词条 | Cities of the Philippines | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
释义 |
A city is one of the units of local government in the Philippines. All Philippine cities are chartered cities ({{Lang-tl|nakakartang lungsod}}), whose existence as corporate and administrative entities is governed by their own specific municipal charters in addition to the Local Government Code of 1991, which specifies their administrative structure and powers. As of December 12, 2015, there were 145 cities.[1] A city is entitled to at least one representative in the Philippine House of Representatives if its population reaches 250,000. Cities are allowed to use a common seal. As corporate entities, cities have the power to take, purchase, receive, hold, lease, convey, and dispose of real and personal property for its general interests, condemn private property for public use (eminent domain), contract and be contracted with, sue and exercise all the powers conferred to it by Congress. Only an Act of Congress can create or amend a city charter, and with this city charter Congress confers on a city certain powers that regular municipalities or even other cities may not have. Despite the differences in the powers accorded to each city, all cities regardless of status are given a bigger share of the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) compared to regular municipalities, as well as being generally more autonomous than regular municipalities. {{TOC limit|3}}Government{{main|Sangguniang Panlungsod}}A city's local government is headed by a mayor elected by popular vote. The vice mayor serves as the presiding officer of the Sangguniang Panlungsod (city council), which serves as the city's legislative body. Upon receiving their charters, cities also receive a full complement of executive departments to better serve their constituents. Some departments are established on a case-by-case basis, depending on the needs of the city. Offices and officials common to all cities
SubdivisionsCities, like municipalities, are composed of barangays, which can range from urban neighborhoods (such as Brgy. 9, Santa Angela in Laoag), to rural communities (such as Brgy. Iwahig in Puerto Princesa). Barangays are sometimes grouped into officially defined administrative (geographical) districts. Examples of such are the cities of Manila (16 districts), Davao (11 districts), Iloilo (seven districts), and Samal (three districts: Babak, Kaputian and Peñaplata). Some cities such as Caloocan, Manila and Pasay even have an intermediate level between the district and barangay levels, called a zone. However, geographic districts and zones are not political units; there are no elected city government officials in these city-specific administrative levels. Rather they only serve to make city planning, statistics-gathering other administrative tasks easier and more convenient. ClassificationIncome classificationCities are classified according to average annual income of the city based on the previous four calendar years. Effective July 28, 2008 the thresholds for the income classes for cities are:[1]
Legal classificationThe Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160) classifies all cities into one of three legal categories:[2]
There are currently 33 highly urbanized cities in the Philippines, 16 of which are located in Metro Manila.
All but five of the remaining cities are considered component cities. Independent citiesThere are 38 independent cities in the Philippines, all of which are classified as either "Highly urbanized" or "Independent component" cities. From a legal, administrative and fiscal standpoint, once a city is classified as such:
Currently, there are only four independent cities that can still participate in the election of provincial officials (governor, vice governor, Sangguniang Panlalawigan members):
Registered voters of the cities of Cotabato, Ormoc, Santiago, as well as all other highly urbanized cities, including those to be converted or created in the future, are not eligible to participate in provincial elections. In addition to the eligibility of some independent cities to vote in provincial elections, a few other situations become sources of confusion regarding the complete autonomy of independent cities from provinces:
A component city, while enjoying relative autonomy on some matters compared to a regular municipality, is still considered part of a province. However, there are several sources of confusion:
Creation of citiesCongress is the lone legislative entity that can incorporate cities. Provincial and municipal councils can pass resolutions indicating a desire to have a certain area (usually an already-existing municipality or a cluster of barangays) declared a city after the requirements for becoming a city are met. As per Republic Act No. 9009, these requirements include:[3]
Members of Congress (usually the involving representative of the congressional district to which the proposed city belongs) then draft the legislation that will convert or create the city. After the bill passes through both the House of Representatives and the Senate and becomes an Act of Congress, the President signs the Act into law. If the Act goes unsigned after 30 days it still becomes law despite the absence of the President's signature. The creation of cities before 1983 was solely at the discretion of the national legislature; there were no requirements for achieving 'city' status other than an approved city charter. No income, population or land area requirements had to be met in order to incorporate cities before Batas Pambansa Bilang 337 (Local Government Code of 1983) became law. This is what made it possible for several current cities such as Tangub or Canlaon to be conferred such a status despite their small population and locally generated income, which do not meet current standards. The relatively low income standard between 1992 and 2001 (which was {{PH peso}}20 million)[2] also allowed several municipalities, such as Sipalay and Muñoz, to become cities despite not being able to meet the current {{PH peso}}100 million local income standard. Before 1987, many cities were created without any plebiscites conducted for the residents to ratify the city charter, most notable of which were cities that were incorporated during the early American colonial period (Manila and Baguio), and during the Commonwealth Era (1935–1946) such as Cavite City, Dansalan (now Marawi), Iloilo