| 词条 | Dogville | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 释义 |
| name = Dogville | image = Dogville poster.jpg | image size = 215px | border = yes | alt = | caption = Theatrical release poster | director = Lars von Trier | producer = Vibeke Windeløv | writer = Lars von Trier | starring = {{Plainlist|
}} | narrator = John Hurt | cinematography = Anthony Dod Mantle | editing = Molly Marlene Stensgård | production companies = {{Plainlist|
}} | distributor = Trust Film Sales ApS[1] | released = {{Film date|df=y|2003|05|19|Cannes}} | runtime = 178 minutes[2] | country = {{Plainlist|
}} | language = English | budget = $10 million | gross = $16.7 million }} Dogville is a 2003 crime revenge tragedy film[3] written and directed by Lars von Trier, and starring an ensemble cast led by Nicole Kidman, Lauren Bacall, Paul Bettany, Chloë Sevigny, Stellan Skarsgård, Udo Kier, Ben Gazzara, and James Caan. It is a parable that uses an extremely minimal, stage-like set to tell the story of Grace Mulligan (Kidman), a woman hiding from mobsters, who arrives in the small mountain town of Dogville, Colorado, and is provided refuge in return for physical labor. The film is the first in von Trier's projected USA – Land of Opportunities trilogy, which was followed by Manderlay (2005) and is projected to be completed with Wasington (sic). The film was in competition for the Palme d'Or at the 2003 Cannes Film Festival[4] but Gus Van Sant's Elephant won the award. It was screened at various film festivals before receiving a limited release in the US on March 26, 2004. Dogville opened to polarized reviews from critics. Some considered it to be pretentious or exasperating; it was viewed by others as a masterpiece,[5] and has widely grown in stature since its initial release. Plot structureThe story of Dogville is told in nine chapters and a prologue, with a one-sentence description of each chapter given in the film, in the vein of such chapter headings in many 19th-century novels. These descriptions are given below. PrologueWhich introduces us to the town and its residents Dogville is a very small American town by an abandoned silver mine in the Rocky Mountains, with a road leading up to it and nowhere else to go but the mountains. The film begins with a prologue in which a dozen or so of the fifteen citizens are introduced. They are portrayed as lovable, good people with small flaws which are easy to forgive. The town is seen from the point of view of Tom Edison Jr., an aspiring writer who procrastinates by trying to get his fellow citizens together for regular meetings on the subject of "moral rearmament". It is clear that Tom wants to succeed his aging father, a physician, as the moral and spiritual leader of the town. Chapter 1In which Tom hears gunfire and meets Grace It is Tom who first meets Grace Mulligan, who is on the run from gangsters who presumably shot at her. Grace, a beautiful but modest woman, wishes to keep running, but Tom assures her that the mountains ahead are too difficult to pass. As they talk, the gangsters approach the town, and Tom quickly hides Grace in the nearby mine. One of the gangsters asks Tom if he has seen the woman, which he denies. The gangster then offers him a reward and hands him a card with a phone number to call in case Grace shows up. Tom decides to use Grace as an "illustration" in his next meeting—a way for the townspeople to prove that they are indeed committed to community values, can receive a gift, and are willing to help the stranger. They remain skeptical, so Tom proposes that Grace should be given a chance to prove that she is a good person. Grace is accepted for two weeks in which, as Tom explains to her after the meeting, she must gain the friendship and trust of the townspeople. Chapter 2In which Grace follows Tom's plan and embarks upon physical labor On Tom's suggestion, Grace offers to do chores for the citizens—talking to the lonely, blind Jack McKay, helping to run the small shop, looking after the children of Chuck and Vera, and so forth. After some initial reluctance, the people accept her help in doing those chores that "nobody really needs" but which nevertheless make their lives easier. As a result, she becomes an accepted part of the community. Chapter 3In which Grace indulges in a shady piece of provocation. In tacit agreement Grace is expected to continue her chores, which she does gladly, and is even paid small wages which she saves up to purchase a set of seven expensive porcelain figurines, one at a time, from Ma Ginger's shop. Grace begins to make friends, including Jack, who pretends that he is not blind. She earns his respect upon tricking him into admitting that he is blind. Once the two weeks are over, everyone votes at the town meeting that Grace should be allowed to stay. Chapter 4Happy times in Dogville Things go well in Dogville until the police arrive to place a "Missing" poster