| 词条 | Javelin argument |
| 释义 |
The javelin argument, credited to Lucretius, is an ancient logical argument that the universe, or cosmological space, must be infinite: As to space, I need but ask you, how can that be bounded? For whatever bounds, it that thing must itself be bounded likewise; and to this bounding thing there must be a bound again, and so on for ever and ever throughout all immensity. Suppose, however, for a moment, all existing space to be bounded, and that a man runs forward to the uttermost borders, and stands upon the last verge of things, and then hurls forward a winged javelin,— suppose you that the dart, when hurled by the vivid force, shall take its way to the point the darter aimed at, or that something will take its stand in the path of its flight, and arrest it? For one or other of these things must happen. There is a dilemma here that you never can escape from.[1] This argument was used to support the Epicurean thesis about the universe. However, the argument assumes incorrectly that a finite universe must necessarily have a "limit" or edge. The argument fails in the case that the universe might be shaped like the surface of a hypersphere or torus. (Consider a similar fallacious argument that the Earth's surface must be infinite in area: because otherwise one could go to the Earth's edge and throw a javelin, proving that the Earth's surface continued wherever the javelin hit the ground.) References1. ^[https://books.google.com/books?id=GyQgAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA86 Google Books result]: W. H. Mallock, Lucretius. John B. Alden:New York, 1883. p. 86 {{Philosophy-stub}} 3 : Arguments|Epicureanism|Physical cosmology |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。