请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Maryland v. Garrison
释义

  1. Facts

  2. Opinion

  3. See also

  4. Further reading

  5. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
| Litigants = Maryland v. Garrison
| ArgueDate = November 5
| ArgueYear = 1986
| DecideDate = February 24
| DecideYear = 1987
| FullName = Maryland v. Garrison
| USVol = 480
| USPage = 79
| ParallelCitations = 107 S. Ct. 1013; 94 L. Ed. 2d 72; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 559
| Prior =
| Subsequent =
| Holding = Where police reasonably believed their warrant was valid during a search, execution of the warrant does not violate respondent's Fourth Amendment rights.
| SCOTUS = 1986-1987
| Majority = Stevens
| JoinMajority = Rehnquist, White, Powell, O'Connor, Scalia
| Dissent = Blackmun
| JoinDissent = Brennan, Marshall
| LawsApplied = U.S. Const. amend. IV
}}

Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the extent of discretion given to police officers acting in good faith. The Court held that where police reasonably believe their warrant was valid during a search, execution of the warrant does not violate respondent's Fourth Amendment rights.

Facts

The Baltimore Police Department were executing a warrant that said the ‘3rd floor apartment’ intending to search McWebbs apartment, when the police went upstairs they searched the 3rd floor and found drugs and cash. The police, then discovered that the 3rd floor was actually divided into 2 apartments. Up to that point none of the police had realized there were 2 distinct apartments. Garrison brought a 4th Amendment claim because they did not have a warrant to search his apartment, but rather they had a warrant to search McWebbs apartment, and Garrison wanted to use the 4th Amendment to suppress the drug evidence.

Opinion

The Court finds that because the warrant allowed for investigation of the 3rd floor, the officers reasonably relied on the warrant to carry out the search. Therefore the evidence is allowed, and Garrison is not allowed to invoke the 4th Amendment protection.

See also

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases
    • Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
    • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 480
    • List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court

Further reading

  • {{ cite journal | last = Childress | first = D. R. | authorlink = | coauthors = | year = 1988 | month = | title = Maryland v. Garrison: Extending the Good Faith Exception to Warrantless Searches | journal = Baylor Law Review | volume = 40 | issue = | pages = 151 | issn = 0005-7274 | url = | accessdate = | quote = }}
  • {{ cite journal | last = Ricciardelli | first = G. N. | authorlink = | coauthors = | year = 1988 | month = | title = Stretching the Good Faith Exception beyond Its Constitutional Limits: Maryland v. Garrison | journal = New England Law Review | volume = 23 | issue = | pages = 853 | issn = 0028-4823 | url = | accessdate = | quote = }}

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case=Maryland v. Garrison, {{ussc|480|79|1987|el=no}}
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/111823/maryland-v-garrison/
| findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/480/79.html
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/480/79/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep480/usrep480079/usrep480079.pdf
| oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1986/85-759
}}{{US4thAmendment|warrants|state=expanded}}

4 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|United States Fourth Amendment case law|1987 in United States case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/11 17:48:27