City, Bacolod, San Pablo and Zamboanga City. Only since 1987 has it been mandated under the Constitution that any change to the legal status of any local government unit requires the ratification by the residents that would be affected by such changes. Therefore, all cities created after 1987 – after meeting the requirements for cityhood as laid out in the Local Government Code of 1991 and Republic Act No. 9009 of 2001 – only acquired their corporate status after the majority of their voting residents approved their respective charters. Motivations for cityhoodAlthough some early cities were given charters because of their advantageous (Baguio, Tagaytay) or strategic (Angeles and Olongapo, Cotabato, Zamboanga) locations or in order to especially establish new government centers in otherwise sparsely populated areas (Palayan, Trece Martires, Quezon City), most Philippine cities were originally incorporated to provide a form of localized civil government to an area that is primarily urban, which, due to its compact nature and different demography and local economy, cannot be necessarily handled more efficiently by more rural-oriented provincial and municipal governments. However, not all cities are purely areas of dense urban settlement. To date there are still cities with huge expanses of rural or wilderness areas and considerable non-urban populations, such as Calbayog, Davao, Puerto Princesa and Zamboanga as they were deliberately incorporated with increased future resource needs and urban expansion, as well as strategic considerations, in mind. With the enactment of the 1991 Local Government Code, municipalities and cities have both become more empowered to deal with local issues. Regular municipalities now share many of the same powers and responsibilities as chartered cities, but its citizens and/or leaders may feel that it might be to their best interest to get a larger share of internal revenue allotment (IRA) and acquire additional powers by becoming a city, especially if the population has greatly increased and local economy has become more robust. On the other hand, due to the higher property taxes that would be imposed after cityhood, many citizens have become wary of their town's conversion into a city, even if the municipality had already achieved a high degree of urbanization and has an annual income that already exceeds that of many existing lower-income cities. This has been among the cases made against the cityhood bids of many high-income and populous municipalities surrounding Metro Manila, most notably Bacoor and Dasmariñas (which finally became cities in June 2012 and November 2009 respectively), which for many years have been more qualified to become cities than others. In response to the rapid increase in the number of municipalities being converted into cities since the enactment of the Local Government Code in 1991, Senator Aquilino Pimentel authored what became Republic Act No. 9009 in June 2001 which sought to establish a more appropriate benchmark by which municipalities that wished to become cities were to be measured.[4] The income requirement was increased sharply from {{PH peso}}20 million to {{PH peso}}100 million in a bid to curb the spate of conversions into cities of municipalities that were perceived to have not become urbanized or economically developed enough to be able to properly function as a city. Despite the passage of RA 9009, 16 municipalities not meeting the required locally generated income were converted into cities in 2007 by seeking exemption from the income requirement. This led to vocal opposition from the League of Cities of the Philippines against the cityhood of these municipalities, with the League arguing that by letting these municipalities become cities, Congress will set "a dangerous precedent" that would not prevent others from seeking the same "special treatment".[4] More importantly, the LCP argued that with the recent surge in the conversion of towns that did not meet the requirements set by RA 9009 for becoming cities, the allocation received by existing cities would only drastically decrease because more cities will have to share the amount allotted by the national government, which is equal to 23% of the IRA, which in turn is 40% of all the revenues collected by the Bureau of Internal Revenue.[5] The resulting legal battles resulted in the nullification of the city charters of the 16 municipalities by the Supreme Court in August 2010. (See #"League of 16" and legal battles) Changing city statusThroughout the years there have been instances of changes to the city's status with regard to eligibility for provincial elections, as a result of the passage of laws, both of general effectivity and specific to a city. Before 1979Prior to 1979, all cities were just considered chartered cities, without any official category differentiating them aside from income levels. Though chartered cities were considered autonomous from the provinces from which they were created, the eligibility of their residents to vote for provincial officials was determined by their respective charters.[6] Regarding participation in provincial affairs, there were three types of city charters: 1) those which explicitly allowed their respective residents to elect provincial officials, 2) those which explicitly prohibited participation in provincial elections, 3) and those which are silent regarding voter participation in provincial elections. The 1951 Supreme Court decision on Teves, et al. v. Commission on Elections finally resolved the ambiguity surrounding the third category of cities, by confirming that the residents of cities with such charters (such as Dumaguete and Davao City) are ineligible to participate in provincial elections.[6] Altering the right of city residents to participate in provincial elections was a power solely determined by the national legislature. Before 1979, this power was exercised in seven cases, affecting a total of six cities:
1979–1983Batas Pambansa Bilang 51, approved on December 22, 1979, introduced two legal categories of cities: highly urbanized cities (HUCs) and component cities.[18] COMELEC Resolution No. 1421, which was issued to implement the provisions of BP 51 prior to the January 30, 1980 local elections, stated that a total of 20 cities were not allowed to participate in the election of provincial officials:[29] seven of these were "highly urbanized," while the remaining 13 were "component" cities.
