请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 Arleigh Burke-class destroyer
释义

  1. Characteristics

  2. Development

     Modernization   Production restarted and further development  

  3. Future replacement

     Future Surface Combatant 

  4. Operational history

  5. Accidents & Incidents

      USS Cole bombing    USS Porter and MV Otowasan collision    USS Fitzgerald and MV ACX Crystal collision    USS John S. McCain and Alnic MC collision  

  6. Contractors

  7. Ships in class

  8. In popular culture

  9. See also

  10. Notes

  11. References

  12. Further reading

  13. External links

{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2013}}
infobox caption = Arleigh Burke-class destroyer
}}{{Infobox ship image		 Ship image = 130920-N-NX070-025 - USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51).jpg Ship image size = 300pxArleigh Burke|DDG-51|6}} in Chesapeake Bay in 2013

}}{{Infobox ship class overview

Name=Arleigh Burke classBuilders=*Ingalls Shipbuilding
  • Bath Iron Works
United States}}Kidd|destroyer|4}}Class after=Subclasses=Cost=US$1.843 billion per ship (DDG 114–116, FY2011/12)[1]Built range=1988–presentIn service range=In commission range=1991–presentTotal ships planned= 82 as of July 2018[1]Total ships on order= 5Total ships building= 6Total ships completed=66Total ships canceled=Total ships active=66Total ships laid up=Total ships lost=Total ships retired=Total ships preserved=

}}{{Infobox ship characteristics

 Hide header = Header caption = Ship type = Guided missile destroyer Ship displacement = *Fully loaded:
  • Flight I: {{convert|8315|t|lt|abbr=out|order=flip}}
  • Flight II: {{convert|8400|t|lt|abbr=out|order=flip}}
  • Flight IIA: {{convert|9200|t|lt|abbr=out|order=flip}}
  • Flight III: {{convert|9,800|t|lt|abbr=out|order=flip}}[2]
505|ft|abbr=on}}
  • Flight IIA: {{convert|509|ft|m|abbr=on}}
66|ft|abbr=on}} Ship height =30.5|ft|abbr=on}} Ship depth = Ship decks = Ship deck clearance = Ship ramps = Ship ice class =2500|kW}} each, 440 V)26250|bhp|abbr=on|lk=in}};[3]
  • coupled to two shafts, each driving a five-bladed reversible controllable-pitch propeller;
  • Total output: {{convert|105000|bhp|abbr=on}}
30|kn|abbr=on|lk=in}}4400|nmi|km|abbr=on|lk=in}} at {{convert|20|kn|abbr=on}} Ship boats = 2 × rigid hull inflatable boats Ship complement = * Flight I: 303 total[4]
  • Flight IIA: 23 officers, 300 enlisted[4]
 Ship crew = 276 Ship time to activate = Ship sensors = {{Arleigh Burke class destroyer sensors}} Ship EW = {{Arleigh Burke class destroyer EW}} Ship armament = * Missiles:
  • Flights I and II: 90 cell Mk 41 Vertical Launching System (VLS)
  • Flight IIA: 96 cell Mk 41 VLS
  • Tomahawk cruise missile
  • RIM-66M Standard medium range SAM (has an ASuW mode)[5]
  • RIM-161 Standard Ballistic missile defense missile for Aegis BMD (15 ships {{as of|2009|3|lc=on}}[6])
  • RIM-162 ESSM (4 per cell) SAM (DDG-79 onward)
  • RUM-139 Vertical Launch ASROC
  • RIM-174A Standard ERAM added in 2011
  • 2 × Mk 141 Harpoon Missile Launcher SSM (not in Flight IIA units)[8]
  • Guns:
    • DDG-51 to 80: 1 × 5-inch (127 mm)/54 Mk-45 Mod 1/2 (lightweight gun)
    • DDG-81 onwards: 1 × 5-inch (127 mm)/62 Mk-45 mod 4 (lightweight gun)
    • DDG-51 to -84: 2 × 20 mm Phalanx CIWS
    • DDG-85 onwards: 1 × 20 mm Phalanx CIWS
    • 2 × 25 mm M242 Bushmaster cannons
  • Torpedoes:
    • 2 × Mark 32 triple torpedo tubes (six Mk-46 or Mk-50 torpedoes, Mk-54 in the near future)
 Ship armor = Ship aircraft = *Flights I and II: None
  • Flight IIA onwards: up to two MH-60R Seahawk LAMPS III helicopters
 Ship aircraft facilities = *Flights I and II: Flight deck only, but LAMPS III electronics installed on landing deck for coordinated DDG-51/helo ASW operations
  • Flight IIA onwards: Flight deck and enclosed hangars for two MH-60R LAMPS III helicopters
 Ship notes =
}}

The Arleigh Burke class of guided missile destroyers (DDGs) is the United States Navy's first class of destroyer built around the Aegis Combat System and the SPY-1D multifunction passive electronically scanned array radar. The class is named for Admiral Arleigh Burke, an American destroyer officer in World War II, and later Chief of Naval Operations. The class leader, {{USS|Arleigh Burke}}, was commissioned during Admiral Burke's lifetime.

These warships were designed as multimission destroyers,[4] able to fulfill the strategic land strike role with Tomahawk missiles; antiaircraft warfare (AAW) role with powerful Aegis radar and surface-to-air missiles; antisubmarine warfare (ASW), with towed sonar array, anti-submarine rockets, and ASW helicopter; and antisurface warfare (ASuW) with Harpoon missile launcher. With upgrades to their AN/SPY-1 phased radar systems and their associated missile payloads as part of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System, the ships of this class have also begun to demonstrate some promise as mobile antiballistic missile and anti-satellite weaponry platforms. Some versions of the class no longer have the towed sonar, or Harpoon missile launcher. Their hull and superstructure were designed to have a reduced radar cross-section.[9]

The first ship of the class was commissioned on 4 July 1991. With the decommissioning of the last {{sclass-|Spruance|destroyer|2}}, {{USS|Cushing|DD-985|6}}, on 21 September 2005, the Arleigh Burke-class ships became the U.S. Navy's only active destroyers, until the {{sclass-|Zumwalt|destroyer|4}} became active in 2016. The Arleigh Burke class has the longest production run for any post-World War II U.S. Navy surface combatant.[10] Besides the 62 vessels of this class (comprising 21 of Flight I, 7 of Flight II and 34 of Flight IIA) in service by 2016, up to a further 42 (of Flight III) have been envisioned.

With an overall length of {{convert|505|to|509|ft|m}}, displacement ranging from 8,315 to 9,200 tons, and weaponry including over 90 missiles, the Arleigh Burke class are larger and more heavily armed than most previous ships classified as guided missile cruisers.[11]

Characteristics

The ships of the Arleigh Burke class are among the largest destroyers built in the United States. Only the {{sclass-|Spruance|destroyer|5}}, {{sclass-|Kidd|destroyer|5}} ({{convert|563|ft|m|disp=or|abbr=on}}) and {{sclass-|Zumwalt|destroyer|5}} classes ({{convert|600|ft|m|disp=or|abbr=on}}) are longer. The larger {{sclass-|Ticonderoga|cruiser|0}} ships were constructed on Spruance-class hull forms, but are designated as cruisers due to their radically different mission and weapons systems than the Spruance and Kidd-class destroyers. The Arleigh Burke class were designed with a new, large, water-plane area-hull form characterized by a wide flaring bow which significantly improves sea-keeping ability. The hull form is designed to permit high speed in high sea states.[9]

The designers of Arleigh Burke incorporated lessons learned from the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruisers, which were deemed too expensive to continue building and too difficult to further upgrade. With the Arleigh Burke class, the U.S. Navy also returned to all-steel construction. An earlier generation had combined a steel hull with an innovative superstructure made of lighter aluminum to reduce top weight, but the lighter metal proved vulnerable to cracking. Aluminum is also less fire-resistant than steel;[12] a 1975 fire aboard {{USS|Belknap|CG-26|6}} gutted her aluminum superstructure.[13] Battle damage to Royal Navy ships exacerbated by their aluminum superstructures during the 1982 Falklands War supported the decision to use steel. Another lesson from the Falklands War[14] led the navy to protect the ship's vital spaces with double-spaced steel armor (creating a buffer against modern rockets) and kevlar spall liners.

