请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Capron v. Van Noorden
释义

  1. References

  2. Further reading

  3. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Capron v. Van Noorden
|DecideDate=March 5
|DecideYear=1804
|FullName=Capron v. Van Noorden
|USVol=6
|USPage=126
|ParallelCitations=2 Cranch 126; 2 L. Ed. 229; 1804 U.S. LEXIS 253
|Prior=Error to the Circuit Court of North Carolina
|Subsequent=
|Holding=A plaintiff is allowed to dismiss a case that he had lost at trial because of a lack of diversity jurisdiction, leaving the plaintiff free to bring the case again.
|SCOTUS=1801-1804
|Majority=
|JoinMajority=
|LawsApplied=
}}Capron v. Van Noorden, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 126 (1804), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court allowed a plaintiff to dismiss a case that he had lost at trial because of a lack of diversity jurisdiction, leaving the plaintiff free to bring the case again.[1]

References

1. ^{{Citation |last=Yeazell |first=S. C. |title=Civil Procedure |edition=Seventh |publisher=Aspen Publishers |location=New York |year=2008 |page=218 |isbn=978-0-7355-6925-6 }}.

Further reading

  • {{Citation |last=Friendly |first=Henry J. |authorlink=Henry Friendly |title=The Historic Basis of Diversity Jurisdiction |journal=Harvard Law Review |volume=41 |issue=4 |year=1928 |pages=483–510 |doi=10.2307/1330049 }}.

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = Capron v. Van Noorden, {{Ussc|6|126|1804|Cranch|2|el=no}}
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/6/126/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep006/usrep006126/usrep006126.pdf
| openjurist =https://openjurist.org/6/us/126{{SCOTUS-stub}}

4 : 1804 in United States case law|Diversity jurisdiction case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Marshall Court

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/25 14:30:47