featuring Grace's picture and name on the mission house. With the townspeople divided as to whether they should cooperate with the police, the mood of the community darkens somewhat. Chapter 5Fourth of July after all Still, things continue as usual until the 4th of July celebrations. After Tom awkwardly admits his love to Grace which she reciprocates and the whole town expresses their agreement that it has become a better place thanks to her, the police arrive again to replace the "Missing" poster with a "Wanted" poster. Grace is now wanted for participation in a bank robbery. Everyone agrees that she must be innocent, since at the time the robbery took place, she was doing chores for the townspeople every day. Nevertheless, Tom argues that because of the increased risk to the town now that they are harboring someone who is wanted as a criminal, Grace should provide a quid pro quo and do more chores for the townspeople within the same time, for less pay. At this point, what was previously a voluntary arrangement takes on a slightly coercive nature as Grace is clearly uncomfortable with the idea. Still, being very amenable and wanting to please Tom, Grace agrees. Chapter 6In which Dogville bares its teeth At this point the situation worsens, as with her additional workload, Grace inevitably makes mistakes, and the people she works for seem to be equally irritated by the new schedule—and take it out on Grace. The situation slowly escalates, with the male citizens making small advances to Grace and the females becoming increasingly critical and abusive. Even the children are perverse: Jason, the 10-year-old son of Chuck and Vera, asks Grace to spank him, until she finally complies after much provocation (von Trier has noted that this is the first point in the film where it is clear how completely Grace's lack of social status and choices makes her vulnerable to other people manipulating her).[6] The hostility towards Grace finally reaches a turning point as well when Chuck rapes her in his home. Chapter 7In which Grace finally gets enough of Dogville, leaves the town, and again sees the light of day. That evening, Grace tells Tom what had happened and he starts to form a plan for her escape. The next day, Vera confronts Grace for spanking her son Jason and Liz informs her that a few people saw Tom leave her shack very late the night before, casting suspicions on her virtue. The next evening she is confronted again by Vera, Liz and Martha in her shack. Martha witnessed a sexual encounter between Chuck and her in the apple orchard. Vera blames her for seducing her husband and decides to punish Grace by destroying the figurines. Grace begs her to spare them and tries to remind Vera of all the good things she has done for her including teaching her children the philosophy of stoicism. Vera cruelly uses it against her while destroying the figurines she worked hard for. Grace goes to Tom that evening and they decide to bribe the freight truck driver Ben to smuggle her out of town in his truck. En route, she is raped by Ben, after which the truck lumbers only to return Grace to Dogville. The town agrees that they must not let her escape again. The money paid to Ben to help Grace escape had been stolen by Tom from his father—but when Grace is blamed for the theft, Tom refuses to admit he did it because, as he explains, this is the only way he can still protect Grace without people getting suspicious. So Grace finally becomes a slave: she is chained, repeatedly raped, and abused by the people of the town. She is also humiliated by the children who ring the church bell every time she is violated, much to Tom's disgust. Chapter 8In which there is a meeting where the truth is told and Tom leaves (only to return later). This culminates in a late night general assembly in which Grace—following Tom's suggestion—relates calmly all that she has endured from everyone in town, then heads back to her shack. Embarrassed and in complete denial, the townspeople finally decide to turn her over to the mobsters-assuming that Grace will be executed. As Tom tells Grace this, declaring his allegiance to her over the town, he attempts to make love to her. Still chained, she responds to his advances by saying "...it would be so beautiful, but from the point of view of our love so completely wrong. We were to meet in freedom."