1983–1987Batas Pambansa Bilang 337 (Local Government Code of 1983), approved on February 10, 1983, further refined the criteria by which cities can be classified as highly urbanized cities.[20] Under BP 337 a city that had at least 150,000 inhabitants and an income of at least {{PH peso}}30 million was to be declared highly urbanized by the Minister of Local Government within thirty days of the city having met the requirement.[20] The cities of Angeles (1986), Bacolod (September 27, 1984), Butuan (February 7, 1985), Cagayan de Oro (November 22, 1983), Iloilo (1983) Iligan (November 22, 1983), Olongapo (December 7, 1983), and Zamboanga (November 22, 1983) became HUCs in this manner. The residents in most of these cities lost their right to participate in provincial elections for the first time. The two exceptions are: Iloilo City, which had already been deprived of the right to vote for provincial officials in 1959 by virtue of Section 2 of RA 2259,[21] and Zamboanga City, which had been autonomously governed since its creation by virtue of Section 47 of its city charter (Commonwealth Act No. 39).[22]By virtue of Section 30 of Batas Pambansa Bilang 881 (Omnibus Election Code of the Philippines), approved on December 3, 1985, provided that: "unless their respective charters provide otherwise, the electorate of component cities shall be entitled to vote in the election for provincial officials of the province of which it is a part."[23] This provision therefore overrides the 1951 Supreme Court decision on Teves, et al. v. Commission on Elections by providing voters in component cities whose charters are silent on the matter of electing provincial officials the right to again participate in provincial elections. BP 881 therefore again enfranchised voters in the cities of Bais and Canlaon (Negros Oriental), and Ozamiz (Misamis Occidental). Despite the charter of the city of Cotabato being silent on the matter of electing provincial officials, the city was not legislated to be part of any of the successor provinces of the old undivided Cotabato province. Voters of the city therefore were still not eligible to vote in the provincial elections of either Maguindanao or North Cotabato and therefore remained independent from any province. 1987–1991The period between ratification of the new Constitution (February 1987) and the effectivity of the Local Government Code of 1991 (January 1992) was one of transition. During this time, BP 51, BP 337 and BP 881 were still in force: the only legal classes of cities during this period were still "highly urbanized" and "component" cities. Altering the right of city residents to participate in provincial elections was once again exercised by the newly restored Congress in this period. A total of three cities were affected: Republic Acts No. 6641 (in 1987),[24] 6726 (in 1989)[25] and 6843 (in 1990),[26] once again allowed the residents of Mandaue, Oroquieta and San Carlos to vote for provincial officials of Cebu, Misamis Occidental and Pangasinan respectively. Since BP 51—which only considered cities as being either "highly urbanized" or "component"—was still in force at the time, the changes were not considered as switching between legal categories,[46] but rather a simple change within the "component city" classification that did not require a plebiscite. Note that the "independent component city" legal classification was only introduced through the Local Government Code in 1992. Under the same criteria set in BP 337 (Local Government Code of 1983), a total of three cities became highly urbanized: General Santos (September 5, 1988), Lucena (July 1, 1991) and Mandaue (February 15, 1991). Lucena and Mandaue were special cases, in that because their re-classification into HUC status took place after the ratification of the Constitution (February 11, 1987) but before the effectivity of the Local Government Code of 1991 (January 1, 1992), their residents were allowed to continue to participate in the election of provincial officials as per their respective charters (as amended), by virtue of Sec. 452-c of the LGC.[2] Residents of General Santos were already excluded from voting for provincial officials of South Cotabato since achieving cityhood in 1968; they were therefore unaffected by this exemption. 1992–presentThe Local Government Code of 1991 came into effect on January 1, 1992, and has remained in force ever since, though some amendments have been made.[2] New requirements for creating cities, and upgrading cities to highly urbanized status, were instituted under this Act. The LGC of 1991 was also the first time the independent component city (ICC) category was introduced. These cities are those non-highly urbanized cities whose charters explicitly prohibited city residents to vote in provincial elections. They were finally made completely independent of the province from fiscal, administrative and legal standpoints. UpgradingIndependent municipality to highly urbanized cityThe municipalities of Metro Manila, having been severed from the provinces of Bulacan and Rizal and made independent units in 1975, were converted to highly urbanized cities, beginning in 1995 with Mandaluyong. The most recent, Navotas, became an HUC in 2007. Only Pateros, which does not currently meet the population requirement of 200,000 inhabitants, remains the only independent municipality in Metro Manila. Component city to independent component cityAll that is needed is a congressional amendment to a component city's charter, prohibiting city residents to vote for provincial officials. So far no city has been upgraded this way. Component/independent component city to highly urbanized citySince 1992, once a city reaches a population of 200,000 persons as certified by the Philippine Statistics Authority and an income of {{PH peso}}50 million (based on 1991 constant prices) as certified by the city treasurer, the city government can submit a request to the President to have their city declared as highly urbanized within 30 days. Upon the President's declaration, a plebiscite will be held within a specific timeframe to ratify this conversion. There are no limits as to the number of times a component city can attempt to become a highly urbanized city, should previous tries be unsuccessful.[27]
