请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Cross-examination
释义

  1. Variations by jurisdiction

  2. Affecting the outcome of jury trials

  3. See also

  4. References

  5. Further reading

{{short description|The interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent}}{{about|the court proceeding|the policy debate concept|Structure of policy debate|the research methodology|Triangulation (social science)}}{{multiple issues|{{more footnotes|date=August 2012}}{{Globalize/US |date=October 2011 |discuss=Talk:Cross-examination#US }}
}}{{Evidence law}}

In law, cross-examination is the interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent. It is preceded by direct examination (in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India and Pakistan known as examination-in-chief) and may be followed by a redirect (re-examination in England, Scotland, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India, Hong Kong, and Pakistan). Redirect examination, performed by the attorney or pro se individual who performed the direct examination, clarifies the witness' testimony provided during cross-examination including any subject matter raised during cross-examination but not discussed during direct examination. Recross examination addresses the witness' testimony discussed in redirect by the opponent. Depending on the judge's discretion, opponents are allowed multiple opportunities to redirect and recross examine witnesses (may vary by jurisdiction).

Variations by jurisdiction

In the United States federal Courts, a cross-examining attorney is typically not permitted to ask questions that do not pertain to the testimony offered during direct examination, but most state courts do permit a lawyer to cross-examine a witness on matters not raised during direct examination. Similarly, courts in England, South Africa, Australia, and Canada allow a cross-examiner to exceed the scope of direct examination.

Since a witness called by the opposing party is presumed to be hostile, cross-examination does permit leading questions. A witness called by the direct examiner, on the other hand, may only be treated as hostile by that examiner after being permitted to do so by the judge, at the request of that examiner and as a result of the witness being openly antagonistic and/or prejudiced against the opposing party.[1]

Affecting the outcome of jury trials

Cross-examination is a key component in a trial and the topic is given substantial attention during courses on Trial Advocacy.[2] The opinions by a jury or judge are often changed during cross examination if doubt is cast on the witness. In other times a credible witness affirms the belief in their original statements or in some cases enhances the judge's or jury's belief. Though the closing argument is often considered the deciding moment of a trial, effective cross-examination wins trials.[3]

Attorneys anticipate hostile witness' responses during pretrial planning, and often attempt to shape the witnesses' perception of the questions to draw out information helpful to the attorney's case.[4] Typically during an attorney's closing argument he will repeat any admissions made by witnesses that favor their case. Indeed, in the United States, cross-examination is seen as a core part of the entire adversarial system of justice, in that it "is the principal means by which the believability of a witness and the truth of his testimony are tested."[5] Another key component affecting a trial outcome is the jury selection, in which attorneys will attempt to include jurors from whom they feel they can get a favorable response or at the least unbiased fair decision. So while there are many factors affecting the outcome of a trial, the cross-examination of a witness will often influence an open-minded unbiased jury searching for the certainty of facts upon which to base their decision.

See also

  • {{annotated link|Litigation strategy}}
  • {{annotated link|Testimony}}
  • {{annotated link|Trial advocacy}}
  • {{annotated link|Witness impeachment}}

References

1. ^Ehrhardt, Charles W. and Stephanie J. Young, "Using Leading Questions During Direct Examination" {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081103082145/http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/232/ehrhardt.html |date=2008-11-03 }}, Florida State University Law Review, 1996. Accessed November 26, 2008.
2. ^Lubet, Steven; Modern Trial Advocacy, NITA, New York, NY 2004 pp. 83 et. seq. {{ISBN|1556818866}}
3. ^{{cite book| title=Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination| last=Mahoney| first=Kevin J| location=Costa Mesa, California| publisher=James Publishing| year=2008| isbn=158012125X}}
4. ^Dreier, A.S.; Strategy, Planning & Litigating to Win; Conatus, Boston, MA, 2012, pp. 79-85; {{ISBN|0615676952}}
5. ^Davis v. Alaska, {{ussc|415|308|1974}}.

Further reading

{{Wiktionary|cross-examination}}
  • {{cite book | title=Advocacy 2007/2008 (Blackstone Bar Manual) | author=City Law School | location=Oxford | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=2007 | isbn=0-19-921220-1 }}
  • {{cite book | title=The Art of the Advocate | author=Du Cann, Richard | location=London | publisher=Penguin | year=1993 | isbn=0-14-017931-3 }}
  • {{cite book | title=The Golden Rules of Advocacy | author=Evans, K. | year=1993 | location=London | publisher=Blackstone Press | isbn=1-85431-259-6 }}
  • {{cite book | title=The Devil's Advocate | author=Morley, I | location=London | publisher=Sweet & Maxwell | year=2005 | isbn=0-421-91480-7 }}
  • {{cite book | title=Advocacy | author=Ross, D. | location=London | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2005 | isbn=0-521-61117-2 }}
  • {{cite book | title=The Art of Cross-Examination | author=Wellman, F. | year=2007 | isbn=1-59462-647-2 | origyear=1903 | publisher=Standard Publications }}
  • {{cite book | title=Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination | author=Mahoney, K. | year=2008 | publisher=James Publishing Company | isbn=978-1-58012-125-5}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Cross-Examination}}

4 : Criminal procedure|Civil procedure|Evidence law|Testimony

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/17 21:58:39