The Arleigh Burke design incorporates stealth techniques, such as the angled rather than traditional vertical surfaces and the tripod mainmast,[15][16] which make the ship more difficult to detect, in particular by antiship missiles. A Collective Protection System makes the Arleigh Burke class the first U.S. warships designed with an air-filtration system against nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare.[21] Other NBC defenses include a "countermeasure wash down system".[17]

Their Aegis Combat System differs from a traditional rotating radar that mechanically rotates 360 degrees for each sweep scan of the airspace. Instead, Aegis uses a passive electronically scanned array, which allows continual tracking of targets simultaneous with area scans. The system's computer control also allows centralization of the previously separate tracking and targeting functions. The system is also resistant to electronic countermeasures. Their stand-alone Harpoon antiship missile launchers give them an antiship capability with a range in excess of {{convert|64|nmi|lk=in}}.[9]

With the retirement of the Tomahawk antiship missile variant, only the Arleigh Burke-class ships before Flight IIA versions are well-equipped for antisurface warfare with Harpoon launchers. Others are not, but are loaded with SM-2 missiles in their vertical launch cells capable of an antiship mode, though they have limited range and damage potential.[18]

"The 127 mm 5-inch/54 caliber Mark 45 gun, in conjunction with the Mark 34 Gun Weapon System, is an antiship weapon which can also be used for close-in air contacts or to support forces ashore with Naval gunfire support (NGFS), with a range of up to {{convert|20|mi|km}} and capable of firing 20 rounds per minute." The class's RIM-7 Sea Sparrow/RIM-162 ESSM missiles provide point defense against missiles and aircraft while the Standard Missile SM-2 and SM-6 provide area antiaircraft defense; the SM-6 provides over-the-horizon missile defense.[19][20] The Standard Missile 3 and 6 also provide Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD).[20]

The ship has an electronics warfare suite that provides passive detection and decoy countermeasures.[9] The class's Light Airborne Multi-Purpose System (LAMPS) helicopter system improves the ship's capabilities against submarines and surface ships, a helicopter able to serve as a platform to monitor submarines and surface ships, and launch torpedoes and missiles against them, as well as being able to provide fire support during insertions/extractions with machine guns and Hellfire antiarmor guided missiles.[21] The helicopters also serve in a utility role, able to perform ship replenishment, search and rescue, medical evacuation, communications relay, and naval gunfire spotting and controlling.

The Arleigh Burke class is a set of multimission ships with numerous combat systems, including a "combination of... an advanced antisubmarine warfare system (ASW), land attack cruise missiles, ship-to-ship missiles, and advanced antiaircraft missiles,"[14] Burkes have the Navy's latest antisubmarine combat system with active sonar, a towed sonar array, and antisubmarine rockets. They support strategic land strikes with their VLS launched Tomahawks.[9] They are able to detect antiship mines at a range of about 1400 meters.[22]

So vital has the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMD) role of the class become that all ships of the class are being updated with BMD capability.[23] Burke production is being restarted in place of additional {{sclass-|Zumwalt|destroyer|2}}s.[34]

Development

In 1980, the U.S. Navy initiated design studies with seven contractors. By 1983 the number of competitors had been reduced to three: Bath Iron Works, Todd Shipyards, and Ingalls Shipbuilding.[24] On 3 April 1985 Bath Iron Works received a US$321.9 million contract to build the first of class, {{USS|Arleigh Burke|DDG-51|6}}.[25] Gibbs & Cox was awarded the contract to be the lead ship design agent.[26] The total cost of the first ship was put at US$1.1 billion, the other US$778 million being for the ship's weapons systems.[25] She was laid down by the Bath Iron Works at Bath, Maine, on 6 December 1988, and launched on 16 September 1989 by Mrs. Arleigh Burke. The Admiral himself was present at her commissioning ceremony on 4 July 1991, held on the waterfront in downtown Norfolk, Virginia.

The "Flight II Arleigh Burke" ships have the following improvement over the original Flight I: incorporation of combat direction finding, SLQ-32V-3, TADIX-B, JTIDS command and control processor, and the capability to launch and control SM-2 Block IV Extended Range Missile.[27]

The "Flight IIA Arleigh Burke" ships have several new features, beginning with {{USS|Oscar Austin|DDG-79}}. Among the changes is the addition of two hangars for antisubmarine warfare (ASW) helicopters, and a new, longer 5-inch/62-caliber (127 mm) Mark 45 Mod 4 naval gun (installed onto {{USS|Winston S. Churchill|DDG-81}} and later ships). Later Flight IIA ships starting with {{USS|Mustin|DDG-89}} have a modified funnel design that buries the funnels within the superstructure as a signature-reduction measure. TACTAS towed array sonar was omitted from Flight IIA ships and they also lack Harpoon missile launchers.[40]

Ships from DDG-68 to DDG-84 have AN/SLQ-32 antennas that resemble V3 configuration similar to those deployed on {{sclass-|Ticonderoga|cruiser}}, while the remainder has V2 variants externally resembling those deployed on some {{sclass-|Oliver Hazard Perry|frigate}}. V3 has an active electronic countermeasures component while V2 is passive only. AN/SLQ-32 is being upgraded under the Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), the first SEWIP Block 2 upgrades were installed in 2014 with full-rate production scheduled for mid-2015.[28]

A number of Flight IIA ships were constructed without a Phalanx CIWS because of the planned Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile, but later the Navy decided to retrofit all IIA ships to carry at least one Phalanx CIWS by 2013.[29] In March 2017, it was reported that the Navy plans to incorporate Seasaber Increment 1, a 60 kW-class laser weapon, into an unnamed Flight IIA destroyer by the fiscal year of 2020.[30]

{{USS|Pinckney|DDG-91|6}}, {{USS|Momsen|DDG-92|6}}, {{USS|Chung-Hoon|DDG-93|6}}, {{USS|Nitze|DDG-94|6}}, {{USS|James E. Williams|DDG-95|6}} and {{USS|Bainbridge|DDG-96|6}}[31] have superstructure differences to accommodate the Remote Mine-hunting System (RMS). Mk 32 torpedo tubes were moved to the missile deck from amidships as well.

Modernization

In an effort to address congressional concerns over the retirement of the {{sclass-|Iowa|battleship}}, the Navy began a modernization program for the Arleigh Burkes aimed at improving their gun systems. This modernization was to include an extension of the range of the {{convert|5|in|mm|adj=on|0}} guns on the flight I Arleigh Burke-class destroyers (USS Arleigh Burke to {{USS|Ross|DDG-71|6}}) with extended range guided munitions (ERGMs) that would have given the guns a range of {{convert|40|nmi|km}}.[32][33][34] However, the ERGM was cancelled in 2008.[35]

The modernization program is designed to provide a comprehensive mid-life upgrade to ensure that the class remains effective. Reduced manning, increased mission effectiveness, and a reduced total cost including construction, maintenance, and operation are the goals of the modernization program. Modernization technologies will be integrated during new construction of DDG-111 and 112, then retrofitted into DDG flight I and II ships during in-service overhaul periods.[36] The first phase will update the hull, mechanical, and electrical systems while the second phase will introduce an open architecture computing environment (OACE). The result will be improved capability in both ballistic missile defense (BMD) and littoral combat.[37][38] By 2018, all Arleigh Burke-class ships homeported in the Western Pacific will have upgraded ASW systems, including the new AN/SQR-20, renamed the TB-37/U, Multi-Function Towed Array (MFTA) sonar systems.[39][40]

The Navy is also upgrading the ships' ability to process data. Beginning with USS Spruance (DDG-111), the Navy is installing an internet protocol (IP) based data backbone, which enhances the ship's ability to handle video. Spruance is the first destroyer to be fitted with the Boeing Company's gigabit Ethernet data multiplex system (GEDMS).[41]

In July 2010, BAE Systems announced that they had been awarded a contract to modernize 11 ships.[42] In May 2014, Sam LaGrone reported that 21 of the 28 Flight I/II Arleigh Burke-class ships would not receive a mid-life upgrade that included electronics and Aegis Baseline 9 software for SM-6 compatibility, instead they would retain the basic BMD 3.6.1 software in a $170 million upgrade concentrating on mechanical systems and on some ships, their antisubmarine suite.[43] Seven Flight I ships – DDG 51–53, 57, 61, 65, 69 – will get the full US$270m Baseline 9 upgrade.[43] Deputy of surface warfare Dave McFarland said that this change was due to the budget cuts in the Budget Control Act of 2011.[44]