DowngradingHighly urbanized city to component cityReclassifying an HUC as a component city likely involves not only amending the concerned city's charter, but also the Local Government Code,[43] as currently there is no provision in the LGC that allows this, nor are there any precedents. Some Cebu City politicians have previously indicated that they wish to bring back the city under the province's control, in order to bring in more votes against the Sugbuak, the proposed partition of Cebu Province.[43] Independent component city to component cityA congressional amendment to the city charter enabling city residents to vote for provincial officials is required, followed by a plebiscite. Santiago's status as an independent component city was briefly in question after the enactment of Republic Act No. 8528 on February 14, 1998 which sought to make it a regular component city.[44] The Supreme Court on September 16, 1999 however ruled in favor of the city's mayor who contended that such a change in the status of the city required a plebiscite just like any other merger, division, abolition or alteration in boundaries of any political unit. And due to the lack of a plebiscite to affirm such a change, RA 8528 was therefore unconstitutional.[45] League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP)The League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP) is a non-profit organization and is not a government agency. It has a membership of 143 cities and was founded in 1988. The organization was formed to help coordinate efforts to improve governance and local autonomy and to tackle issues such as preserving the environment and improving public works. List of cities{{Details|List of cities in the Philippines}}{{As of|2015|12|12|df=US}}, there are 145 cities in the Philippines. General Trias in Cavite is the newest city, after its charter was ratified on December 12, 2015.[46]{{center|{{Cities of the Philippines location map}}}}Largest cities{{Main list|List of Philippine cities and municipalities by population}}
Metropolitan areas{{main|List of metropolitan areas in the Philippines}}City facts
Defunct/dissolved cities
"League of 16" and legal battles{{Main|League of Cities of the Philippines vs. COMELEC}}The Supreme Court of the Philippines, by a highly divided vote of 6–5, on November 18, 2008, subsequently upheld with finality on May 6, 2009, declared unconstitutional cityhood laws converting 16 municipalities into cities. The 24-page judgment of Justice Antonio T. Carpio, adjudged that the following Cityhood Laws violate secs. 6 and 10, Article X of the Constitution of the Philippines:{{Div col|colwidth=30em|style=font-size:95%}}
The Court held that the foregoing Cityhood Laws, all enacted after RA 9009's effectivity, "explicitly exempt respondent municipalities from the increased income requirement from {{PH peso}}20 million to {{PH peso}}100 million in Sec. 450 of the Local Government Code (LGC), as amended by RA 9009. Such exemption clearly violates Section 10, Article X of the Constitution and is thus patently unconstitutional. To be valid, such exemption must be written in the Local Government Code and not in any other law, including the Cityhood Laws."[61][62] However, more than a year later, on December 22, 2009, acting on the appeal of the so-called League of 16 Cities (an informal group consisting of the sixteen local government units whose cityhood status had been reversed), the Supreme Court reversed its earlier ruling as it ruled that "at the end of the day, the passage of the amendatory law (regarding the criteria for cityhood as set by Congress) is no different from the enactment of a law, i.e., the cityhood laws specifically exempting a particular political subdivision from the criteria earlier mentioned. Congress, in enacting the exempting law/s, effectively decreased the already codified indicators."[63] As such, the cityhood status of the said 16 LGUs was effectively restored. In August 24, 2010. In a 16-page resolution, the Supreme Court reinstated its November 18, 2008 decision striking down the cityhood laws, reducing once more the sixteen LGUs to the status of regular municipalities.[64] The most recent development in the legal battles surrounding the League of 16 came on February 15, 2011. Voting 7-6, the Supreme Court (SC) ruled that 16 towns that became cities in 2007 can stay as cities. It's the fourth time the SC has ruled on the case, and the third reversal. It said the conversion of the 16 towns into cities met all legal requirements.[65] Rejected cityhood{{small|Note: This section only lists attempts that reached the stage where a Republic Act was enacted for the purpose of achieving cityhood.}}
Former names{{main list|List of renamed cities and municipalities in the Philippines}}{{small|Note: This section only lists name changes made upon or since cityhood.}}
See also{{Div col|colwidth=30em}}
References1. ^{{cite web|title=Department Order No. 23-08|url=http://nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/articles/DepOrderReclass.pdf|website=Philippine Statistics Authority|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=29 July 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141218024948/http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/articles/DepOrderReclass.pdf|archive-date=18 December 2014|dead-url=yes|df=dmy-all}} 2. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 {{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 7160 - An Act Providing for a Local Government Code of 1991|url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1991/ra_7160_1991.html|website=The LawPhil Project|accessdate=30 April 2016|location=Metro Manila, Philippines|date=10 October 1991}} 3. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 9009 - An Act Amending Sec. 450 of Republic Act No. 7160, Otherwise Known as the Local Government Code of 1991, by Increasing the Average Annual Income Requirement for a Municipality or Cluster of Barangays to be Converted into a Component City.|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno9009.