词条 | Well-being |
释义 |
Well-being, wellbeing, or wellness is the condition of an individual or group. A high level of well-being means that in some sense the individual's or group's condition is positive. Multiple factorsAccording to Naci and Ioannidis, {{quote|Wellness refers to diverse and interconnected dimensions of physical, mental, and social well-being that extend beyond the traditional definition of health. It includes choices and activities aimed at achieving physical vitality, mental alacrity, social satisfaction, a sense of accomplishment, and personal fulfillment.[1][2][3]}}Philosophical approachesThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP) entry for "well-being" identifies ways in which terms related to happiness differ. According to the SEP, the terms "happy", "wellness", "satisfaction", "pleasure" or "well-being" can refer to a series of possible states:
The affective and life-satisfaction views of happiness differ meaningfully when it comes to certain topics such as the relationship between income and happiness: "Surveying large numbers of Americans in one case, and what is claimed to be the first globally representative sample of humanity in the other, these studies found that income does indeed correlate substantially (.44 in the global sample), at all levels, with life satisfaction—strictly speaking, a “life evaluation” measure that asks respondents to rate their lives without saying whether they are satisfied. Yet the correlation of household income with the affect measures is far weaker: globally, .17 for positive affect, –.09 for negative affect; and in the United States, essentially zero above $75,000 (though quite strong at low income levels). If the results hold up, the upshot appears to be that income is pretty strongly related to life satisfaction, but weakly related to emotional well-being, at least above a certain threshold."[4] There are weaknesses to the self-report method of elicitation for happiness: The lay conception of emotions (affect) is that they are discrete. It is typical, in everyday language, just as in research, to use research protocols that accept answers such as: "I am happy or I am sad, but not both simultaneously", or "I am 7 on a 1-10 scale of happiness (likert)". Scientific approachesThree subdisciplines in psychology are critical for the study of psychological well-being:[5]
There are two approaches typically taken to understand psychological well-being:
According to Guttman and Levy (1982) well-being is "...a special case of attitude".[7] This approach serves two purposes in the study of well-being: "developing and testing a [systematic] theory for the structure of [interrelationships] among varieties of well-being, and integration of well-being theory with the ongoing{{when|date=February 2015}} cumulative theory {{clarify|date=February 2015}} development in the fields of attitude of related research".[7] Models and components of wellbeingMany different models have developed.[8] Diener: tripartite model of subjective well-being{{Main|Tripartite model of subjective well-being}}Diener's tripartite model of subjective well-being is one of the most comprehensive models of well-being in psychology. It was synthesized by Diener in 1984, positing "three distinct but often related components of wellbeing: frequent positive affect, infrequent negative affect, and cognitive evaluations such as life satisfaction".[9]Cognitive, affective and contextual factors contribute to subjective well-being.[10] According to Diener and Suh, subjective well-being is "...based on the idea that how each person thinks and feels about his or her life is important".[11] Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being{{Main|Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being}}Carol Ryff's multidimensional model of psychological well-being postulated six factors which are key for well-being:[12]
Corey Keyes: flourishing{{Main|Flourishing}}According to Corey Keyes, who collaborated with Carol Ryff, mental well-being has three components, namely emotional or subjective well-being (also called hedonic well-being),[15] psychological well-being, and social well-being (together also called eudaimonic well-being).[13] Emotional well-being concerns subjective aspects of well-being, in concreto, feeling well, whereas psychological and social well-being concerns skills, abilities, and psychological and social functioning.{{sfn|Joshanloo|2015}} Keyes model of mental well-being has received extensive empirical support across cultures.{{sfn|Joshanloo|2015}}[14][15][16] Seligman: positive psychology{{Main|Positive psychology}}Well-being is a central concept in positive psychology. Positive psychology is concerned with eudaimonia, "the good life", reflection about what holds the greatest value in life – the factors that contribute the most to a well-lived and fulfilling life. While not attempting a strict definition of the good life, positive psychologists agree that one must live a happy, engaged, and meaningful life in order to experience "the good life". Martin Seligman referred to "the good life" as "using your signature strengths every day to produce authentic happiness and abundant gratification".[17] PERMA-theoryIn Flourish (2011) Seligman argued that "meaningful life" can be considered as 3 different categories. The resulting acronym is PERMA: Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning and purpose, and Accomplishments. It is a mnemonic for the five elements of Martin Seligman's well-being theory:[19][20]
UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) definitionThe UK ONS defines wellbeing "as having 10 broad dimensions which have been shown to matter most to people in the UK as identified through a national debate. The dimensions are:
Nagel: Experience itself as a goodThomas Nagel has said that "There are elements which, if added to one's experience, make life better; there are other elements which if added to one's experience, make life worse. But what remains when these are set aside is not merely neutral: it is emphatically positive."[29][30]Mixed emotions help wellbeingA 2012 study found that wellbeing was higher for people who experienced both positive and negative emotions.[31][32] Global studiesResearch on positive psychology, well-being, eudaimonia and happiness, and the theories of Diener, Ryff, Keyes and Seligmann covers a broad range of levels and topics, including "the biological, personal, relational, institutional, cultural, and global dimensions of life".{{sfn|Seligman|Csikszentmihalyi|2000}} The World Happiness Report series provide annual updates on the global status of subjective well-being.[33] A global study using data from 166 nations, provided a country ranking of psycho-social well-being.[34] The latter study showed that subjective well-being and psycho-social well-being (i.e. eudaimonia) measures capture distinct constructs and are both needed for a comprehensive understanding of mental well-being. See also
Notes1. ^{{cite journal|author1=Huseyin Naci; John P. A. Ioannidis|title=Evaluation of Wellness Determinants and Interventions by Citizen Scientists|journal=JAMA|date=June 11, 2015|doi=10.1001/jama.2015.6160|volume=314|issue=2|pages=121–2|pmid=26068643}} 2. ^Scott Barry Kaufman sees well-being as influenced by happiness and meaning. 3. ^{{cite web|url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-differences-between-happiness-and-meaning-in-life/|title=The Differences between Happiness and Meaning in Life|first=Scott Barry|last=Kaufman|website=Scientific American Blog Network}} 4. ^{{cite book|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/happiness/|title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|first=Dan|last=Haybron|editor-first=Edward N.|editor-last=Zalta|date=25 March 2019|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|via=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}} 5. ^{{cite journal|last=Ryff|first=Carol D.|title=Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|date=1 January 1989|volume=57|issue=6|pages=1069–1081|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069}} 6. ^1 Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. 7. ^1 {{cite journal|last=Guttman, Levy|first=Louis, Shlomit|title=On the definition and varieties of attitude and wellbeing|journal=Social Indicators Research|date=February 1982|volume=10|issue=2|pages=159–174|doi=10.1007/bf00302508}} 8. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.odi.org/publications/9657-measuring-matters-role-well-being-methods-development-policy-practice|title=Measuring what matters: the role of well-being methods in development policy and practice|website=ODI}} 9. ^Tov & Diener (2013), Subjective Well-Being. Research Collection School of Social Sciences. Paper 1395. {{cite web |url=http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1395 |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2017-06-14 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170605012602/http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1395/ |archivedate=2017-06-05 |df= }} 10. ^Iolanda Costa Galinha & José Luís Pais-Ribeiro (2011), Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(1), 34–53. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2i1.3 11. ^{{cite book|last=Diener, Suh|first=Ed, Eunkook|title=Culture and Subjective Well-being|year=2000|publisher=A Bradford Book|page=4}} 12. ^Carol Ryff’s Model of Psychological Well-being. The Six Criteria of Well-Being {{webarchive|url=http://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/20170616050513/http://livingmeanings.com/six-criteria-well-ryffs-multidimensional-model/ |date=2017-06-16 }} 13. ^{{Cite journal|last=Keyes|first=Corey L. M.|date=2002-01-01|title=The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life|jstor=3090197|journal=Journal of Health and Social Behavior|volume=43|issue=2|pages=207–222|doi=10.2307/3090197}} 14. ^1 {{Cite journal|last=Robitschek|first=Christine|last2=Keyes|first2=Corey L. M.|title=Keyes's model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor.|journal=Journal of Counseling Psychology|volume=56|issue=2|pages=321–329|doi=10.1037/a0013954|year=2009}} 15. ^{{Cite journal|last=Joshanloo|first=Mohsen|last2=Lamers|first2=Sanne M. A.