In 2016, the Navy announced they would begin the outfitting of 34 Flight IIA Arleigh Burke vessels with a hybrid-electric drive (HED) to lower fuel costs. While the four LM-2500 gas turbines of the Arleigh Burkes are most efficient at high speeds, an electric motor is to be attached to the main reduction gear to turn the drive shaft to propel the ship at speeds under {{convert|13|kn|km/h}}, such as during ballistic missile defense or maritime security operations. Use of the HED for half the time could extend time on station by 2.5 days before refueling.[45] In March 2018, the Navy announced the HED would complete installation onto {{USS|Truxtun|DDG-103}} but upgrades of further destroyers would be halted. Budget priorities and design issues caused the move, and Truxtun will be used to test the technology and see if it can be improved.[46]

Also in 2016, four destroyers patrolling with the U.S. 6th Fleet based in Naval Station Rota, Spain ({{USS|Porter|DDG-78|6}}, {{USS|Carney|DDG-64|6}}, USS Ross, {{USS|Donald Cook|DDG-75|6}}) received self-protection upgrades, replacing a Phalanx CIWS with the SeaRAM close-range ship defense system combining the Phalanx sensor dome with an 11-cell missile launcher. This was the first time the system was paired with an Aegis ship.[47]

In February 2018, Lockheed Martin received a contract to deliver their High Energy Laser and Integrated Optical-dazzler with Surveillance (HELIOS) system for installation onto an Arleigh Burke destroyer. The laser can generate 60–150 kW of power to "dazzle" or destroy small boats and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). It is the first time a laser will be mounted on a U.S. Navy ship since the XN-1 LaWS was mounted on {{USS|Ponce|LPD-15|6}} in 2014 and the first time a laser weapon will be put on a warship. The HELIOS is to be delivered in 2020.[48][49]

Production restarted and further development

The class was scheduled to be replaced by {{sclass-|Zumwalt|destroyer|2}}s beginning in 2020,[50] but an increasing threat from both long- and short-range missiles caused the Navy to restart production of the Arleigh Burke class and consider placing littoral combat mission modules on the new ships.[51][52]

In April 2009, the Navy announced a plan that limited the Zumwalt class to three units while ordering another three Arleigh Burke-class ships from both Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding.[53] In December 2009 Northrop Grumman received a $170.7 million letter contract for DDG-113 long-lead-time materials.[54] Shipbuilding contracts for DDG-113 to DDG-115 were awarded in mid-2011 for US$679.6m–$783.6m;[55] these do not include government-furnished equipment such as weapons and sensors which will take the average cost of the FY2011/12 ships to US$1.843b per vessel.[56]

DDG-113 to DDG-115 will be "restart" ships, similar to previous Flight IIA ships, but including modernization features such as Open Architecture Computing Environment. DDG-116 to DDG-121 will be "Technology Insertion" ships with elements of Flight III.[57] Flight III proper will begin with the third ship procured in 2016.[58]

Flight III ships, construction starting in FY2016 in place of the canceled CG(X) program, have various design improvements including radar antennas of mid-diameter increased to {{convert|14|ft|m}} from the previous {{convert|12|ft|m}}.[59] These Air and Missile Defense Radars (AMDR) use digital beamforming, instead of the earlier passive electronically scanned array radars.[60]

Costs for the Flight III ships increased rapidly as expectations and requirements for the program have grown. In particular, this was due to the changing requirements needed to carry the proposed Air and Missile Defense Radar system required for the ships' ballistic missile defense role.[61] The Government Accountability Office found that the design of the Flight IIIs was based on "a significantly reduced threat environment from other Navy analyses" and that the new ships would be "at best marginally effective". The U.S. Navy disagrees with the GAO findings, claiming the DDG-51 hull is "absolutely" capable of fitting a large enough radar to meet requirements. Installation of the AMDR would require double the power and double the cooling, but there is room to fit what is needed inside the hull.[62]

In spite of the production restart, the U.S. Navy is expected to fall short of its requirement for 94 destroyer or cruiser platforms capable of missile defense starting in FY 2025 and continuing past the end of the 30-year planning window. While this is a new requirement as of 2011, and the U.S. Navy has never had so many large missile-armed surface combatants, the relative success of the Aegis ballistic missile defense system has shifted this national security requirement onto the U.S. Navy. The shortfall will arise as older platforms that have been refitted to be missile-defense-capable (particularly the cruisers) are retired in bulk before new destroyers are planned to be built.[63]

The U.S. Navy was considering extending the acquisition of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers into the 2040s, according to revised procurement tables sent to Congress, with the procurement of Flight IV ships from 2032 through 2041.[64] This was canceled to cover the cost of the Ohio Replacement Submarine, with the air defense commander role retained on one cruiser per carrier battle group.[65]

Future replacement

USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112) was originally intended to be the last of the Arleigh Burke class. However, with reduction of the Zumwalt-class production, the U.S. Navy requested new DDG-51-class ships.[66] Long-lead materials contracts were awarded to Northrop Grumman in December 2009 for DDG-113 and in April 2010 for DDG-114.[67] General Dynamics received a long-lead materials contract for DDG-115 in February 2010.[68][69] It was anticipated that in FY2012 or FY2013, the U.S. Navy will commence detailed work for a Flight III design and request 24 ships to be built from 2016 to 2031.[70] In May 2013, a total of 76 Arleigh Burke-class ships were planned.[71] The Flight III variant is in the design phase {{as of|2013|lc=on}}. In June 2013, the U.S. Navy awarded $6.2 billion in destroyer contracts.[72] Up to 42 Flight III ships may be procured by the U.S. Navy with the first ship entering service in 2023.[73]

Future Surface Combatant

In April 2014 the U.S. Navy began the early stages of developing a new destroyer to replace the Arleigh Burke class called the "Future Surface Combatant". The new class is expected to enter service in the early 2030s and initially serve alongside the 22 Flight III DDGs. No hull design or shape has been speculated yet, although the destroyer class will incorporate emerging technologies like lasers, on-board power-generation systems, increased automation, and next-generation weapons, sensors, and electronics. They will leverage technologies in use on other platforms such as the Zumwalt-class destroyer, Littoral Combat Ship, and {{sclass-|Gerald R. Ford|aircraft carrier}}.[74]

The Future Surface Combatant may place importance on the Zumwalt-class destroyer's electric drive system that propels the ship while generating 58 megawatts of on-board electrical power, levels required to operate future directed energy weapons. Laser weapon systems are likely to become more prominent to engage threats without using missiles that could potentially cost more than the target it is engaging. Less costly weapon systems may help keep the destroyer class from becoming too expensive. Initial requirements for the Future Surface Combatant will emphasize lethality and survivability, as well as being able to continue to protect aircraft carriers. The ships also have to be modular to allow for inexpensive upgrades of weaponry, electronics, computing, and sensors over time as threats evolve.[74]

Operational history

In October 2011 it was announced that four Arleigh Burke-class destroyers would be forward-deployed in Europe to support the NATO missile defence system. The ships, to be based at Naval Station Rota, Spain, were named in February 2012, as Ross, Donald Cook, Porter, and Carney.[75] By reducing travel times to station, this forward deployment will allow for six other destroyers to be shifted from the Atlantic in support of the Pivot to East Asia.[76] Russia has threatened to quit the New START treaty over this deployment, calling it a threat to their nuclear deterrent.[77] In 2018, however, Chief of Naval Operations ADM John Richardson criticized the policy of keeping six highly mobile BMD platforms "in a little tiny box, defending land," a role which he believed could be performed equally well at less cost by shore-based systems.[78]

Accidents & Incidents

USS Cole bombing

Arleigh Burke-class destroyer {{USS|Cole|DDG-67|6}} was damaged on 12 October 2000 in Aden, Yemen while docked, by an attack in which an apparently shaped charge of 200–300 kg in a boat was placed against the hull and detonated by suicide bombers, killing 17 crew members. The ship was repaired, and returned to duty in 2001.

USS Porter and MV Otowasan collision

On August 12th 2012, Porter collided with the oil tanker MV Otowasan near the Strait of Hormuz. Though there were no injuires on either ships, the US Navy removed the Porter{{'}}s commanding officer from duty. Repairs took two months at a cost of $700,000.