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=24 February 2001}} 4. ^1 {{cite web|title=A Call for Reason and Respect for Law|url=http://www.lcp-policy.blogspot.com/|website=LCP Policy Blog|accessdate=29 April 2016}} 5. ^{{cite news|title=League of Cities wants veto on city hood of 12 towns|url=http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2007/feb/09/yehey/prov/20070209pro1.html|accessdate=29 April 2016|work=The Manila Times|date=9 February 2007|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090122102944/http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2007/feb/09/yehey/prov/20070209pro1.html|archivedate=22 January 2009}} 6. ^1 2 {{cite web|title=G.R. No. L-5150; Teves, et al. vs. Commission on Elections|url=http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1951/nov1951/gr_l-5150_1951.html|website=The LawPhil Project|accessdate=30 April 2016|location=Metro Manila, Philippines|date=8 November 1951}} 7. ^{{cite web|title=Commonwealth Act No. 604 - An Act to Amend Certain Sections of the Charter of the City of Iloilo |url=http://www.thecorpusjuris.com/legislative/commonwealth-acts/ca-no-604.php|website=The Corpus Juris |author=National Assembly of the Philippines |accessdate=28 November 2016 |date=22 August 1940}} 8. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 170 - An Act Creating the City of Dagupan|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno170.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=28 November 2016|date=20 June 1947}} 9. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 448 - An Act to Amend the Charter of the City of Cabanatuan|url=http://laws.chanrobles.com/republicacts/5_republicacts.php?id=488|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=28 November 2016|date=10 June 1950}} 10. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 526 - An Act Creating the City of Cabanatuan|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno526.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=16 June 1950}} 11. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 1445 - An Act Amending Certain Sections of Republic Act Numbered Five Hundred Twenty-Six, Otherwise Known as the Charter of the City of Cabanatuan|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno1445.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=14 June 1956}} 12. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.chanrobles.com/commonwealthacts/commonwealthactno592.html |date=19 August 1940 |author=National Assembly of the Philippines |website=Chan Robles Law Library |accessdate=18 February 2017 |title=Commonwealth Act No. 592 - An Act to Create the City of Dansalan}} 13. ^{{cite web |url=http://laws.chanrobles.com/republicacts/16_republicacts.php?id=1554 |date=16 June 1956 |author=Congress of the Philippines |website=Chan Robles Law Library |accessdate=18 February 2017 |title=Republic Act No. 1552 – An Act to Amend the Charter of the City of Dansalan so as to Change Its name to Marawi and Make Elective Its Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilors, and for other purposes}} 14. ^{{cite web|title=Commonwealth Act No. 58 - An Act Creating the City of Cebu|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/commonwealthacts/commonwealthactno58.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=28 November 2016|date=20 October 1934}} 15. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 3857 - An Act to Revise the Charter of the City of Cebu|url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1964/ra_3857_1964.html|website=The LawPhil Project|accessdate=28 November 2016|date=10 June 1964}} 16. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 327 - An Act Creating the City of Dumaguete |url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno327.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library |author=Congress of the Philippines |accessdate=28 November 2016 |date=15 July 1948}} 17. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 5797 - An Act to Revise the Charter of the City of Dumaguete |url=http://www.thecorpusjuris.com/legislative/republic-acts/ra-no-5797.php|website=The Corpus Juris |author=Congress of the Philippines |accessdate=10 August 2016 |date=21 June 1969}} 18. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web|title=Batas Pambansa Blg. 51 - An Act Providing for the Elective or Appointive Positions in Various Local Governments and for Other Purposes|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/bataspambansa/bataspambansablg51.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=22 December 1979}} 19. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web |title=G.R. No. L-52304 - RAMON B. CENIZA, FEDERICO C. CABILAO, JR., NELSON J. ROSAL and ALEJANDRO R. ALINSUG, petitioners, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, COMMISSION ON AUDIT, and NATIONAL TREASURER, respondents. |url=http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1980/jan1980/gr_52304_1980.html |website=The LawPhil Project |author=Supreme Court of the Philippines |accessdate=9 August 2016 |date=28 January 1980}} 20. ^1 {{cite web|title=Batas Pambansa Blg. 337 - An Act Enacting a Local Government Code (Repealed by Republic Act No. 7160)|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/bataspambansa/bataspambansablg337.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=10 February 1983}} 21. ^1 {{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 2259 - An Act making elective the offices of Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilors in chartered cities, regulating the election in such cities and fixing the salaries and tenure of such offices. |url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1959/ra_2259_1959.html |date=19 June 1959 |author=Congress of the Philippines |website=The LawPhil Project |accessdate=29 April 2016}} 22. ^{{cite web|title=Commonwealth Act No. 39 - An Act Creating the City of Zamboanga|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/commonwealthacts/commonwealthactno39.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=28 November 2016|date=12 October 1936}} 23. ^{{cite web |author=Batasang Pambansa ng Pilipinas |title=Batas Pambansa Blg. 881 - Omnibus Election Code of the Philippines |url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/bataspam/bp1985/bp_881_1985.html |website=The LawPhil Project |accessdate=11 August 2016|date=3 December 1985}} 24. ^{{cite web |title=Republic Act No. 6641 - An Act allowing qualified voters of the City of Mandaue to vote in provincial elections of the Province of Cebu, amending for the purpose Republic Act Numbered Fifty-Five Hundred and Nineteen |url=http://www.gov.ph/1987/12/23/republic-act-no-6641/ |author=Congress of the Philippines |accessdate=10 August 2016 |date=23 December 1987 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820015845/http://www.gov.ph/1987/12/23/republic-act-no-6641/ |archivedate=20 August 2016 |df= }} 25. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 6726 - An Act Allowing Qualified Voters of the City of Oroquieta to Vote in Provincial Elections of the Province of Misamis Occidental, Amending for the Purpose Republic Act Numbered Fifty-Five Hundred and Eighteen|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno6726.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=15 May 1989}} 26. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 6843 - An Act to Amend Section Ninety-Six of Republic Act Numbered Forty-Four Hundred and Eighty-Seven, Entitled "An Act Creating the City of San Carlos in Pangasinan" by Allowing Qualified Voters of the City of San Carlos to Vote in the Provincial Elections of the Province of Pangasinan|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno6843.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=5 January 1990}} 27. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.dilg.gov.ph/PDF_File/issuances/legal_opinions/DILG-Legal_Opinions-2012223-d5cbf14855.pdf |last=Doque IV |first=Jesus B. |title=DILG Opinion No. 5, S. 2011 |date=11 March 2011 |accessdate=11 August 2016}} 28. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.ph/2007/03/26/proclamation-no-1264-s-2007/ |title=Converting the City of Puerto Princesa from a component city into a highly-urbanized city. |date=26 March 2007 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |last=Macapagal-Arroyo |first=Gloria |publisher=Government of the Republic of the Philippines |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820023505/http://www.gov.ph/2007/03/26/proclamation-no-1264-s-2007/ |archivedate=20 August 2016 |df= }} 29. ^{{cite web | url=http://nap.psa.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/PSGC_updates/Sept07.asp | title=PSGC Updates (July - September 2007) | access-date=11 August 2011 | date=2007 | publisher=Philippine Statistics Authority | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160508081947/http://nap.psa.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/PSGC_updates/Sept07.asp | archive-date=2016-05-08 | dead-url=yes | df= }} 30. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.ph/2007/01/23/proclamation-no-1222-s-2007/ |title=Converting the City of Lapu-Lapu from a component city into a highly-urbanized city. |date=23 January 2007 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |last=Macapagal-Arroyo |first=Gloria |publisher=Government of the Republic of the Philippines}} 31. ^{{cite web | url=http://nap.psa.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/PSGC_updates/Sept07.asp | title=PSGC Updates (July - September 2007) | access-date=11 August 2011 | date=2007 | publisher=Philippine Statistics Authority | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160508081947/http://nap.psa.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/PSGC_updates/Sept07.asp | archive-date=2016-05-08 | dead-url=yes | df= }} 32. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.ph/2008/10/04/proclamation-no-1637-s-2008/ |title=Converting the City of Tacloban into a highly-urbanized city. |date=4 October 2008 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |last=Macapagal-Arroyo |first=Gloria |publisher=Government of the Republic of the Philippines}} 33. ^{{cite web |url=http://nap.psa.gov.ph/pressreleases/2009/PR-200902-PP2-01PSGC.asp | title=Thirteen Barangays Created; One City Converted to Highly Urbanized City in the 4th Quarter of 2008 | access-date=11 August 2011 |date=16 February 2008 | publisher=Philippine Statistics Authority }} 34. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.ph/downloads/1997/02feb/19970213-PROC-0969-FVR.pdf|title=Converting the City of Cabanatuan from a component city into a highly-urbanized city. |date=13 February 1997 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |last=Ramos |first=Fidel V. |publisher=Government of the Republic of the Philippines}} 35. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.philstar.com/nation/2004/06/17/254278/cabanatuan-renews-bid-for-highly-urbanized-city-status |date=17 June 2004 |last=Galvez |first=Manny |accessdate=11 August 2016 |website=PhilStar.com |title=Cabanatuan renews bid for highly urbanized city status }}{{dead link|date=November 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} 36. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.ph/downloads/2005/10oct/20051027-PROC-0940-GMA.pdf |title=Converting the City of Tarlac from a component city into a highly-urbanized city. |date=27 October 2005 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |last=Macapagal-Arroyo |first=Gloria |publisher=Government of the Republic of the Philippines}} 37. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.ph/2011/03/14/proclamation-no-124-s-2011/ |title=Converting the City of Antipolo from a component city into a highly-urbanized city. |date=14 March 2011 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |last=Aquino III |first=Benigno S. |publisher=Government of the Republic of the Philippines}} 38. ^{{cite web | url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/antipolo-citys-urbanization-put-hold-temporarily-20110406-021756-921.html | title=Antipolo City's urbanization put on hold temporarily | access-date=2015-09-04 | date=2011-04-06 | publisher=Manila Bulletin | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305202839/https://sg.news.yahoo.com/antipolo-citys-urbanization-put-hold-temporarily-20110406-021756-921.html | archive-date=2016-03-05 | dead-url=yes | df= }} 39. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.ph/2012/07/04/proclamation-no-418-s-2012/ |title=Converting the City of Cabanatuan from a component city into a highly-urbanized city. |date=4 July 2012 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |last=Aquino III |first=Benigno |publisher=Government of the Republic of the Philippines}} 40. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://punto.com.ph/News/Article/22101/Volume-8-No-55/Headlines/%E2%80%98Highly-urbanized%E2%80%99-Cabanatuan-still-unratified |archive-url=https://archive.today/20150317172444/http://punto.com.ph/News/Article/22101/Volume-8-No-55/Headlines/%E2%80%98Highly-urbanized%E2%80%99-Cabanatuan-still-unratified |dead-url=yes |archive-date=17 March 2015 |date=10 February 2015 |last=Roque |first=Elmo |accessdate=11 August 2016 |publisher=Punto! Central Luzon |title='Highly-urbanized' Cabanatuan still unratified }} 41. