请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Grammatical conjugation
释义

  1. Examples

  2. Verbal agreement

     Nonverbal person agreement 

  3. See also

      Conjugations by language    See also  

  4. Notes

{{Grammatical categories}}{{confuse|conjunction (grammar)}}

In linguistics, conjugation ({{IPAc-en|ˌ|k|ɒ|n|dʒ|ᵿ|ˈ|ɡ|eɪ|ʃ|ən}}{{refn|{{OxfordDictionaries.com|accessdate=2016-01-26|conjugation}}}}{{refn|{{MerriamWebsterDictionary|accessdate=2016-01-26|conjugation}}}}) is the creation of derived forms of a verb from its principal parts by inflection (alteration of form according to rules of grammar). Verbs may inflect for grammatical categories such as person, number, gender, tense, aspect, mood, voice, case, possession, definiteness, politeness, causativity, clusivity, interrogativity, transitivity, valency, polarity, telicity, volition, mirativity, evidentiality, animacy, associativity,[1] pluractionality, and reciprocity. Verbs may also be affected by agreement, polypersonal agreement, incorporation, noun class, noun classifiers, and verb classifiers[2].{{cn|date=September 2018}}

Agglutinative and polysynthetic languages tend to have the most complex conjugations albeit some fusional languages such as Archi can also have extremely complex conjugation. Typically the principal parts are the root and/or several modifications of it (stems). All the different forms of the same verb constitute a lexeme, and the canonical form of the verb that is conventionally used to represent that lexeme (as seen in dictionary entries) is called a lemma.

The term conjugation is applied only to the inflection of verbs, and not of other parts of speech (inflection of nouns and adjectives is known as declension). Also it is often restricted to denoting the formation of finite forms of a verb – these may be referred to as conjugated forms, as opposed to non-finite forms, such as the infinitive or gerund, which tend not to be marked for most of the grammatical categories.

Conjugation is also the traditional name for a group of verbs that share a similar conjugation pattern in a particular language (a verb class). For example, Latin is said to have four conjugations of verbs. This means that any regular Latin verb can be conjugated in any person, number, tense, mood, and voice by knowing which of the four conjugation groups it belongs to, and its principal parts. A verb that does not follow all of the standard conjugation patterns of the language is said to be an irregular verb. The system of all conjugated variants of a particular verb or class of verbs is called a verb paradigm; this may be presented in the form of a conjugation table.

Examples

Indo-European languages usually inflect verbs for several grammatical categories in complex paradigms, although some, like English, have simplified verb conjugation to a large extent. Below is the conjugation of the verb to be in the present tense (of the infinitive, if it exists, and indicative moods), in English, German, Yiddish, Dutch, Afrikaans, Icelandic, Faroese, Swedish, Norwegian, Latvian, Bulgarian, Serbo-Croatian, Polish, Slovenian, Macedonian, Urdu or Hindi, Persian, Latin, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Albanian, Armenian, Irish, Ukrainian, Ancient Attic Greek and Modern Greek. This is usually the most irregular verb. The similarities in corresponding verb forms may be noticed. Some of the conjugations may be disused, like the English thou-form, or have additional meanings, like the English you-form, which can also stand for second person singular or be impersonal.

