请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 OpenOffice.org
释义

  1. History

      Governance    Naming  

  2. Features

      Components    Supported operating systems    Fonts    Extensions    OpenOffice Basic    Connectivity  

  3. File formats

  4. Development

      Native desktop integration    Use of Java    Security    Version history    OpenOffice.org 1    OpenOffice.org 2    OpenOffice.org 3    OpenOffice.org 3.4 Beta 1  

  5. Market share

      Notable users    Retail  

  6. Forks and derivative software

      Active    Apache OpenOffice    LibreOffice    NeoOffice    Discontinued    Go-oo    IBM Lotus Symphony    StarOffice  

  7. References

  8. Further reading

  9. External links

{{redirect|OOo}}{{for|the descendant project currently hosted at the website www.openoffice.org|Apache OpenOffice}}{{for|a currently developed descendant project|LibreOffice}}{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2014}}{{infobox software
| name = OpenOffice.org
| logo = OpenOffice.org.svg
| logo_alt = OpenOffice.org 3 logo
| logo caption = OpenOffice.org 3 logo
| screenshot = OOo App Chooser.png
| screenshot_alt = The Start Center from OpenOffice.org v3.2.1
| caption = The Start Center from OpenOffice.org v3.2.1
| author = StarOffice by Star Division (1985–1999)
| developer = Sun Microsystems (1999–2009)
Oracle Corporation (2010–2011)
| released = {{Start date and age|df=yes|2002|5|1}}[1]
| programming language = C++[2] and Java
| operating system = Linux, OS X, Microsoft Windows, Solaris[3][3]
| platform = IA-32, x86-64, PowerPC, SPARC[3]
| language count = 121
| language footnote = [4]
| discontinued = yes
| genre = Office suite
| latest release version = 3.3
| latest release date = {{release date and age|df=yes|2011|01|25}}
| size = 143.4 MB (3.3.0 en-US Windows .exe without JRE)[5]
| latest preview version = 3.4 Beta 1
| latest preview date = {{release date and age|df=yes|2011|04|12}}[3]
| license = Dual-licensed under the SISSL and GNU LGPL (OpenOffice.org 2 Beta 2 and earlier)[6]
GNU LGPL version 3 (OpenOffice.org 2 and later)[7]
| website = {{URL|//www.openoffice.org}}
See {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110428102539/http://www.openoffice.org/ |date=28 April 2011 }}
| standard = OpenDocument (ISO/IEC 26300)
}}

OpenOffice.org (OOo), commonly known as OpenOffice, is a discontinued open-source office suite. It was an open-sourced version of the earlier StarOffice, which Sun Microsystems acquired in 1999 for internal use.

OpenOffice included a word processor (Writer), a spreadsheet (Calc), a presentation application (Impress), a drawing application (Draw), a formula editor (Math), and a database management application (Base).[8] Its default file format was the OpenDocument Format (ODF), an ISO/IEC standard, which originated with OpenOffice.org. It could also read a wide variety of other file formats, with particular attention to those from Microsoft Office.

Sun open-sourced the OpenOffice suite in July 2000 as a competitor to Microsoft Office,[12][13] releasing version 1.0 on 1 May 2002.[1]

In 2011 Oracle Corporation, the then-owner of Sun, announced that it would no longer offer a commercial version of the suite[15] and donated the project to the Apache Foundation.[9][10]

Apache renamed the software Apache OpenOffice.[11] Other active successor projects include LibreOffice (the most actively developed[12][13][14]) and NeoOffice (commercial, only for macOS).

OpenOffice.org was primarily developed for Linux, Microsoft Windows and Solaris, and later for OS X, with ports to other operating systems. It was distributed under the GNU Lesser General Public License version 3 (LGPL); early versions were also available under the Sun Industry Standards Source License (SISSL).

History

{{see also|StarOffice#History|label 1=History of StarOffice}}

OpenOffice.org originated as StarOffice, a proprietary office suite developed by German company Star Division from 1985 on. In August 1999, Star Division was acquired by Sun Microsystems[22][15] for US$59.5 million,[16] as it was supposedly cheaper than licensing Microsoft Office for 42,000 staff.[17]

On 19 July 2000 at OSCON, Sun Microsystems announced it would make the source code of StarOffice available for download with the intention of building an open-source development community around the software and of providing a free and open alternative to Microsoft Office.[18][13][19] The new project was known as OpenOffice.org,[20] and the code was released as open source on 13 October 2000.[21] The first public preview release was Milestone Build 638c, released in October 2001 (which quickly achieved 1 million downloads[22]); the final release of OpenOffice.org 1.0 was on 1 May 2002.[1]

OpenOffice.org became the standard office suite on Linux and spawned many derivative versions. It quickly became noteworthy competition to Microsoft Office,[23][24] achieving 14% penetration in the large enterprise market by 2004.[25]

The OpenOffice.org XML file format – XML in a ZIP archive, easily machine-processable – was intended by Sun to become a standard interchange format for office documents,[26] to replace the different binary formats for each application that had been usual until then. Sun submitted the format to the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) in 2002 and it was adapted to form the OpenDocument standard in 2005,[27] which was ratified as ISO 26300 in 2006.[28] It was made OpenOffice.org's native format from version 2 on. Many governments and other organisations adopted OpenDocument, particularly given there was a free implementation of it readily available.

Development of OpenOffice.org was sponsored primarily by Sun Microsystems, which used the code as the basis for subsequent versions of StarOffice. Developers who wished to contribute code were required to sign a Contributor Agreement[29][30] granting joint ownership of any contributions to Sun (and then Oracle), in support of the StarOffice business model.[31] This was controversial for many years.[19][32][33][34][35] An alternative Public Documentation Licence (PDL)[36] was also offered for documentation not intended for inclusion or integration into the project code base.[37]

After acquiring Sun in January 2010, Oracle Corporation continued developing OpenOffice.org and StarOffice, which it renamed Oracle Open Office,[49] though with a reduction in assigned developers.[38] Oracle's lack of activity on or visible commitment to OpenOffice.org had also been noted by industry observers.[39] In September 2010, the majority[40][41] of outside OpenOffice.org developers left the project,[42][43] due to concerns over Sun and then Oracle's management of the project[44][45][46] and Oracle's handling of its open source portfolio in general,[47][48] to form The Document Foundation (TDF). TDF released the fork LibreOffice in January 2011,[49] which most Linux distributions soon moved to.[50][51][52][53] In April 2011, Oracle stopped development of OpenOffice.org[54] and fired the remaining Star Division development team.[31][55] Its reasons for doing so were not disclosed; some speculate that it was due to the loss of mindshare with much of the community moving to LibreOffice[56] while others suggest it was a commercial decision.[31]

In June 2011, Oracle contributed the trademarks to the Apache Software Foundation.[57] It also contributed Oracle-owned code to Apache for relicensing under the Apache License,[58] at the suggestion of IBM (to whom Oracle had contractual obligations concerning the code),[19][59] as IBM did not want the code put under a copyleft license.[60] This code drop formed the basis for the Apache OpenOffice project.[61]

Governance

During Sun's sponsorship, the OpenOffice.org project was governed by the Community Council, comprising OpenOffice.org community members. The Community Council suggested project goals and coordinated with producers of derivatives on long-term development planning issues.[62][63][64]

Both Sun and Oracle are claimed to have made decisions without consulting the Council or in contravention to the council's recommendations,[65][66] leading to the majority of outside developers leaving for LibreOffice.[44] Oracle demanded in October 2010 that all Council members involved with the Document Foundation step down,[67] leaving the Community Council composed only of Oracle employees.[68]

Naming

The project and software were informally referred to as OpenOffice since the Sun release, but since this term is a trademark held by Open Office Automatisering in Benelux since 1999,[69][70] OpenOffice.org was its formal name.[71]

Due to a similar trademark issue (a Rio de Janeiro company that owned that trademark in Brazil), the Brazilian Portuguese version of the suite was distributed under the name BrOffice.org from 2004, with BrOffice.Org being the name of the associated local nonprofit from 2006.[72] (BrOffice.org moved to LibreOffice in December 2010.[73])

Features

OpenOffice.org 1.0 was launched under the following mission statement:[74]

{{cquote|The mission of OpenOffice.org is to create, as a community, the leading international office suite that will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.}}

Components

Icon Title Description
Writer A word processor analogous to Microsoft Word or WordPerfect.
Calc A spreadsheet analogous to Microsoft Excel or Lotus 1-2-3.
Impress A presentation program analogous to Microsoft PowerPoint or Apple Keynote. Impress could export presentations to Adobe Flash (SWF) files, allowing them to be played on any computer with a Flash player installed. Presentation templates were available on the OpenOffice.org website.[75][76]
Draw A vector graphics editor comparable in features to the drawing functions in Microsoft Office.
Math A tool for creating and editing mathematical formulas, analogous to Microsoft Equation Editor. Formulas could be embedded inside other OpenOffice.org documents, such as those created by Writer.
Base A database management program analogous to Microsoft Access. Base could function as a front-end to a number of different database systems, including Access databases (JET), ODBC data sources, MySQL and PostgreSQL. Base became part of the suite starting with version 2.0. HSQL was the included database engine. From version 2.3, Base offered report generation via Pentaho.

The suite contained no personal information manager, email client or calendar application analogous to Microsoft Outlook, despite one having been present in StarOffice 5.2. Such functionality was frequently requested.[93] The OpenOffice.org Groupware project, intended to replace Outlook and Microsoft Exchange Server, spun off in 2003 as OpenGroupware.org,[77] which is now SOGo. The project considered bundling Mozilla Thunderbird and Mozilla Lightning for OpenOffice.org 3.0.[78]

Supported operating systems

The last version, 3.4 Beta 1, was available for IA-32 versions of Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 or later, Linux (IA-32 and x64), Solaris and OS X 10.4 or later, and the SPARC version of Solaris.[79][80]

The latest versions of OpenOffice.org on other operating systems were:[81]

  • IRIX (MIPS IV): v1.0.3[82]
  • Mac OS X v10.2: v1.1.2
  • Mac OS X v10.3: v2.1
  • Windows 95: v1.1.5
  • Windows NT 4.0 SP6: v2.0.1
  • Windows 98 and Windows ME: v2.4.3[83]

Fonts

OpenOffice.org included OpenSymbol, DejaVu,[84] the Liberation fonts (from 2.4) and the Gentium fonts (from 3.2).[85][86][87] Versions up to 2.3 included the Bitstream Vera fonts.[84][106] OpenOffice.org also used the default fonts of the running operating system.

Fontwork is a feature that allows users to create stylized text with special effects differing from ordinary text with the added features of gradient colour fills, shaping, letter height, and character spacing. It is similar to WordArt used by Microsoft Word. When OpenOffice.org saved documents in Microsoft Office file format, all Fontwork was converted into WordArt.[88][89]

Extensions

From version 2.0.4, OpenOffice.org supported third-party extensions.[90] As of April 2011, the OpenOffice Extension Repository listed more than 650 extensions.[91] Another list was maintained by the Free Software Foundation.[92][93]

OpenOffice Basic

{{Main article|OpenOffice Basic}}

OpenOffice.org included OpenOffice Basic, a programming language similar to Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications (VBA). OpenOffice Basic was available in Writer, Calc and Base.[94] OpenOffice.org also had some Microsoft VBA macro support.

Connectivity

OpenOffice.org could interact with databases (local or remote) using ODBC (Open Database Connectivity), JDBC (Java Database Connectivity) or SDBC (StarOffice Database Connectivity).[95]

File formats

From Version 2.0 onward, OpenOffice.org used ISO/IEC 26300:2006[96] OpenDocument as its native format. Versions 2.0–2.3.0 default to the ODF 1.0 file format; versions 2.3.1–2.4.3 default to ODF 1.1; versions 3.0 onward default to ODF 1.2.

OpenOffice.org 1 used OpenOffice.org XML as its native format. This was contributed to OASIS and OpenDocument was developed from it.[97]

OpenOffice.org also claimed support for the following formats:[98][99]

Development

OpenOffice.org converted all external formats to and from an internal XML representation.

The OpenOffice.org API was based on a component technology known as Universal Network Objects (UNO). It consisted of a wide range of interfaces defined in a CORBA-like interface description language.

