| 词条 | National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co. |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=National Mutual Insurance Company v. Tidewater Transfer Company |ArgueDate=November 8 |ArgueYear=1948 |DecideDate=June 20 |DecideYear=1949 |FullName=National Mutual Insurance Company v. Tidewater Transfer Company |USVol=337 |USPage=582 |ParallelCitations=69 S. Ct. 1173; 93 L. Ed. 1556; 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2924 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding={{USCSub|28|1332|d}}, treating citizens of United States territories as citizens of a state for the purpose of establishing diversity jurisdiction, is constitutional. |SCOTUS=1946-1949 |Plurality=Jackson |JoinPlurality=Black, Burton |Concurrence=Rutledge |JoinConcurrence=Murphy |Dissent=Vinson |JoinDissent=Douglas |Dissent2=Frankfurter |JoinDissent2=Reed |LawsApplied={{USCSub|28|1332|d}} }}National Mutual Insurance Company v. Tidewater Transfer Company, 337 U.S. 582 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. §1332(d). §1332(d) treats citizens of United States territories as citizens of a state for the purpose of establishing diversity jurisdiction.[1] References1. ^Yeazell, S.C. Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 197 External links
| case = National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., {{Ussc|337|582|1949|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/337/582/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep337/usrep337582/usrep337582.pdf{{SCOTUS-stub}} 4 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Vinson Court|Diversity jurisdiction case law|1949 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。