请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson
释义

  1. Facts

  2. Judgment

     High Court  Court of Appeal 

  3. See also

  4. Notes

  5. References

  6. External links

{{Use British (Oxford) English|date=May 2017}}{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2017}}{{Infobox court case
| name = Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson
| court = Court of Appeal
| image = File:Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg
| caption =
| date decided = 21 December 1990
| full name = Agip (Africa) Limited v (1) Barry Kingsley Jackson and Edward Norman Bowers (both practising as Jackson & Co. a firm) and (2) Ian Duncan Griffin
| citations = [1990] EWCA Civ 2
[1990] Ch 265
| judges = Fox LJ
Butler-Sloss LJ
Beldam LJ
| prior actions =
| subsequent actions =
| opinions = Fox LJ
| transcripts = BAILII
| keywords = {{flatlist|
  • tracing
  • knowing receipt

}}
}}{{cite bailii|litigants=Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson|year=1990|court=EWCA|division=Civ|num=2}} is an English trusts law case concerning the common law remedies for receipt of trust property.

Facts

Mr Zdiri, an Agip Ltd employee, changed the name on a payment order of $518,000 to Baker Oil Services Ltd, a puppet controlled by Mr Jackson and other accountants, who acted on clients’ instructions. The money was transferred from Banque du Sud in Tunisia to Baker Oil’s account with Lloyds Bank in London. All but $43,000 was then paid on to unknown parties. Agip Ltd sued Mr Jackson for return of the money.

Judgment

High Court

Millett J held Agip Ltd was entitled to an equitable proprietary claim for the $43,000 from Mr Jackson and the accountants were liable for ‘knowing assistance in a breach of trust’. But Agip Ltd could not succeed for receipt of the money at common law (which did not allow electronic rather than physical tracing) or in equity (because the money was not transferred for the accountants’ benefit). Banks can be liable in knowing receipt only if they receive and apply trust money to reduce or discharge a customer’s overdraft.[1] Otherwise banks merely pay and receive money as agents of their customers. It must be for their own ‘use and benefit’. He suggested that the liability for knowing receipt could be imposed if the circumstances would put an honest and reasonable person on inquiry. Agip Ltd appealed on the common law point.

Court of Appeal

Court of Appeal upheld Millett J’s decision. Fox LJ gave judgment. Butler-Sloss LJ and Beldam LJ concurred.

See also

Notes

1. ^[1990] Ch 265, 292

References

{{Clist receipt}}
  • English trusts law

External links

  • [https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s71300/sikka1c.htm THE ACCOUNTANTS' LAUNDROMAT]

4 : English trusts case law|Court of Appeal of England and Wales cases|1990 in British law|1990 in case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/11 14:01:45