1. Background

2. The court's decision

3. Aftermath

4. See also

5. Further reading

6. References

7. External links

Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963), was a Supreme Court of the United States case dealing with equal representation in regard to the American election system and formulated the famous "one person, one vote" standard for legislative districting.

Background

James Sanders, a voter in Fulton County, Georgia, brought a lawsuit which challenged the legality of the County Unit System. James H. Gray, the chairman of the State Executive Committee of the Democratic Party, was one of the named defendants as the suit focused on the Democratic party primary elections which usually determined the selection of Georgia officeholders.

Sanders argued that the County Unit System gave unequal and preferential voting power to smaller counties. Rural counties which accounted for one-third of Georgia's population, accounted for a majority of County Unit votes. Fulton County had 14.11% of Georgia's population at that time, but only 1.46% (6 unit votes) of the 410 Unit Votes. Echols County, Georgia, the smallest county in Georgia at the time, had 1,876^[1] people or .05% of the state's population and .48% (1 unit vote) of the unit system. The system managed to give votes to Fulton County at a proportion of one-tenth the county population while giving Echols County a vote which was 10 times the population of the county. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case despite having refused to hear previous challenges to the Unit System.

The court's decision

By a vote of 8 to 1, the court struck down the County Unit System. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the majority opinion and said "The concept of political equality...can mean only one thing—one person, one vote". The court found that the separation of voters in the same election into different classes was a violation of the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection. Justice John Marshall Harlan II dissented, suggesting the case be sent back for retrial, which would have investigated the constitutional requirements for legislative districts.

Aftermath

Georgia had the option of modifying the County Unit System to make it more equal, but instead the state decided to move to using the popular vote in primary elections.

See also

• List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 372
• One Person, One Vote

Further reading

Toplak, Jurij. Gray v. Sanders : 372 U.S. 368 (1963). In: Schultz, David W (Ed.). Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. New York: Facts on file, 2005, pp. 188–189.

References

External links

• {{caselaw source

• Tidferth
• Tid foer tystnad
• Tid for tystnad
• Tidfrith
• Tidfrith (disambiguation)
• Tidfrith (Dunwich)
• Tidfrith (Hexham)
• Tidfrith of Hexham
• Tid för tystnad
• Tid (geometry)
• Tidhar
• Tidiacic
• Tidiacic arginine
• Tidiane Dia
• Tidiane (given name)
• Tidiane N'Diaye
• TI Digital Light Processing
• Ti (digraph)
• Tidilor
• Tidiness
• Tidings of Comfort and Joy
• Tidioute Bridge
• Tidira
• TI (disambiguation)
• Ti (disambiguation)