USS Fitzgerald and MV ACX Crystal collision

On June 17th 2017, Fitzgerald collided with the MV ACX Crystal cargo ship near Yokosuka Japan. In the aftermath, seven sailors had drowned and close to a dozen sailors were given non-judicial punishment for loss of situational awareness. In addition, the ship's commanding officer, executive officer and Chief Petty Officer were relieved of their duties. Repairs are expected to be complete by summer of 2019.

USS John S. McCain and Alnic MC collision

On 21 August 2017, John S. McCain collided with the container ship Alnic MC. The collision killed 10 sailors whose bodies were all recovered by 27 August. The cause of the collision was determined to be poor communication between the two ships and the bridge crew lacking situational awareness. In the aftermath, the ship's top leadership including the commanding officer, executive officer and Chief Petty Officer were removed from command. In addition top leadership of the US Seventh Fleet including the commander, Vice Admiral Joseph Aucoin, were relieved of their duties due to loss of confidence in their ability to command. Other commanders who were relieved included Rear Admiral Charles Williams, commander of the Task Force 70 and Captain Jeffrey Bennett, commodore of Destroyer Squadron 15. This was the third incident involving a US Navy ship in 2017 with an estimated repair cost of $230 million dollars.{{cn|date=February 2019}}

Contractors

  • Builders: 34 units constructed by General Dynamics, Bath Iron Works Division, and 28 by Huntington Ingalls Industries (formerly Northrop Grumman Ship Systems), Ingalls Shipbuilding
  • AN/SPY-1 radar and combat system integrator: Lockheed Martin

Ships in class

>
NameHull no.BuilderLaid downLaunchedCommissionedHome portStatus
Flight I
Arleigh Burke|DDG-51|2}}DDG-51Bath Iron Works6 December 198816 September 19894 July 1991Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Barry|DDG-52|2}}DDG-52Ingalls Shipbuilding26 February 19908 June 199112 December 1992Yokosuka, JapanActive
John Paul Jones|DDG-53|2}}DDG-53Bath Iron Works8 August 199026 October 199118 December 1993Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
Curtis Wilbur|DDG-54|2}}DDG-54Bath Iron Works12 March 199116 May 199219 March 1994Yokosuka, JapanActive
Stout|DDG-55|2}}DDG-55Ingalls Shipbuilding8 August 199116 October 199213 August 1994Norfolk, VirginiaActive
John S. McCain|DDG-56|2}}DDG-56Bath Iron Works3 September 199126 September 19922 July 1994Yokosuka, JapanActive
Mitscher|DDG-57|2}}DDG-57Ingalls Shipbuilding12 February 19927 May 199310 December 1994Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Laboon|DDG-58|2}}DDG-58Bath Iron Works23 March 199220 February 199318 March 1995Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Russell|DDG-59|2}}DDG-59Ingalls Shipbuilding24 July 199220 October 199320 May 1995San Diego, CaliforniaActive
Paul Hamilton|DDG-60|2}}DDG-60Bath Iron Works24 August 199224 July 199327 May 1995San Diego, CaliforniaActive
Ramage|DDG-61|2}}DDG-61Ingalls Shipbuilding4 January 199311 February 199422 July 1995Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Fitzgerald|DDG-62|2}}DDG-62Bath Iron Works9 February 199329 January 199414 October 1995Pascagoula, MississippiActive
Stethem|DDG-63|2}}DDG-63Ingalls Shipbuilding11 May 199317 July 199421 October 1995Yokosuka, JapanActive
Carney|DDG-64|2}}DDG-64Bath Iron Works8 August 199323 July 199413 April 1996Rota, SpainActive
Benfold|DDG-65|2}}DDG-65Ingalls Shipbuilding27 September 19939 November 199430 March 1996Yokosuka, JapanActive
Gonzalez|DDG-66|2}}DDG-66Bath Iron Works3 February 199418 February 199512 October 1996Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Cole|DDG-67|2}}DDG-67Ingalls Shipbuilding28 February 199410 February 19958 June 1996Norfolk, VirginiaActive
The Sullivans|DDG-68|2}}DDG-68Bath Iron Works27 July 199412 August 199519 April 1997Mayport, FloridaActive
Milius|DDG-69|2}}DDG-69Ingalls Shipbuilding8 August 19941 August 199523 November 1996Yokosuka, Japan[79]Active
Hopper|DDG-70|2}}DDG-70Bath Iron Works23 February 19956 January 19966 September 1997Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
Ross|DDG-71|2}}DDG-71Ingalls Shipbuilding10 April 199522 March 199628 June 1997Rota, SpainActive
Flight II
MahanDDG-72Bath Iron Works17 August 199529 June 199614 February 1998Norfolk, VirginiaActive
DecaturDDG-73Bath Iron Works11 January 199610 November 199629 August 1998San Diego, CaliforniaActive
McFaulDDG-74Ingalls Shipbuilding26 January 199618 January 199725 April 1998Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Donald CookDDG-75Bath Iron Works9 July 19963 May 19974 December 1998Rota, SpainActive
HigginsDDG-76Bath Iron Works14 November 19964 October 199724 April 1999San Diego, CaliforniaActive
O'KaneDDG-77Bath Iron Works8 May 199728 March 199823 October 1999San Diego, CaliforniaActive
PorterDDG-78Ingalls Shipbuilding2 December 199612 November 199720 March 1999Rota, SpainActive
Flight IIA: 5"/54 variant
Oscar AustinDDG-79Bath Iron Works9 October 19977 November 199819 August 2000Norfolk, VirginiaActive
RooseveltDDG-80Ingalls Shipbuilding15 December 199710 January 199914 October 2000Mayport, FloridaActive
Flight IIA: 5"/62 variant
Winston S. ChurchillDDG-81Bath Iron Works7 May 199817 April 199910 March 2001Norfolk, VirginiaActive
LassenDDG-82Ingalls Shipbuilding24 August 199816 October 199921 April 2001Mayport, FloridaActive
HowardDDG-83Bath Iron Works9 December 199820 November 199920 October 2001San Diego, CaliforniaActive
BulkeleyDDG-84Ingalls Shipbuilding10 May 199921 June 20008 December 2001Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Flight IIA: 5"/62, one 20mm CIWS variant[29]
McCampbellDDG-85Bath Iron Works15 July 19992 July 200017 August 2002Yokosuka, JapanActive
ShoupDDG-86Ingalls Shipbuilding13 December 199922 November 200022 June 2002Everett, WashingtonActive
MasonDDG-87Bath Iron Works19 January 200023 June 200112 April 2003Norfolk, VirginiaActive
PrebleDDG-88Ingalls Shipbuilding22 June 20001 June 20019 November 2002Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
MustinDDG-89Ingalls Shipbuilding15 January 200112 December 200126 July 2003Yokosuka, JapanActive
ChafeeDDG-90Bath Iron Works12 April 20012 November 200218 October 2003Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
PinckneyDDG-91Ingalls Shipbuilding16 July 200126 June 200229 May 2004San Diego, CaliforniaActive
MomsenDDG-92Bath Iron Works16 November 200119 July 200328 August 2004Everett, WashingtonActive
Chung-HoonDDG-93Ingalls Shipbuilding14 January 200215 December 200218 September 2004Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
NitzeDDG-94Bath Iron Works20 September 20023 April 20045 March 2005Norfolk, VirginiaActive
James E. WilliamsDDG-95Ingalls Shipbuilding15 July 200225 June 200311 December 2004Norfolk, VirginiaActive
BainbridgeDDG-96Bath Iron Works7 May 200313 November 200412 November 2005Norfolk, VirginiaActive
HalseyDDG-97Ingalls Shipbuilding13 January 20029 January 200430 July 2005Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
Forrest ShermanDDG-98Ingalls Shipbuilding7 August 20032 October 200428 January 2006Norfolk, VirginiaActive
FarragutDDG-99Bath Iron Works9 January 200423 July 200510 June 2006Mayport, FloridaActive
KiddDDG-100Ingalls Shipbuilding29 April 200422 January 20059 June 2007Everett, WashingtonActive
GridleyDDG-101Bath Iron Works30 July 200428 December 200510 February 2007Everett, WashingtonActive
SampsonDDG-102Bath Iron Works20 March 200516 September 20063 November 2007Everett, WashingtonActive
TruxtunDDG-103Ingalls Shipbuilding11 April 20052 June 200725 April 2009Norfolk, VirginiaActive
SterettDDG-104Bath Iron Works17 November 200519 May 20079 August 2008San Diego, CaliforniaActive
DeweyDDG-105Ingalls Shipbuilding4 October 200626 January 20086 March 2010San Diego, CaliforniaActive
StockdaleDDG-106Bath Iron Works10 August 200610 May 200818 April 2009San Diego, CaliforniaActive
GravelyDDG-107Ingalls Shipbuilding26 November 200730 March 200920 November 2010Norfolk, VirginiaActive
Wayne E. Meyer|DDG-108|2}}DDG-108Bath Iron Works18 May 200718 October 200810 October 2009Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
Jason Dunham|DDG-109|2}}DDG-109Bath Iron Works11 April 20081 August 200913 November 2010Norfolk, VirginiaActive
William P. Lawrence|DDG-110|2}}DDG-110Ingalls Shipbuilding16 September 200815 December 20094 June 2011Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
Spruance|DDG-111|2}}DDG-111Bath Iron Works14 May 20096 June 20101 October 2011San Diego, CaliforniaActive
Michael Murphy|DDG-112|2}}DDG-112Bath Iron Works18 June 20107 May 20116 October 2012Pearl Harbor, HawaiiActive
Flight IIA: Restart
John Finn|DDG-113|2}}DDG-113Ingalls Shipbuilding5 November 201328 March 2015[80]15 July 2017San Diego, CaliforniaActive
Ralph Johnson|DDG-114|2}}DDG-114Ingalls Shipbuilding12 September 201412 December 201524 March 2018[81]Everett, Washington[82]Active
Rafael Peralta|DDG-115|2}}DDG-115Bath Iron Works30 October 20141 November 2015[83]29 July 2017[84]San Diego, CaliforniaActive
Flight IIA: Technology Insertion
Thomas Hudner|DDG-116|2}}DDG-116Bath Iron Works16 November 201523 April 20171 December 2018[85]Naval Station Mayport[86]Active[85]
Paul Ignatius|DDG-117|2}}DDG-117Ingalls Shipbuilding20 October 201512 November 201627 July 2019Naval Station Mayport[87]Launched[88]
Daniel Inouye|DDG-118|2}}DDG-118Bath Iron Works14 May 2018[106]2020 (estimated)[89]Keel laid[90]
Delbert D. Black|DDG-119|2}}DDG-119Ingalls Shipbuilding1 June 20168 September 2017[91]2019 (scheduled)[92]Launched
Carl M. Levin|DDG-120|2}}[93]DDG-120Bath Iron Works1 February 20192020 (estimated)[89]Keel laid
Frank E. Petersen Jr.|DDG-121|2}}[94]DDG-121Ingalls Shipbuilding21 February 201713 July 20182019 (scheduled)[95]Launched[96]
John Basilone|DDG-122|2}}[97]DDG-122Bath Iron Works2020 (estimated)[89]Contract awarded (MYP)
Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee|DDG-123|2}}[98]DDG-123Ingalls Shipbuilding14 November 20172024 (estimated)[89]Keel laid[99]
Harvey C. Barnum Jr.|DDG-124|2}}[93]DDG-124Bath Iron Works2024 (estimated)[89]Contract awarded (MYP)
Flight III
Jack H. Lucas|DDG-125|2}}[100]DDG-125Ingalls ShipbuildingContract awarded (MYP)
Louis H. Wilson Jr.|DDG-126|2}}[100]DDG-126Bath Iron WorksContract awarded (MYP)
Flight IIA TI (DDG-127 only){{ref|ship|A
Patrick Gallagher|DDG-127|2}}[101]DDG-127Bath Iron WorksContract awarded (MYP)
Flight III (con't)
Ted Stevens|DDG-128|2}}[102]DDG-128Ingalls ShipbuildingApproved for construction
Jeremiah Denton|DDG-129|2}}[103]DDG-129Ingalls ShipbuildingApproved for construction
William Charette|DDG-130|2}}[104]DDG-130Bath Iron WorksApproved for construction
George M. Neal|DDG-131|2}}[105]DDG-131Ingalls ShipbuildingApproved for construction
UnnamedDDG-132Approved for construction
UnnamedDDG-133Approved for construction
UnnamedDDG-134Approved for construction[106]
UnnamedDDG-135Approved for construction[107]
UnnamedDDG-136Approved for construction[108]
UnnamedDDG-137Approved for construction[109]
UnnamedDDG-138Approved for construction[110]
DDG-134
DDG-145
DDG-136
DDG-137
DDG-138
NameHull no.BuilderLaid downLaunchedCommissionedHome portStatus
{{Refbegin}}{{note label|ship|A||The DDG-127 contract was awarded separately at a later date. Though two ships preceding her, DDG-125 & DDG-126 had begun the Flight III series, DDG-127 was designated as a Flight IIA Technology Insertion build.[111] The Flight III series continued with DDG-128.}}{{Refend}}

