请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Baggett v. Bullitt
释义

  1. Background

  2. Opinion of the Court

  3. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
| Litigants=Baggett v. Bullitt
| ArgueDate=March 24
| ArgueYear=1964
| DecideDate=June 1
| DecideYear=1964
| FullName=Baggett, et al. v. Bullitt, et al.
| USVol=377
| USPage=360
| ParallelCitations=84 S. Ct. 1316; 12 L. Ed. 2d 377; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1140
| Prior=Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
| Holding= A State cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred.
| SCOTUS=1962-1965
| Majority=White
| JoinMajority=Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Goldberg
| Dissent=Clark
| JoinDissent=Harlan
| LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV
}}

Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred.

Background

Washington state passed two laws which required teachers and employees to swear oaths as a condition of employment. A 1931 law required them to swear allegiance to the United States. A 1955 law, passed in the McCarthyism era, required the employee to swear he is not a subversive person: that he does not commit, or advise, teach, abet or advocate another to commit or aid in the commission of any act intended to overthrow or alter, or assist in the overthrow or alteration, of the constitutional form of government by revolution, force or violence.

Faculty and staff of the University of Washington sued to overturn the laws.

Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court overturned both the 1931 law and 1955 law, holding that they were too vague, and that they violated the employees' First Amendment rights of association and speech.

External links

  • {{wikisource-inline}}
  • {{caselaw source

| case=Baggett v. Bullitt, {{Ussc|377|360|1964|el=no}}
| justia=https://supreme.justia.com/us/377/360/case.html
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep377/usrep377360/usrep377360.pdf
| oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/220{{SCOTUS-stub}}{{US1stAmendment|association|state=expanded}}

4 : 1964 in United States case law|American Civil Liberties Union litigation|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/24 6:27:43