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/apr2014/gr_203974_2014.html |date=22 April 2014 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |title=Aurelio M. Umali v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 203974, 22 April 2014 |website=The LawPhil Project |publisher=Supreme Court of the Philippines |last=Velasco, Jr. |first=Presbitero J.}} 42. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.rappler.com/nation/74264-cabanatuan-plebiscite-postponed-third-time |date=6 November 2014 |accessdate=11 August 2016 |title=Cabanatuan City plebiscite postponed for the 3rd time |website=Rappler |last=Santos, Jr. |first=Reynaldo}} 43. ^1 Cuenco ready to work for it; del Mar wants to be sure {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060307111850/http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/ceb/2005/05/27/news/cuenco.ready.to.work.for.it.del.mar.wants.to.be.sure.html |date=2006-03-07 }} 44. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 8528 - An Act Amending Certain Sections of Republic Act Numbered 7720 - An Act Converting the Municipality of Santiago into an Independent Component City to be Known as the City of Santiago|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno8528.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=14 February 1998}} 45. ^1 {{cite web|title=Miranda vs. Aguirre : G.R. No. 133064 : September 16, 1999 : J. Puno : En Banc|url=http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1999/sept99/133064.htm|website=Supreme Court of the Philippines|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=16 September 1999}} 46. ^1 {{cite news|title=General Trias in Cavite now a city|url=http://www.rappler.com/nation/115860-cavite-general-trias-cityhood-plebiscite|accessdate=13 December 2015|work=Rappler|date=13 December 2015}} 47. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.philpost.gov.ph/web/cagayan-de-oros-white-water-rafting/ | title=Cagayan de Oro’s White Water Rafting | publisher=Philippine Postal Corporation | date=June 18, 2012 | accessdate=September 13, 2012 | deadurl=yes | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120729194732/http://www.philpost.gov.ph/web/cagayan-de-oros-white-water-rafting/ | archivedate=July 29, 2012 | df= }} 48. ^{{cite web|title=PSGC Interactive; List of Cities |url=http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/listcity.asp |website=Philippine Statistics Authority |accessdate=30 April 2016 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429190752/http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/listcity.asp |archivedate=29 April 2011 |df= }} 49. ^{{cite web|title=Puerto Princesa: The Country's Ecotourism Capital|url=http://www.puertoprincesaboard.com/|website=Puertoprincesaboard.com|accessdate=29 April 2016|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080929084658/http://www.puertoprincesaboard.com/|archivedate=29 September 2008|quote=The city lies along the mid-section of the long island of the Palawan province. It has a land area totalling 253,982.00 hectares stretching to over 106 kilometers and it has the narrowest breadth which is 8.5 kilometers found in the Barangay Bahile.}} 50. ^{{cite web|title=CY 2008 Final Internal Revenue Allotment for LGUs|url=http://www.dbm.gov.ph/irapdf08/pcm/IVB.pdf|website=Department of Budget and Management|accessdate=29 April 2016|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120217061551/http://www.dbm.gov.ph/irapdf08/pcm/IVB.pdf|archivedate=17 February 2012}} 51. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.davaocity.gov.ph/davao/profile.aspx?id=land |title=About Davao - Land Area |website=The Official Website of the City Government of Davao |accessdate=18 February 2017 |date=2011}} 52. ^{{cite news|title=Discussion on CAMANAVA control project continues|url=http://www.congress.gov.ph/committees/commnews/commnews_det.php?newsid=218|accessdate=29 April 2016|work=Congress of the Philippines|agency=Source: Committee Administrative Support Service, Committee Affairs Department|issue=Volume 13; No. 36|date=21 February 2005|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130518033717/http://www.congress.gov.ph/committees/commnews/commnews_det.php?newsid=218|archivedate=18 May 2013}} 53. ^{{cite web |url=http://images.summitpost.org/original/438892.jpg |title=Map of Mount Apo Natural Park |accessdate=18 February 2017 |website=Summit Post }} 54. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 306 - An Act Creating the City of Legaspi|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno306.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=18 June 1948}} 55. ^{{cite web|title=Welcome to My City of Legazpi|url=http://www.angelfire.com/ar/Arimado/page2.html|website=Angelfire (undefined)|accessdate=29 April 2016}} 56. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 288 - An Act Creating the City of Basilan|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno288.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=16 June 1948}} 57. ^{{cite web|title=Presidential Decree No. 356 - Creating the Province of Basilan|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/presidentialdecrees/presidentialdecreeno356.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=27 December 1973}} 58. ^{{cite web|title=Presidential Decree No. 840 - Reorganizing the political subdivision of the Province of Basilan, converting Basilan City into the Municipality of Isabela, appropriating funds therefor, and for other purposes |url=http://www.chanrobles.com/presidentialdecrees/presidentialdecreeno840.html |website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library |accessdate=29 April 2016 |date=11 December 1975}} 59. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 4413 - An Act Creating the City of Rajah Buayan|url=http://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1965/ra_4413_1965.html|website=The LawPhil Project|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=19 June 1965}} 60. ^{{cite web|title=G.R. No. L-25469|url=http://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1966/oct1966/gr_l-25469_1966.html|website=The LawPhil Project|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=29 October 1966}} 61. ^{{cite web|title=G.R. No. 176951|url=http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/november2008/176951.htm|website=Supreme Court of the Philippines|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=18 November 2008}} 62. ^{{cite news|last1=Rempillo|first1=Jay B.