[7] She questions if thoughts of using force against her are in fact why he is so upset, noting that he could have her if he wants—all he needs to do is threaten her to get his way, as the others have done. Tom defends his intentions as pure, but upon reflection realizes that what she says is true. Shaken by self-doubt, he decides it would jeopardize his career as a philosopher if this doubt were allowed to grow. To rid himself of its source, he decides to personally call the mobsters and turn Grace over. Chapter 9 and endingIn which Dogville receives the long-awaited visit and the film ends When the mobsters finally arrive, they are welcomed cordially by Tom and an impromptu committee of other townspeople. Grace is then freed by the indignant henchmen, and her true identity is revealed: she is the daughter of a powerful gang leader who ran away because she could not stand his dirty work. Her father motions her into his Cadillac and argues with her about issues of morality. After some introspection, Grace reverses herself and comes to the conclusion that Dogville's crimes cannot be excused due to the difficulty of their circumstances. Tom, who has become aware that the mobsters pose a threat to himself and the town, is momentarily remorseful, but rapidly descends into rationalization for his actions. Grace sadly returns to her father's car, accepts his power, and uses it to command that Dogville be removed from the earth. Grace tells the gangsters to make Vera watch her children die, as punishment for destroying her figurines, stating that she "owes her that." Dogville is burned to the ground and all of its inhabitants brutally massacred with the exception of Tom, whom she executes personally with a revolver right after he applauds the effectiveness of her use of illustration as an attempt to get her to spare him. After the massacre, the gangsters hear a barking sound from one of the houses. It is the dog Moses. A gangster aims a gun at the dog, but Grace commands that it should live: "He's just angry because I once took his bone." The chalk drawing of Moses becomes a real dog as his barks lead into the credits. Cast{{Div col|colwidth=18em}}
PilotDogville: The Pilot was shot during 2001 in the pre-production phase to test whether the concept of chalk lines and sparse scenery would work. The 15-minute pilot film starred Danish actors Sidse Babett Knudsen (as Grace) and Nikolaj Lie Kaas (as Tom). Eventually Lars von Trier was happy with the overall results. As a result, he and the producers decided to move forward with the production of the feature film. The test pilot was never shown in public, but is featured on the second disc of the Dogville (2003) DVD, released in November 2003.[8]StagingThe story of Dogville is narrated by John Hurt in nine chapters and takes place on a stage with minimalist scenery. Some walls and furniture are placed on the stage, but the rest of the scenery exists merely as white painted outlines which have big labels on them; for example, the outlines of gooseberry bushes have the text "Gooseberry Bushes" written next to them. While this form of staging is common in black box theaters, it has rarely been attempted on film before—the Western musical Red Garters (1954) and Vanya on 42nd Street (1994) being notable exceptions. The bare staging serves to focus the audience's attention on the acting and storytelling, and also reminds them of the film's artificiality. As such it is heavily influenced by the theatre of Bertolt Brecht. (There are also similarities between the song "Seeräuberjenny" ("Pirate Jenny") in Brecht and Kurt Weill's Die Dreigroschenoper (The Threepenny Opera) and the story of Dogville.[9] Chico Buarque's version of this song, Geni e o Zepelim [Geni and the Zeppelin], deals with the more erotic aspects of abjection and bears striking similarity to von Trier's cinematic homage to the song.) The film does however employ carefully designed lighting to suggest natural effects such as the moving shadows of clouds, and sound effects are used to create the presence of non-existent set pieces (e.g., there are no doors, but the doors can always be heard when an actor "opens" or "closes" one). The film was shot on high-definition video using a Sony HDW-F900 camera in a studio in Trollhättan, Sweden. InterpretationsAccording to von Trier, the point of the film is that "evil can arise anywhere, as long as the situation is right".[10] Ebert and Roeper criticized Dogville as having a strongly anti-American message, citing, for example, the closing credits sequence with images of poverty-stricken Americans [taken from Jacob Holdt's documentary book American Pictures (1984)] accompanied by David Bowie's song "Young Americans".[11]ReceptionCriticalDogville divided critics upon its United States theatrical release, with Metacritic giving it a score of 60 ("Mixed or average reviews")[12] and the Rotten Tomatoes critics' consensus for it stating simply, "A challenging piece of experimental filmmaking."[13] Some hailed it as an innovative and powerful artistic statement,[14] while others considered it to be an emotionally detached or even misanthropic work. In The Village Voice, J. Hoberman wrote, "For passion, originality, and sustained chutzpah, this austere allegory of failed Christian charity and Old Testament payback is von Trier's strongest movie--a masterpiece, in fact."