In popular culture

  • Several Arleigh Burke class destroyers are featured in the 2012 film Battleship, including {{USS|John Paul Jones|DDG-53}}, {{USS|Hopper|DDG-70}}, and {{USS|Sampson|DDG-102}}.
  • The book and television series The Last Ship is set on the fictional {{USS|Nathan James||}}. Its hull designation in the book is DDG-80, but was changed to DDG-151 for the television series, presumably to minimize confusion with the real-life {{USS|Roosevelt|DDG-80}}, which did not exist when the book was written. {{USS|Halsey|DDG-97}}, a real Flight IIA Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, stood in for Nathan James during filming.[112] In the television series, three additional Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, Shackleton (DDG-162), Hayward (DDG-157) and Howard Oliver also feature in the series as ships of the US Navy.

See also

{{Portal|United States Navy}}
  • List of naval ship classes in service
{{Div col|colwidth=30em}}
  • {{sclass-|Hobart|destroyer}}; Australian
  • Type 052D destroyer; Chinese
  • Type 055 destroyer; Chinese
  • Horizon-class frigate; Destroyer French/ Italian
  • {{sclass-|Kolkata|destroyer}}; Indian
  • {{sclass-|Visakhapatnam|destroyer}}; Indian
  • {{sclass-|Atago|destroyer}}; Japanese
  • {{sclass-|Kongō|destroyer}}; Japanese
  • {{sclass-|Maya|destroyer}}; Japanese
  • Sovremennyy class destroyer; Russian
  • {{sclass-|Sejong the Great|destroyer}}; South Korean
  • {{sclass-|Kee Lung|destroyer}}; Taiwanese
  • Type 45 (Daring-class) destroyer; United Kingdom
  • United States ship naming conventions
{{div col end}}

