词条 | Computer forensics |
释义 |
Computer forensics (also known as computer forensic science[1]) is a branch of digital forensic science pertaining to evidence found in computers and digital storage media. The goal of computer forensics is to examine digital media in a forensically sound manner with the aim of identifying, preserving, recovering, analyzing and presenting facts and opinions about the digital information. Although it is most often associated with the investigation of a wide variety of computer crime, computer forensics may also be used in civil proceedings. The discipline involves similar techniques and principles to data recovery, but with additional guidelines and practices designed to create a legal audit trail. Evidence from computer forensics investigations is usually subjected to the same guidelines and practices of other digital evidence. It has been used in a number of high-profile cases and is becoming widely accepted as reliable within U.S. and European court systems. OverviewIn the early 1980s personal computers became more accessible to consumers, leading to their increased use in criminal activity (for example, to help commit fraud). At the same time, several new "computer crimes" were recognized (such as cracking). The discipline of computer forensics emerged during this time as a method to recover and investigate digital evidence for use in court. Since then computer crime and computer related crime has grown, and has jumped 67% between 2002 and 2003.[2] Today it is used to investigate a wide variety of crime, including child pornography, fraud, espionage, cyberstalking, murder and rape. The discipline also features in civil proceedings as a form of information gathering (for example, Electronic discovery) Forensic techniques and expert knowledge are used to explain the current state of a digital artifact, such as a computer system, storage medium (e.g. hard disk or CD-ROM), or an electronic document (e.g. an email message or JPEG image).[3] The scope of a forensic analysis can vary from simple information retrieval to reconstructing a series of events. In a 2002 book, Computer Forensics, authors Kruse and Heiser define computer forensics as involving "the preservation, identification, extraction, documentation and interpretation of computer data".[4] They go on to describe the discipline as "more of an art than a science", indicating that forensic methodology is backed by flexibility and extensive domain knowledge. However, while several methods can be used to extract evidence from a given computer the strategies used by law enforcement are fairly rigid and lack the flexibility found in the civilian world.[5] Use as evidenceIn court, computer forensic evidence is subject to the usual requirements for digital evidence. This requires that information be authentic, reliably obtained, and admissible. Different countries have specific guidelines and practices for evidence recovery. In the United Kingdom, examiners often follow Association of Chief Police Officers guidelines that help ensure the authenticity and integrity of evidence. While voluntary, the guidelines are widely accepted in British courts. Computer forensics has been used as evidence in criminal law since the mid-1980s, some notable examples include:[7]
Forensic process{{Main article|Digital forensic process}}Computer forensic investigations usually follow the standard digital forensic process or phases which are acquisition, examination, analysis and reporting. Investigations are performed on static data (i.e. acquired images) rather than "live" systems. This is a change from early forensic practices where a lack of specialist tools led to investigators commonly working on live data. TechniquesA number of techniques are used during computer forensics investigations and much has been written on the many techniques used by law enforcement in particular.
A forensic technique that correlates information found on multiple hard drives. The process, still being researched, can be used to identify social networks and to perform anomaly detection.[10][11]
The examination of computers from within the operating system using custom forensics or existing sysadmin tools to extract evidence. The practice is useful when dealing with Encrypting File Systems, for example, where the encryption keys may be collected and, in some instances, the logical hard drive volume may be imaged (known as a live acquisition) before the computer is shut down.
A common technique used in computer forensics is the recovery of deleted files. Modern forensic software have their own tools for recovering or carving out deleted data.[12] Most operating systems and file systems do not always erase physical file data, allowing investigators to reconstruct it from the physical disk sectors. File carving involves searching for known file headers within the disk image and reconstructing deleted materials.
A method which uses stochastic properties of the computer system to investigate activities lacking digital artifacts. Its chief use is to investigate data theft.
One of the techniques used to hide data is via steganography, the process of hiding data inside of a picture or digital image. An example would be to hide pornographic images of children or other information that a given criminal does not want to have discovered. Computer forensics professionals can fight this by looking at the hash of the file and comparing it to the original image (if available.) While the image appears exactly the same, the hash changes as the data changes.[13] Volatile dataWhen seizing evidence, if the machine is still active, any information stored solely in RAM that is not recovered before powering down may be lost.[8] One application of "live analysis" is to recover RAM data (for example, using Microsoft's COFEE tool, WinDD, WindowsSCOPE) prior to removing an exhibit. CaptureGUARD Gateway bypasses Windows login for locked computers, allowing for the analysis and acquisition of physical memory on a locked computer. RAM can be analyzed for prior content after power loss, because the electrical charge stored in the memory cells takes time to dissipate, an effect exploited by the cold boot attack. The length of time that data is recoverable is increased by low temperatures and higher cell voltages. Holding unpowered RAM below −60 °C helps preserve residual data by an order of magnitude, improving the chances of successful recovery. However, it can be impractical to do this during a field examination.