministry of Transportation of Ontario Geomatics Office |title = Official Road Map / Carte Routière |language = English, French |year = 2010 |edition = 2010–11 |location = Toronto |publisher = Ministry of Transportation of Ontario |scale = 1:250,000 |section = R25 }} 16. ^{{cite news |title = Rae Announces 407 Extension |first = Bob |last = Mitchell |work = Toronto Star |date = April 6, 1995 |page = BR03}} 17. ^{{cite journal |title = Signs of the Times |publisher = Ontario Good Roads Association |date = February 2002 |work = Milestones |volume = 2 |issue = 1 |pages = 26, 31 |url = http://www.ogra.org/lib/db2file.asp?fileid=1780 |access-date = January 2, 2012 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120426090046/http://www.ogra.org/lib/db2file.asp?fileid=1780 |archive-date= April 26, 2012}} 18. ^Check Google Streetview at {{coord|55.5500993|13.0517037}}, {{coord|55.5800398|12.2615534}} and neighboring locations{{full |date=January 2015}} 19. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.rsd.cz/doprava/atrhlp/hs5130.htm |title = Číslo peažující silnice], explanatory notes to the road map, Ředitelství silnic a dálnic |publisher = Directorate of Roads and Highways |language = cs }}{{full|date=March 2018}} 20. ^{{cite book |author1 = עורכת אחראית אלנה בלינקי |author2 = Elena Belinki |year = 2014 |title = 2014 אטלס הזהב |trans-title = Atlas HaZahav 2014 |url = http://www.books.mapa.co.il/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=172:2011-08-24-09-41-24&catid=11:maps&Itemid=12 |language = he |edition = 9th |publisher = מפה הוצאה לאור [Mapa Publishing] |isbn = 978-965-521-136-8 }} 21. ^{{cite web |url = http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/12/02/which-way-ville-making-sense-of-wytheville-virginias-interstate-routes/ |title = Which-way-Ville Making Sense of Wytheville |work = Appalachia Magazine |date = December 2, 2017 }} 22. ^{{cite map |author = Virginia Department of Transportation |title = Official State Transportation Map |year = 2012 |edition = 2012–14 |scale = c. 1:832,680 |location = Richmond |publisher = Virginia Department of Transportation |sections = F6–G6 }} 23. ^{{cite MDOT map |year= 2013 |link= yes |sections= J10, M11 }} 24. ^{{cite GDOT map |year = 2011 |link = yes |at = Main map, §§ B1, I2; Atlanta inset, § E5 }} 25. ^{{AASHTO minutes |year= 1999S |link= yes |access-date=May 24, 2008}} 26. ^{{cite news |url = http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/InfoWeb?p_action=doc&p_topdoc=1&p_docnum=1&p_sort=YMD_date:D&p_product=AWNB&p_text_direct-0=document_id=(%2012050B7ED0067678%20)&p_docid=12050B7ED0067678&p_theme=aggdocs&p_queryname=12050B7ED0067678&f_openurl=yes&p_nbid=V5CS57OSMTM2NTUzMjcwNC43MjYwMDU6MTo4OnJhLTUwODgw&&p_multi=MPMB |title = US 127 Signs Getting Updated |first = Mark |last = Ranzenberger |work = The Morning Sun |location = Mount Pleasant, MI |access-date = August 23, 2012 |date = April 27, 2008 |pages = 1A, 6A |oclc = 22378715 |via = NewsBank |subscription = yes }} 27. ^1 {{cite press release |first1 = Kari |last1 = Debnar |first2 = Mark |last2 = Bott |last-author-amp = yes |publisher = Michigan Department of Transportation |title = US 27 Designation Soon To Be Deleted from Michigan Highways |url = http://www.michiganhighways.org/indepth/US-27_deleted_MDOT_PressRelease.pdf |format = PDF |date = January 14, 2002 }} 28. ^{{cite sign |url = http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NJ_guide_sign.jpg |title = Signage for US 1/9, NJ 21, US 22, and I-78 |author = New Jersey Department of Transportation |location = Newark, NJ |publisher = New Jersey Department of Transportation |medium = Highway guide sign |access-date = December 5, 2009 }} 29. ^{{cite journal |url = http://www.gbcnet.com/ushighways/history/1964_route_renumbering.pdf |format = PDF |title = Route Renumbering: New Green Markers Will Replaces Old Shields |journal = California Highways and Public Works |date = March–April 1964 |volume = 43 |issue = 1–2 |pages = 11–14 |issn = 0008-1159 |access-date = March 8, 2012 }} References{{reflist|30em}}External links{{commons category}}
1 : Road transport |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。