Notes

1. ^{{cite web |url=https://news.usni.org/2018/07/11/report-congress-u-s-navy-destroyer-programs-4 |title=Report to Congress on U.S. Navy Destroyer Programs |publisher= usni.org |date=11 July 2018 |accessdate= 21 August 2018}}
2. ^{{cite web|url=http://opencrs.com/document/RL32109/2010-02-26/?24684 |title=Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress |date=26 February 2010 |publisher=Congressional Research Service Reports for the People (Open CRS) |accessdate=15 April 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100423160951/http://opencrs.com/document/RL32109/2010-02-26/?24684 |archivedate=23 April 2010 |deadurl=yes }}
3. ^{{cite web|title=LM2500 Gas Turbine Engine|url=https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/eng/lm2500.htm|publisher=FAS Military Analysis Network|accessdate=7 December 2016}}
4. ^1 2 {{cite web |url=http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/pages/Destroyer.aspx |title=US Navy Ship – Destroyer |publisher=United States Navy |date= |accessdate=16 June 2014}}
5. ^Missile Defense Agency Fact sheet (03/2007) {{cite web |url=http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/pdf/aegis.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2010-12-28 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091014072238/http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/pdf/aegis.pdf |archivedate=14 October 2009 |df=dmy-all }}
6. ^{{cite book |title=pamphlet 09-MDA-4298 (4 MAR 09)}}
7. ^Missile Defense Agency Fact sheet (03/2007)  
8. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/ddg-51-flt2a.htm|title=DDG-51 Arleigh Burke – Flight IIA|first=John |last=Pike|website=globalsecurity.org|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
9. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web |url=https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/ddg-51.htm |title=DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class |website=fas.org |accessdate=1 August 2015}}
10. ^After 2-plus decades, Navy destroyer breaks record{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
11. ^"Northrop Grumman-Built William P. Lawrence Christened; Legacy of Former POW Honored". Northrop Grumman, 17 April 2010.
12. ^{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/11/us/navy-reverting-to-steel-in-shipbuilding-after-cracks-in-aluminum.html |title=Navy Reverting To Steel In Shipbuilding After Cracks In Aluminum |newspaper=The New York Times |agency=Associated Press |date=11 August 1987}}
13. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.hazegray.org/faq/smn6.htm#F7 |title=Section F.7: Aluminum in warship construction |website=hazegray.org |date=30 March 2000}}
14. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/docs/ArleighB.htm|title=The Arleigh Burke: Linchpin of the Navy|website=fas.org|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
15. ^Gardiner and Chumbley 1995, p. 592
16. ^Baker 1998, p. 1020
17. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dvidshub.net/image/1024607/countermeasure-washdown-system-test|title=DVIDS – Images – Countermeasure washdown system test|work=DVIDS|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
18. ^{{cite web |url=http://news.usni.org/2013/06/06/u-s-navys-next-bid-for-ship-to-ship-combat |title=U.S. Navy’s Next Bid for Ship to Ship Combat |website=usni.org |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=6 June 2013 |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
19. ^{{cite web |url=https://news.usni.org/2016/03/07/navy-sinks-former-frigate-uss-reuben-james-in-test-of-new-supersonic-anti-surface-missile |title=Navy Sinks Former Frigate USS Reuben James in Test of New Supersonic Anti-Surface Missile |last=LaGrone |first=Sam |website=usni.org |date=7 March 2016 |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
20. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://breakingdefense.com/2015/08/sm-6-can-now-kill-both-cruise-and-ballistic-missiles/ |title=SM-6 Can Now Kill Both Cruise and Ballistic Missiles |last=Freedburg |first=Sydney J. |website=breakingdefense.com |date=4 August 2015 |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
21. ^{{cite web|url=https://fas.org/programs/ssp/man/uswpns/air/rotary/sh60seahawk.html#lamps|title=Federation Of American Scientists -|work=Federation Of American Scientists|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
22. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/logistics_material_readiness/acq_bud_fin/SARs/DEC+2011+SAR/DDG+51+-+SAR+-+31+DEC+2011.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511052734/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/logistics_material_readiness/acq_bud_fin/SARs/DEC%202011%20SAR/DDG%2051%20-%20SAR%20-%2031%20DEC%202011.pdf|dead-url=yes|archive-date=11 May 2012|title=Wayback Machine|date=11 May 2012|publisher=|accessdate=19 February 2018}}
23. ^{{cite web|url=http://opencrs.com/document/RL33745/ |title=Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140811152641/http://opencrs.com/document/RL33745/ |archivedate=11 August 2014 }}
24. ^1 {{cite news |first=Wayne |last=Biddle |title=The dust has settled on the Air Force's Great Engine |work=The New York Times |date=28 February 1984 }}
25. ^1 {{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= Maine shipbuilder gets Navy contract for a new destroyer |work=The New York Times |date=3 April 1985 }}
26. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.gibbscox.com/historyofgibbscox.htm |title=History of Gibbs & Cox |date=January 2011 |publisher=Gibbs & Cox |accessdate=6 February 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110109012157/http://www.gibbscox.com/historyofgibbscox.htm |archivedate=9 January 2011 |df=dmy }}
27. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/ddg-51-flt2.htm|title=DDG-51 Arleigh Burke – Flight II|first=John|last=Pike|website=www.globalsecurity.org|accessdate=19 February 2018}}
28. ^1 {{cite web |format=pdf |url=http://www.navy.mil/cno/docs/141104_PositionReport.pdf |title=CNO's Position Report: 2014 |publisher=US Navy |date=4 November 2014 |accessdate=2014-11-26}}
29. ^1 Analyst: DDGs without CIWS vulnerable. Navy Times. 16 September 2008.
30. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.janes.com/article/68550/usn-plans-accelerated-laser-weapon-fit-on-ddg-51-flight-iia-destroyer |title=USN plans accelerated laser weapon fit on DDG 51 Flight IIA destroyer |publisher=IHS Jane's 360 |date=8 March 2017 |accessdate=2017-03-08}}
31. ^DN-SD-07-24674 (up to DDG-96) {{dead link|date=June 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}
32. ^Taken from the National Defense Authorization Act of 2007, pages 67–68 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061102142340/http://armedservices.house.gov/NDAA2007CommiteeReport.pdf |date=2 November 2006 }}
33. ^Taken from the National Defense Authorization Act of 2007, p. 193 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061025175652/http://armedservices.house.gov/NDAA2007CommiteeReport.pdf |date=25 October 2006 }}
34. ^{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/weaps/mk-45.htm |title=MK 45 5-inch / 54-caliber (lightweight) gun; MK 45-5 inch / 62-caliber (MOD 4 ERGM) gun |website=fas.org |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
35. ^Navy ends ERGM funding Navy Times {{dead link|date=November 2016}}
36. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4200&tid=900&ct=4|title=United States Navy Fact File: Destroyers – DDG|first=Dan |last=Petty|publisher=United States Navy|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
37. ^DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-class Aegis Guided-Missile Destroyer Modernization{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
38. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/year-2013-news/december-2013-navy-naval-forces-maritime-industry-technology-security-global-news/1403--drs-technologies-wins-contract-to-continue-its-support-for-arleigh-burke-class-ddg-modernization.html |title=DRS Technologies Wins Contract to Continue its Support for Arleigh Burke-class Guided Missile Destroyers Modernization Program |website=navyrecognition.com |date=4 December 2013 |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
39. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2017/06/towed-array-sonar-surface-warships-anti-submarine-warfare-asw.html|title=Lockheed Martin to build anti-submarine warfare (ASW) towed-array sonar systems for surface warships|website=www.militaryaerospace.com|accessdate=19 February 2018}}
40. ^{{cite web |url=http://docs.house.gov/meetings/AS/AS00/20130918/101291/HHRG-113-AS00-Wstate-GreenertUSNJ-20130918.pdf |format=pdf |first= Jonathan |last=Greenert |authorlink=Jonathan Greenert |title=Statement Before The House Armed Services Committee On Planning For Sequestration In FY 2014 And Perspectives Of The Military Services On The Strategic Choices And Management Review |date=18 September 2013 |publisher=US House of Representatives |accessdate=21 September 2013}}
41. ^{{cite web|url=http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1983 |title=Boeing: Boeing Deploys Gigabit Ethernet Data Multiplex System on USS Spruance |publisher=Boeing.mediaroom.com |date=24 October 2011 |accessdate=27 December 2011}}
42. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/BAE-to-Modernize-Up-to-11-Norfolk-based-Destroyers-06498/ |accessdate=3 August 2010 |title=BAE to Modernize Up to 11 Norfolk-based Destroyers |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20100807230224/http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/BAE-to-Modernize-Up-to-11-Norfolk-based-Destroyers-06498/ |archivedate= 7 August 2010 |deadurl= no}}