Native desktop integration

OpenOffice.org 1.0 was criticized for not having the look and feel of applications developed natively for the platforms on which it runs. Starting with version 2.0, OpenOffice.org used native widget toolkit, icons, and font-rendering libraries on GNOME, KDE and Windows.[102][103][104]

The issue had been particularly pronounced on Mac OS X. Early versions of OpenOffice.org required the installation of X11.app or XDarwin (though the NeoOffice port supplied a native interface). Versions since 3.0 ran natively using Apple's Aqua GUI.[105]

Use of Java

Although originally written in C++, OpenOffice.org became increasingly reliant on the Java Runtime Environment, even including a bundled JVM.[106] OpenOffice.org was criticized by the Free Software Foundation for its increasing dependency on Java, which was not free software.[107]

The issue came to the fore in May 2005, when Richard Stallman appeared to call for a fork of the application in a posting on the Free Software Foundation website.[107] OpenOffice.org adopted a development guideline that future versions of OpenOffice.org would run on free implementations of Java and fixed the issues which previously prevented OpenOffice.org 2.0 from using free-software Java implementations.[108]

On 13 November 2006, Sun committed to releasing Java under the GNU General Public License[109] and had released a free software Java, OpenJDK, by May 2007.

Security

In 2006, Lt. Col. Eric Filiol of the Laboratoire de Virologie et de Cryptologie de l'ESAT demonstrated security weaknesses, in particular within macros.[110][111][112] In 2006, Kaspersky Lab demonstrated a proof of concept virus, "Stardust", for OpenOffice.org.[113] This showed OpenOffice.org viruses are possible, but there is no known virus "in the wild".

As of October 2011, Secunia reported no known unpatched security flaws for the software.[114] A vulnerability in the inherited OpenOffice.org codebase was found and fixed in LibreOffice in October 2011[115] and Apache OpenOffice in May 2012.[139]

Version history

OpenOffice.org release history
VersionRelease date Description
Build 638c2001-10[22]The first public milestone release.
1.02002-05-01[1]First official release.
1.0.3.12003-04[22]Last version officially supporting Windows 95.
1.12003-09-02[143]Export to PDF, export to Flash, extension mechanism.[120]
1.1.12004-03-29[116]Bundled with TheOpenCD.[117]
1.1.42004-12-22[118]Last version released under SISSL.
1.1.52005-09-09[118]Last release for 1.x product line. Can edit OpenDocument files.
Last version to officially support Windows NT 4.0.
2.02005-10-20[149]Milestone, with major enhancements and default saving in the OpenDocument format.
2.1.02006-12-12[118]Minor enhancements, bug fixes.[119]
2.2.02007-03-29[118]Minor enhancements, bug fixes,[120] security fixes.[121]
2.3.02007-09-17[118]Updated charting component, minor enhancements,[122] improved extension manager.[123]
2.4.02008-03-27[118]Bug fixes and new features,[124][125] enhancements from RedOffice.[126]
2.4.32009-09-04[118]Last version for Windows 98 and Windows ME[83]
3.0.02008-10-13[118]Milestone: ODF 1.2, OOXML import, improved VBA, native OS X interface, Start Center.[165]
3.1.02009-05-07[118]Overlining and transparent dragging.
3.22010-02-11[127]New features,[128] and performance enhancements.[129]
3.2.12010-06-04[118]Updated Oracle Start Center and OpenDocument format icons, bug fixes. First Oracle stable release.[130]
3.32011-01-26[118]New spreadsheet functions and parameters. Last Oracle stable release, and the last stable release to support Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on PowerPC.
3.4 Beta 12011-04-12[79]Last Oracle code release, and the last release to support Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on PowerPC.

OpenOffice.org 1

The preview, Milestone 638c, was released October 2001.[22] OpenOffice.org 1.0 was released under both the LGPL and the SISSL[19] for Windows, Linux and Solaris[131] on 1 May 2002.[1][132] The version for Mac OS X (with X11 interface) was released on 23 June 2003.[133][134]

OpenOffice.org 1.1 introduced One-click Export to PDF and Export presentations to Flash (.SWF). It also allowed third-party addons.[135]

OpenOffice.org was used in 2005 by The Guardian to illustrate what it saw as the limitations of open-source software.[136]

OpenOffice.org 2

Work on version 2.0 began in early 2003 with the following goals (the "Q Product Concept"): better interoperability with Microsoft Office; improved speed and lower memory usage; greater scripting capabilities; better integration, particularly with GNOME; a more usable database; digital signatures; and improved usability.[137] It would also be the first version to default to OpenDocument. Sun released the first beta version on 4 March 2005.[138]

On 2 September 2005, Sun announced that it was retiring SISSL to reduce license proliferation,[139] though some press analysts felt it was so that IBM could not reuse OpenOffice.org code without contributing back.[19] Versions after 2.0 beta 2 would use only the LGPL.[6]

On 20 October 2005, OpenOffice.org 2.0 was released.[140] 2.0.1 was released eight weeks later, fixing minor bugs and introducing new features. As of the 2.0.3 release, OpenOffice.org changed its release cycle from 18 months to releasing updates every three months.[141]

The OpenOffice.org 2 series attracted considerable press attention.[142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149] A PC Pro review awarded it 6 stars out of 6 and stated: "Our pick of the low-cost office suites has had a much-needed overhaul, and now battles Microsoft in terms of features, not just price."[150] Federal Computer Week listed OpenOffice.org as one of the "5 stars of open-source products",[151] noting in particular the importance of OpenDocument. ComputerWorld reported that for large government departments, migration to OpenOffice.org 2.0 cost one tenth of the price of upgrading to Microsoft Office 2007.[152]

OpenOffice.org 3

On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released, featuring the ability to import (though not export) Office Open XML documents, support for ODF 1.2, improved VBA macros, and a native interface port for OS X. It also introduced the new Start Center[153] and upgraded to LGPL version 3 as its license.[154]

Version 3.2 included support for PostScript-based OpenType fonts. It warned users when ODF 1.2 Extended features had been used. An improvement to the document integrity check determined if an ODF document conformed to the ODF specification and offered a repair if necessary. Calc and Writer both reduced "cold start" time by 46% compared to version 3.0.[155] 3.2.1 was the first Oracle release.[130]

Version 3.3, the last Oracle version, was released in January 2011.[156] New features include an updated print form, a FindBar and interface improvements for Impress.[157][158] The commercial version, Oracle Open Office 3.3 (StarOffice renamed), based on the beta, was released on 15 December 2010, as was the single release of Oracle Cloud Office (a proprietary product from an unrelated codebase).[159][160]

OpenOffice.org 3.4 Beta 1

A beta version of OpenOffice.org 3.4 was released on 12 April 2011, including new SVG import, improved ODF 1.2 support, and spreadsheet functionality.[79][3][161]

Before the final version of OpenOffice.org 3.4 could be released, Oracle cancelled its sponsorship of development[54] and fired the remaining Star Division development team.[31][55]

Market share

Problems arise in estimating the market share of OpenOffice.org because it could be freely distributed via download sites (including mirror sites), peer-to-peer networks, CDs, Linux distributions and so forth. The project tried to capture key adoption data in a market-share analysis,[162] listing known distribution totals, known deployments and conversions and analyst statements and surveys.

According to Valve Corporation, as of July 2010, 14.63% of Steam users had OpenOffice.org installed on their machines.[163]

A market-share analysis conducted by a web analytics service in 2010, based on over 200,000 Internet users, showed a wide range of adoption in different countries:[164] 0.2% in China, 9% in the US and the UK and over 20% in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Germany.

Although Microsoft Office retained 95% of the general market — as measured by revenue — as of August 2007,[165] OpenOffice.org and StarOffice had secured 15–20% of the business market as of 2004[166][167] and a 2010 University of Colorado at Boulder study reported that OpenOffice.org had reached a point where it had an "irreversible" installed user base and that it would continue to grow.[168]

The project claimed more than 98 million downloads as of September 2007[169] and 300 million total to the release of version 3.2 in February 2010.[170] The project claimed over one hundred million downloads for the OpenOffice.org 3 series within a year of release.[171]

Notable users

{{see also|OpenDocument adoption}}

Large-scale users of OpenOffice.org included Singapore's Ministry of Defence,[172] and Banco do Brasil.[173] {{As of | 2006}} OpenOffice.org was the official office suite for the French Gendarmerie.[162]

In India, several government organizations such as ESIC, IIT Bombay, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, the Supreme Court of India, ICICI Bank,[174] and the Allahabad High Court,[175] which use Linux, completely relied on OpenOffice.org for their administration.

In Japan, conversions from Microsoft Office to OpenOffice.org included many municipal offices: Sumoto, Hyōgo in 2004,[176] Ninomiya, Tochigi in 2006,[177][178] Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima in 2008[179] (and to LibreOffice as of 2012[180]), Shikokuchūō, Ehime in 2009,[181] Minoh, Osaka in 2009[182] Toyokawa, Aichi,[183] Fukagawa, Hokkaido[184] and Katano, Osaka[185] in 2010 and Ryūgasaki, Ibaraki in 2011.[186] Corporate conversions included Assist in 2007[187] (and to LibreOffice on Ubuntu in 2011[188]), Sumitomo Electric Industries in 2008[189] (and to LibreOffice in 2012[190]), Toho Co., Ltd. in 2009[191][192] and Shinsei Financial Co., Ltd. in 2010.[193] Assist also provided support services for OpenOffice.org.[191][193]

Retail

In July 2007, Everex, a division of First International Computer and the 9th-largest PC supplier in the U.S., began shipping systems preloaded with OpenOffice.org 2.2 into Wal-Mart, K-mart and Sam's Club outlets in North America.[194]

Forks and derivative software

A number of open source and proprietary products derive at least some code from OpenOffice.org, including AndrOpen Office,[195] Apache OpenOffice, ChinaOffice, Co-Create Office, EuroOffice 2005,[196] Go-oo, KaiOffice, IBM Lotus Symphony, IBM Workplace, Jambo OpenOffice (the first office suite in Swahili),[197][198][199] LibreOffice, MagyarOffice, MultiMedia Office, MYOffice 2007, NeoOffice, NextOffice, OfficeOne, OfficeTLE, OOo4Kids,[200] OpenOfficePL, OpenOffice.org Portable,[201] OpenOfficeT7, OpenOffice.ux.pl, OxOffice,[202] OxygenOffice Professional,[203][204] Pladao Office,[205] PlusOffice Mac,[206] RedOffice,[34][126][207] RomanianOffice, StarOffice/Oracle Open Office, SunShine Office, ThizOffice, UP Office, White Label Office,[208][209][210][211] WPS Office Storm (the 2004 edition of Kingsoft Office) and 602Office.[212]

The OpenOffice.org website also listed a large variety of complementary products, including groupware systems.[213]

{{Wide image|StarOffice major derivatives.svg|1100px|A timeline of major derivatives of StarOffice and OpenOffice.org{{legend|#C83296|StarOffice}}{{legend|#003BAA|OpenOffice.org}}{{legend|#FF3C3C|Go-oo}}{{legend|#FFAF32|IBM Workplace/IBM Lotus Symphony}}{{legend|#BF7FFF|NeoOffice}}{{legend|#18A303|LibreOffice}}{{legend|#0E85CD|Apache OpenOffice}}
|100%|center|dir=rtl}}

Major derivatives include:

Active

Apache OpenOffice

{{main article|Apache OpenOffice}}

In June 2011, Oracle contributed the OpenOffice.org code and trademarks to the Apache Software Foundation. The developer pool for the Apache project was proposed to be seeded by IBM employees, Linux distribution companies and public sector agencies.[214] IBM employees did the majority of the development,[215][216][217][277][218] including hiring ex-Star Division developers.[217] The Apache project removed or replaced as much code as possible from OpenOffice.org 3.4 beta 1, including fonts, under licenses unacceptable to Apache[219] and released 3.4.0 in May 2012.[220]

The codebase for IBM's Lotus Symphony was donated to the Apache Software Foundation in 2012 and merged for Apache OpenOffice 4.0,[282] and Symphony was deprecated in favour of Apache OpenOffice.[221]

While the project considers itself the unbroken continuation of OpenOffice.org,[222] others regard it as a fork,[19][215][216][223][224][225][226] or at the least a separate project.[227]

In October 2014, Bruce Byfield, writing for Linux Magazine, said the project had "all but stalled [possibly] due to IBM's withdrawal from the project."[228] {{As of|2015}}, the project has no release manager,[229] and itself reports a lack of volunteer involvement and code contributions.[230] After ongoing problems with unfixed security vulnerabilities from 2015 onward,[231][232][233] in September 2016 the project started discussions on possibly retiring AOO.[234]