"To be" in several Indo-European languages
BranchLanguagePresent
infinitive
Present indicative
Singular personsPlural persons
1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd
GermanicEnglish be am are
art1
be'st1
isare
German sein bin bist ist sind seid sind
Yiddish
transliterated
זיין
zein
בין
bin
ביסט
bist
איז
iz
זענען
zenen
זענט
zent
זענען
zenen
Dutch zijn ben bent
zijt2
iszijn
Afrikaans weesis
Icelandic vera er ert er erum eruð eru
Faroese vera eri ert ereru
Norwegian være3
vera, vere4
er
Danish væreer
Swedish varaär
RomanceLatin esse sum es est sumus estis sunt
Italian essere sono sei è siamo siete sono
French être suis es est sommes êtes sont
Catalan ésser sóc ets és som sou són
Spanish ser soy eres es somos sois son
Galician ser son es é somos sodes son
Portuguese ser sou és é somos sois são
Friulian jessi soi sês è sin sês son
Neapolitan èssere songo, so è simmo site songo, so
Romanian a fi sunt ești este suntem sunteți sunt
CelticIrish bheith bím bíonn bíonn bímid bíonn bíonn
Welsh (standard form) bod rydw rwyt mae rydych rydyn maen
GreekAncient5
transliterated
grc|εἶναι}}
eînai
grc|εἰμί}}
eimí
grc|εἶ}}
grc|ἐστί}}
estí
grc|ἐσμέν}}
esmén
grc|ἐστέ}}
esté
grc|εἰσί}}
eisí
Modern
transliterated
none6 είμαι
eímai
είσαι
eísai
είναι
eínai
είμαστε
eímaste
είσ(ασ)τε
eís(as)te
είναι
eínai
Albanian me qenë jam je është jemi jeni janë
ArmenianWestern
transliterated
hy|ըլլալ}}
ĕllal
hy|Եմ}}
em
hy|ես}}
es
hy|է}}
ē
hy|ենք}}
enk‘
hy|էք}}
ēk‘
hy|են}}
en
Eastern
transliterated
hy|լինել}}
linel
hy|Եմ}}
em
hy|ես}}
es
hy|է}}
ē
hy|ենք}}
enk‘
hy|եք}}
ek‘
hy|են}}
en
SlavicCzech být jsem jsi je jsme jste jsou
Slovak byť som si je sme ste
Polish być jestem jesteś jest jesteśmy jesteście
Russian
transliterated
быть
byt
есть
yest
Ukrainian
transliterated
бути
buty
є
ye
Serbo-Croatian strong biti jesam jesi jest(e) jesmo jeste jesu
Serbo-Croatian clitic none sam si je smo ste su
Slovenian biti sem si je smo ste so
Bulgarian
transliterated
none съм
săm
си
si
е
e
сме
sme
сте
ste
са
Macedonian
transliterated
none сум
sum
си
si
е
e
сме
sme
сте
ste
се
se
BalticLatvian būt esmu esi ir esam esat ir
Lithuanian būti esu esi yra esame esate yra
Indo-IranianPersian
transliterated
fa|بودن}}
budan
fa|ام}}
æm
fa|ای}}
ei
fa|(است (ا}}
æst (æ)9
fa|ایم}}
eem
fa|(اید (این}}
eed (spoken: een)
fa|(اند (ان}}
and (spoken: an)
Sanskrit
transliterated
अस्ति
{{transl>sa|asti}}
अस्मि
asmi
असि
asi
अस्ति
asti
स्मः
smah
स्थ
stha
सन्ति
santi
Hindustani
Devanagari Script
Perso-Arabic Script
transliterated
होना
ہونا
{{transl>hi|hona}}
 
हूँ
ہوں
hū̃
 
है
ہیں
hai
 
है
ہے
hai
 
हैं
ہیں
hãĩ
 
हो
ہو
ho
 
हैं
ہیں
hãĩ
Marathi
transliterated
असणे
{{transl>mr|asṇe}}
आहे
āhe
आहेस
āhes
आहे
āhe
आहोत
āhot
आहात
āhāt
आहेत
āhet
Gujarati
transliterated
હોવું
{{transl>gu|hovũ}}
છું
chhũ
છે
chhe
છીએ
chhīe
છો
chho
છે
chhe
Assamese
transliterated
হোৱা
{{transl>as|hüa}}
হওঁ
hoü̃
হোৱা
hüa
হয়
hoy
হওঁ
hoü̃
হোৱা
hüa
হয়
hoy

1 Archaic, poetical; used only with the pronoun 'thou'.

2 In Flemish dialects.

3 In the bokmål written standard.

4 In the nynorsk written standard. vera and vere are both alternate forms.

5 Attic.

6 'eínai' is only used as a noun ("being, existence").

7 Ptc: qenë.

8 In the Tosk and Geg dialects, respectively.

9 Existential: هست (hæst) has another meaning. Usage of (æ) is considered to be rural, now. See, Indo-European copula

Verbal agreement

Verbal agreement or concord is a morpho-syntactic construct in which properties of the subject and/or objects of a verb are indicated by the verb form. Verbs are then said to agree with their subjects (resp. objects).

Many English verbs exhibit subject agreement of the following sort: whereas I go, you go, we go, they go are all grammatical in standard English, she go is not (except in the subjunctive, as "They requested that she go with them"). Instead, a special form of the verb to go has to be used to produce she goes. On the other hand I goes, you goes etc. are not grammatical in standard English. (Things are different in some English dialects that lack agreement.) A few English verbs have no special forms that indicate subject agreement (I may, you may, she may), and the verb to be has an additional form am that can only be used with the pronoun I as the subject.

Verbs in written French exhibit more intensive agreement morphology than English verbs: je suis (I am), tu es ("you are", singular informal), elle est (she is), nous sommes (we are), vous êtes ("you are", plural), ils sont (they are). Historically, English used to have a similar verbal paradigm. Some historic verb forms are used by Shakespeare as slightly archaic or more formal variants (I do, thou dost, she doth, typically used by nobility) of the modern forms.