43. ^1 {{cite news |url=http://news.usni.org/2014/05/27/navy-quietly-downscales-destroyer-upgrades |first=Sam |last=LaGrone |title=Navy Quietly Downscales Destroyer Upgrades |date=27 May 2014 |website=usni.org |publisher=U.S. Naval Institute |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
44. ^{{cite news |url=http://news.usni.org/2014/06/03/navy-altered-destroyer-upgrade-plan-due-budget-pressure-demand-ships |title=Navy Altered Destroyer Upgrades Due to Budget Pressure, Demand for Ships |last1=LaGrone |first1=Sam |date=3 June 2014 |website=usni.org |publisher=U.S. Naval Institute |accessdate=3 June 2014}}
45. ^{{cite web |url=http://news.usni.org/2015/09/23/navy-set-to-install-hybrid-electric-drives-in-destroyer-fleet-staring-next-year |title=Navy Set to Install Hybrid Electric Drives in Destroyer Fleet Staring [sic] Next Year |last=LaGrone |first=Sam |website=usni.org |publisher=U.S. Naval Institute |date=23 September 2015 |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
46. ^[https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2018/03/08/the-us-navy-is-cancelling-a-program-to-turn-gas-guzzling-destroyers-into-hybrids/ US Navy canceling program to turn gas-guzzling destroyers into hybrids]. Defense News. 8 March 2018.
47. ^{{cite web |url=http://news.usni.org/2015/09/15/navy-integrating-searam-on-rota-based-ddgs-first-installation-complete-in-November |title=Navy Integrating SeaRAM on Rota-Based DDGs; First Installation Complete In November |last=Eckstein |first=Megan |website=usni.org |publisher=U.S. Naval Institute |date=15 September 2015 |accessdate=20 November 2016}}
48. ^[https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/03/03/navy-buys-ship-lasers-dazzle-drone-swarms-take-out-small-boats.html Navy Buys Lasers to 'Dazzle' Drones, Take Out Small Boats]. Military.com. 3 March 2018
49. ^[https://breakingdefense.com/2018/03/first-combat-laser-for-navy-warship-lockheed-helios/ First Combat Laser For Navy Warship: Lockheed HELIOS]. Breaking Defense. 1 March 2018
50. ^{{cite journal |title=Resource Implications of the Navy’s 2008 Shipbuilding Plan |url=http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=6985 |publisher=Congressional Budget Office |date=23 March 2007 |postscript=.}}
51. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3657972 |title=Missile Threat Helped Drive DDG Cut |publisher=Defense News |date=4 August 2008 |accessdate=27 December 2011}}
52. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60G1U920100117|title=Navy's future linked to flexible weapons: chief|work=Reuters|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
53. ^1 [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09defense.html?_r=1&em Contractors Agree on Deal to Build Stealth Destroyer]. Navy Times, 8 April 2009.
54. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.defense.gov/contracts/contract.aspx?contractid=4172 |title=Contracts for Wednesday, December 02, 2009 |publisher=Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs), U.S. Department of Defense |date=2 December 2009 |accessdate=23 October 2011}} Contract N00024-10-C-2308.
55. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=62942 |title=DDG 51 Class Ship Construction Contract Awards Announced |date=26 September 2011 |publisher= Naval Sea Systems Command Office of Corporate Communication |accessdate=23 October 2011}}
56. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA543249 |title=Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress |date=19 April 2011 |first=Ronald |last=O'Rourke |publisher=Congressional Research Service |accessdate=23 October 2011}} Since 1 and 2 ships are procured in alternate years and the "1 in a year" ships cost more, the fairest estimate of unit price comes from averaging three ships across two years. US$50-300m is spent on long lead-time items in the year before the main procurement of each ship. DDG-114 and DDG-115 together cost US$577.2m (FY2010) + US$2.922b (FY2011)= US$3.500b, (p25) and DDG-116 cost US$48m (FY2011) + US$1.981b (FY2012)= US$2.029b, (p12) making an average for the three ships of US$1.847b. DDG-113 cost US$2.235b. (p6)
57. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Media/SAS2010/Lyle_DDGRestart.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402175035/http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Media/SAS2010/Lyle_DDGRestart.pdf |dead-url=yes |archive-date=2 April 2012 |title=DDG 51 Arleigh Burke Burke-Class Destroyer – New Construction Program |first=Peter C. |last=Lyle |year=2010 |publisher=Naval Sea Systems Command |accessdate=23 October 2011 |page=17 |format=PDF }} Presentation summarising the restart program.
58. ^{{cite news |url=https://news.usni.org/2016/05/01/bath-iron-works-will-build-first-flight-iii-arleigh-burke-ddg |title=Bath Iron Works Will Build First Flight III Arleigh Burke DDG |last1=LaGrone |first1=Sam |date=1 May 2016 |website=usni.org |publisher=USNI |accessdate=1 May 2016}}
59. ^RL32109 Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100423160951/http://opencrs.com/document/RL32109/2010-02-26/?24684 |date=23 April 2010 }}. CRS, 26 February 2010.
60. ^GAO-10-388SP, "Defense Acquisitions: Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs". GAO, 30 March 2010
61. ^Fabey, Michael. "Potential DDG-51 Flight III Growth Alarms." Aviation Week, 10 June 2011.
62. ^Freedberg, Sydney J. Jr. "Navy Bets On Arleigh Burkes To Sail Until 2072; 40 Years Afloat For Some." {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121008042714/http://defense.aol.com/2012/10/05/navy-bets-on-arleigh-burkes-to-sail-until-2072-40-years-afloat/ |date=8 October 2012 }} 5 October 2012.
63. ^O'Rourke, Ronald. [https://web.archive.org/web/20121106015333/https://opencrs.com/document/RL32109/2012-03-02/?26751 "CRS-RL32109 Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress."] Congressional Research Service, 2 March 2012.
64. ^"US proposes Flight IV Arleigh Burke and life extension for command ships". Jane's Information Group, 14 June 2011.
65. ^{{cite news |url=http://news.usni.org/2014/07/14/navy-cancelled-new-destroyer-flight-due-ohio-replacement-submarine-costs |title=Navy Cancelled New Destroyer Flight Due to Ohio Replacement Submarine Costs |last1=LaGrone |first1=Sam |date=14 July 2014 |website=news.usni.org |publisher=U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE |accessdate=14 July 2014}}
66. ^RL32109, Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090124231702/http://opencrs.com/document/RL32109 |date=24 January 2009 }}. Congressional Research Service, 23 December 2009.
67. ^"Northrop Grumman awarded $114M contract; Navy orders 30th DDG 51 ship", www.gulflive.com, 24 April 2010.
68. ^"General Dynamics wins over $900 mln 9 Navy deals", Reuters, 26 February 2010.
69. ^"BIW to purchase DDG 115 material", UPI.com, 2 March 2010.
70. ^CRS RL32109 Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress 14 June 2010{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
71. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=16035 |title=Department of Defense Announces Selected Acquisition Report |date=23 May 2013 |publisher=United States Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) |accessdate=3 June 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130820182239/http://www.defense.gov//releases/release.aspx?releaseid=16035 |archivedate=20 August 2013 }}
72. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.defense.gov/contracts/contract.aspx?contractid=5056|title=Contract View|publisher=|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
73. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.usni.org/print/25780|title=Now Hear This – The Right Destroyer at the Right Time|publisher=|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
74. ^1 Navy Makes Plans for New Destroyer for 2030s – Military.com, 9 April 2014
75. ^Navy, Navy Names Forward Deployed Ships to Rota, Spain
76. ^"NavWeek: Keeping Asian Waters Pacific." {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140219211318/http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A038fade9-083d-4ca9-8212-b44b043e9a1f |date=19 February 2014 }}
77. ^{{cite web |url=http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_02_02/Russias-arms-stockpile-doesnt-exceed-START-III-ceiling-8228/ |title=Russia may quit START III after US deploys destroyer in Europe |date=2 February 2014 |website=voiceofrussia.com |publisher=The Voice of Russia |accessdate=31 January 2014}}
78. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2018/06/23/as-threats-mount-us-navy-grapples-with-costly-ballistic-missile-defense-mission/|title=As threats mount, US Navy grapples with costly ballistic missile defense mission|publisher=defensenews.com|date=23 June 2018|accessdate=18 December 2018}}
79. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/ddg69/Pages/USS-Milius-joins-Forward-Deployed-Naval-Forces-in-Japan.aspx#.WwYFXjQvyUk|title=USS Milius joins Forward Deployed Naval Forces in Japan|last=Affairs|first=By Garrett Zopfi, U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka Public|website=www.public.navy.mil|access-date=2018-05-24}}
80. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.navsea.navy.mil/NewsView.aspx?nw=NewsWires&id=518 |title=Future USS John Finn (DDG 113) Launched |website=US Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) |date=30 March 2015 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402123343/http://www.navsea.navy.mil/NewsView.aspx?nw=NewsWires&id=518 |archivedate=2 April 2015 |df=dmy }}