LibreOffice

{{main article|LibreOffice}}

Sun had stated in the original OpenOffice.org announcement in 2000 that the project would be run by a neutral foundation,[18] and put forward a more detailed proposal in 2001.[235] There were many calls to put this into effect over the ensuing years.[33][303][236][237] On 28 September 2010, in frustration at years of perceived neglect of the codebase and community by Sun and then Oracle,[66] members of the OpenOffice.org community announced a non-profit called The Document Foundation and a fork of OpenOffice.org named LibreOffice. Go-oo improvements were merged, and that project was retired in favour of LibreOffice.[238] The goal was to produce a vendor-independent office suite with ODF support and without any copyright assignment requirements.[308]

Oracle was invited to become a member of the Document Foundation and was asked to donate the OpenOffice.org brand.[239][240] Oracle instead demanded that all members of the OpenOffice.org Community Council involved with the Document Foundation step down,[67] leaving the Council composed only of Oracle employees.[68]

Most Linux distributions promptly replaced OpenOffice.org with LibreOffice;[50][51][52][53] Oracle Linux 6 also features LibreOffice rather than OpenOffice.org or Apache OpenOffice.[241][242][243] The project rapidly accumulated developers, development effort[244][245][246] and added features,[247] the majority of outside OpenOffice.org developers having moved to LibreOffice.[40][41][44] In March 2015, an LWN.net development comparison of LibreOffice with Apache OpenOffice concluded that "LibreOffice has won the battle for developer participation".[248]

NeoOffice

{{main article|NeoOffice}}NeoOffice, an independent commercial port for Macintosh that tracked the main line of development, offered a native OS X Aqua user interface before OpenOffice.org did.[249] Later versions are derived from Go-oo, rather than directly from OpenOffice.org.[329] All versions from NeoOffice 3.1.1 to NeoOffice 2015 were based on OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, though latter versions included stability fixes from LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.[250] NeoOffice 2017 and later versions are fully based on LibreOffice.[251]

Discontinued

Go-oo

{{main article|Go-oo}}

The ooo-build patch set was started at Ximian in 2002, because Sun were slow to accept outside work on OpenOffice.org, even from corporate partners, and to make the build process easier on Linux. It tracked the main line of development and was not intended to constitute a fork.[252] Most Linux distributions used,[253] and worked together on,[254] ooo-build.

Sun's contributions to OpenOffice.org had been declining for a number of years[255] and some developers were unwilling to assign copyright in their work to Sun,[35] particularly given the deal between Sun and IBM to license the code outside the LGPL.[31] On 2 October 2007, Novell announced that ooo-build would be available as a software package called Go-oo, not merely a patch set.[256] (The go-oo.org domain name had been in use by ooo-build as early as 2005.[257]) Sun reacted negatively, with Simon Phipps of Sun terming it "a hostile and competitive fork".[33][258] Many free software advocates worried that Go-oo was a Novell effort to incorporate Microsoft technologies, such as Office Open XML, that might be vulnerable to patent claims.[259] However, the office suite branded "OpenOffice.org" in most Linux distributions, having previously been ooo-build, soon in fact became Go-oo.[260][261][262]

Go-oo also encouraged outside contributions, with rules similar to those later adopted for LibreOffice.[263] When LibreOffice forked, Go-oo was deprecated in favour of that project.

OpenOffice Novell edition was a supported version of Go-oo.[264]

IBM Lotus Symphony

{{main article|IBM Lotus Symphony}}

The Workplace Managed Client in IBM Workplace 2.6 (23 January 2006[265]) incorporated code from OpenOffice.org 1.1.4,[19] the last version under the SISSL. This code was broken out into a separate application as Lotus Symphony (30 May 2008[266]), with a new interface based on Eclipse. Symphony 3.0 (21 October 2010[267]) was rebased on OpenOffice.org 3.0, with the code licensed privately from Sun. IBM's changes were donated to the Apache Software Foundation in 2012, Symphony was deprecated in favour of Apache OpenOffice[221] and its code was merged into Apache OpenOffice 4.0.[268]

StarOffice

{{main article|StarOffice}}

Sun used OpenOffice.org as a base for its commercial proprietary StarOffice application software, which was OpenOffice.org with some added proprietary components. Oracle bought Sun in January 2010 and quickly renamed StarOffice as Oracle Open Office.[269] Oracle discontinued development in April 2011.[54]

