请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Garratt v. Dailey
释义

  1. Background

  2. Ruling

  3. References

  4. External links

{{italic title}}{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2011}}Garratt v. Dailey, 46 Wash. 2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091 (Wash. 1955) is a famous tort law case that illustrates the principle of "intent" for intentional torts.[1][2][3]

Background

Dailey, a 5 years, 9 months boy, moved a lawn chair that Ruth Garratt was going to sit down in. When she did, she fell, sustaining injuries. Garratt brought an action against the child for battery.

The trial judge found in favor of Dailey stating that there was no intent to harm the old lady. Garratt appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.

The issue before the Court was whether a lack of intent to cause harm precludes a battery charge.

Ruling

Relying on the definition of battery from the Restatement of Torts, the Court held that battery could only be found if it is shown that the boy knew with "substantial certainty" that after the chair was moved Garratt would attempt to sit in the chair's original position. That is, the accused must be substantially certain that his action would result in the contact. The absence of an intent to injure or to play a joke is not sufficient to absolve the accused of liability. It is sufficient for the plaintiff to prove only that the accused had sufficient knowledge to foresee the contact with "substantial certainty."

The Court, noting that a new trial was unnecessary,[4] remanded the case back to the trial court for clarification of the boy's knowledge at the time. Subsequently, the trial Court found in favor of Garratt and was affirmed by the state Supreme Court.

References

1. ^{{Citation | last = Schwartz, Victor E. | first = Kathryn , Kelly | author-link = | last2 = Partlett, David F. | first2 = | author2-link = | title = Prosser, Wade, and Schwartz's Torts: Cases and Materials | place = | publisher = Foundation Press | year = 2010 | volume = | edition = 12th | url =http://www.worldcat.org/title/prosser-wade-and-schwartzs-torts/oclc/757213852 | doi = | id = | isbn =9781599417042}}
2. ^{{Citation | last = Dobbs, Dan B. | first = Paul T. Hayden | author-link = | last2 = Bublick, Ellen M. | first2 = | author2-link = | title = Torts and Compensation: Personal Accountability and Social Responsibility for Injury | place = | publisher = West Group | year = 2009 | volume = | edition = 6th | url =http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Dobbs-Hayden-and-Bublicks-Torts-and-Compensation-Personal-Accountability-and-Social-Responsibility-for-Injury-6th/Dan-B-Dobbs/e/9780314184900 | doi = | id = | isbn =9780314184900}}
3. ^{{Citation | last = Epstein, Richard Allen | first = | author-link = | last2 = | first2 = | author2-link = | title = Cases and Materials on Torts | place = | publisher = Wolters Kluwer Law & Business/Aspen | year = 2008 | volume = | edition = 9th | url =http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Dobbs-Hayden-and-Bublicks-Torts-and-Compensation-Personal-Accountability-and-Social-Responsibility-for-Injury-6th/Dan-B-Dobbs/e/9780314184900 | doi = | id = | isbn =9780735569232}}
4. ^Wade, John W. "Cases and Materials on Torts, 9th Edition." The Foundation Press, 1994. Page 9

External links

  • Link to a summary of the case

6 : United States tort case law|Washington (state) state case law|1955 in United States case law|1955 in Washington (state)|United States lawsuits|Law articles needing an infobox

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/14 16:42:42