|date=2016-07-01|title=Reinvestigation of the factor structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: Contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling|journal=Personality and Individual Differences|volume=97|pages=8–12|doi=10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.089}} 16. ^{{Cite journal|last=Gallagher|first=Matthew W.|last2=Lopez|first2=Shane J.|last3=Preacher|first3=Kristopher J.|date=2009-08-01|title=The Hierarchical Structure of Well-Being|journal=Journal of Personality|language=en|volume=77|issue=4|pages=1025–1050|doi=10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x|issn=1467-6494|pmc=3865980|pmid=19558444}} 17. ^Seligman, M.E.P. (2009). Authentic Happiness. New York: Free Press. 18. ^Best Benefit of Exercise? Happiness {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120626155303/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197466,00.html |date=2012-06-26 }}, Robin Loyd, Fox News, May 30, 2006. 19. ^David Sze (2015), The Father of Positive Psychology and His Two Theories of Happiness {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625051421/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sze/the-father-of-positive-ps_b_7600226.html |date=2017-06-25 }} 20. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.edge.org/q2011/q11_2.html |title=THE WORLD QUESTION CENTER 2011— Page 2 |publisher=Edge.org |accessdate=2011-02-07 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110210015906/http://edge.org/q2011/q11_2.html |archivedate=2011-02-10 |df= }} 21. ^1 2 Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Free Press. Ch 1 22. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pursuit-of-happiness.org/history-of-happiness/martin-seligman-positive-psychology/|title=The Pursuit of Happiness|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150109130710/http://www.pursuit-of-happiness.org/history-of-happiness/martin-seligman-positive-psychology/|archivedate=2015-01-09|df=}} 23. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ted.com/talks/mihaly_csikszentmihalyi_on_flow?language=en|title=Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi TED talk|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141208203018/http://www.ted.com/talks/mihaly_csikszentmihalyi_on_flow?language=en|archivedate=2014-12-08|df=}} 24. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-beauty-in-the-beast/201210/other-people-matter|title=Other People Matter}} 25. ^{{cite web|url=http://health.usnews.com/health-news/family-health/brain-and-behavior/articles/2009/06/24/using-positive-psychology-in-your-relationships|title=Using Positive Psychology in Your Relationships|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140206061426/http://health.usnews.com/health-news/family-health/brain-and-behavior/articles/2009/06/24/using-positive-psychology-in-your-relationships|archivedate=2014-02-06|df=}} 26. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-murphy/why-do-you-do-what-you-do_b_3873650.html|title=Why do You do What You Do?|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141013074415/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-murphy/why-do-you-do-what-you-do_b_3873650.html|archivedate=2014-10-13|df=|date=2013-09-06}} 27. ^{{cite web|url=http://awesomeculture.com/2011/09/13/the-science-of-a-happy-startup/|title=The Science of a Happy Startup|deadurl=no|archiveurl=http://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/20141206020015/http://awesomeculture.com/2011/09/13/the-science-of-a-happy-startup/|archivedate=2014-12-06|df=}} 28. ^{{Cite web | url=https://whatworkswellbeing.org/about/what-is-wellbeing/ | title=What is wellbeing? | What Works Centre for Wellbeing}} 29. ^Further; "Therefore life is worth living even when the bad elements of experience are plentiful, and the good ones too meager to outweigh the bad ones on their own. The additional positive weight is supplied by experience itself, rather than by any of its consequences." 'Death' (essay), Thomas Nagel, CUP, 1979 30. ^{{Cite web | url=http://www.oxonianreview.org/wp/the-vise-side-of-life/ | title=The Vise Side of Life| date=2018-04-24}} 31. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224856302_Mixed_Emotional_Experience_Is_Associated_with_and_Precedes_Improvements_in_Psychological_Well-Being|title=(PDF) Mixed Emotional Experience Is Associated with and Precedes Improvements in Psychological Well-Being|website=ResearchGate}} 32. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256542618_When_Feeling_Bad_Can_Be_Good_Mixed_Emotions_Benefit_Physical_Health_Across_Adulthood|title=(PDF) When Feeling Bad Can Be Good: Mixed Emotions Benefit Physical Health Across Adulthood|website=ResearchGate}} 33. ^{{cite web |title=World Happiness Report |url=http://worldhappiness.report/ |website=World Happiness Report}} 34. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/bjop.12316|pmid = 29846018|title = Optimal human functioning around the world: A new index of eudaimonic well-being in 166 nations|journal = British Journal of Psychology|volume = 109|issue = 4|pages = 637–655|year = 2018|last1 = Joshanloo|first1 = Mohsen}} References{{Reflist|2}}Sources
Further reading
External links{{commonscatinline}}
4 : Welfare economics|Quality of life|Positive psychology|Well-being |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。