{{Portal bar|Free and open-source software|Java (programming language)}}

References

1. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/01/openoffice_suite_goes/|title=OpenOffice suite goes 1.0|date=1 May 2002|first=John|last=Lettice|work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|accessdate=16 October 2013}}
2. ^{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Hacking&oldid=192524|title=Hacking|date=27 January 2011|accessdate=20 August 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation}}
3. ^1 2 {{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4beta.html|title=3.4 Beta - Developer Snapshot - Release Notes|publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=22 September 2013}}
4. ^{{cite web | url= http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Languages&oldid=195965 | title= Language localization status | work= OpenOffice Language Localization Project|publisher=Oracle Corporation|date=12 April 2011| accessdate=20 June 2013}}
5. ^{{cite web|url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.3.0/|title=Home / stable / 3.3.0|work=Apache OpenOffice|publisher=Sourceforge.net|accessdate=21 September 2013}}
6. ^1 {{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/FAQs/license-change.html |title=License Simplification FAQ |publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=27 February 2010}}
7. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/license.html |title=Licenses|publisher=Apache Software Foundation |accessdate=21 January 2012}}
8. ^{{cite web|title=Why OpenOffice.org|url=http://why.openoffice.org/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104082941/http://www.openoffice.org/why/|archivedate=4 January 2012|publisher=Sun Microsystems, Apache Software Foundation|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
9. ^{{citation|url=http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm|title=Statements on OpenOffice.org Contribution to Apache|date=1 June 2011}}
10. ^{{citation|url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apache/9035|title=Oracle gives OpenOffice to Apache|author=Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols|date=1 June 2011|publisher=ZDnet}}
11. ^{{citation|url=//www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html|title=Thank you for using OpenOffice.org - now Apache OpenOffice}}
12. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-and-OpenOffice-comparing-the-community-health|title=LibreOffice and OpenOffice: comparing the community health|last=Byfield|first=Bruce|date=25 October 2014|website=Linux Magazine|publisher=|access-date=2016-08-05}}
13. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2913764/openoffice-development-is-looking-grim-as-developers-flock-to-libreoffice.html|title=OpenOffice development is looking grim as developers flock to LibreOffice|last=Newman|first=Jared|date=23 April 2015|website=PC World|publisher=|access-date=2016-08-05}}
14. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.datamation.com/open-source/libreoffice-vs.-openoffice-why-libreoffice-wins-1.html|title=LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice: Why LibreOffice Wins - Datamation|last=Byfield|first=Bruce|date=27 October 2014|website=Datamation|publisher=|access-date=2016-08-05}}
15. ^{{Cite news |last=Rooney |first=Paula |title=Apache OpenOffice 3.4 makes official debut; LibreOffice makes its case |publisher=ZDnet |date=8 May 2012 |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/apache-openoffice-34-makes-official-debut-libreoffice-makes-its-case/10915 |accessdate=9 May 2012 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120508233526/http://www.zdnet.com//blog/open-source/apache-openoffice-34-makes-official-debut-libreoffice-makes-its-case/10915 |archivedate=8 May 2012 |df=dmy-all }}
16. ^{{cite web|title=Star-Division-Gründer Marco Börries verlässt Sun Microsystems|url=http://business.chip.de/news/Star-Division-Gruender-Marco-Boerries-verlaesst-Sun-Microsystems_41399961.html|work=Chip Online DE|date=18 January 2001|accessdate=21 June 2013|language=German|trans-title=Star Division founder Marco Börries leaves Sun Microsystems|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922204916/http://business.chip.de/news/Star-Division-Gruender-Marco-Boerries-verlaesst-Sun-Microsystems_41399961.html|archivedate=22 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}
17. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-at-the-crossroads-1023702.html?page=2|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208042359/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-at-the-crossroads-1023702.html?page=2|archivedate=8 December 2013|work=The H Open|publisher=Heinz Heise|title=OpenOffice at the crossroads: Every bug is a feature|page=2|first=Richard|last=Hillesley|date=21 June 2010|accessdate=20 June 2013|quote=Simon Phipps, now an ex-Sun employee, later claimed that 'The number one reason why Sun bought Star Division in 1999 was because, at the time, Sun had something approaching forty-two thousand employees. Pretty much every one of them had to have both a Unix workstation and a Windows laptop. And it was cheaper to go buy a company that could make a Solaris and Linux desktop productivity suite than it was to buy forty-two thousand licenses from Microsoft.'|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
18. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/press/sun_release.html |title=SUN MICROSYSTEMS OPEN SOURCES STAROFFICE TECHNOLOGY |publisher=Sun Microsystems |date=19 July 2000 |accessdate=19 January 2012}}
19. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 {{cite web|url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208000704/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html|archivedate=8 December 2013|accessdate=9 May 2012|date=6 July 2011|title=OpenOffice – splits and pirouettes|first=Richard|last=Hillesley|publisher=Heinz Heise|work=The H Online|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
20. ^{{cite web |url=http://sun.systemnews.com/articles/29/1/news/2477 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041031190014/http://sun.systemnews.com/articles/29/1/news/2477 |dead-url=yes |archive-date=31 October 2004 |title=Sun Will Release StarOffice Source Code |publisher=System News |work=Sun.systemnews.com |volume=Volume 29 |issue=1 |accessdate=14 January 2012 }}
21. ^{{cite web|url=http://www4.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2640108,00.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20001211201100/http://www4.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2640108,00.html|title=Sun puts StarOffice into open source|archivedate=11 December 2000|date=13 October 2000|first=Mary Jo|last=Foley|work=ZDNet News|publisher=ZDNet|accessdate=15 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
22. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=A_Brief_History_Of_OpenOffice.org&oldid=186681|title=A Brief History Of OpenOffice.org|date=13 October 2010|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation}}
23. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/11/24/ms_scorns_israeli_openoffice_defection/ |title=MS scorns Israeli OpenOffice defection |work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|first=Andrew|last=Orlowski |date=24 November 2003|accessdate=5 January 2013}}
24. ^{{cite web|url=http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/25/1950234 |title=Why You Should Choose MS Office Over OO.org |publisher=Slashdot |date= 25 March 2004|accessdate=5 January 2013}}
25. ^{{cite web|url=http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |first=Jack|last=Loftus|title=Desktop apps ripe turf for open source |publisher=Searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com |date=4 October 2004 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
26. ^{{cite web|title=StarOffice XML File Format: Working Draft: Technical Reference Manual: Draft 9|url=http://xml.coverpages.org/openoffice-xml_specification_draft200012.pdf|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=December 2000|page=19|accessdate=17 October 2013|quote=Our goal is twofold: to have a complete specification encompassing all StarOffice components, and to provide an open standard for office documents.}}
27. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12572/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf|title=Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.0: OASIS Standard, 1 May 2005|publisher=Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards|date=1 May 2005|accessdate=17 October 2013}}
28. ^{{cite web|url= http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43485&scopelist=PROGRAMME|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20070208224733/http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43485&scopelist=PROGRAMME|archivedate= 8 February 2007|title= Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.0|date= 30 November 2006|accessdate= 17 October 2013|publisher= International Organisation for Standardisation|deadurl= yes|df= dmy-all}}
29. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/licenses/sca.pdf |title=Licenses – SCA |publisher=Sun Microsystems |date= |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
30. ^{{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/licenses/oca.pdf |title=Oracle Contributor Agreement |publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=13 September 2011}}
31. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite news|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/443989/|title=OpenOffice.org and contributor agreements|work=LWN.net|first=Simon|last=Phipps|authorlink=Simon Phipps (programmer)|date=20 May 2011|accessdate=16 June 2013}}
32. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/is-sun-right-to-insist-on-copyright-transfer/1311|title=Is Sun right to insist on copyright transfer?|work=Between The Lines|publisher=ZDNet|first=David|last=Berlind |date=26 April 2005 |accessdate=3 January 2013}}
33. ^1 2 {{cite news|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/303009/|title=OpenOffice.org releases 3.0, faces new challenges|first=Jake|last=Edge|work=LWN.net |date=15 October 2008 |accessdate=3 January 2013}}
34. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/sca_r_office|title=OpenOffice.org Tipping Point?|first=Simon|last=Phipps|work=SunMink|date=3 October 2007|accessdate=3 January 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081654/https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/sca_r_office|archivedate=8 March 2013|df=dmy-all}}
35. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/|title=History of Calc Solver|work=Roundtrip to Shanghai via Tokyo|first=Kohei|last=Yoshida |date=2 October 2007 |accessdate=3 January 2013}}
36. ^{{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/licenses/pdl.pdf |title=Public Documentation License |publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=13 September 2011}}
37. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#pdla|title=FAQs: Licensing|date=22 July 2009|publisher=Sun Microsystems}}
38. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Die-Woche-Bad-Company-Oracle-1130884.html|title=Die Woche: Bad Company Oracle?|trans-title=The Week: Bad Company Oracle?|first=Mirko|last=Dölle|work=Heise Open Source|publisher=Heinz Heise|language=German|date=4 November 2010|accessdate=19 October 2013|quote=Nach der Übernahme von Sun hatte Oracle offenbar etliche Entwickler vom OpenOffice-Projekt abgezogen, was zu empfindlichen Verzögerungen bei der Weiterentwicklung geführt hat. [After the acquisition of Sun, Oracle apparently took several developers off the OpenOffice project, which led to severe delays in development.]}}
39. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/203910/dont_count_on_oracle_to_keep_openoffice_org_alive.html|title=Don't Count on Oracle to Keep OpenOffice.org Alive|first=Katherine|last=Noyes|work=PC World Linux Line|publisher=IDG|date=23 August 2010|accessdate=12 October 2014}}
40. ^1 {{cite news|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/page2.html|title=openSUSE 11.4 rocks despite missing GNOME: Fork, yeah: LibreOffice replaces OpenOffice|quote=LibreOffice came about last year when the majority of OpenOffice developers, concerned about the future of the project under new owner Oracle, broke away.|last=Gilbertson|first=Scott |date=14 March 2011 |accessdate=30 December 2012|newspaper=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing}}
41. ^1 {{Cite news|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/11/fork-off-mass-exodus-from-ooo-as-contributors-join-libreoffice/|title=Fork off: mass exodus from OOo as contributors join LibreOffice|accessdate=26 December 2012|last=Paul|first=Ryan |date=2 November 2010 |work=Ars Technica}}
42. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@native-lang.openoffice.org/msg04865.html |title=[native-lang] Every end is a new beginning |publisher=Mail-archive.com |date=31 October 2010 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
43. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OpenOffice-wird-zu-LibreOffice-Die-OpenOffice-Community-loest-sich-von-Oracle-1097356.html|title=OpenOffice wird zu LibreOffice: Die OpenOffice-Community löst sich von Oracle|language=German|trans-title=OpenOffice to LibreOffice: The OpenOffice community dissolves Oracle|work=Heise Online|publisher=Heinz Heise|date=28 September 2010|accessdate=21 June 2013}}
44. ^1 2 {{cite news|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/09/document-foundation-forks-openofficeorg-to-liberate-it-from-oracle/|title=Document Foundation forks OpenOffice.org, liberates it from Oracle|accessdate=26 December 2012|last=Paul|first=Ryan |date=28 September 2010 |work=Ars Technica}}
45. ^{{cite web|title=LibreOffice und The Document Foundation: Die Freiheit, die ich meine ..|url=http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/Die-Freiheit-die-ich-meine-1170972.html|trans-title=LibreOffice and The Document Foundation: The freedom that I mean ... |first1=Thorsten|last1=Behrens|first2=Florian|last2=Effenberger|date=February 2011|accessdate=21 June 2013|work=iX Magazine|publisher=Heinz Heise}}
46. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/LibreOffice-A-fresh-page-for-OpenOffice-1097358.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131206203304/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/LibreOffice-A-fresh-page-for-OpenOffice-1097358.html|archivedate=6 December 2013|title=LibreOffice - A fresh page for OpenOffice|first=Richard|last=Hillesley|work=The H Online|publisher=Heinz Heise|date=28 September 2010|accessdate=7 October 2010|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
47. ^{{cite web|url=http://techrights.org/2010/09/28/document-foundation-and-libreoffice/|title=LibreOffice is Launched, Offering Independence from Oracle|first=Roy|last=Schestowitz|work=TechRights|date=28 September 2010|accessdate=8 October 2013}}
48. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.zdnet.com/could-oracle-fracture-open-source-community-2062202707/|title=Could Oracle fracture open source community?|first=Jack|last=Wallen|publisher=ZDNet|date=7 September 2010|accessdate=8 October 2013}}
49. ^{{cite web|author= Florian Effenberger |url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/01/25/the-document-foundation-launches-libreoffice-3-3/ |title=The Document Foundation launches LibreOffice 3.3|work=The Document Foundation Blog|publisher=The Document Foundation|date=25 January 2011|accessdate=16 November 2011}}
50. ^1 {{cite news|url=https://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/052512-openoffice-windows-259633.html|title=Most OpenOffice users run Windows|first=Jon|last=Gold|work=Network World |date=25 May 2012 |accessdate=27 December 2012}}
51. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://wiki.debian.org/LibreOffice?action=recall&rev=6|title=LibreOffice has replaced OpenOffice in Debian|work=Debian wiki|publisher=Debian|date=26 February 2012|accessdate=20 June 2013}}
52. ^1 {{cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven J. |title=Ubuntu opts for LibreOffice over Oracle's OpenOffice |publisher=ZDNet |date=23 January 2012 |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/ubuntu-opts-for-libreoffice-over-oracles-openoffice/8122 |accessdate=19 January 2012}}
53. ^1 {{cite news |last=Gilbertson|first=Scott|title=openSUSE 11.4 rocks despite missing GNOME |work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|date=14 March 2011 |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/|accessdate=19 January 2012}}
54. ^1 2 3 {{cite web|url=https://www.oracle.com/lb/corporate/pressrelease/2-7334.html|title=Oracle Announces Its Intention to Move OpenOffice.org to a Community-based Project|author=Oracle Corporation|first=|date=15 April 2011|work=press release|accessdate=5 June 2013}}
55. ^1 {{cite web|title=Open-Xchange takes aim at no less than Microsoft Office, Google Docs|url=https://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/040913-open-xchange-268535.html|first=Jon|last=Gold|work=Network World|date=9 April 2013|accessdate=23 June 2013}}
56. ^{{Cite news |url= https://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/04/oracle-gives-up-on-ooo-after-community-forks-the-project.ars |title=Oracle gives up on OpenOffice after community forks the project |accessdate=19 April 2011 |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=18 April 2011 |work=Ars Technica}}
57. ^{{Cite news |url=http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |title=Statements on OpenOffice.org Contribution to Apache |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606030535/http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |archivedate=6 June 2011 |accessdate=15 June 2011 |author=Oracle Corporation |publisher=MarketWire |date=June 2011 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}; [https://blogs.oracle.com/trond/entry/statements_on_openoffice_org_contribution Oracle blog version]
58. ^{{cite web|url=http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel/19052|title=RE: LibreOffice relicensing efforts|first=Dennis|last=Hamilton|work=Apache Incubator mailing list|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date=24 May 2012|accessdate=13 October 2013}}
59. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025|title=What the heck is happening with OpenOffice? (UPDATE)|last=Vaughan-Nichols|first=Steven J.|work=ZDNet Linux and Open Source |publisher=ZDNet|date=31 May 2011 |accessdate=27 December 2012}}
60. ^{{cite web|url=https://www-304.ibm.com/connections/blogs/bcde08b8-816c-42a8-aa37-5f1ce02470a9/entry/symphony_is_alive_and_well_and_living_at_apache_explaining_ibm_s_document_strategy1?lang=en_us|title=Symphony is alive and well and living at Apache: Explaining IBM's document strategy|first=Douglas|last=Heintzman|publisher=IBM|work=IBM Software Blog|date=12 March 2012|accessdate=16 June 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927083420/https://www-304.ibm.com/connections/blogs/bcde08b8-816c-42a8-aa37-5f1ce02470a9/entry/symphony_is_alive_and_well_and_living_at_apache_explaining_ibm_s_document_strategy1?lang=en_us|archivedate=27 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}
61. ^{{cite web |url=http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html |title=OpenOffice.org Incubation Status |accessdate=18 June 2011 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation |date=June 2011}}
62. ^{{cite web|url=http://council.openoffice.org/councilcharter12.html|title=Community Council Charter: version 1.2|work=OpenOffice.org|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=25 March 2009|accessdate=9 February 2010|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110424032526/http://council.openoffice.org/councilcharter12.html|archivedate=24 April 2011|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
63. ^{{cite web|url=http://council.openoffice.org/|title=OpenOffice.org Community Council|date=15 November 2010|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111213124745/http://council.openoffice.org/|archivedate=13 December 2011|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
64. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/guidelines.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100913013250/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/guidelines.html|archivedate=13 September 2010|title=Guidelines for Participating in OpenOffice.org|publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
65. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.dailytech.com/Open+Source+Rebels+Defeat+Oracle+Free+OpenOffice/article21401.htm |title=Open Source Rebels Defeat Oracle, Free OpenOffice |first=Jason |last=Mick|work=DailyTech |quote=With the death of OpenOffice, LibreOffice lives on, inheriting its legacy. |date=18 April 2011 |accessdate=1 January 2013}}
66. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://webwereld.nl/development/45256-openoffice-coup-al-jaren-in-de-maak|title=OpenOffice-coup al jaren in de maak|language=Dutch|trans-title= OpenOffice coup years in the making|first=Sander|last=van der Meijs|work=WebWereld|date=30 September 2010|accessdate=6 July 2013}}
67. ^1 {{cite web |last=Paul |first=Ryan |title=Oracle wants LibreOffice members to leave OOo council |date=18 October 2010|url= https://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/10/oracle-wants-libreoffice-members-to-leave-ooo-council.ars |work=Ars Technica |accessdate=17 February 2011}}
68. ^1 {{cite web|last=Blankenhorn |first=Dana |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-purging-openoffice-org-community-council/7575 |title=Oracle purging OpenOffice.org community council |publisher=ZDNet |date=19 October 2010 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
69. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.zdnet.com/orange-launches-open-office-3039289058/|title=Orange launches 'Open Office'|first=David|last=Meyer|work=ZDNet Networking|publisher=ZDNet|date=4 September 2007|accessdate=22 June 2013}}
70. ^{{cite web|url=http://openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie|title=over het merk "Open Office"|language=Dutch|trans-title=about the brand "Open Office"|publisher=Openoffice.nl|accessdate=27 June 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130823152257/http://www.openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie|archivedate=23 August 2013|df=dmy-all}}
71. ^{{cite web |url = //www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-other.html#4 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20100616005802/http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-other.html#4 |archivedate = 16 June 2010 |title = Why should we say "OpenOffice.org" instead of simply "OpenOffice" |work = OpenOffice.org Frequently Asked Questions |date = 16 June 2010 |accessdate = 27 June 2013 |quote = Why should we say "OpenOffice.org" instead of simply "OpenOffice"? The trademark for "OpenOffice" belongs to someone else. Therefore we must use "OpenOffice.org" when referring to this open source project and its software. |deadurl = yes |df = dmy-all}}
72. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.broffice.org/sobre|title=Sobre o BrOffice.org|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101120111119/http://broffice.org/sobre|archivedate=20 November 2010|date=7 July 2006|language=Portuguese|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
73. ^{{cite web|title=LibreOffice Development Extends To Brazil|url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2010/12/06/libreoffice-development-extends-to-brazil/ |publisher=The Document Foundation|date=6 December 2010|first=Florian|last=Effenberger|accessdate=24 January 2011}}
74. ^1 2 {{cite web |title=OpenOffice.org community announces OpenOffice.org 1.0: free office productivity software |url=//www.openoffice.org/about_us/ooo_release.html |date=30 April 2002 |accessdate=16 March 2007|publisher=Sun Microsystems}}
75. ^{{cite web|url=http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template/presentations/index.html |title=Presentation templates at OpenOffice.org |publisher=documentation.openoffice.org |date= |accessdate=22 April 2009}}
76. ^{{cite web|url=http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template_2_x/impress/index.html |title=Impress Templates — User/Template |publisher=documentation.openoffice.org |date= |accessdate=22 April 2009}}
77. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.cnet.com/Exchange-targeted-by-open-source-group/2100-1012_3-1024994.html|title=Exchange targeted by open-source group|first=Matt|last=Hines|work=CNET News|publisher=CNet|date=11 July 2003|accessdate=17 June 2013}}
78. ^1 {{cite web|first=Louis|last=Suárez-Potts|url=//www.openoffice.org/editorial/mozilla_lightning_and_OOo.html |title=Interview: Mozilla Lightning and OpenOffice.org|publisher=Openoffice.org |date= |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
79. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web|url=http://download.openoffice.org/all_beta.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429112756/http://download.openoffice.org/all_beta.html|title=OpenOffice.org - Download Beta Release|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archivedate=29 April 2011|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
80. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs.html|title=System Requirements for OpenOffice.org|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514140306/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs.html|archivedate=14 May 2011|accessdate=15 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
81. ^{{cite web|title=Porting: The OpenOffice.org Porting Project: home|url=http://porting.openoffice.org/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120109000427/http://www.openoffice.org/porting/|archivedate=9 January 2012|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
82. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/porting/irix/ |title=IRIX OpenOffice.org Porting Site |publisher=Openoffice.org |date=17 May 2003 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
83. ^1 {{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110529092059/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html|archivedate=29 May 2011|title=System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2|publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=15 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
84. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=External/Modules&oldid=91799#Fonts |title=External/Modules |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=4 September 2008|accessdate=20 June 2013}}
85. ^{{cite web |url=http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89682 |title=OpenOffice.org — Issue 89682 — Include the Gentium open fonts |publisher=OpenOffice.org |accessdate=3 February 2010}}
86. ^{{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77705 |title=OpenOffice.org — Issue 77705 – Liberation font and OOo |publisher=OpenOffice.org|accessdate=5 February 2010}}
87. ^{{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104723 |title=OpenOffice.org — Issue 104723 – Update Liberation fonts to v1.05.1.20090721 |publisher=OpenOffice.org|accessdate=5 February 2010}}
88. ^{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual/Impress_Guide/Using_Fontwork&oldid=78557|date=23 May 2008|title=Using Fontwork|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=22 September 2013}}
89. ^{{cite web|url=http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual/Getting_Started/Using_Fontwork|title=Using Fontwork|date=9 November 2007|accessdate=22 September 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems}}
90. ^{{cite mailing list |last=Bergmann |first=Stephan |title=.oxt, .uno.pkg, .zip |mailinglist=dev@extensions.openoffice.org |date=7 July 2006 |url=http://markmail.org/thread/mqs2zu2razceqnr3|accessdate=22 September 2013}}
91. ^{{cite web|url=http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110424015927/http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project|title=OpenOffice.org Extensions|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archivedate=24 April 2011|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
92. ^{{cite web|title=Open Office und FSF streiten um Extensions|language=German|trans-title= OpenOffice and FSF argue about extensions|publisher=Linux Magazin|url=http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Open-Office-und-FSF-streiten-um-Extensions |accessdate=16 May 2012|date=10 May 2010|first=Ulrich |last=Bantle}}
93. ^{{cite web|url=http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List|title=Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List|publisher=LibrePlanet|accessdate=23 June 2013}}
94. ^{{cite web |last=Bain |first=Mark Alexander |work=NewsForge |title=An introduction to OpenOffice.org Basic |url=http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/09/20/1840248.shtml |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060323022629/http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/09/20/1840248.shtml |archivedate=23 March 2006 |accessdate=3 March 2007 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
95. ^{{Cite conference |first = Editha D. |last = Dimalen |author-link = |first2 = Davis Muhajereen D. |last2 = Dimalen |author2-link = |title = An OpenOffice Spelling and Grammar Checker Add-in Using an Open Source External Engine as Resource Manager and Parser |url = http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/downloads/4NNLPRS/pdf/paper16.pdf |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20110501094549/http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/downloads/4NNLPRS/pdf/paper16.pdf |archivedate = 1 May 2011 |conference = 4th National Natural Language Processing Research Symposium: Philippine Languages and Computation |year = 2007 |page = 70 |place = Manila |conferenceurl = http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/events.asp |format = PDF |accessdate = 16 October 2013 |quote = SDBC (StarOffice Database Connectivity) and ODBC (Open Database Connectivity) was used to bridge the postgreSQL engine with the OpenOffice document. |deadurl = yes |df = dmy-all}}
96. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref1004|title=ISO and IEC approve OpenDocument OASIS standard for data interoperability of office applications|date=8 May 2006|accessdate=23 April 2013|work=ISO Press Releases|publisher=ISO}}
97. ^{{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/xml/general.html |title=OpenOffice.org XML File Format |accessdate=22 September 2013|publisher=Sun Microsystems}}
98. ^{{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/OOo3_User_Guides/Getting_Started/File_formats&oldid=175577 |title=File formats OOo can open|date=17 July 2010|accessdate=20 June 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation}}
99. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual/Getting_Started/File_formats&oldid=74444 |title=Getting Started Guide for OpenOffice.org 2.x — File formats |date=23 April 2008|accessdate=20 June 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems}}
100. ^{{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=API/Tutorials/PDF_export&oldid=169158 |title=API/Tutorials/PDF export |date=24 May 2010|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=22 May 2011}}
101. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0/ |title=3.0 New Features |publisher=Openoffice.org |date= |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
102. ^{{cite web|url=http://projects.gnome.org/ooo/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415144829/http://projects.gnome.org/ooo/|archivedate=15 April 2009|title=Gnome/OpenOffice.org(G/OO.o)|publisher=Gnome.org|date=|accessdate=22 April 2009|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
103. ^{{cite web|url=http://kde.openoffice.org/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100713115136/http://kde.openoffice.org/|archivedate=13 July 2010|title=OpenOffice.org KDE Integration Project|publisher=OpenOffice.org|date=|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
104. ^{{cite web |url=http://blogs.kde.org/node/3983 |title= Elite Kubuntu Developers Successful OpenOffice KDE 4 Integration |publisher=blogs.kde.org |accessdate=23 September 2013}}
105. ^{{cite web | title = OpenOffice.org Mac OS X Delivery Schedule |url= //www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/timeline.html |publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
106. ^{{cite web|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120105133104/http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html|archivedate=5 January 2012|url=//www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html|title=Java & OpenOffice.org|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|accessdate=30 December 2012|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
107. ^1 {{cite news |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |authorlink=Bruce Byfield |title=Free Software Foundation and OpenOffice.org team up to escape Java trap|publisher=Linux Foundation|work=linux.com|date=16 May 2005 |url=http://www.linux.com/feature/44959 |accessdate=9 September 2007}}
108. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/jdk@tools.openoffice.org/msg00005.html|title=Reoccuring discussions arounds OOos Java usage (sic)|first=Kay|last=Ramme|work=tools-jdk mailing list|publisher=OpenOffice.org|date=11 May 2005 |accessdate=22 September 2013}}
109. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.sun.com/2006-1113/feature/story.jsp |title=Sun Opens Java |accessdate=25 November 2006 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20061116045838/http://www.sun.com/2006-1113/feature/story.jsp |publisher=Sun Microsystems |archivedate=16 November 2006 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
110. ^{{cite web |url= https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060718-7288.html |title=OpenOffice.org less secure than Microsoft Office? |work=Ars Technica|first=Eric|last=Bangeman|date=18 July 2006| accessdate =1 August 2006}}
111. ^{{cite web |url= http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/quot-Le-ministere-de-la-Defense-met-OpenOffice-a-l-index-quot-td2918635.html |title='Le ministère de la Défense met OpenOffice à l'index' |first=Louis|last=Suárez-Potts|date=21 July 2006|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
112. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/le-ministere-de-la-defense-met-openoffice-a-l-index-39362096.htm|title= Le ministère de la Défense met OpenOffice à l'index|language=French|first=Thomas|last=Rousseau |work=ZDnet.fr|date=11 July 2006|accessdate=14 October 2015}}
113. ^{{cite web | url = http://news.cnet.com/2100-7349_3-6078475.html |first=Joris|last=Evans|title=Stardust virus lands on OpenOffice|publisher =CNet |date=31 May 2006|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
114. ^{{cite web |url= http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20130/ |title=Vulnerability Report: OpenOffice.org 3.x |publisher=Secunia|accessdate =20 October 2011}}
115. ^{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/461673/|title=An odd vulnerability report for LibreOffice|first=Jake|last=Edge|work=LWN.net|date=5 October 2011|accessdate=15 October 2013}}
116. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.osnews.com/story/6515|title=OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 Released|first=Eugenia|last=Loli|work=OSNews|date=29 March 2004|accessdate=16 October 2013}}
117. ^{{cite web|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20040610181058/http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/programs-v1.4/|archivedate=10 June 2004|publisher=TheOpenCD|title=TheOpenCD Home|accessdate=2 February 2013|deadurl=yes|url=http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/programs-v1.4/|df=dmy-all}}
118. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 {{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Product_Release&oldid=195944|title=Product Release|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=11 April 2011|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
119. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.1.0.html|title=OpenOffice.org2.1 - Release Notes|publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=26 September 2013}}
120. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.2.0.html|title=OpenOffice.org 2.2 (build OOF680_m14) - Release Notes|publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=26 September 2013}}
121. ^{{cite news |last=Espiner |first=Tom |title=New OpenOffice version includes security upgrades |publisher=CNet |date=4 April 2007 | url = http://news.cnet.com/New+OpenOffice+version+includes+security+upgrade/2100-7344_3-6173145.html| accessdate =16 October 2013|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022081324/http://news.cnet.com/New-OpenOffice-version-includes-security-upgrade/2100-7344_3-6173145.html|archivedate=22 October 2012}}
122. ^{{cite web |url=http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.3.0.html |title=OpenOffice.org 2.3.0 (build OOG680_m5) – Release Notes |publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=22 May 2011}}
123. ^{{cite web |url= https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/20/openoffice_org_unveils_new_version_trumpeting_extensions/ |work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|accessdate=26 April 2012 |title=OpenOffice builds extensions for v2.3 |date=20 September 2007 |first=Cade |last=Metz}}
124. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.4.0.html |title=New Features in OpenOffice.org 2.4 |publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=22 May 2011}}
125. ^{{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Feature_Freeze_Testing_2.4&oldid=108873 |title=Feature Freeze Testing 2.4 |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=23 January 2009|accessdate=22 May 2011}}
126. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_2_4_features|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024114047/http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_2_4_features|archivedate=24 October 2007|title=OpenOffice.org 2.4 features implemented in cooperation with the RedFlag 2000 framework team|work=GullFOSS|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=22 October 2007|first=Carsten|last=Driesner|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
127. ^{{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OOoRelease32&oldid=157099 |title=OpenOffice 3.2 developer page |date=11 February 2010|accessdate=11 February 2010|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation}}
128. ^{{cite web |title=Features planned for OOo 3.2 (November 2009) |work=OpenOffice.org wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems |date=1 August 2009 |url= http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=153651#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.2_.28January_2010.29 |accessdate=23 August 2009}}
129. ^{{cite web |title=Performance |work=OpenOffice.org wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Performance&oldid=135877|date=24 July 2009 |accessdate=23 August 2009}}
130. ^1 {{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.2.1.html#note|title=3.2.1 (build OOO320m18) - Release Notes: Important Notes: OOo Brand Refresh|publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=19 October 2013}}
131. ^{{cite web |title=Release Notes for the OpenOffice.org 1.0.0 Release |publisher=Sun Microsystems |url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.0/release_notes_1.0.0.html |date=May 2002 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20020504114841/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.0/release_notes_1.0.0.html |archivedate=4 May 2002 |accessdate=16 October 2013 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
132. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/news.html|title=News: The Press on OpenOffice.org and Open Source|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=5 June 2002|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20020607182735/http://www.openoffice.org/news.html|archivedate=7 June 2002|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
133. ^{{cite web |url=http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/index.html |title=Mac OS X OpenOffice.org Port |date=29 June 2003 |accessdate=8 August 2010 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20030801095825/http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/index.html |archivedate=1 August 2003 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
134. ^{{cite web |title=OpenOffice.org 1.0 for Mac OS X (X11) |date=7 July 2003 |url=http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html |publisher=Sun Microsystems |accessdate=8 August 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20030801095614/http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html |archivedate=1 August 2003 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
135. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/1.1/index.html |title=1.1 Features |publisher=Sun Microsystems |accessdate=26 July 2010}}
136. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/dec/08/opensource.software |title=If this suite's a success, why is it so buggy? |last=Brown |first=Andrew |publisher=The Guardian |date=8 December 2005 |accessdate=2 October 2012}}
137. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/tools/releases/q-concept.html|title= StarOffice / OpenOffice.org "Q" Product Concept|first=Lutz|last=Hoeger|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=August 2003|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
138. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/about_us/2.0beta_press_release.html|title=OPENOFFICE.ORG ANNOUNCES VERSION 2.0 PUBLIC BETA|date=4 March 2005|publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=19 October 2013}}
139. ^{{cite web|url=https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/addressing_proliferation_deeds_not_just|first=Simon|last=Phipps|work=Simon Phipps, SunMink|publisher=Sun Microsystems|title=Addressing Proliferation: Deeds not just Words|accessdate=26 December 2012|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081837/https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/addressing_proliferation_deeds_not_just|archivedate=8 March 2013|df=dmy-all}}
140. ^1 {{cite press release| url=//www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html| title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Here (OpenOffice.org 2.0 Announcement)| publisher=Sun Microsystems| date=20 October 2005| accessdate=16 October 2013}}
141. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2153630/openoffice-zooms-lagging |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20060408003518/http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2153630/openoffice-zooms-lagging |archivedate = 8 April 2006 |first = Tom |last = Sanders |publisher = vnunet.com |title = OpenOffice aims to boost lagging performance |accessdate = 20 April 2006 |deadurl = yes |df = dmy-all}}
142. ^{{cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven |title=Why OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Your Best Choice |work=Linux & Open Source |publisher=eWeek |date=20 October 2005 |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Why-OpenOfficeorg-20-Is-Your-Best-Choice |accessdate=16 November 2008}}
143. ^{{cite news |last=Brooks |first=Jason |title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Has Edge over Its StarOffice 8 Cousin |work=Linux & Open Source |publisher=eWeek |date=21 October 2005 |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-20-Has-Edge-over-Its-StarOffice-8-Cousin |accessdate=8 November 2008}}
144. ^{{cite news |last=Bona |first=Michael |title=OFFICE ARRIVAL. Here at last: OpenOffice 2.0 |format=PDF |work=Reviews |publisher=Linux Magazine |date=February 2006 |url=http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/63/OpenOffice.org_2.0_Review.pdf |pages=44–46, 48 |accessdate=27 April 2009 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011090041/http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/63/OpenOffice.org_2.0_Review.pdf |archivedate=11 October 2007 |df=dmy-all }}
145. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1851001,00.asp |title=OpenOffice.org|publisher=Pcmag.com |date=1 December 2004|accessdate=22 April 2009}}
146. ^{{cite news |last=London |first=Simon |title=Open source moves into Microsoft's Office block |publisher=Financial Times (Registration required) |date=21 April 2005 |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1c5e53b8-b205-11d9-8c61-00000e2511c8.html?nclick_check=1 |accessdate=16 November 2008}}
147. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214234333/http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org|archivedate=14 December 2005|title=Openoffice.org 2|publisher=Personal Computer World|date=22 July 2005|first=Cliff|last=Joseph|accessdate=22 April 2009|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
148. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/OpenOffice-Sports-AllAround-Improvements/ |title=OpenOffice Sports All-Around Improvements |publisher=eWeek |first=Tiffany |last=Maleshefski|date=13 June 2007 |accessdate=22 April 2009}}
149. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-23-Impresses/ |title=OpenOffice.org 2.3 Impresses |publisher=eWeek |accessdate=22 April 2009|first=Tiffany|last=Maleshefski |date=28 November 2007}}
150. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/80012/openoffice-2.html |first=Nik|last=Rawlinson|date=18 November 2005|title=OpenOffice 2 review|publisher=PC Pro |accessdate=22 April 2009}}
151. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.fcw.com/Articles/2005/09/26/5-stars-of-opensource-products.aspx |title=5 stars of open-source products: If you're not using these tools, you may be missing out |last=Joch |first=Alan |work=Federal Computer Week |publisher=1105 Public Sector Media Group|date=26 September 2005|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
152. ^{{cite news |title=Migrating to OpenOffice.org 90 per cent cheaper than to Microsoft Office 12 |work=Daily Update |publisher=Computerworld Singapore |date=4 October 2005 |url=http://www.computerworld.com.my/PrinterFriendly.aspx?articleid=2742&issueid=94&pubid=1 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071110134943/http://computerworld.com.my/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=2742&pubid=3&issueid=66 |archivedate=10 November 2007 |accessdate=16 October 2013 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }} Computerworld Volume 11, Issue 23.
153. ^1 {{cite web | url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0 |title=OpenOffice.org 3.0 Features|publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
154. ^{{cite news|last1=Suarez-Potts|first1=Louis|title=OpenOffice.org moving to LGPLv3|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/272202/|accessdate=16 August 2016|work=Linux Weekly News|date=7 March 2008}}
155. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.2/ |title=OpenOffice.org 3.2 New Features|publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=26 July 2010}}
156. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.golem.de/1101/81004.html |language=German |publisher=Golem.de |accessdate=7 May 2012 |title=Openoffice.org 3.3 als kostenloser Download |trans-title=Openoffice.org 3.3 as a free download |date=26 January 2011 |first=Ingo |last=Pakalski}}
157. ^{{cite web |title=Features planned for OOo 3.3 Third quarter 2010 |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=21 June 2010 |url= http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=172840#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.3_.28Third_quarter_2010.29 |accessdate=26 July 2010}}
158. ^{{cite web |title=Roadmap 2009 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |date=23 October 2009 |url= http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Renaissance:The_Roadmap&oldid=144031 |accessdate=3 November 2009}}
159. ^1 {{cite press release |title=Oracle Announces Oracle Cloud Office and Oracle Open Office 3.3: Industry's First Complete, Open Standards-Based Office Productivity Suites for Desktop, Web and Mobile Users |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=15 December 2010 |url=http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 |archivedate=17 December 2010 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
160. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/22/cloud_office_javafx_ready/ |title=Oracle preps Google and Microsoft Office challenger |first=Gavin |last=Clarke |work=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing |date=22 September 2010 |accessdate=9 October 2013}}
161. ^{{cite web |url=//www.openoffice.org/news/index.html#OOo340beta |title=News |publisher=Oracle Corporation |year=2011 |accessdate=14 January 2012}}
162. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Market_Share_Analysis&oldid=170058 |title=OpenOffice.org Market Share Analysis |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=1 June 2010 |accessdate=20 June 2013}}
163. ^{{cite web |title=Steam Hardware & Software Survey|url=http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/?platform=combined |publisher=Valve Corporation |accessdate=3 December 2012|date=November 2012}}
164. ^{{cite news |author=Thomas H |title=International OpenOffice market shares |publisher=Webmasterpro.de |date=5 February 2010 |url=http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html |accessdate=27 May 2012}}
165. ^{{cite web|url=http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1795|title=Rivals Set Their Sights on Microsoft Office: Can They Topple the Giant?|work=Knowledge@Wharton|publisher=Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania|date=22 August 2007|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
166. ^{{cite web |last=Loftus |first=Jack |title=Desktop apps ripe turf for open source |format=First two paragraphs available, the rest requires login |work=SearchEnterpriseLinux.com |publisher=TechTarget |date=4 October 2004 |url=http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |accessdate=27 May 2012}}
167. ^{{cite news |last=Wrolstad |first=Jay |title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Delayed |publisher=Top Tech News |date=13 October 2005 |url=http://www.toptechnews.com/news/OpenOffice-org-2-0-Release-Delayed/story.xhtml?story_id=03100339SMZN |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090104215102/http://www.toptechnews.com/news/OpenOffice-org-2-0-Release-Delayed/story.xhtml?story_id=03100339SMZN |archivedate=4 January 2009 |accessdate=27 May 2012 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
168. ^{{cite book|ssrn=1656616|first1=Tony|last1=Casson|first2=Patrick|last2=Ryan|chapter=Open Standards, Open Source Adoption in the Public Sector, and Their Relationship to Microsoft's Market Dominance|title=STANDARDS EDGE: UNIFIER OR DIVIDER?|editor-first=Sherrie|editor-last=Bolin|page=87|publisher=Sheridan Books|year=2006|accessdate=}}
169. ^{{cite web|url=http://stats.openoffice.org/spreadsheet/OOo-2007-09-01.ods|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080301000000/http://stats.openoffice.org/spreadsheet/OOo-2007-09-01.ods|archivedate=1 March 2008|title=OOo-2007-09-01.ods|publisher=Sun Microsystems|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
170. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3584404.htm|title=OpenOffice.org 3.2 is First Out of the Blocks in the 2010 Office Software Race (press release)|publisher=Oracle Corporation|date=11 February 2010|accessdate=7 October 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426155704/http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3584404.htm|archivedate=26 April 2012|df=dmy-all}}
171. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/ooo/centomilioni/prweb3108474.htm|title=OpenOffice.org clocks up one hundred million downloads|accessdate=28 November 2009|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=29 October 2009}}
172. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.zdnet.com/singapore-government-deploys-openoffice-org-on-5000-pcs-3039171012/|title=Singapore government deploys OpenOffice.org on 5,000 PCs|first=Ingrid|last=Marson|publisher=ZDNet|date=2 November 2004|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
173. ^{{cite web |title=Banco do Brasil, a successful case on the OpenOffice.org migration |url=http://opendocument.xml.org/node/153|author=kraucermazuco|date=8 February 2007 |publisher=Opendocument.xml.org |accessdate=26 July 2010}}
174. ^{{cite web |title=What's Behind the Move to OpenOffice.org, Can OpenOffice Replace MS-Office?|publisher=TheUnical Technologies |url= http://blog.theunical.com/general/whats-behind-the-move-to-openoffice-org-can-openoffice-replace-ms-office/ |work=TheUnical Technologies Blog|date=15 January 2010|accessdate=9 March 2011}}
175. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/faq.htm |title=FAQ: Why are Linux, Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice.org softwares selected for use by the High Court? |publisher= High Court of Judicature at Allahabad |date=20 November 2004 |accessdate=22 April 2009}}
176. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/0401/19/news041.html|title=IT特区の洲本市、OpenOfficeを全庁内PCに導入|trans-title=|language=Japanese|work=|publisher=ITmedia|date=19 January 2004|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
177. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/OPINION/20060428/236610/|title=「全事務職員がLinuxデスクトップを使用している町役場」は実在する|trans-title="All Town Hall administrative staff using the Linux desktop" is real|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=10 May 2006|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
178. ^{{cite web|url=http://japan.internet.com/public/news/20060602/5.html|title=オープンソースも「使えば慣れる」、みんなが Linux、OpenOffice.org を使う町役場|trans-title=|language=Japanese|work=|publisher=japan.internet.com|date=2 June 2006|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
179. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080529/304780/|title=会津若松市がOpenOffice.orgを全庁導入へ「順次MS {{sic|hide=y|reason=error in source|Off|ce}} から切り替え，5年間で約1500万円削減」|last=|first=|date=29 May 2008|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|language=Japanese|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|trans-title=Aizuwakamatsu City switches all agencies to OpenOffice.org: "switching from MS Office sequentially, saving about 15 million yen in five years"|work=ITpro|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
180. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120220/382107/|title=会津若松市がOpenOffice.orgからLibreOfficeに移行|trans-title=Aizuwakamatsu transitions to LibreOffice from OpenOffice.org|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=20 February 2012|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
181. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090331/327513/|title=四国中央市がOpenOffice.orgを全庁PC1100台に導入，5年で3300万円コスト削減|trans-title=Shikokuchūō puts OpenOffice.org onto 1100 PCs, 33 million yen cost savings in five years|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=31 March 2009|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
182. ^{{cite web|url=http://www2.city.minoh.osaka.jp/JYOUHOU/HOUDOU/20091014linux_supporter.html|title=～脱MS！無償「 Linux 」シンクライアントにより中古パソコン500台を再生利用へ～|trans-title=De-MS! 500 used computers to be reclaimed free of charge by the "Linux" thin client|language=Japanese|work=|publisher=City of Minoh|date=14 October 2009|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
183. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100222/344886/|title=豊川市がOpenOffice.orgを全面導入、コスト削減狙う|trans-title=Toyokawa is fully introduced to OpenOffice.org, aiming at cost reduction|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=21 February 2010|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
184. ^{{cite web|url=http://cloud.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/release/20100802_385080.html|title=北海道深川市、OpenOffice.org全庁導入を決定|trans-title= Hokkaido Fukagawa City decides to introduce OpenOffice.org to all PCs|language=Japanese|work=press release|publisher=City of Fukagawa, Hokkaido|date=2 August 2010|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
185. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100815/351172/|title=大阪府交野市がOpenOffice.orgとODF採用、中古PCのLinuxによる再生も|trans-title=Katano, Osaka City adopts ODF and OpenOffice.org, also trialling Linux pre-owned PCs|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=16 August 2010|accessdate=23 September 2010}}
186. ^{{cite web|url=http://japan.cnet.com/release/30021374/|title=龍ケ崎市、全庁標準オフィス・ソフトとしてOpenOffice.orgを利用|trans-title=Ryugasaki uses OpenOffice.org as standard office software for all PCs|language=Japanese|work=|publisher=CNet Japan|date=11 June 2012|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
187. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20070315/265301/|title=アシストが社内通常業務をMicrosoft OfficeからOpenOffice.orgへ全面移行|trans-title=Assist's full conversion to OpenOffice.org from Microsoft Office for the normal course of business|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=15 March 2007|accessdate=24 September 2013}}
188. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20110720/362604/|title=アシストが社内のPC約800台をWindowsからUbuntu Linuxに移行へ|trans-title=Assist to migrate about 800 in-house PCs to Ubuntu Linux from Windows|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=20 July 2011|accessdate=24 September 2013}}
189. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080523/303912/|title=「コスト削減が狙いではない」、住友電工OpenOffice導入の真相|trans-title="Cost reduction is not the aim": the facts on Sumitomo Electric's OpenOffice introduction|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=23 May 2008|accessdate=24 September 2013}}
190. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.sei.co.jp/news/press/12/prs030_s.html|title=オープンソース･ソフトウェアの社内推奨オフィスソフトをOpenOffice.orgからLibreOfficeに移行|trans-title=The transition from OpenOffice.org to LibreOffice — company-recommended open source office software|language=Japanese|work=press release|publisher=Sumitomo Electric Industries|date=28 March 2012|accessdate=24 September 2013}}
191. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://gihyo.jp/ad/pr/2009/NRR200943213|title=トーホー，OpenOffice.orgの導入を決定，アシストの支援サービスを採用|trans-title=Toho decides to adopt OpenOffice.org, uses the support services of Assist|language=Japanese|work=|publisher=Gihyo.jp|date=27 January 2009|accessdate=24 September 2013}}
192. ^{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090127/323592/|title=トーホーがオープンオフィス採用、PC約1500台に一斉導入|trans-title=Toho adopts OpenOffice, simultaneously introduced to about 1500 PCs|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=27 January 2009|accessdate=24 September 2013}}
193. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120326/388017/|title=新生フィナンシャルがOpenOffice.orgを全社標準に、対象は1000台以上|trans-title=Company-wide standard OpenOffice.org on more than 1000 PCs at Shinsei Financial|language=Japanese|work=ITpro|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|date=26 March 2012|accessdate=24 September 2013}}
194. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/07/18/everex.gc3502/ |title=Everex intros $298 green PC with OpenOffice |publisher=Electronista |date=18 July 2007 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
195. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pianetatech.it/p2p-download/download/openoffice-sbarca-su-android.html|title=OpenOffice sbarca su Android|language=Italian|trans-title=OpenOffice lands on Android|author=Mirko|work=P2P Download|publisher=PianetaTech|date=20 September 2013|accessdate=5 October 2013}}
196. ^{{cite web|title=A multilingual OpenOffice with some commercial extensions|accessdate=13 March 2016|publisher=MultiRáció Ltd.|url=http://www.multiracio.com/index.php?lang=en&style=eurooffice&page=eo}}
197. ^{{cite web|accessdate=23 September 2013|publisher=BBC|title=L'Afrique dit "Jambo" aux logiciels libres|trans-title=Africa says "Jambo" to free software|language=French|date=15 December 2004|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/french/highlights/story/2004/12/041215_openofficejambo.shtml}}
198. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/editorial/interview_alberto_escudero.html|accessdate=1 January 2012|title=Interview: Alberto Escudero, klnX: The Open Swahili Localization Project|date=25 October 2004|first1=Louis|last1=Suárez-Potts|first2=Alberto|last2=Escudero|publisher=OpenOffice.org}}
199. ^{{cite web|title=OpenOffice.org goes Swahili|first=Ingrid|last=Marson|publisher=ZDNet|date=6 December 2004|accessdate=30 December 2011|url=http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/application-development/2004/12/06/openofficeorg-goes-swahili-39179058/}}
200. ^{{cite web|url=http://ooo4kids.org|title= Welcome to OOo4Kids project|publisher=EducOOo|accessdate=1 October 2013}}
201. ^{{cite web|url=http://portableapps.com/apps/office/openoffice_portable|title=OpenOffice.org Portable|publisher=PortableApps.com|date=25 February 2010|accessdate=1 October 2013}}
202. ^{{cite web|url=http://ithelp.ithome.com.tw/question/10054256|title=Openoffice.org與OxOffice|trans-title=Openoffice.org and OxOffice|work=iT邦|date=15 October 2010|accessdate=14 October 2015}}
203. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.download.com/8301-2007_4-9822335-12.html|title=Oxygen breathes more life into OpenOffice|accessdate=20 November 2007|last=Rosenblatt|first=Seth|date=24 November 2007|work=Download.com|publisher=CNET}}
204. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/12990/go-oo-erster-fork-von-openofficeorg.html|title=Go-oo: Erster Fork von OpenOffice.org|language=German|trans-title=Go-oo: First fork of OpenOffice.org|first=Hans-Joachim|last=Baader|work=Pro-Linux.de|date=30 July 2008|accessdate=21 June 2013|quote=Nach Angaben der Entwickler beruht die bereits bekannte erweiterte Distribution Oxygen Office Professional auf Go-oo und nicht, wie man beim Lesen auf der Webseite von Oxygen Office vermuten würde, direkt auf OpenOffice.org. [According to the developer, the well-known expanded distribution Oxygen Office Professional was based on Go-oo and not, as one might expect from reading the Oxygen Office website, on OpenOffice.org.]}}
205. ^{{cite conference| url =//www.openoffice.org/marketing/conference/presentations-pdf/fri1330/PladaoOffice2003.pdf| title =Pladao Office| first =Nusorn| last =Photpipat| date = 21 March 2003| conference = OpenOffice.org Conference 2003| conferenceurl = //www.openoffice.org/marketing/ooocon2003/index.html| publisher = Sun Microsystems| location = Hamburg| accessdate=16 October 2013}}
206. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.macworld.com/article/1137502/plusoffice.html|title=PlusOffice to build on OpenOffice.org|first=Peter|last=Cohen|date=12 December 2008|accessdate=1 October 2013|publisher=MacWorld}}
207. ^{{Cite press release|publisher=Sun Microsystems|url=http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2007-05/sunflash.20070523.2.xml|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080216183643/http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2007-05/sunflash.20070523.2.xml|title=Sun and Redflag Chinese 2000 to Collaborate on OpenOffice.org Projects|date=23 May 2007|archivedate=16 February 2008|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
208. ^{{Cite press release|url=http://world.einnews.com/pr_news/61139143/open-source-software-defends-itself-against-looming-shut-down|publisher=Team OpenOffice e.V.|title=Open-Source Software Defends Itself Against Looming Shut-Down|location=Hamburg, Germany|date=11 October 2011|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111108212808/http://world.einnews.com/pr_news/61139143/open-source-software-defends-itself-against-looming-shut-down|archivedate=8 November 2011|accessdate=16 October 2013|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
209. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/241758/facing_closure_openofficeorg_makes_a_plea_for_survival.html|accessdate=16 May 2012|title=Facing Closure, OpenOffice.org Makes a Plea for Survival|date=13 October 2011|first=Katherine|last=Noyes|publisher=PCWorld}}
210. ^{{cite web|url=https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_statement|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|accessdate=13 May 2012|date=14 October 2011|title=The Apache Software Foundation Statement on Apache OpenOffice.org}}
211. ^{{cite web|accessdate=13 May 2012|work=The H Open|publisher=Heinz Heise|url=http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ASF-says-OpenOffice-org-is-in-good-health-1362079.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208113518/http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ASF-says-OpenOffice-org-is-in-good-health-1362079.html|archivedate=8 December 2013|title=ASF says OpenOffice.org is in good health|date=17 October 2011|first=Chris|last=von Eitzen|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
212. ^{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=DerivedWorks&oldid=171353 |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|title=DerivedWorks |publisher=Oracle Corporation|date=8 June 2010 |accessdate=26 July 2010}}
213. ^{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org_Solutions&oldid=196039 |title=Openoffice.org Solutions|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=17 April 2011|accessdate=20 June 2013}}
214. ^{{cite web|url=http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/raw/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E/2|title=Proposal|first=Luke|last=Kowalski|work=attachment|accessdate=23 September 2013}}; attachment to {{cite web|url=https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E|title=OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal|first=Luke|last=Kowalski|work=incubator-general mailing list|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date=1 June 2011|accessdate=23 September 2013}}
215. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.infoworld.com/print/225555|title=In defense of Apache|publisher=InfoWorld|first=Andrew|last=Oliver|date=26 August 2013|accessdate=28 August 2013}}
216. ^1 {{cite news|url=http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/apache-openoffice-who-knows-where-the-time-goes|title=Apache OpenOffice: who knows where the time goes?|last=Hillesley|first=Richard|date=4 April 2012|publisher=LinuxUser|accessdate=11 June 2013}}
217. ^1 {{cite news|url=http://www.zdnet.com/does-openoffice-have-a-future-7000006480/|title=Does OpenOffice have a future?|last=Vaughan-Nichols|first=Steven J.|work=ZDNet Linux and Open Source |publisher=ZDNet|date=28 October 2012 |accessdate=27 December 2012}}
218. ^{{cite web|url=http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/05/open-source-suites-highly-active/index.htm|title=Open Source Suites Highly Active|first=Simon|last=Phipps|work=Simon Says|publisher=Computerworld UK|date=9 May 2012|accessdate=2 July 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054858/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/05/open-source-suites-highly-active/index.htm|archivedate=21 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}
219. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html |title=ASF Legal Previously Asked Questions |publisher=Apache Software Foundation |date= |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
220. ^1 {{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4.0.html|title=AOO 3.4.0 Release Notes|work=Apache OpenOffice|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|accessdate=30 September 2013}}
221. ^1 2 {{cite web|first=Ed|last=Brill |url=http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap |title=More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap |publisher=Ed Brill |date=5 February 2012 |accessdate=18 October 2012}}
222. ^{{cite web|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130825090723/http://www.openoffice.org/about/|url=//www.openoffice.org/about/|archivedate=25 August 2013|accessdate=3 October 2013|title=About Apache OpenOffice|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
223. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.cloudave.com/13293/oracle-donates-openoffice-org-to-apache-a-quick-analysis/|title=Oracle Donates OpenOffice.org To Apache: A Quick Analysis|first=Krishnan|last=Subramanian|date=1 June 2011|accessdate=1 October 2013|work=CloudAve|publisher=Cloud Avenue LLC}}
224. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/11/apache_openoffice_ship_when_ready/|title=Apache devs: 'We'll ship no OpenOffice before its time'|first=Neil|last=McAllister|work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|date=11 June 2013|accessdate=2 October 2013}}
225. ^{{cite web|url=http://opensource.com/life/13/1/software-wars|title=Software Wars: A film about FOSS, collaboration, and software freedom|first=Jason|last=Hibbets|work=opensource.com|publisher=Red Hat|date=15 January 2013|accessdate=2 October 2013}}
226. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html|title=Apache OpenOffice 4.0 review: New features, easier to use, still free|first=Ian|last=Harac|work=Download This|publisher=PCWorld|date=23 September 2013|accessdate=13 October 2013}}
227. ^{{Cite journal | last1 = Gamalielsson | first1 = J. | last2 = Lundell | first2 = B. R. | title = Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork: How and why has the LibreOffice project evolved? | doi = 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1077 | journal = Journal of Systems and Software | volume = 89 | pages = 128 | year = 2013 | pmid = | pmc = }}
228. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-OpenOffice-and-rumors-of-unification|first=Bruce|last=Byfield|date=30 September 2014|title=LibreOffice, OpenOffice, and rumors of unification|work=Linux Pro Magazine|publisher=Linux New Media}}
229. ^[https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg20922.html Retirement announcement], October 2014; note of position still being unfilled, March 2015
230. ^{{cite web|url=http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2015/board_minutes_2015_01_21.txt|title= The Apache Software Foundation Board of Directors Meeting Minutes January 21, 2015|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date=21 January 2015|accessdate=3 May 2015}}
231. ^{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/695562/|title=Apache OpenOffice and CVE-2016-1513|date=27 July 2016|first=Jake|last=Edge|work=LWN.net|accessdate=4 August 2016}}
232. ^{{cite web|url=http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2017/board_minutes_2017_01_18.txt|title=Board of Directors Meeting Minutes|date=18 January 2017|publisher=Apache Foundation|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170418162204/https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2017/board_minutes_2017_01_18.txt|archivedate=18 April 2017|deadurl=yes|accessdate=18 April 2017|quote=There will be at least one security fix in the under-development release 4.1.4.}}
233. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/04/apache_openoffice_no_patch/|title=LibreOffice patches malicious code-execution bug, Apache OpenOffice – wait for it, wait for it – doesn't|last=Claburn|first=Thomas|date=4 February 2019|work=The Register|accessdate=28 February 2019}}
234. ^{{cite news|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/699047/|title=Contemplating the possible retirement of Apache OpenOffice|work=LWN.net|date=2 September 2016}}
235. ^{{cite web|url=//www.openoffice.org/white_papers/OOo_project/openofficefoundation.html|title=The OpenOffice.org Foundation|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=4 November 2001|accessdate=9 October 2013}}
236. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10129764-16.html|title=Why is OpenOffice "profoundly sick"?|first=Matt|last=Asay|work=The Open Road|publisher=CNet|date=30 December 2008|accessdate=17 June 2013}}
237. ^{{cite web|first=Dave|last=Neary|url=http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/04/29/openofficeorg-a-candidate-for-a-501c6/ |title=OpenOffice.org – a candidate for a 501(c)6? |work=Safe as Milk|publisher=Blogs.gnome.org |date=29 April 2008 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
238. ^{{cite web |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/407339/ |title=Michael Meeks talks about LibreOffice and the Document Foundation |date=28 September 2010 |first=Jake|last=Edge |publisher=Linux Weekly News}}
239. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_release.html|title=OpenOffice.org Community announces The Document Foundation|accessdate=31 December 2012|date=28 September 2010|publisher=The Document Foundation|archivedate=30 September 2010|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100930085933/http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_release.html|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
240. ^{{cite news |title=OpenOffice.org developers move to break ties with Oracle |publisher=Computerworld |url= http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9188338/OpenOffice.org_developers_move_to_break_ties_with_Oracle |first=Jeremy|last=Kirk|date=28 September 2010|accessdate=28 September 2010}}
241. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/open-source-development-the-history-of-openoffice-shows-why-licensing-matters/1079|title=Open-source development: The history of OpenOffice shows why licensing matters|first=Richard|last=Hillesley|work=TechRepublic|date=2 October 2012|accessdate=22 June 2013}}
242. ^{{cite web|url=http://derstandard.at/1342947279200/Ironie-Oracle-liefert-nun-LibreOffice-aus|title=Ironie: Oracle liefert nun LibreOffice aus|language=German|trans-title=Irony: Oracle now provides LibreOffice|work=derStandard.at|date=22 July 2012|accessdate=22 June 2013}}
243. ^{{cite web|url=https://oss.oracle.com/ol6/docs/RELEASE-NOTES-U3-en.html|title=Oracle Linux 6.3 Release Notes |publisher=Oracle Corporation|date=June 2012 |accessdate=19 June 2013}}
244. ^{{cite web|url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/09/28/the-document-foundation-celebrates-its-first-anniversary/ |title=The Document Foundation celebrates its first anniversary|first=Italo|last=Vignoli|work=The Document Foundation Blog |publisher=The Document Foundation |date=28 September 2011 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
245. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=3095 |title=Viva la LibreOffice! |accessdate=28 September 2010 |first=Kerry |last=Adorno |date=28 September 2010 |work=Novell News |publisher=Novell |quote=Novell, Google, Red Hat, Canonical, and others are pleased to work with The Document Foundation to help make LibreOffice the best office productivity suite on the market. |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110415090729/http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=3095 |archivedate=15 April 2011 |df=dmy-all }}
246. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Canonical-unterstuetzt-LibreOffice-1194699.html|title= Canonical unterstützt LibreOffice|language=German|trans-title=Canonical supports LibreOffice |work=Heise Open Source|publisher=Heinz Heise|date=22 February 2011|accessdate=21 June 2013|quote=Das Unternehmen hinter Ubuntu bezahlt mit Björn Michaelsen einen Entwickler, der vollzeit an der freien Bürosuite arbeiten soll. [The company behind Ubuntu pays a developer, Björn Michaelsen, to work full-time on the free office suite.]}}
247. ^{{cite news|url=http://ostatic.com/blog/apache-openoffice-lagging-behind-libreoffice-in-features|title=Apache OpenOffice Lagging Behind LibreOffice in Features|work=Ostatic|first=Susan|last=Linton |date=26 April 2012 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
248. ^{{Cite news |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/637735/ |title=Development activity in LibreOffice and OpenOffice |accessdate=20 June 2015 |author=Jonathan Corbet |date=15 March 2015 |work=LWN.net}}
249. ^{{cite web|url=http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/NeoOffice |title=Information about NeoOffice |publisher=NeoOffice |date=13 June 2007 |accessdate=22 April 2009}}
250. ^{{cite web|url=http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=64520#64520|title=Mac App Store complaints|date=7 November 2013|author=Pluby|publisher=trinity.neooffice.org|accessdate=25 December 2013}}
251. ^{{cite web|url=https://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=65212#65212|title=NeoOffice 2017 Beta Professional Edition released|date=2 May 2017|author=Pluby|publisher=trinity.neooffice.org|accessdate=10 May 2017}}
252. ^{{cite web |url=http://ooo.ximian.com/ooo-build.html |title=About ooo-build |publisher=Ximian |date=18 October 2003 |accessdate=5 January 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060410080023/http://ooo.ximian.com/ooo-build.html |archivedate=10 April 2006 |df=dmy-all }}
253. ^{{cite web|url=http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/184|title=Meek not geek - Interview with Michael Meeks of OpenOffice.org|work=Tux Deluxe|first=Daniel|last=James|date=7 May 2007|accessdate=1 October 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929232956/http://www.tuxdeluxe.org/node/184|archivedate=29 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}
254. ^{{cite conference |last=Meeks |first=Michael |editor-last=Lockhart |editor-first=John W. |date=21–24 July 2004 |title=The World of OpenOffice |conference=Linux Symposium 2004 |conferenceurl=http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/ |booktitle=Proceedings of the Linux Symposium |location=Ottawa, Ontario |volume=2 |pages=361–366 |url=http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/Reprint-Meeks-OLS2004.pdf |format=PDF |accessdate=1 October 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502012130/http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/Reprint-Meeks-OLS2004.pdf |archivedate=2 May 2014}}
255. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/ooo-commit-stats-2008.html |first=Michael|last=Meeks|work=Stuff Michael Meeks is doing |title=Measuring the true success of OpenOffice.org|publisher=People.gnome.org |date=10 October 2008 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
256. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2007-10-02.html |title=2007-10-02: Tuesday|work=Stuff Michael Meeks is doing|publisher=People.gnome.org |date=2 October 2007 |accessdate=22 April 2009}}
257. ^{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/121441/|title=ooo-build 1.3.8 Announced|first=Michael|last=Meeks|work=LWN.net|date=28 January 2005|accessdate=1 October 2013}}
258. ^{{cite web|url=http://techrights.org/2008/10/12/microsoft-novell-hijack-openoffice/#comment-27387 |title=Microsoft/Novell Fork OpenOffice.org and Insult Sun, Warn Your Distributor Now |first=Roy|last=Schestowitz|work=TechRights |date=10 December 2008 |accessdate=5 January 2013}}
259. ^{{cite web|url=http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3794611_1|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090323073107/http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3794611_1|archivedate=23 March 2009|date=7 January 2009|first=Bruce|last=Byfield|title=OpenOffice.org vs. Go-OO: Cutting through the Gordian Knot|work=Datamation|accessdate=15 August 2015|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
260. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://www.go-oo.org/download/ |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100803034339/http://www.go-oo.org/download/ |archivedate=3 August 2010 |title=Download Go-OO!: Other derivatives |publisher=Go-oo.org |accessdate=16 October 2013 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy-all }}
261. ^{{cite web |url = https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/151829/comments/5 |title=Bug #151829 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu): "Include go-oo in Ubuntu" |work=Launchpad.net|publisher=Canonical Ltd.|accessdate=28 January 2009}}
262. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.linux.com/feature/154364 |title=Go-OO: The best office suite you never knew you used|first=Federico|last=Kereki |publisher=Linux.com |date=4 December 2008 |accessdate=26 July 2010}}
263. ^{{cite web|url = http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Calling-a-cat-a-dog-746843.html|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20131208000702/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Calling-a-cat-a-dog-746843.html|archivedate = 8 December 2013|title = Healthcheck: OpenOffice: Calling a cat a dog|page = 4|first = Richard|last = Hillesley|work = The H Open|date = 29 January 2009|accessdate = 26 June 2013|deadurl = yes|df = dmy-all}}
264. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.oooninja.com/2008/01/openxml-translator-odf-converter-11.html|accessdate=21 November 2012|title=odf-converter 1.1 released|first=Andrew|last=Ziem|date=31 January 2008|publisher=OpenOffice.org Ninja}}
265. ^{{cite web|url=http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/19142.wss|title=IBM Announces New Version of Workplace Products With Enhanced Support for Open Standards and Improved SOA Functionality|publisher=IBM|date=23 January 2006|accessdate=22 September 2013}}
266. ^{{cite web|url=http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=ED2B95285B0545B3862574A40074E7C6|title=Announcing ----- IBM Lotus Symphony Version 1.0 is NOW AVAILABLE|work=Lotus Symphony Buzz|author=Buzzmaster1|publisher=IBM|date=30 May 2008|accessdate=22 September 2013}}
267. ^{{cite web|url=http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3.0-now-available|title=Lotus Symphony 3.0 now available|first=Ed|last=Brill|date=21 October 2010|accessdate=22 September 2013}}
268. ^1 {{cite web|first=Rob|last=Weir |url=https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/merging_lotus_symphony_allegro_moderato|title=Merging Lotus Symphony: Allegro moderato |publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date= 21 January 2013|accessdate=23 July 2013}}
269. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.newformat.se/documents/oracle/oracle-open-office-features-overview-060550.pdf|title=Oracle Open Office: Features Overview: An Oracle White Paper|date=January 2010|publisher=Oracle Corporation|accessdate=20 September 2013}}