81. ^{{cite press release |url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=102954 |title= Future USS Ralph Johnson to be Commissioned in Charleston |date=23 October 2017 |id=NNS171023-23 |publisher=U.S. Navy |accessdate=31 October 2017}}
82. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/ddg114/Pages/Future-USS-Ralph-Johnson-to-be-Commissioned-in-Charleston.aspx#.WrdEu9TwZhE|title=Future USS Ralph Johnson to be Commissioned in Charleston|last=Affairs|first=From Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet Public|website=www.public.navy.mil|access-date=2018-03-25}}
83. ^{{cite web |first=Chase, LTJG |last=Allvord |title=Rafael Peralta Achieves Three Key Milestones in One Weekend |url=http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/ddg115/Pages/RAFAEL-PERALTA-Achieves-Three-Key-Milestones-in-One-Weekend.aspx# |work=US Navy |date=9 November 2015 |accessdate=6 October 2017}}
84. ^{{cite web |first1=Monica |last1=Garske |first2=Samantha |last2=Tatro |title=USS Rafael Peralta Commissioned in San Diego |url=http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/USS-Rafael-Peralta-Commissioned-in-San-Diego-US-Navy-Guided-Missile-Destroyer-437373243.html |work=KNSD |date=29 July 2017 |accessdate=29 July 2017}}
85. ^1 {{cite press release|url=https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=107984|title=USS Thomas Hudner brought to life in Boston|publisher=United States Navy|id=NNS181203-14|date=3 December 2018|accessdate=7 January 2019}}
86. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_DDG_116_3969.HTML|title=Naval Vessel Register - THOMAS HUDNER (DDG 116)|website=www.nvr.navy.mil|access-date=2018-07-05}}
87. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_DDG_116_3969.HTML|title=Naval Vessel Register - THOMAS HUDNER (DDG 116)|website=www.nvr.navy.mil|access-date=2018-07-05}}
88. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=83615|title=Future USS Paul Ignatius Begins Fabrication|author=This story was written Naval Sea Systems Command Public Affairs|publisher=|accessdate=27 October 2015}}
89. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite web |url=http://www.navycommissionings.org/index.php?s=Hull|title=Upcoming US Navy Ship Commissionings |website= navycommissionings.org |language=en |access-date= 16 June 2018}}
90. ^1 {{cite press release|url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=105598|title=Keel Laid for Future USS Daniel Inouye|publisher=United States Navy|id=NNS180515-04|date=15 May 2018|accessdate=15 May 2018}}
91. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Media/News/Article/1305697/us-navy-launches-the-future-uss-delbert-d-black/ |title=U.S. Navy Launches the Future USS Delbert D. Black |work=U.S. Navy |date=11 September 2017 |accessdate=6 October 2017}}
92. ^{{cite web |first=Sam |last=LaGrone |title=SECNAV Mabus Names Destroyer After First MCPON Delbert D. Black |url=https://news.usni.org/2015/03/13/secnav-mabus-names-destroyer-after-first-mcpon-delbert-d-black |work=USNI News |date=13 March 2015 |accessdate=6 October 2017}}
93. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.gd.com/news/press-releases/2016/03/navy-awards-general-dynamics-bath-iron-works-644-million-construction|title=Navy Awards General Dynamics Bath Iron Works $644 Million for Construction of DDG 51 Class Destroyer|work=General Dynamics}}
94. ^{{cite web|url=http://newsroom.huntingtoningalls.com/releases/ingalls-shipbuilding-awarded-618-million-contract-to-build-ddg-123-3433700|title=Ingalls Shipbuilding Awarded $618 Million Contract to Build DDG 123|author=Huntington Ingalls Industries|work=Huntington Ingalls Newsroom}}
95. ^{{cite press release |url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=97601 |title=Secretary Mabus Names Newest Arleigh-Burke Class Destroyer |work=U.S. Navy |date=9 November 2016 |access-date=6 October 2017}}
96. ^{{cite press release |url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=106360 |title=US Navy Launches Future USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. |id=NNS180716-21 |publisher=United States Navy |date=16 July 2018 |access-date=17 July 2018}}
97. ^{{cite web|url=http://navaltoday.com/2016/08/15/us-navy-to-name-next-destroyer-after-medal-of-honor-recipient-john-basilone/|title=US Navy to name next destroyer after Medal of Honor recipient John Basilone|work=Naval Today}}
98. ^{{cite web|url=https://news.usni.org/2016/06/14/mabus-names-ddg-higbee|title=Mabus Names Arleigh Burke Destroyer After Higbee, First Woman Awarded Navy Cross|author=Otto Kreisher}}
99. ^{{cite web|title=Photo Release-Huntington Ingalls Industries Authenticates Keel of Guided Missile Destroyer Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123)|url=http://newsroom.huntingtoningalls.com/releases/photo-release-huntington-ingalls-industries-authenticates-keel-of-guided-missile-destroyer-lenah-h-sutcliffe-higbee-ddg-123|website=Huntington Ingalls Industries|accessdate=14 December 2017}}
100. ^1 {{cite web |url=https://news.usni.org/2016/08/03/document-notice-congress-proposed-navy-ship-names |title=Notice to Congress on 8 Proposed Navy Ship Names |date=2016-08-03 |website=USNI News |access-date=2016-08-03}}
101. ^{{cite press release |url=http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=104681 |title=SECNAV Names Newest Destroyer in Honor of U.S. Marine |publisher=United States Navy |id=NNS180312-11 |date=12 March 2018 |access-date=12 March 2018}}
102. ^{{cite press release |url=https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=108239 |title=SECNAV Names New Destroyer in Honor of US Senator from Alaska |publisher=United States Navy |id=NNS190104-05 |date=4 January 2019 |access-date=5 January 2019}}
103. ^{{cite press release |url=https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=108240 |title=SECNAV Names Future Destroyer in honor of Navy Veteran, Vietnam War POW |publisher=United States Navy |id=NNS190104-04 |date=4 January 2019 |access-date=5 January 2019}}
104. ^{{cite press release |url=https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=108938|title=SECNAV Names Future Destroyer in Honor of US Navy Medal of Honor Recipient|publisher=United States Navy|id=NNS190318-03|date=18 March 2019|accessdate=18 March 2019}}
105. ^{{cite press release |url=https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=109029|title=SECNAV Names Destroyer in Honor of US Navy, Korean War Veteran|publisher=United States Navy|id=NNS190326-09|date=26 March 2019|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
106. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_DDG_134_7552.HTML|title=Naval Vessel Register - NO NAME (DDG 134)|website=www.nvr.navy.mil|access-date=2018-12-11}}
107. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_DDG_135_7566.HTML|title=Naval Vessel Register - NO NAME (DDG 135)|website=www.nvr.navy.mil|access-date=2018-12-11}}
108. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_DDG_136_7554.HTML|title=Naval Vessel Register - NO NAME (DDG 136)|website=www.nvr.navy.mil|access-date=2018-12-11}}
109. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_DDG_137_7568.HTML|title=Naval Vessel Register - NO NAME (DDG 137)|website=www.nvr.navy.mil|access-date=2018-12-11}}
110. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPDETAILS/SHIPSDETAIL_DDG_138_7556.HTML|title=Naval Vessel Register - NO NAME (DDG 138)|website=www.nvr.navy.mil|access-date=2018-12-11}}
111. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1328736/|title=DoD Contracts|publisher=defense.gov|date=28 September 2017|accessdate=27 March 2018}}
112. ^{{cite web | title= Naval Base San Diego; USS Halsey featured in "The Last Ship" | url= http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=70567 | work= Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Justin L. Webb, Naval Base San Diego Public Affairs | publisher= United States Navy | date= November 2012|accessdate=February 26, 2015}}

References

  • Baker, A.D. The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World 1998–1999. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1998. {{ISBN|1-55750-111-4}}.
  • Gardiner, Robert and Chumbley, Stephen. Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1947–1995. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1995. {{ISBN|1-55750-132-7}}.

Further reading

  • {{cite book |author=Sanders, Michael S. |title=The Yard: Building a Destroyer at the Bath Iron Works |location=New York |publisher=HarperCollins |year=1999 |isbn=0-06-019246-1}} Describes the construction of Donald Cook (DDG-75) at Bath Iron Works.

External links

{{Commons category|Arleigh Burke class destroyers}}
  • [https://web.archive.org/web/20110725231406/http://destroyerhistory.org/arleighburkeclass/ Arleigh Burke-class destroyers] at [https://web.archive.org/web/20090219202357/http://destroyerhistory.org/ Destroyer History Foundation]
  • Arleigh Burke unit list on globalsecurity.org
  • Arleigh Burke-class (Aegis) page on naval-technology.com
  • Arleigh Burke Flight I & Flight II Class destroyer- United States Navy on navyrecognition.com
{{Arleigh Burke class destroyer}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer}}

3 : Arleigh Burke-class destroyers|Active naval ships of the United States|Destroyer classes
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/13 10:56:01