[15] Some of the tools needed to extract volatile data, however, require that a computer be in a forensic lab, both to maintain a legitimate chain of evidence, and to facilitate work on the machine. If necessary, law enforcement applies techniques to move a live, running desktop computer. These include a mouse jiggler, which moves the mouse rapidly in small movements and prevents the computer from going to sleep accidentally. Usually, an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) provides power during transit. However, one of the easiest ways to capture data is by actually saving the RAM data to disk. Various file systems that have journaling features such as NTFS and ReiserFS keep a large portion of the RAM data on the main storage media during operation, and these page files can be reassembled to reconstruct what was in RAM at that time.[16] Analysis tools{{see also|List of digital forensics tools}}A number of open source and commercial tools exist for computer forensics investigation. Typical forensic analysis includes a manual review of material on the media, reviewing the Windows registry for suspect information, discovering and cracking passwords, keyword searches for topics related to the crime, and extracting e-mail and pictures for review.[7] CertificationsThere are several computer forensics certifications available, such as the ISFCE Certified Computer Examiner, Digital Forensics Investigation Professional (DFIP) and IACRB Certified Computer Forensics Examiner. The top vendor independent certification (especially within EU) is considered the [CCFP - Certified Cyber Forensics Professional [https://www.isc2.org/ccfp/default.aspx]].[1] Others, worth to mention for USA or APAC are the: IACIS (the International Association of Computer Investigative Specialists) offers the Certified Computer Forensic Examiner (CFCE) program. Asian School of Cyber Laws offers international level certifications in Digital Evidence Analysis and in Digital Forensic Investigation. These Courses are available in online and class room mode. Many commercial based forensic software companies are now also offering proprietary certifications on their products. For example, Guidance Software offering the (EnCE) certification on their tool EnCase, AccessData offering (ACE) certification on their tool FTK, PassMark Software offering (OCE) certification on their tool OSForensics, and X-Ways Software Technology offering (X-PERT) certification for their software, X-Ways Forensics.[2] See also
References1. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.itjobswatch.co.uk/jobs/uk/ccfp.do |title=CCFP Salaries surveys |publisher=ITJobsWatch |date= |accessdate=2017-06-15}} [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]2. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.x-pert.eu/ |title=X-PERT Certification Program |publisher=X-pert.eu |date= |accessdate=2015-11-26}} 3. ^1 2 3 {{cite book|last=Casey|first=Eoghan|title=Digital Evidence and Computer Crime, Second Edition|year=2004|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-12-163104-8|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Xo8GMt_AbQsC}} 4. ^1 {{cite web|title=Recovering and examining computer forensic evidence|url=https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/oct2000/computer.htm|accessdate=26 July 2010|author=Michael G. Noblett|author2=Mark M. Pollitt |author3=Lawrence A. Presley |date=October 2000}} 5. ^1 {{cite web|title=Computer forensics education|citeseerx=10.1.1.1.9510|publisher=IEEE Security & Privacy|author=A Yasinsac|author2=RF Erbacher |author3=DG Marks |author4=MM Pollitt |year=2003}} 6. ^1 {{cite journal|url=http://citp.princeton.edu/research/memory/|title=Lest We Remember: Cold Boot Attacks on Encryption Keys|author=J. Alex Halderman, Seth D. Schoen, Nadia Heninger, William Clarkson, William Paul, Joseph A. Calandrino, Ariel J. Feldman, Jacob Appelbaum, and Edward W. Felten|publisher=Princeton University|date=2008-02-21|accessdate=2009-11-20}} 7. ^1 2 {{cite book|last=Various|title=Handbook of Digital Forensics and Investigation|year=2009|publisher=Academic Press|isbn=978-0-12-374267-4|page=567|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xNjsDprqtUYC|editor=Eoghan Casey|accessdate=27 August 2010}} 8. ^1 {{cite web|author=Garfinkel, S.|title=Forensic Feature Extraction and Cross-Drive Analysis|date=August 2006|url=http://www.simson.net/clips/academic/2006.DFRWS.pdf}} 9. ^1 {{cite web|title=EXP-SA: Prediction and Detection of Network Membership through Automated Hard Drive Analysis|url=https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0730389}} 10. ^1 {{cite book|title=Hacking Exposed: Computer Forensics|year=2009|publisher=McGraw Hill Professional|isbn=978-0-07-162677-4|page=544|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yMdNrgSBUq0C|author=Aaron Phillip|author2=David Cowen |author3=Chris Davis |accessdate=27 August 2010}} 11. ^1 {{cite book|title=Computer forensics: incident response essentials|year=2002|publisher=Addison-Wesley|isbn=978-0-201-70719-9|page=392|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nNpQAAAAMAAJ|author=Warren G. Kruse|author2=Jay G. Heiser|accessdate=6 December 2010}} 12. ^1 {{cite web|author=Gunsch, G|title=An Examination of Digital Forensic Models|date=August 2002|url=http://www.utica.edu/academic/institutes/ecii/publications/articles/A04A40DC-A6F6-F2C1-98F94F16AF57232D.pdf}} 13. ^1 {{cite web|author=Leigland, R|title=A Formalization of Digital Forensics|date=September 2004|url=http://www.utica.edu/academic/institutes/ecii/publications/articles/A0B8472C-D1D2-8F98-8F7597844CF74DF8.pdf}} 14. ^1 {{cite web|author=Geiger, M|title=Evaluating Commercial Counter-Forensic Tools|date=March 2005|url=http://www.dfrws.org/2005/proceedings/geiger_couterforensics.pdf}} 15. ^1 {{cite web|author=Dunbar, B|title=A detailed look at Steganographic Techniques and their use in an Open-Systems Environment|date=January 2001|url=http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/covert/detailed-steganographic-techniques-open-systems-environment_677}} [15]}} Further reading
Related journals
External links
3 : Computer forensics|Computer security procedures|Information technology audit |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。