Further reading

{{Refbegin|2}}
  • {{cite book|last=OOo AuthorsTeam|title=Getting Started with Open Office.org 3.0|page=436|isbn=978-1-921320-05-7}}
  • {{cite book|author1=Tamar E. Granor |author2=Scott Carr |author3=Sam Hiser |title=OOoSwitch: 501 Things You Want to Know About Switching To OpenOffice.org from Microsoft Office |page=311 |isbn=1-930919-36-0}}
  • {{cite book|last=Andrew Pitonyak|title=OpenOffice.org Macros Explained|page=334|isbn=1-930919-51-4}}
  • {{cite book|last=Gabriel Gurley|title=A Conceptual Guide to OpenOffice.org 3|pages=|isbn=978-0-9778991-6-6}}
  • {{cite book|last=Jacek Artymiak|title=OpenOffice.org Calc Functions & Formulas Tips, 1st ed.|page=145|isbn=978-83-60869-23-9}}
  • {{cite book |title=OpenOffice.org Migration Plan For The Public Sector (ODF) |publisher=Malaysian Public Sector Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC)|location=Cyberjaya Selangor, Malaysia |page=6 |url= http://knowledge.oscc.org.my/solution-areas/desktop/OpenOffice.org/migration-pack/openoffice.org-migration-plan-general|author1=Malaysian Administrative Modernisation |author2=Management Planning Unit |lastauthoramp=yes }}
  • {{cite book|title=OpenOffice.org Implementation in Public Sector (ODF) |publisher=Malaysian Public Sector Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC)|location=Cyberjaya Selangor, Malaysia|page=3|url=http://knowledge.oscc.org.my/solution-areas/desktop/OpenOffice.org/migration-pack/openoffice.org-position-paper|author1=Malaysian Administrative Modernisation |author2=Management Planning Unit |lastauthoramp=yes }}
{{Refend}}

External links

{{Sister project links |wikt=no |commons=OpenOffice.org |b=OpenOffice.org |n= |q=no |s=no |v=OpenOffice.org |species=no}}
  • {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110428102539/http://www.openoffice.org/ |date=28 April 2011 |title=Official website }}
{{OpenOffice|state=expanded}}{{Office suites}}{{Spreadsheets}}{{Sun Microsystems}}{{FOSS}}{{Authority control}}

13 : 2002 software|Cross-platform free software|Formerly proprietary software|Free PDF software|Free software programmed in C++|Free software programmed in Java (programming language)|Free word processors|Office suites for macOS|Office suites for Windows|Open-source office suites|OpenOffice|Portable software|Unix software
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/9/22 21:18:43