Some languages with verbal agreement can leave certain subjects implicit when the subject is fully determined by the verb form. In Spanish, for instance, subject pronouns do not need to be explicitly present, even though in French, its close relative, they are obligatory. The Spanish equivalent to the French je suis (I am) can be simply soy (lit. "am"). The pronoun yo (I) in the explicit form yo soy is only required for emphasis or to clear ambiguity in complex texts.

Some languages have a richer agreement system in which verbs also agree with some or all of their objects. Ubykh exhibits verbal agreement for the subject, direct object, indirect object, benefaction and ablative objects (a.w3.s.xe.n.t'u.n, you gave it to him for me).

Basque can show agreement not only for subject, direct object and indirect object, but it also on occasion exhibits agreement for the listener as the implicit benefactor: autoa ekarri digute means "they brought us the car" (neuter agreement for listener), but autoa ekarri ziguten means "they brought us the car" (agreement for feminine singular listener).

Languages with a rich agreement morphology facilitate relatively free word order without leading to increased ambiguity. The canonical word order in Basque is subject–object–verb. However, all permutations of subject, verb and object are permitted.

Nonverbal person agreement

In some languages,[3] predicative adjectives and copular complements receive a form of person agreement that is distinct from that used on ordinary predicative verbs. Although this is a form of conjugation in that it refers back to the person of the subject, it is not “verbal” because it always derives from pronouns that have become cliticised to the nouns to which they refer.[4] An example of nonverbal person agreement, along with contrasting verbal conjugation, can be found from Beja[5] (person agreement affixes in bold):

  • wun.tu.wi, “you (fem.) are big”
  • hadá.b.wa, “you (masc.) are a sheik”
  • e.n.fór, “he flees”

Another example can be found from Ket:[5]

  • fèmba.di, “I am a Tungus”
  • .fen, “I am standing”

In Turkic, and a few Uralic and Australian Aboriginal languages, predicative adjectives and copular complements take affixes that are identical to those used on predicative verbs, but their negation is different. For example, in Turkish:

  • koş.u.yor.sun “you are running”
  • çavuş.sun “you are a sergeant”

Under negation this becomes (negative affixes in bold):

  • koş.mu.yor.sun “you are not running”
  • çavuş değil.sin “you are not a sergeant”

For this reason, the person agreement affixes used with predicative adjectives and nominals in Turkic languages are considered to be nonverbal in character. In some analyses, they are viewed as a form of verbal takeover by a copular strategy.

==Factors that affect conjugation==

Common grammatical categories according to which verbs can be conjugated are the following:

  • Finite verb forms:
    • Grammatical person
    • Grammatical number
    • Grammatical gender
    • Grammatical tense
    • Grammatical aspect
    • Grammatical mood
    • Grammatical voice
  • Non-finite verb forms.

Other factors which may affect conjugation are:

  • Degree of formality (see T-V distinction, Honorific speech in Japanese, Korean speech levels)
  • Clusivity (of personal pronouns)
  • Transitivity
  • Valency

See also

Conjugations by language

  • Category:Grammatical conjugation
  • Indo-European copula
  • [https://archivium.biz/strumenti/Coniugazione-Verbi.html Archivium: Italian verbs conjugator, for regular and irregular verbs]

See also

  • Agreement (linguistics)
  • Declension (nouns, adjectives, etc.)
  • Inflection
  • Redundancy (linguistics)
  • Screeve
  • Strong inflection
  • Verb
  • Verb argument
  • Volition (linguistics)
  • Weak inflection

Notes

1. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.grammaticalfeatures.net/features/associativity.html|title=Grammatical Features - Associativity|author=|date=|website=www.grammaticalfeatures.net|accessdate=18 March 2018}}
2. ^{{cite journal|url=https://www.academia.edu/10502997/Verb_Classifiers_-_Misfits_of_Nominal_Classification|title=Verb Classifiers - 'Misfits' of Nominal Classification?|first=Matthias|last=Passer|date=|website=academia.edu|accessdate=18 March 2018}}
3. ^Stassen, Leon; Intransitive Predication (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory); published 1997 by Oxford University Press; p. 39. {{ISBN|0-19-925893-7}}
4. ^Stassen; Intransitive Predication; pp. 77 & 284-288
5. ^Stassen, Intransitive Predication; p. 40
{{DEFAULTSORT:Grammatical Conjugation}}

2 : Grammatical conjugation|Grammatical number

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/13 11:53:53