|title=SC Voids 16 Cityhood Laws|url=http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/news/courtnews%20flash/2008/11/11180803.php|accessdate=29 April 2016|work=Court News Flash November 2008|publisher=Supreme Court of the Philippines|date=18 November 2008|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090319070240/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/news/courtnews%20flash/2008/11/11180803.php|archivedate=19 March 2009}} 63. ^{{cite news|last1=Pulta|first1=Benjamin B.|title=SC reverses self, upholds creation of 16 cities|url=http://www.tribuneonline.org/nation/20091223nat1.html|accessdate=29 April 2016|work=The Daily Tribune|date=23 December 2009|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100508210303/http://www.tribuneonline.org/nation/20091223nat1.html|archivedate=8 May 2010}} 64. ^{{cite news|last1=Rempillo|first1=Jay B.|title=SC Reinstates 2008 Decision Voiding 16 Cityhood Laws|url=http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/news/courtnews%20flash/2010/08/08271001.php|accessdate=29 April 2016|work=Court News Flash August 2010|publisher=Supreme Court of the Philippines|date=27 August 2010|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120318154303/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/news/courtnews%20flash/2010/08/08271001.php|archivedate=18 March 2012}} 65. ^{{cite news|last1=Dedace|first1=Sophia M.|title=16 towns now cities again as SC reverses itself for 3rd time|url=http://www.gmanews.tv/story/213170/16-towns-now-cities-again-as-sc-reverses-itself-for-3rd-time|accessdate=29 April 2016|work=GMA News|date=16 February 2011|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110218070316/http://www.gmanews.tv/story/213170/16-towns-now-cities-again-as-sc-reverses-itself-for-3rd-time|archivedate=18 February 2011}} 66. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 4586 - An Act Creating Laurel City|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno4586.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=19 June 1965}} 67. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 5907 - An Act Creating the City of Tarlac|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno5907.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=21 June 1969}} 68. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 8474 - An Act Converting the Municipality of Ilagan into a Component City of the Province of Isabela to be Known as the City of Ilagan|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno8474.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=2 February 1998}} 69. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 10169 - An Act Converting the Municipality of Ilagan in the Province of Isabela into a Component City to be Known as the City of Ilagan|url=http://www.senate.gov.ph/republic_acts/ra%2010169.pdf|website=Senate of the Philippines|accessdate=29 April 2016|location=Metro Manila, Philippines|date=21 June 2012}} 70. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 8535 - An Act Creating the City of Novaliches|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno8535.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=23 February 1998}} 71. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 9021 - An Act Converting the Municipality of Meycauayan, Province of Bulacan into a Component City to be Known as the City of Meycauayan|url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9021_2001.html|website=The LawPhil Project|accessdate=29 April 2016|location=Metro Manila, Philippines|date=5 March 2001}} 72. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 9356 - An Act Converting the Municipality of Meycauayan in the Province of Bulacan into a Component City to be Known as the City of Meycauayan|url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2006/ra_9356_2006.html|website=The LawPhil Project|accessdate=29 April 2016|location=Metro Manila, Philippines|date=2 October 2006}} 73. ^{{cite news|last1=Balabo|first1=Dino|title=Bulacan Now Has 3 Cities|url=http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/ht/ht006759.htm|accessdate=29 April 2016|work=NewsFlash.org|publisher=STAR|date=12 December 2006|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120607131133/http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/ht/ht006759.htm|archivedate=7 June 2012}} 74. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 521 - An Act Creating the City of Cagayan de Oro|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno521.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=15 June 1950}} 75. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 3134 - An Act Creating the City of Lapu-Lapu|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno3134.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=17 June 1961}} 76. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 1552 - An Act to Amend the Charter of the City of Dansalan So as to Change Its Name to Marawi and Make Elective Its Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilors, and for Other Purposes|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno1552.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=16 June 1956}} 77. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 321 - An Act Creating the City of Ozamiz|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno321.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=19 June 1948}} 78. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 437 - An Act Changing the Name of Rizal City to Pasay City|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno437.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=7 June 1950}} 79. ^{{cite web|title=Republic Act No. 603 - An Act Creating the City of Roxas|url=http://www.chanrobles.com/republicacts/republicactno603.html|website=Chan Robles Virtual Law Library|accessdate=29 April 2016|date=11 April 1951}} External links
3 : Cities in the Philippines|Country subdivisions in Asia|Subdivisions of the Philippines |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。