“Biopsychosocial model”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

The biopsychosocial model is a model of health that includes biological, psychological, and social factors. The model was proposed by George L. Engel in 1977 for understanding health and illness.

History

The biopsychosocial model was proposed by George L. Engel to better reflect the development of illness through the complex interaction of biological factors (genetic, biochemical, etc), psychological factors (mood, personality, behavior, etc.), and social factors (cultural, familial, socioeconomic, medical, etc.).^[1]{{primary-inline|date=September 2018}}^[2]{{primary-inline|date=September 2018}} The model provides a blueprint for research, a framework for teaching, and a design for action in the real world of health care.^[3]{{primary-inline|date=September 2018}}

The proposal of the model was in reaction to the perceived lack of science being used in psychiatry at the time and the reductionist approach used in other medicine fields—neither of which were adequate for treating illness.^[1]{{primary-inline|date=September 2018}} In developing the model, Engel noted that it needed to be equally applicable for illnesses, rather than being for either physical or psychological problems. By considering both in the same terms, it became obvious that both the inclusion of somatic and psychosocial factors were indispensable and the exclusion of either would impact on patient care.{{citation needed|date=September 2018}}

Criticisms

There have been a number of criticisms of the biopsychosocial model. Benning summarised the arguments against the model including that it lacked philosophical coherence, was insensitive to patients' subjective experience, was unfaithful to the general systems theory that Engel claimed it be rooted in, and that it engendered an undisciplined eclecticism that provides no safeguards against either the dominance or the under-representation of any one of the three domains of bio, psycho, or social.^[4] Some have argued that the approach borders on anarchy because of the suggestion that the target and focus on intervention is determined by the practitioner based on personal preference.^[5] Finally, some became reductionistic about the model itself, attempting to predict small parts of one aspect to predict the functioning in one field of medicine, for example psychiatry.^[6]

See also

References

1. ^¹{{cite journal |last1=Engel |first1=GL |title=The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. |journal=Science |date=8 April 1977 |volume=196 |issue=4286 |pages=129–36 |pmid=847460|doi=10.1126/science.847460 }}
2. ^{{cite journal | author = Engel G. L. | year = 1980 | title = The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model | url = | journal = American Journal of Psychiatry | volume = 137 | issue = 5 | pages = 535–544 | doi=10.1176/ajp.137.5.535 | pmid=7369396}}
3. ^{{cite journal |last1=Engel |first1=George L. |title=The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine |journal=Holistic Medicine |date=6 July 2009 |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=37–53 |doi=10.3109/13561828909043606}}
4. ^{{cite journal |last1=Benning |first1=TB |title=Limitations of the biopsychosocial model in psychiatry. |journal=Advances in Medical Education and Practice |date=2015 |volume=6 |pages=347–52 |doi=10.2147/AMEP.S82937 |pmid=25999775 |pmc=4427076}}
5. ^{{cite journal |last1=Ghaemi |first1=SN |title=The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model. |journal=The British Journal of Psychiatry |date=July 2009 |volume=195 |issue=1 |pages=3–4 |doi=10.1192/bjp.bp.109.063859 |pmid=19567886}}
6. ^{{cite journal |last1=McLaren |first1=N |title=A critical review of the biopsychosocial model. |journal=The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry |date=February 1998 |volume=32 |issue=1 |pages=86–92; discussion 93–6 |doi=10.3109/00048679809062712 |pmid=9565189}}

History

Criticisms

See also

References

External links