[15] Peter Travers of Rolling Stone gave the film 3.5/4 stars, praising Kidman's performance and dubbing it "a movie that never met a cliche it didn't stomp on."[16] Scott Foundas of LA Weekly described it as a work of "boldness, cutting insight, [and] intermittent hilarity," and interpreted it as "a potent parable of human suffering."[17] In Empire, Alan Morrison wrote that "Dogville, in a didactic and politicised stage tradition, is a great play that shows a deep understanding of human beings as they really are."[18]In the Los Angeles Times, on the other hand, Manohla Dargis dismissed it as "three hours of tedious experimentation."[19] Richard Corliss of TIME argued that von Trier lacked humanity and wrote that the director "presumably wants us to attend to his characters' yearnings and prejudices without the distractions of period furnishings. It's a brilliant idea, for about 10 minutes. Then the bare set is elbowed out of a viewer's mind by the threadbare plot and characterizations."[20] Roger Ebert, who gave it two out of four stars, felt that the film was so pedantic as to make von Trier comparable to a crank, and viewed it as "a demonstration of how a good idea can go wrong."[21] In the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Sean Axmaker said, "There's no denying von Trier is visually intriguing. [...] But as an artist, his contempt for humanity is becoming harder to hide with stylistic flourish."[22] Charles Taylor of Salon additionally responded to allegations of the film's anti-Americanism with the charge that it was "anti-human", and said that it was "as total a misanthropic vision as anything control freak Stanley Kubrick ever turned out"—while personally admitting that he felt von Trier was as deliberate a filmmaker as Kubrick.[23] Later, Dogville was named one of the greatest films of its decade in The Guardian,[24] The List,[25] Paste,[26] and other publications. In 2016, it was ranked one of the 100 greatest motion pictures since 2000 in a critics' poll conducted by BBC Culture.[27] According to aggregator They Shoot Pictures, Don't They, it is the 20th most acclaimed film of the same time period.[28] American director and screenwriter Quentin Tarantino has named the film as one of the 20 best to have been released during the time of his active career as a director;[29] he said that if it had been written for the stage, von Trier would have won a Pulitzer Prize.[30] CommercialThe film grossed $1,535,286 in the US market and $15,145,550 from the rest of the world for a total gross of $16,680,836 worldwide. In the opening US weekend it did poorly, grossing only $88,855. The movie was released in only nine theaters, however, with an average of $9,872 per theater.[31] In Denmark, the film grossed $1,231,984.[32] The highest-grossing country was Italy, with $3,272,119.[32] "Best-of" listsDogville made many 2004 top-ten lists:[33]
The film received nine votes (with six from critics and three from directors) in the 2012 Sight & Sound polls.[5] Accolades
References1. ^1 {{cite web | url= http://www.bfi.org.uk/films-tv-people/4ce2b85bbfe0f| title=Dogville | work=BFI | accessdate=2013-02-06}} 2. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/dogville-2004-4 | title=Dogville | work=British Board of Film Classification | accessdate=2013-02-06}} 3. ^{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6TlQBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=dogville+fragments+of+postmodern+tragedy&source=bl&ots=KPibUqPqWU&sig=ACfU3U28IeL5apvxN8fl9pyEQkO_UA-yBQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjdjZr-lpzgAhVSDq0KHXGSDEEQ6AEwAnoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=dogville%20fragments%20of%20postmodern%20tragedy&f=false|last=Sezen |first=Kayhan |authorlink1=Sezen Kayhan |date=16 October 2014|title=Fragments of Tragedy in Postmodern Film|publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing|via=Google Books|access-date=1 February 2019}} 4. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/4072375/year/2003.html |title=Festival de Cannes: Dogville |accessdate=2009-11-05|work=festival-cannes.com}} 5. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://explore.bfi.org.uk/sightandsoundpolls/2012/film/4ce2b85bbfe0f |title=Dogville (2003) |publisher=British Film Institute |accessdate=July 7, 2015}} 6. ^von Trier in the dvd audio commentary track, Ch.6 7. ^http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/d/dogville-script-transcript-nicole-kidman.html 8. ^[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413956/ Dogville: The Pilot on IMDb] 9. ^Marit Kapla: Our Town. Filmmaker Magazine, June 11, 2002. 10. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/21/movies/dogville-it-fakes-a-village.html?pagewanted=3 |title='Dogville' – It Fakes a Village |work=The New York Times |date=March 21, 2004 |accessdate=2010-02-25 | first=A. O. | last=Scott}} 11. ^{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040409/REVIEWS/404090303/1023 |title=Reviews: Dogville|date=April 9, 2004|author=Ebert, Roger |work=Sun Times}} 12. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.metacritic.com/movie/dogville |title=Dogville Reviews |publisher=Metacritic |accessdate=October 12, 2016}} 13. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dogville/ |title=Dogville (2003) |publisher=Rotten Tomatoes |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 14. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2004/04/09/DDGHV61J081.DTL&type=movies |title='Dogville as poetic as it is powerful |last=LaSalle |first=Mick |publisher=San Francisco Chronicle |date=April 9, 2004 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} "[...] mischievous, singular, and profound." 15. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.villagevoice.com/film/the-grace-of-wrath-6407914 |title=The Grace Of Wrath |last=Hoberman |first=J. |publisher=The Village Voice |date=March 16, 2004 |accessdate=October 12, 2016}} 16. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/dogville-20040326 |title=Dogville |last=Travers |first=Peter |publisher=Rolling Stone |date=March 23, 2004 |accessdate=October 12, 2016}} 17. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.laweekly.com/film/once-upon-a-time-in-amerika-2137956 |title=Once Upon a Time in Amerika |last=Foundas |first=Scott |publisher=LA Weekly |date=March 25, 2004 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 18. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.empireonline.com/movies/dogville/review/ |title=Dogville Review |last=Morrison |first=Alan |publisher=Empire |date= |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 19. ^{{cite web|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2004/mar/26/entertainment/et-dog26 |title=Seduced by ideas? |last=Dargis |first=Manohla |publisher=The Los Angeles Times |date=March 26, 2004 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 20. ^{{cite web|url=http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040412-607794,00.html |title=Empty Set, Plot to Match |last=Corliss |first=Richard |publisher=TIME |date=April 4, 2004 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 21. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/dogville-2004 |title=Dogville Movie Review & Film Summary (2004) |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=April 9, 2004 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 22. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.seattlepi.com/ae/movies/article/Von-Trier-s-stylistic-Dogville-is-muzzled-by-1142370.php |title=Von Trier's stylistic 'Dogville' is muzzled by its contempt for humanity |last=Axmaker |first=Sean |publisher=Seattle Post-Intelligencer |date=April 15, 2004 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 23. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/2004/03/26/dogville/ |title="Dogville" |last=Taylor |first=Charles |publisher=Salon |date=March 23, 2004 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 24. ^[https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2009/dec/23/best-films-noughties-dogville Best films of the noughties No 8: Dogville] 25. ^[https://film.list.co.uk/article/22425-best-of-a-decade-film/ Best of a decade: film] 26. ^[https://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2009/11/50-best-movies-of-the-decade-2000-2009.html?a=1 50 Best Movies of the Decade (2000-2009)] 27. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160819-the-21st-centurys-100-greatest-films |title=The 21st Century's 100 greatest films |publisher=BBC |date=August 23, 2016 |accessdate=October 13, 2016}} 28. ^21st Century (Full List) 29. ^Quentin Tarantino's Top 20 Favorite Films 30. ^https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv0WlHbBhdc 31. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=dogville.htm |title=Dogville (2004) |publisher=Box Office Mojo |date= |accessdate=2010-02-25}} 32. ^1 33. ^2004 Film Critic Top Ten Lists {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080527000000/http://www.metacritic.com/film/awards/2004/toptens.shtml |date=27 May 2008 }} Retrieved on 28 March 2010. Sources
External links{{wikiquote}}
33 : 2003 films|2000s avant-garde and experimental films|2000s drama films|Danish films|Danish drama films|Swedish films|Swedish drama films|British films|British drama films|French films|French drama films|German films|German drama films|Dutch films|Dutch drama films|Norwegian films|Finnish films|Finnish drama films|Italian films|Italian drama films|English-language films|Films directed by Lars von Trier|Danish art films|Danish avant-garde and experimental films|Fictional populated places|Films set in the 1930s|Films set in the United States|Lions Gate Entertainment films|Adultery in films|Films about rape|Rape and revenge films|Films set in Colorado|2000s crime drama films |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。